NOPE

How long has it been?

Sure seems like we would have seen some real evidence by now, if it were true.

Lemme skip a step for you before you post "there's plenty of evidence!!!!!"

Lt Gov. Dan Patrick offered $1 Million for evidence of voter fraud.

$1 Million.

He still has that $1 million.

Well, $975,000 of it as a liberal found evidence of conservative voter fraud and presented the evidence. The Lt. Gov. paid him $25,000.

Sure seems like easy money to make if there's so much evidence of voter fraud in favor of Biden.

You should get some of it and go show it to Lt. Governor Dan Patrick.

It'll be the easiest $975,000 you'll ever make.

Although...I do wonder why no on else has done it?

I mean, it HAS been over a year.

Huh.

NOPE

It's real. The easiest $1 million you'll ever make.

https://nypost.com/2020/11/11/texas-lt-gov-offers-1-million-for-voter-fraud-reports/

Just get him this abundant evidence.

Notice how the courts didn't have the balls to give the evidence a hearing... OOPS

they are still collecting evidence, wide range alot to go through the cases are not shut, nursing home voter fraud, ballet drop boxes, fake address', fake mail in votes, and fake over sea's votes from our own military... I'd say 2-4 more years of collecting evidence and puttig cases together...

i'd say about 10 or 20 more years and then trump will be dead and then they'll find out he really won. lulz.

A lot of ILLEGAL ballot harvesting on top of that...

Yes... the corruption is so widespread... it's going to take some time... LOL

It's never too late for justice... just wait until Nov... LOL

Its too late to get Trump in, but its not too late to arrest everyone involved and charge them with sedition.

even tRump's lackey Billy Barr said tRump was delusional about winning. bigly sad!!!

Bill Barr — I would vote for Trump in 2024…

Barr had it right when he called Trump's effort a clown show.

I wonder if tRump really believes he won? I think He's just keeping the charade going to keep the fools donating $ to him.

You had 70 hearings.

Nope... not one heard the evidence...

LOL. what evidence? how'd that Cyber Ninja thingy work out for ya in Arizona? tRump turned AZ blue by even more votes against him. LMAO.

Well, you had 70 hearings. The fact that you didn't have any evidence is kind of the entire point.

Nope... the point is the court should hear the evidence and not dismiss it because they're too chicken...

They had 70 hearings. You didn't HAVE evidence AT THE HEARINGS.

We had signed affidavits which is enough to start a case in any other circumstance.

Giuliani in Public: ‘It’s a Fraud.’ Giuliani in Court: ‘This Is Not a Fraud Case.’
I see the problem now. They had no evidence of voter fraud. No wonder why all 60 lawsuits failed.

Nope. You and your alts got it wrong. They presented affidavits which are enough to start a lawsuit in any other circumstances.

hahahaha. you should watch more Judge Judy and less Newsmax.

Judge Judy? No, thanks. I'll do what I've been doing: reading up on the law and legal precedent. I don't watch newsmax at all.

kinda similar to Benghazi. no evidence, no Hillary locked up. maybe Trey Gowdy should investigate Wisconsin next??

They did, and they found that Wisconsin did everything right.

of course. tRump lost in by a landslide in the EC. and 2 years on still can't admit he lost. pretty sad.

Yes, when they had the signed affidavits the judges said "that's not evidence" despite it being enough to start cases in every other instance.

Investigations perhaps but not litigation. Yet, the only investigation that holds any real merit are the audits which continue to show irregularities but not what was claimed in the affidavits.

Willful widespread voter fraud that would've effected the outcome of the election in any way that would've resulted in a Trump victory.

Those individual cases of fraud are being investigated and arrests have been made.

Some even by individuals who willfully and spitefully utilized the supposed loopholes in an attempt to gain a Trump victory. Naturally, they failed. Just as any who may have unnecessarily done the same with Biden.

That's because the judge didn't allow them to immediately investigate with the start of a trial which would have allowed the Republicans to subpoena evidence. This is why they tried to get a trial. It seems you don't understand how the justice system works. Unless you start a criminal investigation (which they refused to do) the only way you can investigate is if the judge gave a trial.

Or they refused to investigate based on the insufficient evidence and the judges dismissed a trial based on standing.

Tsk.

No. Affidavits are enough to start a trial. They were presented. They didn't start the trial.

Based on lack of standing and evidence.

"Independent experts, governors and state election officials from both parties say there was no evidence of widespread fraud."

Independent experts, governors, legislatures, and state election officials from both parties say there was evidence of widespread fraud.
See how easy it is. How bout some sources?

"Texas and the other states had no standing over any of the alleged widespread fraud in Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Arizona. Nor does it have standing to object to how those states conduct their election. The correct parties who would’ve had such evidence have claimed there was no evidence."

Texas's standing was that the outcome of the election was going to affect them financially and legally as anything Biden did would negatively affect them. Not to mention they could have filed criminal charges against the individuals involved for sedition. Of course the judge didn't see it that way.

"Affidavits alone does not always give sufficient standing in federal law.

It’s been proven time and time again that there was no widespread fraud."

Affidavits alone are plenty to start a lawsuit and being discovery. Look up your case law.

Its been proven time and time again that there was widespread fraud.

An affidavit is evidence and gives standing. Please educate yourself on how trials work.

Independent experts, governors and state election officials from both parties say there was no evidence of widespread fraud.

Texas and the other states had no standing over any of the alleged widespread fraud in Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Arizona. Nor does it have standing to object to how those states conduct their election. The correct parties who would’ve had such evidence have claimed there was no evidence.

Affidavits alone does not always give sufficient standing in federal law.

It’s been proven time and time again that there was no widespread fraud.

They are "in" on doing what the Supreme Court said which was that they weren't getting involved.
No one said Trump drained the swamp. We said Trump should drain the swamp and he tried. It's just that the entirety of DC is a swamp, down to the janitors.