Do democrats want to destroy America? Uhh, which rock exactly have you been hiding under?

Sounds like Christophobia

Which ones are the true ones? Or are you just singling this one out? Can we add Islam and Shinto?

I have not problem with it, if you do it on factually based reasons, but that rarely happens.

Agreed.

It's against the TOS. Do it elsewhere.

I'll agree to that because what good are the TOS when the mods don't enforce them?

"...do not discriminate against any sect..."
"...please express your opinions in a way that is kind and respectful to all people of the world..." "...if stating your opinion does not follow these terms, please keep it to yourself or post it elsewhere..."
"...comments, or other images whose sole purpose is to attack a person or group of people in a condemning and non-humorous way are subject to deletion..."
"...please be careful when authoring content around sensitive subjects such as politics, religion, and race..."

imgflip.com/terms

"I didn't violate any of those rules" - No, you didn't get a TIMER for VIOLATING those rules.

Just because you don't get caught and/or punished doesn't meant that you didn't break the law.

Except I didn't break the rules

I'm sorry did some one show up at Rienharts house with weapons and zip ties ?

No, but a fanatical trump supporter did bring those into the US Capitol on Jan 6

You mean a white supremacist claiming to support Trump right?

Not all of his supporters were there!

The one has nothing to do with the other. Are you all right Modda? Your comments seem a little lackluster lately.

Kav drinks way too , burp, much and has way too many doors on his house.

Trump supporters are not always Christian. Many people also claim to be Christian, but aren't.

Uh no. Christianity calls for Christians to love everyone. If they are hateful people they aren't Christian.

No, the defining characteristic of Christianity is that you don't show hate to others. Now I'm not saying some people struggle with hate that are Christian, but if you see them hating on everyone all the time, they aren't Christian.

TRUTH

You have to read the Bible for that.

1 John 2:9 Anyone who claims to be in the light but hates a brother or sister is still in the darkness.

Proverbs 10:12 Hatred stirs up conflict, but love covers over all wrongs.

Leviticus 19:17 “ ‘Do not hate a fellow Israelite in your heart. Rebuke your neighbor frankly so you will not share in their guilt.
18 “ ‘Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against anyone among your people, but love your neighbor as yourself. I am the LORD.

Luke 6:27 “But to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you,
28 bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you.

1 John 3:14 We know that we have passed from death to life, because we love each other. Anyone who does not love remains in death.
15 Anyone who hates a brother or sister is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life residing in him.

I'm sorry, but please don't claim to know what's in the bible unless you sure and have read it.

Telling people not to hate others doesn't mean that not hating people is a defining characteristic of being a Christian.

Americans are prohibited from committing murder. That doesn't mean that if somebody commits murder they are not an American citizen.

You will never know the defining characteristics of a Christian because you don't believe in the Gospel. So even if we told you, you would just go on debating about whether the Gospel is real or not.

Yep. The concept of real Christians and fake Christians doesn't enter their mind because to them all Christians are fake.

Commanding Israelites to not hate fellow Israelites (adopted by the Romans for fellow Christians of Rome) does not mean not hating everyone else. Which they did. A lot.

In fact, Constantine used Christianity as a tool of conquest, a cause to rally the masses, a symbol to kill in the name of...

This approach only began to fade after WWII, when various European countries were forced to set free their colonial holdings of not-quite-citizen exploitable "heathens."

Constantine wasn't Christian. He just used Christianity because it says 'follow the laws of the government'.

Neighbors doesn't just mean your own people. It means anyone you interact with that aren't specifically out to kill you.

Again, WWII had nothing to do with religion. It was a purely ideological philosophical war.

He wasn't? Wait, Son of Jackal seated in Rome who will steal the Word of the Chosen and call it their own but not before corrupting it beyond recognition are NOT Judeans? Tha Hell you say!

That's not what those quotes say. Kindly read them and stop lying, God don't like it.

Oh, and He don't like the people who sought to exterminate HIS Chosen in WWII either.
A lil FYI fer ya,,,

Where'd you get that from?

"And what about Bible times to the modern day? How many people did the Assyrians and Babylonians kill between 200 CE and 2000 CE?"

That was just one example. What about the nations after that who conquered the Assyrians and Babylonians? They weren't Christians so you have to take them into consideration as well. If you're trying to actually prove to me (which no one still has) Modda's claim that Christians have killed more people than everyone else in history combined, then you're gonna need to give me some actual proof.

Funny how you jump in and answer questions meant for Modda. Almost like the two of you were the same person...

...almost...

In what part of history has Christian "killed more people than everyone else combined"?

Not sure if the number is that high, but Christians have killed countless hundreds of thousands of people

The part that began in 312AD

Well apparently it's more than anyone else combined... Don't remember that though? I'm pretty sure during Bible times, the Assyrians and Babylonians have killed and conquered WAY more than anyone Israel.

"I'm pretty sure during Bible times, the Assyrians and Babylonians have killed and conquered WAY more than anyone Israel"

And what about Bible times to the modern day? How many people did the Assyrians and Babylonians kill between 200 CE and 2000 CE?

Christians have not killed more people than everyone else combined. Did you search that on Google? Did you find an article giving this claim? Where's your source lol?

You're kidding, right?
This is basic history, not some AP article you're gonna call "fake news"
Frigs sake, look out your window.

Still waiting for the sources of your claims...

Europe

Maybe you should've studied history more.

If you're claiming that Christians have killed more people than everyone else combined, you have to take into consideration ALL the times Christians have murdered people, them somehow compare that to every single person on the planet (all the other religions). Then you also said throughout ALL of history. According you guys, the earth is millions of years old. So that means you have to take into consideration all the people from the beginning of time (or whenever you guys say humans evolved lol). Then you can prove your claim. Otherwise, you look out a window.

Human history goes back MILLIONS of years!?! Good gosh.

"According you guys, the earth is millions of years old"

No, according to the evidence it's about 4.54 billion years old

"So that means you have to take into consideration all the people from the beginning of time (or whenever you guys say humans evolved lol)"

Modern humans have been around for less than 100,000 years

pure drivel

No, Catholics have done that. Christians avoid war unless absolutely necessary.

"No, they just weren't Christian. Another logical fallacy. Why am I not surprised"

Saying that Christians are Christians is not a logical fallacy

hahahahahahahaha, goodness gracious.

Have you never heard of Europe?
Ask your great grandparents about a lovely pair known as WWI & WWII - and that was just the beginning of the end of the barbarism.

Replying here because you asked questions in the last comment in that thread.

"What the heck are you saying? Catholicism IS Christianity, having invented the religion."

Nope, 13 Jews created Christianity, the Catholic Church came much later.

"A Germanic splinter group from the 16th Century that thinks its rad because it doesn't recognize the Papacy is nothing but that, or do you require assistance with the math regarding something that came a over millenia and a half after the religion was birthed? Sheesh, the Germans were a bunch of wandering tribes of barbarians from unmapped hinterlands with not an iota of contact with or even knowledge of the Judeans at the time, let alone, Jesus. Nearly two thousand years later they sought to exterminate Jesus's people, or ain'tchu heard?
Ain't that ripe, claim the so-called Messiah (he wasn't), kill the Chosen. Yeah, they're the authentic Christians! Killing His people in the name of their Savior!""

Nope, wrong again. Christianity was already a thing when the Catholic church was established. At first the Catholic Church was Christian, but become corrupt over time. When the bible was translated into English many people realized that what the Catholic Church was doing did not line up with the what the bible said. They broke off and followed the real Christianity. Please study history.

False.
Other than Seventh-day Adventists keeping the Sabbath, Christians follow nothing of the Law nor any aspect of the Word.
Christianity is a Saul/Paul corruption, Son of Jackal, seated in Rome. Christianity, ironically IS the anti-Christ. It is the Beast. As per prophecy,,,

aaaaaaaaaaaaaand it was created in the form of the Catholic Church, STILL. See above, Son of Jackal, seated in Rome. Protestantism's soft separation is minor, and has no realigning with real Judaism and its tenets.

WWI & II had nothing to do with religion. Please do some research.

"All the Protestants who killed Catholics were really Catholics in disguise"

No, they just weren't Christian. Another logical fallacy. Why am I not surprised.

"and Catholics were no more Christian than Jesus was Jewish"

"Christians avoid war unless absolutely necessary"

Plenty of Christians don't. And Catholicism is one branch of Christianity.

""Catholicism is not a branch of Christianity"

Yes it is

"The requirement to be Christian is that you believe the Jesus died for your sins so that you can go to heaven and that the promise to the Israelites was fulfilled through Jesus"

And Catholics believe that"

No they do not. They believe you have to be part of the Catholic church to be saved. They also believe you have to earn being saved by works.

""Catholicism teaches that if you aren't a catholic you are not saved"

And there are Protestant groups that believe the same thing. So by your logic Protestant must not be Christians"

Protestants is a giant group that basically means 'not Catholic'. Within that group there are many that don't believe in saved by grace or believe you have to go to their church to be saved. Those branches are not Christian either, by definition.

Catholicism is not a branch of Christianity. The requirement to be Christian is that you believe the Jesus died for your sins so that you can go to heaven and that the promise to the Israelites was fulfilled through Jesus.
Catholicism teaches that if you aren't a catholic you are not saved. Thus it is not a Christian organization. Though there may be Christians that attend and work within it.

What the heck are you saying? Catholicism IS Christianity, having invented the religion.

A Germanic splinter group from the 16th Century that thinks its rad because it doesn't recognize the Papacy is nothing but that, or do you require assistance with the math regarding something that came a over millenia and a half after the religion was birthed? Sheesh, the Germans were a bunch of wandering tribes of barbarians from unmapped hinterlands with not an iota of contact with or even knowledge of the Judeans at the time, let alone, Jesus. Nearly two thousand years later they sought to exterminate Jesus's people, or ain'tchu heard?
Ain't that ripe, claim the so-called Messiah (he wasn't), kill the Chosen. Yeah, they're the authentic Christians! Killing His people in the name of their Savior!

"Catholicism is not a branch of Christianity"

Yes it is

"The requirement to be Christian is that you believe the Jesus died for your sins so that you can go to heaven and that the promise to the Israelites was fulfilled through Jesus"

And Catholics believe that

"Catholicism teaches that if you aren't a catholic you are not saved"

And there are Protestant groups that believe the same thing. So by your logic Protestant must not be Christians

That fallacy is exactly your first comment. Nice trolling!

Unicorns and faeries are also very hateful creatures, so.

"Artificial means"

Artificial means artificial. If you don't know what IVF is, look it up.

"You are now just coming up with excuses and very bad ones at that"

It's not an excuse at all. Lesbians have gotten pregnant through IVF. I'm sorry if you don't like that, but too bad.

I'm still waiting for you to show a screenshot of me saying that two men can reproduce with each other.

"The point remains, in reality, a 100% Christian population will thrive and prosper while a 100% homosexual population will die out and perish"

Again, that's just factually false. Also, do you think medieval Europe thrived and prospered while Christians were killing each other? 😂 You literally had Christians burning other Christians alive. I wouldn't call that thriving and prospering. And how did the Black Plague work out for you god-fearing types? What was it? A third of Europe wiped out? That's not thriving and prospering 😂

"So, that observation concludes that homosexuality is WAY more harmful to 1) the human species 2) the society than Christianity would ever be"

You didn't demonstrate that at all. You created a ridiculous and unrealistic scenario, then said humanity would go extinct, which it wouldn't.

The Dark Ages. When the only ones still writing in a decaying Europe were Irish monks on a tiny isle off Ireland and Moorish Spain.
But I hear at least the heretic disposal industry was in full swing! Call your neighbor a witch or a werewolf or a secret Jew and it was the drowning pool or vat of boiling oil to prove their innocence!

Dude you are delusional. Show me medical data that a man can have a kid with another man. You are just blabbering right now speaking nonsense, what is an IVF going to do when a man does not have a uterus? again you are talking sci-fy. I assume your posts will get deleted 6 month later after you review your own comments and realized how delusional they are. Go say hi to the wookiees for me.

"Show me medical data that a man can have a kid with another man"

I'm still waiting for you to show me where I ever said that that was possible. Why do you keep arguing against something that no one actually said?

"what is an IVF going to do when a man does not have a uterus?"

This is sad. You're not even trying. I said "lesbians have gotten pregnant through IVF".

well I guess man to man are Shiat out of luck then because they can't get IVF. I said "lesbians have gotten pregnant through IVF". still is a male cell with a female cell. I was also very precise when I said on their own, not with medical intervention and using a male cell. You are just working your excuses out of it, and you cant. I circled in red right exactly where you said it. That you and your homeboy Modda are playing dumb because you guys know you lost is something else. Now both of you are just wasting my time, crawl out with the tail between your legs and know when you lost.

"I said "lesbians have gotten pregnant through IVF". still is a male cell with a female cell"

I never said it wasn't

"I circled in red right exactly where you said it"

No you didn't

"Now both of you are just wasting my time"

Good one :)

Here is what you said. Nothing about "on their own".

Wait a minute, why the heck are you sticking me in this?

And my question was on their own, not using articicial means. You completely disregarded that part. What you are suggesting STILL is the union of a MALE cell with a FEMALE cell, that seems very heterosexual to me.

You didn't say anything about on their own. You just said that if 100% of people were gay, humans were go extinct. That is not true.

Not in your safe fantasy world

I live in reality. Christians exist in reality.

Christians do exist in reality, But you do not live in a reality. You believe that biological man with biological man relationships can bear children, you live in a fantasy world. Again prove it to me that man with man can have children of their own, make me a believer.

Are you on drugs? Have you already forgotten? You did, do not call me a liar. You are the liar who can't answer a straight question and find cunning and deceiving ways to work your way around it. Here is my evidence. Also staying silent IS an answer. Care to elaborate how they will prosper and not fade, without being able to reproduce Octavia? You never answered that question, but in your fantasy world they will right?

He didn't slam dunk anything. He misrepresented what I said because he's a liar

Hey, Abby_Normal is right, I can flag you for that. But I will get nothing from that. That is not the way I work. I protect people's freedoms. Go ahead, call me all you like.

So you're saying that if somebody tells a lie it's not okay to say that they told a lie?

^5

Funny how he left out the part of the screenshot where I pointed out that artificial means would allow for reproduction even if everybody was gay

Artificial means... Oh, So it is Sci-fi. Sorry for mentioning unicorns, I should have said wookiee. I put what I felt was necessary, and that was very black and white. You are now just coming up with excuses and very bad ones at that. The point remains, in reality, a 100% Christian population will thrive and prosper while a 100% homosexual population will die out and perish. So, that observation concludes that homosexuality is WAY more harmful to 1) the human species 2) the society than Christianity would ever be. Boy, you sure worked yourself around that one, and it did not end well for you.

"You did, do not call me a liar"

I will call you a liar because you are a liar. You said "You believe that biological man with biological man relationships can bear children". I don't believe that and I never said it. What I said is that if 100% of the people on the Earth were gay, there would still be reproduction through artificial means like IVF. That's what I actually said.

"Care to elaborate how they will prosper and not fade, without being able to reproduce Octavia?"

In vitro fertilization is a thing which exists. I have already explained this.

So where does it say what you falsely claimed he said?

Oh poor you, you are colorblind! I am sorry I guess I should have made it also for the colorblind impaired, but you are not worth my time to go back and fix that.

Awesome! So, um, where does it say what you falsely claimed he said?

You literally have nothing to defend that claim. That's just your assumption and therefore subjective.

You are the expert on being hateful.

If you don't give any support for the claim, it's just an assumption.

Like which groups? LGBTQ?

Groups like the American Family Association, Family Research Council, Americans For Truth About Homosexuality, and many others say very hateful and disgusting things about LGBTQ people.