I'm confused on what Democrats and Liberals deem acceptable

Early in his administration, Biden warned his staff to show colleagues and members of the press with respect.

"I’m not joking when I say this: If you’re ever working with me and I hear you treat another colleague with disrespect or talk down to someone, I promise you, I will fire you on the spot — on the spot. No ifs ands or buts," Biden said. "Everybody is entitled to be treated with decency and dignity."

Don't you know the democrats golden rule? Rules for thee but not for me

Should he not fire himself then? Lol, that’ll be hilarious if he just hung his head in shame and walked out of his office after being fired by Brandon.

TV ratings would be YUUUGE!

Lol bigly

https://i.imgflip.com/62ketf.jpg

Yes, he united everyone against him.

The moral code of a Democrat is based on what party you’re in, not beliefs or actions.
They deem whatever they do acceptable, and whatever Republicans do unacceptable.

... almost like a cult, where faith overpowers all reason and logic.

Communism is a total cult.

TrumpTardism is a bigger cult.

This is the People vs Person argument, you can reason with a person not a mob. A Christian is a reasonable person, Christianity has a troubled history but is currently much better than Islam.

Then we agree

Alot of Atheist are not reasonable. See what I did there?

so what are you going to do about it?

How is that working for you?

Wow, I really learned a lot from that, thank you so much for sharing your thoughts.

See Jan 6 for details.

Actually atheism takes far more faith than religion does (depending on the religion, because some are just anti-logical)

The part where nobody created the universe.

I've never seen anything create itself. Have you?

I have thoughts on this, if we take God out the question of how the universe then we end up with a better question why does the universe exist? According to what I know about science, the big bang created the universe, big bang was cause by all matter exploding from a single point of existence. But how and why did that exist? Was there nothing before or was there something else? If there was nothing that means either it was created by an outside force or a paradox, in which it became in existence because it did not exist before. Or is the universe an endless time loop where the end of the universe is also the beginning?

Your comment about the big bang didn't add any new info? My question is how was the singularly created?

I never really thought of it like that, thanks for posting that.

Oy vey, someone's scared of a special little word. Typical gutless atheist.

I'd tell but it'd cause another shoah.

Like how you’re totally silent with the rest of these comments but when this guy says God like 3 times you start arguing. Totally missing the point.

ikrrr
The only thing is I didn't even mention God here

XD

I wasn't referring to my moral code. Actually there is no such thing as a "person's moral code", as there is just morality and immorality. I was pointing out hypocrisy.

No, CommanderFunguy is right- there is only moral and immoral. Laws can be immoral.

Let's see - Does it hurt someone? Does it make someone worse off? Take abortion, for example. It makes the unborn baby worse off by, well, ending his life. So that would be considered immoral.

Yes, there is. That's called neutral. But we're not talking about tying your shoe.

In regards to your first statement, doesn't matter. Sometimes moral actions are tough. Those are called consequences.

In regards to your second statement, that's just it- saving a life. Something is immoral if it brings about hurt or harm to another person, or if it encourages such immoral things as cheating on a partner, etc.

So deep! How do you come up with your poignant pithy comments? Always on target they are.

I hate to sound like I am any way disagreeing with your preeminent knowledge, just looking for a slight clarification...would all local, state, and federal criminal codes and statutes be considered "moral codes", which would then directly tie in with religion?

…

You have admitted a Democrat csn do wrong and thus are not exactly like a Democrat mob.

That's not really relevant here, because God doesn't constantly change what He thinks is good every five seconds like politicians do. Unlike politicians, God isn't trying to be elected into Godhood, and thus has no need to swindle the masses.

When He's testing people. He doesn't break His own rules and then just pretend it doesn't matter.

Well, if a God were to exist, we wouldn't have much of a choice, would we? Lest hell sounds appealing

You are aware that rule was changed so the apostles could preach to the Gentiles, right? Before then, Jews weren't supposed to interact with Gentiles unless they were captured (and if you read accounts from the people who captured them [these are not found in the Bible], you'll see that they tried to adhere to this rule (excluding the Samaritans, who most of the Jews didn't even count as Jews anymore). After Jesus died, God wanted to send Peter to Cornelius' house, and so He allowed him to eat the foods which had been considered unclean. This was also a part of the Old Testament Law being replaced by the New Covenant. This is a different standard being applied based on the time. It still bears no resemblance to suddenly changing His stances of righteousness based on His actions just to gain human approval, which, as I have stated, God clearly has no need for. In order for that situation to be even remotely similar to the leftist comparison, God would've needed to have said that "all beings cannot eat meat, as it is an egregious sin" but then one day decided to eat meat, and when He gets caught, He then says it's perfectly fine, but then goes back to saying it's a sin when He's done.

That's a nonsense hypothetical and God would never do that. But if anyone was dumb enough to put a gun to my head, I'd slap it out of their hand.

So I take it you'd be cool with all the bad things that happen in Revelation? Because I sure wouldn't want to be on the wrong side of that. Also whatever you think about God, the devil is billions of times worse. It's from him that humans got the idea of treating women like property. It's actually because of him that males have leadership over their houses. It's because of him that slavery exists, and without him, there'd be no animosity, no murder, no hatred, no nazism, and certainly no communism. You ever wonder why the anti-religious left is completely supportive of Islam but despises Christianity, even though both religions are not pro-LGBT? (When I say "supportive" I mean they give them minority treatment; you can be "racist" toward them [whatever the heck that means], and putting Muslims on TV is a win for representation.) The devil is not anyone's friend, and certainly doesn't care about you even if you intentionally ally yourself with him. And I certainly don't care to join him anywhere.

Quit being such a snowflake.

so says the snowflake. Men can't give birth. Go cry snowflake

Once again I must ask for some slight clarification - you said "But he does change his mind" - so now you're admitting that He exists and is a He?

An absolutely beautiful comment. I think I'm going to cry.