Imgflip Logo Icon

PUTIN & LAST 4 US PRESIDENTS

PUTIN & LAST 4 US PRESIDENTS | PUTIN & THE LAST 4 US PRESIDENTS; BUSH - 2008 PUTIN INVADES GEORGIA; OBAMA - 2014 PUTIN INVADES CRIMEA; TRUMP - PUTIN RESPECTS BORDERS; BIDEN - 2022 PUTIN INVADES UKRAINE; Wake up and stop hating Trump because the DC Swamp told you to.  Trump was looking out for you more than the other 3 combined. DC Swamp | image tagged in black background,putin,russia,trump,biden,obama | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2,583 views 89 upvotes Made by sptroup12 3 years ago in politics
Black background memeCaption this Meme
194 Comments
6 ups, 3y,
3 replies
Wait what? When did Putin invade Georgia?
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Georgian_War
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Guess you missed the sarcasm in my joke lol
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
*wipes egg off face* I live in Europe so I automatically thought of the country, not the state. :D
4 ups, 3y
🤣🤣🤣👍
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
2008 when Bush was president. Did you read the post you are responding to?
3 ups, 3y,
2 replies
It's 2022 have you learned about sarcasm yet?
4 ups, 3y,
1 reply
To be fair, there is absolutely nothing to indicate sarcasm in your post.
1 up, 3y
Bingo!
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Sarcasm usually needs emphasis to work. It’s your own fault people take your words at face value if that is all you have. Especially if it’s a question.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
I'm sorry you we're too slow and stupid to catch it. Not my problem 🤷‍♂️
0 ups, 3y
The whole point of communication is to be understood. So, wrong again.

Sarcasm needs emphasis. It rarely works purely in text. Which yours was.

Fewer people would’ve addressed your comment otherwise. So, if you’re frustrated by so many comments, then you do have a problem with it.

Especially, if you’re still replying to explain yourself.
0 ups, 3y
He wanted their peaches 😂
4 ups, 3y
Dropping a MOAB in the first six weeks of your Presidency tends to get peoples attention.
6 ups, 3y,
4 replies
Um... This is a complex situation, that is NOT Biden's fault
9 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Kinda is his fault. Some of it. Also he’s gunna make it worse
1 up, 3y,
4 replies
I stand corrected. Looks like people have already begun blaming Joe Biden.
4 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Largely because he commands absolutely no respect from other world leaders.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Source? And let's say it's true .... You're saying it as if it isn't the status quo.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
My source is I have eyes and ears.

As for status quo, mostly true, but despite what the American left wants people to believe, Trump commanded a lot of respect from other world leaders.

Not the "oh he's such a good guy, I want to be his friend" kind of respect, bug the "ok this guy's obnoxious, but we don't want to piss him off too much" kind of respect, which is exactly thd kind of respect a president needs to earn from guys like Putin and Winnie.

The idea of "mutually assured destruction", while insane on the face of it, was still a deterrent. I'm pretty sure neither Putin nor Winnie are remotely worried about Brandon even having enough mental faculties, let alone balls, to retaliate should they decide to launch nukes.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
First... his name is Biden. Let's both be grown ups.

Second, MAD only guarantees that Russia and the United States cannot launch nukes at each other. ItIt still creates a stability-instability paradox which allows a nuclear armed country to invade a non-nuclear country. It would be like if the US held Mexico hostage. Technically, nothing Russia nor rest of the world could do about it if we did. In fact, we kinda did do that with Iraq.

Third, if Russia is launching nukes, then we're launching nukes and vice versa. So, no one is going to launch nukes. Though Putin did make a veiled threat to retaliate with historical proportions if there were any interference; but I suspect that's just a bluff. He knows the US wouldn't risk a nuclear attack from Russia and he knows the American people have no desire to enter into another war after Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan

Fourthly, you've presented an opinion and not a fact.

It's noted that you think world leaders do not respect Biden. It's irrelevant to the conversation nor is it based on fact.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
It's telling how you want to "be grown ups" about Brandon, but make no mention of Winnie.

Your second point isn't actually a point so much as irrelevant exposition.

Your third point actually addresses what I was talking about, because yes, Putzin did implicitly threaten to launch nukes, precisely because he has no respect for Brandon.

As for your fourth point, obviously I was stating an opinion, based on observation. And it's just as valid an opinion as those people who think he IS respected. (Whose numbers are rapidly dwindling, mind you.)
0 ups, 3y
You know, Biden's numbers may go up after this.

But who knows? The media machine is pretty strong on the Republican front as the so-called MSM was against Trump.

Otherwise, Hillary would've been President. ;)

I doubt Russia will utilize a Nuclear first strike. Putin's spin machine has been utilizing a global narrative that because the US made the first major nuclear strike, we're the bad guys. It wouldn't be good for his narrative to now make that same show on us.

Especially since that effort would not render the same results that ours did in the immediate aftermath of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It would only result in what you called "irrelevant" exposition.
0 ups, 3y,
3 replies
Strange, considering world leaders are following his cue to sanction Russia. But… okay.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
But do the sanctions really matter now that we buy millions of dollars worth of oil from the Russians every month?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Short term, no. It won't stop Russia from doing what they're doing now.

Long term? Yes, the ramifications of so many countries joining in these sanctions may hurt Russia for generations.
1 up, 3y
That does make sense. I think it's good that the smaller countries are doing their best to help out.

But still, we should stop canceling our own oil industry and buying from Russia instead. The gas makes just as much CO2 no mater where it comes from. But when it comes from Russia, it not only pollutes the atmosphere but also fuels Putin's ability to do things like invade and enslave Ukraine.

I guess my point is the sanctions would be a lot more effective if we didn't shoot ourselves in the foot by doing business with the state-run Russian petroleum industry.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
They're not following his cue, the US wasn't even the first to sanction. The EU and the UK sanctioned before America did.
0 ups, 3y
February 22nd US announces sanctions on Russia.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2022/02/22/remarks-by-president-biden-announcing-response-to-russian-actions-in-ukraine/

Februrary 23rd UK announces sanctions on Russia.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-60476137

February 24th EU announces sanctions on Russia.

https://euobserver.com/world/154423

But please, if my timeline needs correcting, I'll happily accept any corrections if I missed anything.

Regardless, if my timeline is inaccurate, the US, the UK, and the EU; as well as many countries are united in their efforts. Hardly a thing that wouldn't happen if there was no mutual respect. Even the EU and UK respected Trump. Let's not get carried away with political euphemism and forget the real problem.

Putin.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Following his cue to do nothing of substance that would actually deter Putin and cause him to withdraw.
0 ups, 3y
What would you have them do?
5 ups, 3y,
3 replies
Yeah, when he said we weren't doing jack when Russia invades Ukraine (sanctions), that's when Putin decided to go ahead with it.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Putin has been planning this invasion for years. He went ahead with it because Ukraine was trying to join NATO to get their protection from him.
1 up, 3y
If true, it would seem their fear was valid.

And I'm assuming you mean he went ahead with it NOW (at this time) because they were trying to.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
And what would you have him have the US do... Attack Russia?

I mean who even gives a f*ck considering 75% of America will be dead in less than 8 years anyway..... right Loki?
;P
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Pretty much. More and more studies are confirming the 6 to 8 year thing by the way.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Riiiight. I guess I'll see on the other side brother.
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Do... do they really not know why we can't liberate Ukraine?

Oh Jesus Christ these Charter and private schools need to be reigned in.
1 up, 3y
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Its not about liberating Ukraine. It's the fact we are not supposed to get into foreign entanglements at all in the US.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
We’ve been in foreign entanglements since World War I. And, arguably, been doing so every decade since then. What do you mean we’re not suppose to? Where is that written? Now, if you mean you wish the US was more isolationist? Fine. That’s great, and it’s a very widespread opinion. The trouble is we’re capitalists and capitalism loves competition and competition is more profitable with foreign businesses and recognizing a global market. And when corporate interests remain the sole interest of millionaires and billionaires and politicians rely on them to grow our economy and keep unemployment down through tax breaks; then that way leads to globalization. Isolationism is a good dream but it’s unrealistic in every progressive (not political progressive but the profit machine) scenario. It’s either move or die in the world of business. And isolationism is antithetical to that.
0 ups, 3y
The original founders of the constitution designed it so we wouldn't do that. Read up on it.
0 ups, 3y
I thought Biden was down with WWIII, tho?
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Feel better now?
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
On some level..... yes.
It's comforting to see someone else here recognize that reaction as a parallel. For good or for bad, we're human.

Before Trump everything was Obama's fault.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
When Obama was in office, everything was Bush’s fault.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Oh, how quickly they forget....

The Bush Recession, costs for the Afghan & Iraq Wars and TARP, the Russian invasion of Georgia, North Korea getting nukes... all blamed on Obama. Even nearly a third of New Orlean residents polled during his presidency believe Katrina and the mess of a delayed response occured during Obama...
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Obama blamed everything on Bush, including Katrina (climate change). Obama made weak threats to N Korea that he had no intention of backing … and they knew it. That’s why their missile tests we on unabated. Oh how quickly they forget…
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Obama did not blame Katrina on Climate Change from Bush, that's silly.

Obama did not make threats to N Korea which is why their missile tests went on unabated because he wasn't president in 2006 when they developed the bomb.

I knew you'd walk into that one. They always do.

Oh, how quickly they forget…
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Obama and his ilk repeatedly blamed storms like Katrina on climate change and blamed republican leaders for not getting on the human-caused greenhouse gasses bandwagon. So, yes, he did Blame bush.

As for N Korea, they only did their first test in 2006. In 2014 they were planning another test and Obama threatened further sanctions against them “with more bite”. So you’re wrong on 2 accounts. N Korea didn’t develop the bomb in 2006 and Obama did make threats.

You walked into that because you quickly forgot 😂
0 ups, 3y
You ARE aware that your silly attempts at trying to sustain your bot lies merely serve to prove what I pointed out, yes?
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
I said some of it
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Ok so which part of it are you saying is Biden's fault?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Him not doing anything to really stop it and instead just saying over and over again that Putin is gunna attack ukraine and sending troops to ukraine, which is really dumb because if those troops get killed, Biden’s gunna declare war on Russia and then it’s gunna get really bas
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
So, it’s Biden’s fault that Putin invaded Ukraine but it isn’t because he didn’t declare war on Russia before the invasion nor sanction Russia for pre-emotive wrongdoing and it’ll be bad when Troops died just because Biden sent them. Okay, it’s somewhat logical.

Have you considered it’s more Putin’s fault?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Oh yea I’m just saying some is Biden’s fault
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Except it’s all Putin’s fault.

He is just as much of a fascist national socialist as those he claims to be invading and “protecting”, which they’re not. He wants Ukraine and he’s ready to strike back with nuclear weapons.

Putin and the rest of the KGB are still operating under the mindset that expanded borders means more control. He keeps forgetting that this is precisely why he lost the Cold War. We should’ve abandoned the mindset of a country being too big to sink last century.

And we almost did!

Putin is whining about rigged elections and has the military on his side when things don’t go his way.

Trump wishes he could do to Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania what Putin is doing to Ukraine right now.

Overturn the will of the people.
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Why bring Trump into it?
0 ups, 3y
Because the OP wrongfully believes Trump had anything to do with Putin respecting borders.

Both Trump and Putin lie to back personal agendas and pretend they’re for the national good.

Both are wrong.

Putin doesn’t make look Trump look strong, if anything, he makes him weaker because Trump frequently pines that he does not have that same kind of authority here.
0 ups, 3y
In this whole instance I don’t believe that Russia or Ukraine is a good guy. I believe they’re both bad guys and other countries have been involved with it since before Russia invaded
5 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Um... he gave Putin the green light... so

“This war and suffering could have easily been avoided if Biden Admin/NATO had simply acknowledged Russia’s legitimate security concerns regarding Ukraine’s becoming a member of NATO, which would mean US/NATO forces right on Russia’s border.”
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Oh look, a patriot that sides with Pootys concerns of Ukraine becoming a member of Nato. How times have changed in America. Great job comrade!
2 ups, 3y,
3 replies
That was actually a quote from Tulsi Gabbard... ignorant troll...
1 up, 3y
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Nice name call. The quote source has nothing to do with my reply. I was replying to your opinion of Biden green lighting it.

That is the only reason he (pooty poot) is doing this. If they were to join, he WOULD never get the BAND BACK TOGETHER!
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Name call? "comrade"?

hahahahaha Hypocrite
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Comrade offends you, huh? I dont believe you.
4 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Yup... and your ilk and you called Tusli a Russian agent because she told the truth about Kamala and Hillary... LOL
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
So Tulsi is a Russian agent?... LOL.... more lies... thanks
1 up, 3y
Putting words in my mouth? Where did i post that? Your mistake was placing me into your ILK BOX.

My meme was a way of saying....
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
That’s what you get for quoting a stupid Democrat who actually makes Russian talking points.

Ukraine becoming a member of NATO is Ukraine’s business. Not Russia, nor the US.

Now it’s our business to make Russia an example.

And it’s Putin who started it. Not Ukraine.

His excuses are horseshit.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
What? Like 0bama and Bush did??
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
If they ever did, yeah.

Maybe don’t be making Russian talking points. Especially if your source is Democrat. Your true colors are showing...
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Yup... sure... Bush, 0bama and Biden all gave away land to Putin on their watches... OOPS
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Europe would still be sanctioning and condemning Russia, though.

But Trump would’ve joined Xi in standing back and standing by in addition to congratulating Putin’s peacekeeping efforts.

Maybe even thrown a bit of that: “Putin is just taking back his own lands from the corrupt Democrats” Shtick.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Psaki Says Biden Didn’t Mean Comment That “No One Expected the Sanctions to Prevent Anything From Happening”... OOPS
0 ups, 3y
Yup. We’ve spent decades sanctioning and negotiating with Russia while they’ve built back their arsenals and military.

It’s clear Russia wants war. They just didn’t want to make the first move. They think taking back Ukraine will escalate that with NATO and the UN.

Our options are to either do nothing or stop them.

He knows the US’s resolve, not it’s military might, is weakened. And he thinks if we will stay out the rest of the UN will too.

And he might be right!

That doesn’t mean invading Ukraine was genius.

It just means Putin is a scumbag and people who thought he could be negotiated with or support him in anyway are scumbags too!
4 ups, 3y,
3 replies
Biden dropped the sanctions that were on Putin's Nordstream pipeline & simultaneously cancelled the American/Canadian Keystone pipeline making Western Europe more dependent on Russian gas & less able to stand up to Putin in substance.
Then he showed American weakness and complete incompetence in Afghanistan.
4 ups, 3y
Complete incompetence in general.
1 up, 3y
And yet it's 'Trump's Fault!'
0 ups, 3y
Yea he did something no military leader would dream of.
1 up, 3y
As the leader of NATO, at least some responsibility lies with Biden.
Show More Comments
Black background memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
PUTIN & THE LAST 4 US PRESIDENTS; BUSH - 2008 PUTIN INVADES GEORGIA; OBAMA - 2014 PUTIN INVADES CRIMEA; TRUMP - PUTIN RESPECTS BORDERS; BIDEN - 2022 PUTIN INVADES UKRAINE; Wake up and stop hating Trump because the DC Swamp told you to. Trump was looking out for you more than the other 3 combined. DC Swamp