Time to Change Back to 'Rational' as 'Radical' Did Not Work

Trump wasn't a f**king politican his entire career like these professional politicans are, he never needed to "choose a party" and stick with it . That is the thing about being an independent, you can work with what ever side you need to.

Oh yes he was, or a public figure anyways, or at least trying very hard to be one. That's what his career has been, selling himself, his name, his brand. Know anyone else who put their own name on buildings that far back?

Besides, he only started switching parties when he decided to enter real politics, and that opportunistically.

A public figure is not a politican, He as we all know was a private citizen and a businessman that had to deal with both democrats and republicans, Trying to conflate his maneuvering through life and dealing with politicians with Camela's flip flopping from last year to now is so far beyond the realm of legit debate its in deep space in another dimension.

I understand, you don't comprehend your own comments and can not connect the very simple dots to the subject at hand. Good to know.

Ill break it down for you okay in the simplest form I can-
dark 0 " trump switched parties 5 times"
Me " trump is not a career politican, he is a business man"
Modda " he is a public figure so he is trying to be a politican"
me " a public figure is not a politican but needs to engage politicans"
Modda " StRAwMaN"

How is this difficult, How much weed does someone have to smoke to not understand the thread?

So the Kamala Red Herring is mine in there somewhere?
Nice to know.

The thread is comparing trump to Kamala.. ffs. Maybe don't comment if you are not aware of the comment thread's topic.

Sounds like you and Cameltoe have the same speech writers.

She was nominated? Which states did she win primaries in? How many Americans voted for her to be the nominee?

The fact that they claim a Trump victory is the end of democracy after pulling this BS show how much of a joke the system is nowadays

The funniest part about your comment is that you’re actually defending her.

You know what's funnier than that? That showing you how the Democrats followed their own process is some how "defending her."

That's hysterical.

So, rich Democrats are racist?

So, this isn't the gotcha you think it is. Because... yes.

Being a member of the democratic party doesn't automatically innoculate someone from being racist.

That’s a true statement since the Dems have a long history of racism.

Do you think i'm exempting Republicans? 'Cause I'm not. America has a Very Long history of racism. We are raised in a system built by racists to make sure their children succeeded at the cost of others.

It's a system problem, and the sooner we're all honest about it, the sooner we can fix it.

Yes, this was true 200 years ago. But people really fought to change that back in the 1920s, and succeeded. Blacks were doing very fine on their own by the 1940s and 50s without white people holding their hands. Yes, there were far more honest white racists at the time, but blacks got educated and prospered. Then the Civil Rights movement came in the 60s, which encouraged women to "marry" the government instead of having incentive for everyone to stay in their families. This resulted in a skyrocketing of black family splits, which caused many black children to grow up fatherless (an epidemic we still have not overcome). This put them at a massive disadvantage in life (people without a father figure are MUCH less likely to succeed in life). And this was done by evil white people who just wanted to get the black vote, at the cost of black people. However, once this happened, blacks went from forging their own destinies like before, to blaming ALL whites and slavery for disadvantages their parents had already overcome. This was also instigated by evil whites. You see, there were two kinds of white racists back then; the KKK/ppl who hated black Republicans, and the ones who sold their entire race out to try to get themselves in power. These people are mass hypocrites.

The person who told you this version of history is a white supremacist. Just the Jim Crow laws alone show you how oppressed they were by the system of state and local laws.

Those politicians ran on those racist concepts and won.

And the 'race riots'? Those were when groups of white men descended on black communities to level them to the ground. Like the Atlanta "riot" of 1906, the Springfield IL of 1908, East St Louis of 1917, there was the Red Summer of 1919 when in at least 25 cities there white supremacists carried out terrorist campaigns against black communities. The largest happened in Chicago. It lasted for 13 days. The national guard was called out on day 3. 100s of Black Americans were killed. Many more were wounded. 1,000s were left homeless because their neighborhoods were destroyed (by white people).

That one was kicked off because a young black man was swimming in the lake in an area reserved for white people. He was killed on the site by being stoned to death.

Of course, Tulsa. Where there was an affluent Black community known as the "Black Wall Street." Until the white people decided they had too much money and leveled the place. They had airplanes and dropped bombs.

These are just the ones I know off the top of my head.

And then there's the desegregation of schools. What do connection do you think private Christian schools and desegregation have to do with each other? You're probably thinking, not much.

You'd be wrong. Private Christians schools sprung up all over the place when the federal government forced schools to desegregate.

If you'd like to know more about the history of racial violence in America, up to the modern era, here's a great place to start: https://www.blackpast.org/special-features/racial-violence-united-states-1660/

I never claimed they weren't oppressed or there wasn't racial disparity in the system. They just did better when they were making their own opportunities. Back in the 80s, blacks got arrested for breathing at a cop the wrong way. Anyone who knows a black person older than 50 years old knows that's true.
The way it is now, whites just meatride blacks while many blacks do absolutely nothing to improve their lives and continue to blame whites for all their failures, because, quite frankly, there's no reason to be hardworking when people give you handouts for existing. The same way you were privileged for simply being born with white skin for 200 years, it's the exact opposite now, but people still complain. This is why we have brats like Amandla Stenberg complaining about how oppressed she is when she was born into a millionaire lifestyle bc of her white dad. She has never had a job and never will. But she's oppressed bc she's half black. Sure. She totally has it harder than 90% of the modern white population who has to work hard long hours for a living and barely make enough to afford housing and food in this garbage economy.
There were MUCH better reasons to complain in the 20s to 80s, and yet it's more rampant now than it was then, even though whites were openly racist back then and they'd get killed for that now.

Interesting that you go to "white supremacist", most of the people that have documented this are black themselves. Thomas Sowell is a 90+ year old black man who lived at the time, and was even marxist for a time, until he learned economics. He has been called a "house N word" by Democrats for simply endorsing Reagan's remarks on Marxism, but thats to be expected as the left has shown repeatedly that if a black person doesn’t agree with them or stay in line, they will get very racist.

The riots were absolutely terrible tragedies, but that was not the fault of "the system". Those were racist terrorist groups or racist terrorist people who wanted to harm other people for the crime of simply not looking like them, and that is evil. However, they do not speak for all white people, the same way BLM doesn't speak for all blacks when their terrorist rioters burned down buildings in Minneapolis and Tim Walz delayed the national guard for as long as possible and then used his daughter to warn the terrorists of when they would come so they could plan accordingly, while his wife enjoyed the smell of burning tires and buildings bc it represented "change". Then Hollywood actors bailed all the terrorist criminals out of jail and treated them like heroes. This would be like if rich people bailed out all the white terrorists who committed those heinous acts against blacks in the early 1900s because "well blacks aren't actually real people so you did the country a favor". Racism is evil both ways. It was evil back in the 1900s and it is evil now. It's just acceptable widespread now, which has not been true in reverse since the early 1900s and the general public wasn't this honest about being openly racist since the death of slavery.

Tulsa was the worst of these, since it resulted in 300 deaths and was the case where the local government didn't even pressure to get those people arrested.

However, this is all irrelevant. I said that blacks did better when they fought for themselves, and you basically replied with "but there were racists back then". I never said they weren't met with racism or setbacks. I said they did better on their own before the government tricked them into being dependent on them 100%. Have you ever noticed that Dems are ALWAYS promising to make lives easier for blacks but never do a thing about it? Thats because that promise gets them black votes, but if they actually tried to fix things, the need for that promise would disappear, which would free blacks from a desperate phase and actually allow them to make good decisions and think for themselves as successful individuals, which Dems absolutely do not want. The Dems have always been racist. They're just more sneaky and manipulative about it now and have been since the 60s. They used MLK Jr to promote their cause when they had little interest in helping his dream come true. Whenever you see a black marxist, they usually were taught by a white one first. Like the BLM founders. White Marxists are the ones destroying the country now. They find blacks that are desperate, give them careers where they sell out their own people (sometimes unknowingly), and then if you fact check the things they say, they hide behind the black person's skin color and call you racist, even though they themselves could care less about blacks. This was how they got Obama elected. That man promised to solve racial disparity, and all he did was make the topic even more rampant, which does nothing but make racism worse. But you were a racist if you ever pointed that out. Do you see the system here?

There are fewer setbacks than ever now, and yet we do not have anything like the black wall street nowadays (the closest thing to it ig would be the Michael Jackson estate). We have black pop stars, Hollywood actors, and sports figures, so that's going well, but then again, entertainment is a field where at the end of the day, if you do well at your job, a real fan won't give a damn about your race. For example, as a lover of music, I dont care if a singer is black or white as long as the song is good. I dont care what color a starting QB is as long as he can win games for my team. No one complained about diverse casting in older Disney movies. It only became a problem when that became the entire point of movies and the production became crap bc race was all they cared about. Cause they're the racists.

Morgan Freeman once said the way to solve racism was to stop talking about it. And he's right. The same people who think you're such a "racist dudebro" for hating the Acolyte don't know that the older generation grew up with Cuba Gooding Jr in movies and didn't raise a fuss. Nobody complained Corbyn Blue was in High School Musical. You know why? Race wasn't a massive focal point of our culture, until Obama came in and made his whole political career about "is america too racist to elect me?" It went downhill from there. How are we progressed LESS in 2024 than in 2006 or even the 1950s?

The answer is, that you're right. This is a system problem. We had a system that was going to solve the racial disparities (because America was supposed to be an "equal opportunity for everyone" country [that was one of the many reasons people fought to end slavery]), before evil white Democrats came and effed that system up and then got blacks to blame all whites on the failures those specific whites created. And the sooner we get these racist goons out of office, the better American blacks will be. Because Dems never do anything for blacks, and why would they? Black suffering and failure and desperation is how they get votes. If black people succeeded, they wouldnt need handouts and would be able to think, and these people do not want that. They want blacks dependent on them, like a toxic parent who refuses to let you move out when you're ready to live on your own or get married.

The other truth is, blacks aren't as irrelevant as you'd think. Go outside of America, every culture respects and looks up to American blacks. Only Americans don't. Some Asian cultures respect blacks more than they respect themselves.

Glad to see you know that.