Biden's own history of bigotry

Well, yes, but I don’t really care if other people do it as long as they do it responsibly.

If you decide to raw a girl and she consents to it, you should be ready to take care of a child.
I know, I know “Well, why doesn’t abortion count as taking responsibility?”.
Let’s say you irresponsibly buy let’s say a Hellcat Red Eye, but you don’t actually have the money for it you could #1. Keep it, #2. Sell it , #3. Send it to the scrap yard and pretend you never wasted $80k on a car you barely knew how to drive much less afford.
By far I’d say 3 is the least responsible, 1 is the second most irresponsible, and 2 is the most responsible.
So you’re getting at it a week later you take a pregnancy test, “Uhh oh, I tested positive”.
Now what can you do?
#1. Carry through with the pregnancy and keep the baby, #2. Carry through with the pregnancy and search for a potential adopter, #3. Abort the baby and pretend you never hooked up with some hunk you didn’t even care about.
I’d say 3 is the least responsible, 1 is the second most irresponsible but most dignified, and 2 is the most responsible.

Nice try Incel (I don't care how much cuss you get, being an incel is a meme now, a state of mind), but most those problems you mention are a capitalism problem.

Also, the car anecdote is a cheap strawman against the entirety of the working class that I'm surprised it still works to this day.

Banning abortion doesn't change the demand for abortions, the demand for abortions happens because people don't have proper sex education, as evidenced by how pro abstinence states have more unwanted pregnancies and child abuse per capita than places that emphasize the most in sex ed.

Grow
the hell
UP!

“Banning abortion doesn't change the demand for abortions, the demand for abortions happens because people don't have proper sex education, as evidenced by how pro abstinence states have more unwanted pregnancies and child abuse per capita than places that emphasize the most in sex ed.“

Right, but outlawing guns will stop crime. Whatever you say.

So, you think people who have recreational sex shouldn't raise children. I see. Well, that is your opinion and honestly irrelevant to the matter as it would be even more irresponsible to support any legislation that allows the state to determine in how people conduct their personal lives or whom can and cannot raises children.

It is natural to want what is best for the child but most conservatives would argue what is best for the child is their natural mother and father; if that is an option. Unless you now support the liberal notion that the state should decide that for them.

Would it surprise you to learn that no protective sex is 100% reliable?

“So, you think people who have recreational sex shouldn't raise children.”

No. I think that people who practice recreational sex should raise children, but if they can’t then it might be a smarter choice to put the child up for an open adoption.

“Would it surprise you to learn that no protective sex is 100% reliable?”

No, no it would not. Hints why I said that I did have something against recreational sex.

Well, thank you for that clarification. I was surprised to see you state, twice, in both your analogy and then the hypothetical that you would prefer a child be adopted than raised. It is certainly good to hear that you didn't mean that.

It is natural for human beings to engage in sexual urges regardless of the more fundamental societal obligations of marriage. Even marital people engage in recreational sex which is important for a long and healthy relationship. This doesn't mean every sexual encounter should result in a baby but it is possible even with the most responsible adults, who use protection, that even then it can result in a baby.

And regardless of what those parents do once that happens should not be up to the state to decide but the individuals.

That is why I cannot support any legislation by the state to make abortion illegal. The state doesn't get to decide that. We do.

“And regardless of what those parents do once that happens should not be up to the state to decide but the individuals.

That is why I cannot support any legislation by the state to make abortion illegal. The state doesn't get to decide that. We do.“

I agree with that with most issues, but not abortion ‘cause I believe it now involves another life.
A similar case is homosexuality.

I don’t really care about LGBTQ+ as long as they aren’t allowing biological males into women’s restrooms and the other way around, or teaching kids gender theory in public schools.

Or in the case of religion I don’t care if you’re Buddhist, Muslim, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Hindu, atheist, agnostic, or if you worship the goddess Hylia from The Legend of Zelda it just shouldn’t be taught in public schools.

I do believe in “My body, my choice”, but I believe at the moment of conception it is no longer just the woman’s body.

And you’re free to believe that but I don’t believe the state should decide whether or not a woman has or hasn’t willfully miscarried an unborn child.

We’re not really making abortion illegal.

What we’re actually doing is criminalizing miscarriages..

Any woman or doctor who fails delivers a baby to term is a potential criminal.

And yes, if the doctor or any of their assistances don’t turn in the Mother if the state at all suspects foul play, can also be potentially arrested.

That is just not a power I would so willingly give the state.

Not to save one life or a billion.

But the problem there is the same thing could be said about murder.
Since murder is illegal someone could wrongfully be blamed for a natural death, or suicide on the fault of the coroner.

Naturally, there is a big difference in murder and a miscarriage. And we don’t arrest coroners or medical examiners for making mistakes. At worst, they’re sued or fired.

And thank you as well. I wish you all the luck in your noble endeavors. I just don’t like to see any innocent people hurt by the state.

Though, we’re both entitled to our own opinions so thank you for the civil conversation.

Pretty sure nominating or not nominating someone based on his/her abortion stance is also wrong.

Only if their personal stance outweighs their convictions to honor the constitution.

Yes. Yes he did!!!!

SMHID

I’d say his record of voting and activity against minorities throughout his history indicates he is racist. You’ve convicted Trump of being one with less evidence.

That doesn’t change that his history and record make that a believable statement.

It's even more reprehensible. He wanted to keep them off because it would give The Other Party the "first black" W.

He said that. Biden also said Negroes shouldn't be allowed to hold public office (actually he used a different word that began with N) and in the early 70s he teamed up with fellow white supremacists Strom Thurmond and Robert C Byrdbrain -Grand Kleagle of the KKK to try and keep black kids out of good schools. He's got 50 years of public racism under his belt.

Enjoy!
https://www.the-sun.com/news/1175772/joe-biden-quoted-n-word-13-times-1985-hearings/

It's the 'brought' that counts,,,

read*

oops

No, you're wrong. You claimed he never said it. He said it, used it 27 times in one day in testimony on the hill, etc. Why do you think he teamed up with Grand Kleagle Byrd and fought to keep black kids out of the good schools. Go talk to an older Bkack Panther. They protested him in the 70s. He's got 50 years of public racism under his belt.

ICYMI

Nice, super predator dog whistling anecdote, bucko, but you ain't proving jack about shit because anecdotes aren't an argument, just an appeal to emotion (facts don't care about your feelings anyone?)

There's lots more of those anecdotes about Republican politicians and aides, but they're still anecdotes, plus I don't need to make a strawman of the right because they strawman themselves better than anybody, becoming more radical and insular every passing day.

Boy I'm so glad to live in Europe and watch the train wreck from a distance

That'd be Resident Brandon who is celebrating Black History Month with "Free Crackpipes for Racial Equity!"
You can't make this shit up.

Actually I'd be happy if people making lame excuses for Brandon and denying what he said on public record got kicked out of their parents basement and sent to rehab before their substance abuse lands them in an early grave.

So who's rolling over to the doggie whistle? Facts are what facts are.. Lol.Facts, Logic and Reason over Rampant Lefty Emotions.Truth vs Lies and the Pink Hat Crowd's wanting to believe.

Upper casing the words Facts, Logic and Reason on rapid succession and directly associate them with Rampant Lefty Emotion doesn't work.

You're not Ben Shapiro, you're embarrassing yourself more than he did with Andrew Neil.

Besides, nobody's making excuses for Biden, if you knew any actual leftists, you'd know we mostly want Clinten, Bushy, Dronebummer and Bidementia sitting in a Hague Court for war crimes.

What the left (except obvious tankies) actually does, is try to enjoy and take as much advantage of whatever silverlining the Biden admin. is providing, knowing that getting full justice for every wrong can't be achieved overnight, specially when the left is basically powerless.

Ah yes, right, the left is weak and don't have authority beyond fake leftist, milquetoast liberals and champagne socialists occasionally allowed by the status quo, but at the same time, cultural marxist teachers are everywhere and we control everything in the shadows with Soros money...

Something something Umberto Eco...

Go Brigade somewhere else. Maybe you'll get lucky and find the stereotypical conservative you so desperately want to believe exists while Team Pinko keeps humiliating itself by making the feeblest excuses for the low level foibles of Brandon, Barry, Jailbait Bill and the Good Ole Backroom Boys who got rich off insider deals, influence peddling and job outsourcing while our country suffered.

Brigade? a one man Brigade you say?

Thanks for the compliment I guess.

It's not a compliment. It's what Pinko Trolls do. Your side got outed for it months ago.

My side? as in leftism as a whole? Can you not look at politics like it's a movie? it'd be much appreciated.

Nobody cares what you appreciate.

Lmao let me introduce you to the wonderful concept of rhetorical, hecking questions.

You triggered?