This stuff needs to be shown to voters

Do you think the images in my meme are example of progression and strengthening of society? Is unchecked illegal immigration that is on par with war like invasion going to ensure America's survival? Is depending on slave labor making our economy stronger? Is over reliance on foreign countries for our oil, pharmaceuticals, and other things that if they stopped sending would cripple our country in a matter of weeks? These things are not going to get better, it is going to get worse , and these things will lead to a 2 class system , which is what the people in power want to happen. The extremely rich and the extremely poor - and the poor will have to always be on their knees to the rich. Our kids, kids.. have a dystopian future to look forward to, because anytime any one wants to stop these things , they get called racists, xenophobes, homophobes and terrorists by the left. It is impossible to turn back time so even talking about it is moot.

teaching age appropriate material to children is fine, preschoolers being urged to participate in/ or be forced to view sexual acts by either men or women , is not. I think you know this. That is why I included the two bottom pictures , You are a smart kid, be brave enough to get off the Political party agenda lines when common sense tells you to.

Perhaps framing it as "political party agenda lines" ends up serving more to antagonize when it is basic common sense and should be approached from that angle. It's not a "vs" thing, it's about what is not age appropriate and letting children be children.

I get what you are saying, but sometimes people ( young people )need to be reminded that just because the party they are affiliated with might believe something , doesn't mean you HAVE to believe it as well. I remember a while back when Raven claw first showed up on this site and me and him had a few really good conversations about some different issues. I wanted to say "political party lines" because i see so many people just parroting the same talking points from both their sides without any real independent though, no one can agree 100% with everyone their political party does, if they say they do, no matter which side they role with .. I would not have anything to do with and take anything they said with a grain of salt.

regulated by the IL school board - > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yMow35pzLb1YSEZ69oT2KXKBq3hdGGlEy4MfopYhNcY/edit

take note that this is for Pre K - so 3 -4 -and 5 year olds.

Um dafuq

IL school board (one of many left wing school boards) is pushing LGBTQ propaganda in to pre K learning curriculum .

Because they should be allowed to be just kids when they're just kids, and learn about sexual identity issues and practices and whatnot when they are old enough, if necessary.
There's plenty of stuff that exists in this humanary stew we all live in that even my crusty self still doesn't want to know about.

True, but this clearly looks like it's not a school activity

My bad, but in general, really.

I'm old enough that we were in denial of all matters sexual till a much older age.
Since aspects of sexuality are entertwined in this, exposing children to it maybe shouldn't be a priority...

I agree not a priority the sexual side, but I at least think we should say something like "people should be allowed to love whoever they want" and not go into the sexual side unless the parents want it.

thing is we aren't advocating to replace it with religious indoctrination

but WE AREN'T

No, because then this CURRENT agenda being SPREAD so therefore christain ideals AREN'T (and that's not a problem here)

"OUR atheistic schools". Wow, I didn't know that was even a thing. Where does one enroll in your atheistic school?

So then what's the problem? Also off topic, but since it's free (disregarding tax dollars), and anyone can enroll, wouldn't you expect people of religious backgrounds to go there if they can't afford their religion's school? (just saying)

that is weird .. I thought pubic schools recognized all religions and decided that one particular religion over another can not be taught in public school. Saying School recognizes no religion is not correct - Religion, per se, is not banned from schools. That is, prayer is not banned. Teaching religious history or literature is not banned. What is banned is proselytizing. Students can pray silently to themselves. Students can not lead prayers nor can teachers. Students can not be religiously indoctrinated. If we agree to these terms, why can't the left not indoctrinated children either? Seems like pushing lgbtq lifestyles on children that are not lgbtq is attempting to make them unsure of their self, again , I am speaking about preschoolers and kindergarteners till about 6th grade, which are the grades the left have been targeting.

look its at every pride parade..

LOL SO TRUE

Being naked is one thing, spreading your legs to show off your crotch to children, that are very obviously in the front row, is another thing. I am still wondering why Epstein's client list has been locked away and no one has been arrested for participating with the horrors that occurred there. We definitely need to end this attack on children , including dropping the hammer on the child traffickers, This shit has gone way to far .

you think Elon Musk and Donald Trump control the FBI? I Think too many names from Congress, both house and senate , come up too many times - I think our government would fall, The British Empire would be humiliated - and so many of the "morally superior" democrats would be ousted. But , I am well aware that scum doesn't have a political leaning , it festers on both sides . Oh and Hollywood would not have any actors or actresses left either lol.

"so many of the "morally superior" democrats would be ousted."

Much as what happened with many of the Moral Majority biggies by the late 80s?

I've posted a list of crimes which I won't here as it's only of Republicans busted but was initially as a response to someone posting part of the same list but only of the Democrats named in the first half.

Fact is, there ain't any sides, just power hungry entitled narcissists doing what they, and sadly many other folks (and especially including those who rail against it the most), do what they do when they think no one else can see, or even when the rest of their buds hop in, as anyone who was ever a teen and early twenties can attest too. Well, as long as they're fellas... Women get the big "S" branding. Unless they're Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian.

Yea, my comment with that quote was more of a reactionary dig - Its hard to not do it when you have someone blaming Trump and De santis for child trafficking and Epstein's client list being locked away for ever. I have no problem saying that this sickness of pedophilia and perversion is soaked on both sides and everywhere in between , when someone tries to defend democrats no matter what, when they won't even acknowledge the crimes of their own party.. makes me lash out a bit . I have yet to see certain individuals on this site that are well know left wing democrats , call this behavior out as wrong and needing to be stopped, instead I get excuses.

The FBI who were complicit in covering up crimes committed during the 2016 elections? The James Comey FBI? The FBI that falsified documents in order to get FISA warrants to spy on a sitting president? That FBI?

yet they covered up jeffrey epstein's ties. trump had enough power to fire comey when he did

Comey is why Trump won 2016, and barely!

Oh please, if Trump or Musk were on that list, it absolutely would have been "leaked" by now.

the official copy of the book was never revealed on national tv because it would've likely lead to the fall of so many rich people, including black rock: the company that runs the stock market. however, putting trump's name into https://epsteinsblackbook.com/ reveals contacts

And that proves what, exactly?

that the media and our federal law enforcement will happily protect pedos

all we can hope for now is for a wikileaks entry

imgflip doing the job of faithfully protecting pedos too

Just for shits and giggles I checked out that claim about Florida .. this is what I found -> https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/human-trafficking-statistics-by-state

yup. florida is the third highest, following nevada and mississippi. it's worth mentioning that, well... matt gaetz

"no one left to worship the PedoCRATS or the PEDOdent"

and elon musk and/or donald trump.

"Let me fix that for you again, since it obviously didn’t sink in the first time:"

read it fine, my guy. republicans and democrats are the same

Not exactly. The Republicans who are guilty are trying to hide it. Dems have started trying to normalize it.

"Oh, and if you think they’re the same, go to PeeToo, tell them that Democrats are the same as Republicans, and see if your comment stays up"

i actually did, once. stayed up, but i only believe that because of the smaller numbers of users on pTOO

If he did talk about it you'd probably call him a nutjob obsessed with conspiracy theories. So how would your line of logic work if he did talk about it? I'm legitimately curious, as your proposal seems right to me, but somewhat contradictory. I'm just trying to open up a conversation and have no intent to insult.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/human-trafficking-statistics-by-state according to this Nevada is number one. Who is the governor of Nevada?

who are the governors of the other two top 3 states?

like i said earlier, these are politicians that you're more likely to vote for. party alliance doesn't matter. what does matter is if they'd actively push kids into pride parades or not. nevada is also not stealing the spotlight by writing suggestive bills

So, because Nevada is not writing suggestive bills , it is fine that they are number 1 when it comes to human trafficking? You seem to purposely avoid any condemnation of anyone as long as they hang on the left side of the fence, dude.

the reason nevada and mississippi aren't getting the kafkae trap on the trafficking is because they aren't pushing anything into schools. because of the don't say gay bill (i ain't callin' it anything else) the news could easily call desantis a pedo for compensation. he'd deny it, but that's exactly what a called-out pedo would do. whereas no one pays attention to nevada because there aren't any don't say gay bills.

nevada also has las vegas, where rich people congregate. of course trafficking is high there. meanwhile, mississippi is just another poor state ignored by every other state since louisiana and florida are more newsworthy, so scummy things are bound to happen in mississippi.

Oh, that is a valid point

aye :)

I think the difference is the nudists at the beach aren't coming skyclad into classrooms , nor are they allowed to shake their booties in children's faces or ask the kids to stuff dollar bills where the sun don't shine.

yeah-- no one is doing any of that here either

Dude , why can't you just say, those people should not be allowing kids watch grown men spread their legs wide open while wearing leather thongs? I mean , are you so party orientated that you can 't see the problem with what is happening? You have yet to say ANYTHING regarding these left wingers and the shit that these kids are being allowed to do. All you do is start "whataboutisms ". I thought you had a more independent mind than this.

"why can't you just say, those people should not be allowing kids watch grown men spread their legs wide open while wearing leather thongs?"

because a normal person would assume i believed that already. you don't go up to any stranger across the street asking them, "do you believe showing kids kinky stuff is ok?"

you'd have to be deranged to think anything else

avoiding saying it again. All you do is deflect when it comes to condemning anyone on the left for their actions when it involves something like this.

imgflip.com/i/6jet5z?nerp=1656100843#com19496554

if you want some sugarcoating out of me, here's a discussion with boredmeme i was having that you might get a kick out of.

"avoiding saying it again"

i believe i already basically said it, especially in other comment threads. it's why i don't come up to right-leaning imgflip users asking them, "do you condone nazis?" when they'd say no

First, I don't follow your threads or anyone else's , I usually jump on here for 30 minutes to put a meme together and maybe look at what is currently at the top few spots - I don't follow or remember other users comments. All I seen is you come on to this meme and start asking about republican states and Mat Gatz or what ever that dudes name is, and this and that. Instead of just seeing the meme and saying "yea that shit is f**ked up and people should not allow those kids to be there" , So my impression, on this thread, is that you wanted to distract from what these people are doing and focus on the right ( which conservative like me are, and with out a doubt, against taking children to trans shows). When you make these types of comments , what else am I supposed to think ?

"Instead of just seeing the meme and saying 'yea that shit is f**ked up and people should not allow those kids to be there'"

you did see the bit where i said "i don't agree with taking kids to pride parades, personally, since kinks aren't something for kids," right? literally one of the first few things i said in this thread specifically.

"First, I don't follow your threads or anyone else's"

not an excuse for jumping to conclusions on what others believe. i should not have to sugarcoat and/or do damage control for anyone else's guilt-tripping/strawman.

"So my impression, on this thread, is that you wanted to distract from what these people are doing and focus on the right ( which conservative like me are, and with out a doubt, against taking children to trans shows)"

they're called drag shows. not every trans person is into it.
also, although it's a red herring, are you not able to admit that my comment was funny? :)

"When you make these types of comments , what else am I supposed to think ?"

what the left think and remember that you have a greater chance of voting in a pedo than seeing one in a pride parade, despite what the cherry-picked image taken by the mainstream media might have you think :)
pedophiles don't show up on camera as often as we'd wish. they hide the reality and twist things up.
meanwhile, and this might not be the case, but this part of the pride parade is likely to be catered to adults, and it's not entirely their fault that some irresponsible parents bring their children along.

Well I'm glad you recognize that right-leaning imgflip users aren't nazis and don't condone them.