Presidential History Lesson

"Believing" anything does not make it fact. But believing only what benefits you personally does make you shallow and unbelievable.

Well said.

Reminder: this filthy w**re only got where she is by sucking off Willie Brown and affirmative action. Only picked because her skin has enough melanin by the side obsessed with identity politics.

Thank you

Did you call Kamela Harris, the first female VP; first person of color VP; first female of color VP; first asian american VP; and first female asian american VP, a w**re? Shut up, please and take a SEAT

Do you actually know anything about her other than her skin color, sex, and ethnic background?

Probably not, since that's mostly what matters to brainwashed liberals.

As a long-time Taxifornia resident, I've watched her and her career path over the years. What Syd said could have been stated in a more PC manner, but why bother when the facts are essentially correct?

HAHAHA so much identity politics lololol

Yeah, w**res have sex for money. So yeah. She's a repugnant w**re.

I'm curious. When all the libs were calling Melania a gold digging w**re, did you defend her as the first naturalized immigrant to be 1st lady?

Ladies and gents, identity politics. Nothing matters besides race and gender. You should take a seat, because brains matter more than this.

Sick fake news.

Oh, really? Stupid libtard. She was only picked because she's 'black'. This was stated before the pick, but deny and lie, that's all you retards do.

Nice job lying that I denied that.

Then where's the fake news? She also was sleeping with married Willie Brown, who promoted her.

Your w**re spin.

And Brown was separated.

But you do not deny what this meme is saying right? I think the conversation is getting away from it.

Harris did say she believed the women Joe had touched inappropriately.

okay, and do you not think is hypocritical for her to completely drop that stance and join him as VP? I mean, I know people can be bought with money, but can people also be blinded by other motives?

She's never indicated whether her stance has changed. Certainly questionable.

My question to you was, and I am going to repeat it in case it was not clear the first time: "do you not think is hypocritical for her to completely drop that stance and join him as VP? " it is a simple yes and no answer.

Good One - 20f68v.jpg (click to show) Upvoted!

What happened August 2020? The Tara Reade allegations came out before that

But anyway, it’s possible for a #BelieveAllWomen person to believe someone who’s been accused 24+ times, and bragged on tape about doing the very thing he was accused of, is worse than someone who’s been accused once.

In fact, it’s a necessary consequence of that belief!

And those were the two choices we had in November. So, no hypocrisy detected.

If you want to make hay out of this issue, you’ll have to nominate someone pristine like Mitt Romney in ‘24, assuming Biden even runs again.

However, a little birdie told me last week the GOP isn’t moving on from Trump in the slightest.

So, have fun owning those r a p e s

Since he didn't brag on tape about doing anything without the woman's permission, your entire argument falls apart. Trump hasn't been found guilty yet. More fake news from the paid left.

"Grab 'em by the pussy"