How Ironic

Careful, you’re making a case for fully vaccinated people to be required to wear masks too.

Wait about two weeks. They will. :(

3igsly.gif (click to show) Oh no ... irony

You can still get covid if you are vaccinated. It will be more mild and not bad enough that you can't breath

Anecdotal

90% of covid casualties are unvaccinated.

97% of people in hospitals are unvaccinated.

That’s a lie

uh-huh, where's your source, I'll cite mine: https://www.npr.org/2021/07/16/1017012853/97-of-people-entering-hospitals-for-covid-19-are-unvaccinated

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/06/26/cdc-4115-fully-vaccinated-have-been-hospitalized-or-died-with-breakthrough-covid-19-infections/?sh=229a2a196993

From the article:

Regardless, let’s put the 3,907 hospitalizations and 750 deaths in proper perspective. Over 4,000 may sound like a large number when counting something like the number of marmots in your bed. Certainly any death is tragic. But consider the fact that over 150 million people in U.S. have already been fully vaccinated in U.S. Doing a quick calculation with your abacus and your fingers and toes will reveal that the 4,115 cases constitute less than 0.003% of all fully vaccinated people in the U.S.

We are taking post vaccination infection not overall number of vaccinated. The claim that the only people in the hospital are unvaccinated is incorrect. There are plenty of vaccinated who are admitted, more than 3 percent.

https://news.yahoo.com/nearly-25-percent-lexington-covid-211508547.html

That article doesn't prove anything. Vaccines don't necessarily mean you don't get the virus, it provides WAY better chances of not getting sick and/or dying than not getting vaccinated.

https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-health-941fcf43d9731c76c16e7354f5d5e187

Nearly ALL, 98-99% of COVID deaths are unvaccinated.

It proves that more than 3% of those admitted for Covid are vaccinated. Which was the point contended.

In Lexington, perhaps. Overall? Not so much. These percentages may fluctuate. I’m not sure why the percentage is so high in Lexington. There may be other factors at play beyond the norm. Poor vaccine management (as many of them needed to be at certain temperatures) and they have an expiration so they may have taken an old batch that was no longer effective.

So what is the overall Number you claim?

There is no official pool of data yet as it is too early at this time. But the preliminary data points to 97-99% of covid hospitalizations are from the unvaccinated.

https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/unvaccinated-individuals-now-account-for-the-vast-majority-of-covid-19-hospitalizations-and-deaths-in-the-u-s-according-to-available-data/

How does it point to that? because npr said do. You stated yourself there is no official pool of data. I provided real data that is evidence that that isn’t true in at least on data pool and likely many many others.

One small pool doesn’t equal a large pool. I also provided data with references.

Again, according to the preliminary data, IT IS about 97%.

One small pool doesn’t negate the whole source.

Clearly did not helped the democrats on that plane either. ROFL.

Ummmm

The vaccine, as any informed person would know, doesn't prevent you from getting it. It helps prevent serious symptoms

Hydrocloriquine(sp) did the same thing. . .cut down the worst of it. . .

Except that's actually not true. And if it was it would be used.

The COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) recommends against the use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine and/or azithromycin for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients (AI) and in nonhospitalized patients (AIIa).

https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/chloroquine-or-hydroxychloroquine-and-or-azithromycin/

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/hydroxychloroquine-does-not-benefit-adults-hospitalized-covid-19#:~:text=A%20National%20Institutes%20of%20Health,benefit%20to%20hospitalized%20patients.

And no....it's not because Trump said it worked. It simply doesn't work.

Feel that cough yet. When you do remember your dipshit fear posts. Polio alone would have killed most of the world if not for vaccines.

You are obviously clueless about the history of polio and polio vaccines.

Obviously so are you because everything I read in a BOOK tells the history of them all and they were not all perfect. Polio alone was only 60-70 -percent effective at the start in the US in 1954 and it was pulled multiple times for some bad batches. But eventually they worked and how much polio do you see now? Typhoid? Do you see it? Lots of issues with the vaccine initially but how do you think they tested things in 1920 or 1954? DNA was discovered in 1894 but could not really be broken down until close to 1951 and then it took YEARS to work with so how did they test vaccines. Answer the question now no changing the subject like you tend to do. How did they test it? What did they test it on? Animals sure but what about virus that animals did not get? What then? They made it and injected it into the people who MADE IT FIRST! Yep. And they prayed it worked. So don't tell me I did not do research if you should doubt look up the history of vaccines on the history site for one. That will break it down for you like a vaccine breaks down a virus. I really do not care if you don't get the shot you will get sick eventually and pass on and then poof dust and forgotten but the fact you are willing to spread it knowingly is basically murder really. You know what it does and how it spreads so if you spread it you are willingly putting others in danger. Premeditated at that because you PLANNED it beforehand. Someone is gonna get sued for it eventually just watch.

Yup, totally clueless.

TESTED... let me say that again TESTED VACCINES THAT WERE DEEMED SAFE. THE EXPERIMENTAL JAB IS NOT. THERE IS A HUGE F**KING DIFFERENCE. PLUS POLIO, SYPHILIS, TYPHOID, AND ETC. HAVE A MUCH HIGHER DEATH RATE YOU F**KING THICK NUMSKULL

Nicely said . . . but perhaps too filled with subtlety for the average propaganda gulping leftist to grasp your points.

You say subtle, I say unhinged. Easily triggered. Like a leftist.

The vaccine has been tested. And the death rate is still miniscule

It has not been tested long term. That’s why it only has emergency use approval by the FDA. Unlike all the other vaccines you may get that were studied for at least a decade.

It's been approved by the FDA. Because in our current situation, it does far more good than harm

I try s been approved for “emergency use” if your a child or young person without severe health issues it may not be an emergency.

Not everyone is a child or young person, as you may or may not have guessed

The point is perfectly Healthy young people may be at more risk from vaccine complications than from the virus itself. There has not been enough study on complications among younger people. You experiment with your kids if you want.

The studies you are saying don't exist are underway. We don't know, yes. So don't vaccinate your kids against covid for all I care. They won't die from Covid. I want simply for Adults to be vaccinated. Because they are the ones at risk here

I want people to make informed decisions and do what’s best for themselves and their family and that’s not up to you to dictate. Vaccinate your whole family even the infants if that’s your decision. I’m not the one trying to impose my beliefs on you. It’s the other way around. Your fear shouldn’t determine what others do,

It's good to see that you aren't a conspiracy theorist. I'm just saying that the vaccine is safer than some of you make it out to be

What are the long-term side-effects of the COVID vaccine???

None. Because all side-effects of a vaccine show up within two months of getting the vaccine, or not at all. There aren't really any exceptions to this rule

And how do you know that this experimental vaccine with zero long-term studies will have no side-effects?

I never said it had no side-effects. I said it has no side-effects that we don't know of. Because with all vaccines, side-effects appear within the first two months.

And it's not experimental. The method they used to make it (injecting a spike protein) has been used with many antiviral vaccines. It has been through testing and trials, and the FDA has approved it, meaning the benefits outweigh the costs

“Because with all vaccines, side-effects appear within the first two months.“

Wrong. Some vaccines have side effects that do not show up in the first two months. Some don’t show up until years later, as specified by the CDC website.

Try again.

OK. Thanks for proving that you trust the CDC.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/prepare-for-vaccination.html

I don’t trust them. I provided information from a site you leftists trust.

Try again.

By the way, I will take my chances with a disease that has a better than 99% chance of survival over a drug that has had no long term testing.

Well, in that case, I may just have to prove to you that the CDC aren't an evil conspiracy to murder you and control the world

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/centers-disease-control-prevention-cdc/

Sorry, but when they admitted to inflating the numbers of Covid deaths, they lost all credibility for me.

I just thought you might prefer information from a site that prefers to push a leftist narrative.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/aug/31/facebook-posts/no-cdc-did-not-quietly-adjust-us-coronavirus-death/?fbclid=IwAR1aZHYWQ1bLKP_e-9Uu2wi9LU3qpcMGuLj4xJMVzrnibL5M2Y5wCljUTb0

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cdc-death-figures/

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/politifact/

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/snopes/

How were those vaccines studied for at least a decade?

The way all new medicines are studied, clinical trials and monitoring.

We did that.

Not Completely that’s why it’s an emergency use authorization.

Keep on posting CDC propaganda and I’ll keep on NOT reading it.

You really are hopeless

Says the guy who trusts an organization who admitted to lying.

Can you, um, prove that?

What part? You trusting them or them lying?

-You posted multiple links from them, so it seems like you trust them.

-They’ve admitted to inflating the covid numbers, so it’s been proven.

You obviously have internet capabilities. Use them, but avoid the leftist search engines which hide anything going against the preferred narrative.

Them lying. Common sense

And also, do you really think google is actually leftist? A giant f**king corporation? Why the f**k would they be left wing?

Do you do any research before making a comment. A Google employee blew the whistle on how the algorithms hide conservative viewpoints and opinions.

And if you think ‘giant corporations’ can’t be biased, you must be biased as well.

Facebook, Twitter, etc. have an obvious left-leaning bias and are also ‘giant corporations’, so your argument is complete BS.

You haven't replied to my main point

“ You haven't replied to my main point”

You keep deflecting from the point I brought up, so we’re even.

I already did offered a rebuttal to your point after I smashed your BS answer to my question, then you just deflected into a new tangent.

When you truthfully answer what the long term side effects of the Covid vaccine are, I will get back to your point.

I asked you to prove whether the CDC had admitted or even lied about inflating covid numbers. You never did. So, I'll be pleased to continue when you do

Why should I answer your question when you still haven’t answered mine? You gave some BS about there not being ANY long term side effects even though the vaccine hasn’t been around long enough to make that claim.

It’s still too early to be able to say there are no LTSE and if you claim otherwise, you’re just proving you’re a leftist sheep who believes anything the MSM and the government tells you.

Start thinking for yourself, child.

I gave you a source, you said it was BS. I asked you to prove it

https://www.muhealth.org/our-stories/how-do-we-know-covid-19-vaccine-wont-have-long-term-side-effects