Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

"It’s no secret the Washington Post is one of the most far-left propaganda pushers in mainstream media, perhaps only exceeded by MSNBC and NY Times. Now liberals are going insane because Jeff Bezos won’t let them admit it? 🤡"

This one for the normal people, why would anyone vote for Kamala Harris?

I am going to say, BRAIN WORMS ate his brain?

So wanting to make America healthy is a bad thing?

RFK Jr. turned MAGA after the worm ate half his brain.

Didn't he say "I didn't leave the Democratic party, the party left me" or something similar?

Anyway, why the party left him is because of the anti-vaxx nonsense, things like Wi-Fi causes leaky brains, and the thing with eating dogs & posing dead bears in central park.

He lost support in the party because of his policies and ideas.

Yes, RFK Jr. said several times during his campaign speeches that the Democrat party that he knew intimately changed from being anti-war to pro-war, from pro-civil liberties to anti-liberties, from pro-education to anti-education. RFK had a lot of traditional Democrat voters supporting him, which seems to be a big reason why the Democrat party fought against him so hard.

I agree with and disagree with you on the shifts you've laid out. I agree that a shift happened, but I disagree that it was the Democratic party. In my opinion, it was the baby boomers who have made that shift from anti to pro war, anti education, and anti liberties.

You know, the hippies.

And I can see how a boomer like Junior would conflate the idea of the Democratic party and his age demographic. His peers when he was young were very anti-war. And as that group has aged, they've become very pro-war. And how they are the group that is the most anti Gay, anti Trans, and disparage modern education.

The common core math freakout is an example. There's more than one way to do math, and demanding that everyone do long division in exactly the way it was taught back in the 50s is just assinine.

Who escalated the Vietnam conflict? That was JFK and LBJ. Both of them Democrats. So, saying the Democrats were anti-war isn't accurate. Were the baby boomers when they were of draftable age? yes.

And as to why the party left him? Things like Wi-Fi causes brain leakage were kooky and a bit eye-rolly, but today? That's some anti-science nonsense and that needs to stop.

And since he refuses to engage in a factual data-based reality and keep on with his conspiracy theory nonsense, that party left.

Do you seriously still believe in the covid vaccine?? And you can laugh all you want, but EMF radiation does affect people, however subtly

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/05/20/rfk-jr-super-pac-gop-megadonor-00159021

Tell me you didn't read the link without saying... well, you get the point.

No, but the fact that a MAGAt billionaire funded RFK's spoiler campaign absolutely is.

RFK's fund raiser was Nicole Shanahan. She was a lifelong Democrat and recently left the Democrat party this year.

RFK's primary donor was Timothy Mellon, a MAGAt billionaire who paid the Kennedy reject to be a spoiler.

Guessing Shanahan got a nice paycheck out of that as well.

I absolutely know who he is, which is why I find it so funny that Trump's billionaire donor buddy thought he was a good choice as a spoiler candidate.

Turns out he had to bow out early because MAGAts were the only ones stupid enough to think he was a serious candidate.

Very unimpressive.

Now, why did he defect?

Because we no longer wanted him?

Oh.

I did not know that.

Why did you no longer want him?

Cause he’s a lunatic?

Specifically, why do you not want him?

Specifically, what makes him a lunatic?

He's a nutjob conspiracy theorist with brain worms and a fetish for the corpses of animals who spent the pandemic spreading antivax nonsense - I can absolutely see why he appeals to you guys, but surely by now you've figured out from the people laughing at you that we've never wanted him.

Omit the histrionic embellishments in your next reply, please.

What is the reason that not a single one of you had these things to say about his character and did not ostracize him until AFTER he decided to run as an independent?

Specifically.

Make it specific and factual.

Thing is, none of that was 'histrionic embellishments', and he was ostracized long before his run as an independent, which was evident by not getting a single delegate in the 2024 primaries even with name recognition.

Again, we were never dumb enough to think he was a serious candidate in the first place.

"who spent the pandemic spreading antivax nonsense"
since ALOT of CoronaPandemicConspiracyTheories have turned out to be true, might you go in detail so we can check if it was nonsense with the power of hindsight?

Uh huh... the fact that they "turned out to be true" is just another dumb conspiracy theory you've bought into.

This

He didn't defect, he was ostracized for being a f**king loon.

Have you swapped alts or are you using both right now?

You parroted what the last reply was a few minutes ago.

I will parrot the same question from a few minutes ago:

Specifically, why do you not want him?

Specifically, what makes him a lunatic?*

*You used loon this time.

Try not to get too hung up on the "alt" business and try to articulate a well thought out, rational, informative answer.

Try reading his books.

Is that any way to address those that hold prestigious degrees from Google Search University?

do you find it surprising that the Democrat party sued every state election board to try to remove RFK Jr. from each state's presidential ballot?

Not as surprising as his failed attempts to have himself taken off those ballots when his MAGA donors realized he was only going to take votes from Donald Trump.

You might as well write off Michigan and Wisconsin for Trump because SCOTUS refused to remove the MAGA spoiler from those ballots.

that was after RFK Jr. dropped out of the race. When he was still running as presidential candidate and had fulfilled all of the requirements to be on the ballot, the Democrat party fought to get him removed from the ballot while he was running for President. Do you find that puzzling why the Democrat party would do that?

Why would I find it puzzling? All but three states - Connecticut, Iowa, and New York - have regulations against sore losers running as independents after a losing primary bid.

His MAGA sugar daddy funding his spoiler campaign was, quite literally, illegal in most of the United States.

Why did democrats sue to keep him on the ballot if he was good for splitting the MAGAt vote? Wouldn’t that weaken Trump and give them an advantage? Are dems trying to lose?

The Democrats have sued to keep him on the ballot since he dropped out and endorsed Trump - he's still on the ballot in several of the blue wall states which will likely throw those contests to Harris.