Sooooo... anarchists?

Just like a lot of words today, "gender" for example, the meaning of the word regulated in the constitution isn't the same as the meaning now.

It would be paradoxical for an amendment intending to protect against a tyrannical government to allow that same government to impose regulations, in your sense of the word.

I wouldn't be surprised if, one of these days, one of them unironically asks "but what about the price of tea in China?!"

Either one of them being considered the people's choice is sus af.