Democrats Embrace Censorship of All That Does Not Support the NWO

Censorship is what Nazi Germany did before they became the famous group that killed the conservative Jewish people.

If Democrats keep their power and keep their direction - Conservatives in General will be the new Jews of the new Holocaust. It starts at censorship and doesn't stop until the other voice is eliminated - or someone else stands up for that voice.

During Hitler's time - it was the United States who stood up and made the war turn for the allies. It's sickening that this country has allowed a new Nazi party to form, right in its own back yard. The new Nazi Party is liberals and their mental issues. Give it 12 more years of democrats and conservatives will be living in ReEducation Kamps.

How leftist/liberal Americans have lost their minds; they were usually on the edge but have fallen over the cliff, EmporerCzar_Elect_JR.

Fun fact: Hitler offered to ship the Jews to the US free of charge. The US refused.

Wait - does that mean Biden will offer to send me to Germany Ireland or Scotland??? Maybe I'm being to harsh on this idea....

Referencing and mythologizing a history from 4000 years ago and making an appeal to the populace to strive for a return to its glory was the core of Hitler's message and the ultimate in Right Wing Conservatism.

Ridding Germany of foreign elements he saw as polluting the purity of that prehistory (ironic, since Germans are Teutons, the Arayans were invaders from Central Asia) was something he gave priority too.

Reviling the Jews as the alleged instigators for Liberalism and Leftism and Maxism as tools for some imaginary Zionist plot to take over the world was one of his rallying cries.

Revisionism does not alter facts.

The Neu Nazi Party is the one using Hitler's tactics.
His wannabe imitator has been stopped - at least for now.
He's been telling his minions he's taking over again in August.

We'll see how long the temple to this creature will last.

You are aware that Democrats (including you, right here) compare Trumpism to Nazism, right? So Democrats do exactly what you are saying here; using history to prove a point. Which by the way, you didn’t “prove” anything. EmperorCzar at least gave a reason for his comparison.

Also, it’s not a bad idea to cite history as a reason why you don’t want something to happen. People who don’t know their history are doomed to repeat it.

No, I'm not aware of your asinine retrofitted revisionist partisan hack babble because I don't get a script from Putin like you do, Russbot.

For those not consumed by Trumpian fanfic for childish trailer park denizens, that pic there was of a Unite the Right march in Derp Frufru's honor.

I don’t even listen to Putin. The only thing I’ve seen Putin say is his response to Biden’s accusation (which was a smart response, btw). I don’t pay much attention to Russia, and they sometimes scare me (which is why I was not happy with Biden’s decision on the Russian pipeline). I don’t know where you got this idea from. All you did was hurl a bunch of insults and accusations.

You call people childish, but then you assume everyone who doesn’t agree with you is an idiot. That in and of itself is extremely childish. And I am not the robot here. If anyone here is a robot, it’s you. You are just repeating the stuff you hear on the media (I hear what you said over and over and over, on a loop, constantly, from one leftist to the other). I said nothing to imply I was just spewing stuff I hear, whereas you totally did, and in a nasty way, too.

I could hurl insults back, if you want to have a slander war. Not many win those against me. If you want to actually have a discussion built on information, drop the insults.

Also, you are aware that Neo-Nazism is not a popular belief in America? It is believed by some people (and I’ve seen their bogus arguments spouted online), but it is completely asinine to group an entire party of people as Nazis unless you have a reason besides “The media told me so.”

People that are racist and want to mass murder like Hitler do not sign laws to help people of a different ethnicity AFTER being elected. Years after, to be exact. People that want power like Hitler and Communists did will use people to gain complete power, and then basically say “too bad, sucker” and overtake the country like a dictator. That’s what Hitler did, it’s what some Communists have done, and it’s absolutely NOT what Trump did.

You are ushering in what you claim to hate by supporting Democrats. Remember this in a few decades.

tl;dr

I understand your script is limited, but "NO, YOU'RE WRONG BECAUSE MUH FEELZ" is not an adequate retort.

These still - hissy fit all you want - are still historical facts still:

"Referencing and mythologizing a history from 4000 years ago and making an appeal to the populace to strive for a return to its glory was the core of Hitler's message and the ultimate in Right Wing Conservatism.

Ridding Germany of foreign elements he saw as polluting the purity of that prehistory (ironic, since Germans are Teutons, the Arayans were invaders from Central Asia) was something he gave priority too.

Reviling the Jews as the alleged instigators for Liberalism and Leftism and Maxism as tools for some imaginary Zionist plot to take over the world was one of his rallying cries.

Revisionism does not alter facts.

The Neu Nazi Party is the one using Hitler's tactics.
His wannabe imitator has been stopped - at least for now.
He's been telling his minions he's taking over again in August."

I hope this clarifies things!

i already read that. Also, are you even reading what I said? Nothing I said implied “You’re wrong because muh feelz.” However, this about sums up the entire Democrat party.

lt;dr means:

AKA, no, I did not read your non-retort diatribe about how I hurt feelz your feelz.
I didn't even read past your 2nd sentence.

And that is why you didn’t understand a darn word I said. You didn’t feel like reading it.

Replying without reading a comment makes you sound retarded, and that is not a statement drawn from emotion.

I’ll stop here, since you can’t seem to take more than a few paragraphs.

Party On -595vd4.jpg (click to show) - Upvote for you!

You are so right. There has simply been no instance in history where censorship has been used for anything besides oppression and keeping the truth out of the public, under the guise that it was done to protect people. And here we are, censoring opposition under the guise that we’re protecting the public. The only thing being accomplished here is that we are keeping the truth far from the public. Oppression will come later.

Commander, I concur and am in disbelief that we can have Americans signing on to this censorship and control voluntarily all the while supporting CRT, BLM, Anti-fa, open borders and INSANITY.

Yes, the fact that they were able to misrepresent the purpose of the borders and get people to believe in that was flat out disturbing. And the CRT, BLM, and antifa are just craziness, and meanwhile we need to be protected from certain information? Rage is the most dangerous thing to be exposed to. It’s just all borderline insanity.

I say the leftists/Democrats/liberals/Marxists/Progressives/Communists (OR whatever you choose to call 'em) are not firing on all cylinders and that is putting it politely! 😳🤪🤕🤒😷

False.

Democrats complained of rampant misinformation and volatile posts containing baseless claims from Trump Jr’s Facebook account.

I don’t read much CNN, but this was the first article I found. At no point did CNN report that Democrats demanded Facebook to censor “Election Integrity.”

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/06/23/politics/facebook-dnc-biden-emails/index.html

Unless you’re referring to some other article, perhaps?

Just because you don't know how to utilize the internet, doesn't make facts "FALSE", Gumshoe.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2021/06/26/report-emails-show-biden-campaign-demanding-facebook-censor-posts-on-election-integrity/#

Ah, that explains why you got it wrong then. It is interesting to see Breitbart now breaking down reports from CNN but inserting their own spin onto what the emails were "actually about" rather than actually quote the article that they built their story on which contains NOTHING about election integrity.

The link I sent you IS what Breitbart is reporting about so I, apparently, CAN utilize the internet.

The first time election integrity is even mentioned is only in the headlines of Breitbart's commentary, and in regards to Trump Jr's unfounded claims, before the election. The quote from the main article that supposedly concerns elation integrity comes from this portion here:

"The Trump Campaign has received the message that they may put videos on your platform saying that millions of fraudulent votes will be used to steal the election. And the solution to that is for 'able-bodied people' to enlist in an 'army.' So, their shrieks of fraud compound and their calls to 'enlist' multiply. Good gracious," the Biden official wrote. "I struggle to believe that is the precedent you are intending to set."

That is directly from the email. At the time, those claims were reasonably unfounded. Meaning, there was no proof at the time those claims were made. If anything, it actually vindicates the people that those who have made claims that election fraud are simply an attempt to spin a reason why "everyone's favorite President" apparently lost the popular vote (again) and this time it cost him the votes that were actually counted (in the Electoral College).

So, yes. Your claim is false.

The Biden campaign pressured Facebook to remove posts about election misinformation. Not election integrity. I know it sounds like I'm repeating myself, but I'm really trying to get you to understand these two things are not the same.

A smaller version of the above:

Basically, you read a biased commentary on an otherwise unbiased report that shaped your bias and made you draw an unfounded conclusion that is, indeed, false.

What IF FB just doesn't like whiney, fat, orange, one term- LOSERS?

How many times did you win the presidency, Li'l Stanley?

Answer is ZERO, Syd....

That would MDSA: Make Dogs Safe Again.

What if FB is just an extension of the political establishment?

What if the "loser" you refer to is unpopular because he gatecrashed the self-appointed political "elite" and threatened their monopoly on power?

what if the loser, cant admit he lost not only the HOUSE, the Senate and the WH. Billy Barr even said it was BS, So now he is on his tantrum tour... Not ONE appointed judge took his side, that would be zero- why? Judges dont act on hurt feelings.

Well, he did win once. Which is what the political establishment can't forgive him, or his voters.

Jabba the Gut won, with the help of Russia

That's about as well documented as Obama being born in Kenya.

Censorship is still censorship. Name a group that used censorship in history that wasn't tyrannical.

imgflip sensors me from the orange snowflakes on here at least once a week, i guess i hurt someones tiny little feelings...

“Imgflip censors me from the orange snowflakes on here at least once a week. I guess I hurt someone’s tiny little feelings...”

Once a week. So you’re just an amateur troll?

Your side gets me censored 2-4 times a week.

BTW, I fixed your 6 mistakes.

English students from the Leftist School of Buffoonery should stop showing off their lousy language skills.