anti-grooming bill

maybe it should've targeted matt gaetz instead lmfao

Or maybe the numerous PedoCRATS and their leader?

69cwib.jpg (click to show)

He should be in prison just like the rest of them.

^^most based comment i've seen from you in a while

Grooming is already against the law, so obviously the bill is about something else. The author of the bill originally added a provision that would have required school principals to out gay and bi kids to their parents once the school learns of their sexuality. It was an anti-gay bill from the beginning.

Have you read it?

No, he hasn't. And even if he has, he would claim it's still not about grooming 6 year olds.

I think that should be required so the parents can prepare themselves and the child for what happens next (i.e. the heightened STD, depression, poverty, suicide, etc...etc... rates associated with homosexuals and bi people).

No one should be forcibly outed. What is wrong with you?

Yeah, the family needs to prepare for all the bad stuff that comes with it. The individual should be educated too. Why are you against education?
Btw if they are under 18, the parents should definitely be notified because statutory rape could be happening.

"Yeah, the family needs to prepare for all the bad stuff that comes with it."

Nothing bad automatically comes with it

"The individual should be educated too. Why are you against education?"

You're not talking about education, you're talking about misinformation.

"Btw if they are under 18, the parents should definitely be notified because statutory rape could be happening"

Based on what?

Bad stuff does come with it including: huge suicide rates, depression, mental illness, STDs, poverty etc...etc...

Again, not automatically

The only way to avoid it is to be aware of it and then avoid it. I'm sure there's someone somewhere that completely avoided it by pure random chance just to prove the rule by exception.

Are you an insane person?

No I just keep up with the science and studies.

Show me a single study that says kids should be forcibly outed to their parents.

There's no force required. The law states that the child is the parents property, with a few caveats about child abuse. So the parents should already know.

"The law states that the child is the parents property"

False.
What eon do you think this is?

You need to familiarize yourself with the law in the US.

1. Nobody is anyone's property.
2. That still doesn't suggest at all that it's the right thing to do to out kids to their parents.

1. According to the law they are treated as the parent/guardian's property.
2. The parent is supposed to be privy to all information regarding their children.

He really is

"I think that should be required so the parents can prepare themselves and the child for what happens next (i.e. the heightened STD, depression, poverty, suicide, etc...etc... rates associated with homosexuals and bi people)"

Don't forget to tell people that same sex marriage causes tornadoes and hurricanes. You probably believe that too.

Ad absurdum.

"Grooming is already against the law, so obviously the bill is about something else."

Tell that to the leftist agenda and the public schools who want to push the grooming crap on kindergartners.

Actually, what has liberals in a tizzy is the massive shift of power away from them to the parents.

Essentially, the law flips the script where almost everything becomes opt-in instead of opt-out. There could also be criminal penalties for not seeking parental permission in advance. Only pedophiles could possibly be against this state of affairs.

To become outraged and attempt to defeat the law on a anti-parental rights basis would be political suicide in an election year, so liberals had to invent a pithy lie to get the useful idiots to carry the water. Hence, "don't say gay" was born.

The problem is the word "gay" appears exactly zero times in the text of the law. It doesn't limit any of those discussions from taking place, it completely bans them from taking place WITHOUT PARENTAL PERMISSION. This is what set liberals off.

What I want to know is simply this : why would you want to have discussions my children are ill-equipped to handle WITHOUT MY PERMISSION? What, exactly, are you trying to hide?

Maybe if you say it a million more times, it will suddenly become true

What's not true about it? That's exactly what the bill is meant for.

No, that’s exactly what Ron DeSantis and the GOP say the bill is meant for.

Ron Desantis isn't wrong. We don't condone teaching sex to 6 year olds.

The bill doesn’t mention sex, only gender identity and sexual orientation. Look who really doesn’t know what they’re talking about.

"Ron Desantis isn't wrong"

lol yes he is. being floridian is enough to be wrong on so many things

Does it say the word grooming anywhere in the text?

Apparently it doesn't say the words gay or homosexual anywhere in it either.

That is the favorite tactic of leftists.

Or, and I know this is crazy, you could read the text of the proposed law.