Where We Are Right Now With The Covid Vax....

My original lucky rock cannot stop other people from crashing into me, so I need a luck booster rock to make me feel double safe and protected.

These tweets are brilliant. :D

Twitter is an evil dumpster fire hell hole, but these three tweets might be the three tweets that God needs as proof that there are three good tweets in twitter to not destroy it.

LOL, DrS...the new poster boy for the Democrat Party!

I get what you’re saying, won’t lie it took me a minute but you’re correct. Have an upvote

Thanks, Jtug!

Np V

https://i.imgflip.com/5z4emz.jpg

You're always 'thinking', Abby. 😁😂

Vaccines do work though. I got COVID, and my symptoms were not very severe at all, since I am vaccinated.

ZFloyd, I have heard of so many unvaxxed people who actually had Covid and never even knew they had it and of people who had it with very mild symptoms. So, every time I hear people touting the jab as giving them less severe reactions, I really don't place much value in it. Plus, considering the fact it is about 99% survivable, I will take my chances and bank on natural immunity/Ivermectin/early treatment rather than a jab w/ known side effects, deaths and unknown future surprises. Good luck. 🙂

Where did you get the information that it's 99% survivable? How can you have natural immunity to something your immune system hasn't encountered before?

Where's the evidence for the vax causing side-effects and deaths?

"Good luck"

Hah! The irony.

Vaxxed or unvaxxed, a lot of people have very mild symptoms

when you study for a test you have a smaller chance of failing the test. you can still fail the test, but you have a higher chance of getting an A

when you get the vaccine, you have a smaller chance of dying from covid, and a smaller chance of it being severe. you can still die from it, but you have a much better chance of living.

yalls lord and savior trump got it, why wont you?

Zaklog is right, bing_bong. You say, "you have a much better chance of living" when you are talking about something that has an aproximate 99% survival rate. If you told that to the many thousands of jab injured persons, I bet they would say if they had it to do over again, they would skip the jab (and unfortunately the jabbed dead are unable to weigh in on it). You say, "you have a smaller chance of dying from covid" & I would say with early treatment and Ivermectin, etc. you have a better chance to live without serious side effects from the jab. Look at the 'risk' vs the 'reward', bb, as they just do not pan out and not knowing what the future effects from the jab will be, it's best not to comply.

imgflip.com/i/5yfxdv

Further, about 90% have fully recovered worldwide.

And almost 2% who’ve had it have died.

So, I’m not sure why people like you keep making up a 99% survivability statistic that isn’t based on any fact at all other than your own wishful thinking or confirmation bias.

How can anyone take you seriously if you’re going to make up statistics?

"And almost 2% who’ve had it have died." <<<< YOUR words...

So, you are arguing that OVER 98% survived when MY words were it "has an approximate 99% survival rate"? You are beating me up over a fraction of 1%? That is hardly making up statistics. "How can anyone take you seriously"? (YOUR words back at you, Gumshoe)...

If I may... are you saying that 2,813,436 million people are not worth keeping track of?

And your error is not just numerically incorrect but factually as well.

I also said only 90% have recovered.

So I'm not just accusing you of being off by 2.8 million people, but 28 million who are still sick from Covid and are not fully recovered.

Having the virus and still being in that uncertainty stage is not necessarily surviving.

I appreciate your glass half-full sentiment but it's just not rooted in science at all.

Take it up with the courts who wish to only release 500 pages a month on documents that spans a couple hundred thousand pages.

However, you won’t have to wait 75 years to see the data that does not need to be redacted to protect the privacy of citizens. That’s being released in a couple of months. I’m not even sure what your grandchildren are going to discern from those redacted documents.

https://www.texastribune.org/2021/11/08/texas-coronavirus-deaths-vaccinated/

unvaccinated people were the majority of cases and deaths in texas this year

id say seeing my family again is a pretty good reward

Studying for a test doesn’t cause irreversible heart damage. Small, but important difference.

source?

let me guess, it causes autism and stds. ive heard it all from yall

No, as I said, heart damage: pericarditis & myocarditis. Also apparently Bell’s Palsy.

You haven’t actually heard anything because you’re deliberately not listening.

Now you're posting some tweet with 244 likes, I remember when liberals were doing that in Trump's 4 years.

So?