Imgflip Logo Icon

More than half the country thinks there was fraud

More than half the country thinks there was fraud | WHY WON'T PEOPLE ACCEPT THAT BIDEN WON? BECAUSE HE CHEATED | image tagged in tumblr angel,ConservativeMemes | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
6,344 views 140 upvotes Made by Perspicacity 4 years ago in politics
Tumblr Angel memeCaption this Meme
289 Comments
12 ups, 4y,
4 replies
Joe Biden 2020 | C'MON MAN I DID PUBLICALLY ADMIT THAT WE ORGANIZED THE LARGEST VOTER FRAUD IN HISTORY | image tagged in joe biden 2020 | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
4 ups, 4y,
3 replies
really? if you show me then perhaps i might think about it. do you have a link to anything?
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Firestar9990, here's a video link:
https://youtu.be/MA8a2g6tTp0

This video has purposely been filtered online and even on YouTube, because out of the blue, off the topic, Joe accidentally blurts out that they have planned voter fraud.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
well if you blindly look closely he was actually talking about PREVENTING voter fraud in the news after an interview in news.
1 up, 4y
but he wasn't. The context of the interview was Biden listing his platform talking points, then he paused and said the part about creating the largest voter fraud organization. Certainly, he didn't mean to say this, at least not for the public.

But if Biden did mean to say that he's organized the largest "voter fraud prevention" organization, that's definitely not true, because he doesn't have any voter fraud prevention organization, much less the largest one. The fact that this video clip has been blocked by social media and not covered by MSM doesn't help the argument. I would totally accept if the excuse from Biden's campaign was "he misspoke. He meant to say voter fraud prevention". But then again, where is the largest voter fraud prevention organization then?
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Yes, he really said it. If you weren't deliberately blinding yourself, you'd probably know about this already.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRZEs9BRGK4
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
I recently discovered that online media, social media, search results, etc. is heavily filtered based on the user's region and online profile, so it's very likely that liberals have never seen this video, because social media purposely filters it out.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
At some level, yes. At some level, they don't know because they don't *want* to know. They don't want to hear anything that challenges their preconceptions.
2 ups, 4y
2 ups, 4y
Haha he posted a link, go look
5 ups, 4y
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Your screen name speaks volumes to your meme.
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Perspicacity has "earned" his screen name by consistently supporting conservative thoughts and actions and it suits him very well. You might learn something if you followed him instead of Biden.

Now, in YOUR choice of screen name, I am not getting a clear idea of where you were going with that; cerebroma refers to a mass or tumor of the brain and phage a parasitic virus? I am thinking somehow it relates to your terminal TDS affliction...am I right?
2 ups, 4y
no need for a random hissy fit
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Try to keep up, I was replying to ToneDef's comment.

God, your comment was an embarrassing knee-jerk reaction.
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Free country and it should remain that way if we can keep you freedom-hating leftists from gaining traction. Perspicacity's meme was 'true' so I was just commenting on your comment about him as it was 'not true'.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
"Free country and it should remain that way if we can keep you freedom-hating leftists from gaining traction."
>> Dude, strawman arguments, really? You're better than that. I never said this was not a free country. Nor did I suggest that it shouldn't be; you're putting words in my mouth then coupling it with an attack on one's character without basis for solid conclusion beyond what few exchanges we've had in the past.
Man, the gymnastics you guys do to save face from looking like idiots. This winter you guys have really been pulling out all the stops.
My comment had nothing to do with Perspicacity's meme. Get that through your head. I was talking to ToneDef. Lol. In this thread I never commented on Perspicacity. You're making arguments out of nothing.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
vBackman, yeah c'mon man. Cerebrophage was just making an attack on one's character without basis for solid conclusion beyond what few exchanges we've had in the past.
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
? No I wasn't. I was speaking that your meme speaks volumes to your screen name. I'm sorry if that offended you or hit too close to the mark. I didn't think that you would take it personally. I thought you were posting in irony. Does your screen name represent your character? I was poking fun at your screen name at your meme. Not you personally. You might be a bit sensitive for this place, my man.

You know, being that your name is ToneDef, and you're cherrypicking something someone said without taking it into context. Suggesting that you're def that you only really heard one thing.

But if you're actually deaf/have issues with grasping multiple concepts at the same time, I apologize. In which case, my writing this post is a futile effort as you wouldn't understand it. But, that isn't the case because you've been able to follow along and try to use my words against me by using your conjecture about my initial comment to justify what vBackman is trying to say, by feigning your defense for me by pointing out your incapacity to understand my comment. You just took it personally.

I thought only snowflakes had feelings.

So, you had a knee jerk reaction. It's okay, they happen to everyone.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
You say he’s got dementia but can pull off the larger voter fraud in history?

Maybe your guy just sucks THAT BAD. So bad, sleepy dementia Joe beat him because people hate Trump THAT MUCH.
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You say he’s got dementia but can still be a good president?

And saying “maybe” isn’t a real scenario.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
No, I’m repeating what Trump Cult members say. “Maybe” offers a possibility. It certainly CAN be true.
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Becoming president is easier than being president.
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Clearly we saw that 2016. The GOP needs to step away from the cult koolaid

2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
No, we see that with every presidency.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Regardless- Still have to step away from the cult koolaid. Even the most tried and true republicans are saying trump is treading in bad areas. The phone call to Georgia sec of state being the latest dance with constitutional crisis....
3 ups, 4y,
2 replies
You’re speaking as if I’m a radical Trump supporter. I’m not.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
The 2020 election is over,” said a statement Sunday from a bipartisan group of 10 senators, including Republicans Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana and Mitt Romney of Utah.

The senators wrote that further attempts to cast doubt on the election are “contrary to the clearly expressed will of the American people and only serve to undermine Americans’ confidence in the already determined election results.”

Republican Gov. Larry Hogan of Maryland said, “The scheme by members of Congress to reject the certification of the presidential election makes a mockery of our system and who we are as Americans.”

Former House Speaker Paul Ryan, a Republican, said in a statement that “Biden’s victory is entirely legitimate” and that efforts to sow doubt about the election “strike at the foundation of our republic.”

Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, the third-ranking House Republican, warned in a memo to colleagues that objections to the Electoral College results “set an exceptionally dangerous precedent.”

One of the more outspoken conservatives in Congress, Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton, said he will not oppose the counting of certified electoral votes on Jan. 6. “I’m grateful for what the president accomplished over the past four years, which is why I campaigned vigorously for his reelection. But objecting to certified electoral votes won’t give him a second term—it will only embolden those Democrats who want to erode further our system of constitutional government.”

Cotton said he favors further investigation of any election problems, separate from the counting of the certified Electoral College results.

(From an AP story I saw online)
2 ups, 4y
The election was rigged. Democraps planned it from the beginning. Change voter process and laws to create opportunity for fraud. Biden is an illegitimate nominee and president. Hahahahaha NOT MY PRESIDENT! Bwahahhaha
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
I never said YOU personally.

Paranoid much?
2 ups, 4y
Don’t know how you got the word “paranoid” out of my reaction, but okay. Whatever you think the word means.

You say the most tried republicans are turning against Trump, but fail to not only mention examples, but also fail to realize that happens with most every president (yes, it’s even happened to Obama).
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Wait until 2024 if Trump runs again. It’ll be a Democrat landslide win.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
1 up, 4y
We can hope
1 up, 4y
*largest
10 ups, 4y,
1 reply
6 ups, 4y,
5 replies
https://hereistheevidence.com/
8 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Seriously, thank you. I will be reading this.
7 ups, 4y
My political alignment has no bearing in this matter whether I agree with you or not.
[deleted]
7 ups, 4y,
3 replies
1 up, 4y
3 ups, 4y
“ There are two kinds of people in the world, the conscious dogmatists and the unconscious dogmatists. I have always found myself that the unconscious dogmatists were by far the most dogmatic.” - G.K. Chesterton

I doubt you even understand what he’s saying there.
3 ups, 4y,
3 replies
I’ve changed my mind on several issues over the past few years. Just because I don’t happen to agree with you doesn’t mean I’m close-minded.

Why did vote-counting stop in several precincts in 3 battleground states only to resume hours later with wildly different results? You want me to believe you can actually think? Fine. Honestly address a simple, relevant question.
[deleted]
5 ups, 4y,
1 reply
1 up, 4y
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Didn't happen. Nice fiction.
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
So in Georgia, a woman didn't tell the poll-watchers to go home because they were done counting, then pull out three boxes from under a table and start counting those once they were gone?
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
No, that did not happen.
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Funny thing, because it's on video. I guess I'm supposed to believe you instead of video evidence.
4 ups, 4y
No it isn't.
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/12/fact-check-video-from-ga-does-not-show-suitcases-filled-with-ballots-pulled-from-under-a-table-after-poll-workers-dismissed.html
2 ups, 4y
Where is this video? You saying “it’s on video” doesn’t make it true any more than an affidavit being evidence because someone signed it under threat of jail time. People say things (lie) to get what they want with threat of jail time all the time. See: Stone, Manafort, Cohen et al for details. Until they get/got caught with actual evidence they are innocent.
1 up, 4y
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Because counting the ballots submitted in person was over then the counting of mail in ballots began.

You people are obtuse as shit.
1 up, 4y,
3 replies
Why did the counting have to stop between those? Why were observers sent home in some places and excluded in others? If that's normal procedure, why did it not happen everywhere? You're not answering any questions.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
More importantly why have I never seen that in any previous election and I have seen a few.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
More mail in ballots this year than ever because of covid.
0 ups, 4y
You Mean because of fraud
2 ups, 4y
And it did happen where it was the ruling. It happened in every state that had the same “start to count mail in ballots at midnight on Election Day or after the polls close.”

The counting takes time as it’s a more manual process.

It’s basic logic as well as factual information if you just stop believing your cult leader and accept the truth.
1 up, 4y
Because the GOP wanted it that way. The dems wanted to count the mail in ballots as they were received.
8 ups, 4y,
2 replies
You keep posting this. It is 100% fake news published by radical right-wing conspiracy theorist. It doesn't show any proof at all. Grow up.
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
3 replies
9 ups, 4y
2 ups, 4y
Ur moms hangnail is a known slanderer and general name caller. He can’t make his point so he resorts to the age old slander and racist, fascist exclamations from any leftie losing a debate.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Let's just talk about the two audio tapes that were released of Trump: a) talking about how the coronavirus was five times worse than the flu and b) trying to pressure a government official to "find"him 10,000 votes.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
A) No matter what Trump did there, creeps like you would have attacked him. Makes a big deal? “Oh no! He’s causing a panic! He’s a doomsayer.” Tries to keep people calm? “He’s lying about how serious it is.”

I don’t care. You creeps have made it quite clear there is nothing he could do to please you.

B) We only heard a very tiny section, carefully chosen to make him look as bad as possible, of an hour long conversation. But sure, pretend you know everything.
0 ups, 4y
He could resign. Still could.

Also, the entire conversation is online in regards to Georgia's AG.
4 ups, 4y
On the surface there does appear to be a lot of click-baity titles...

But when you read the actual article, which is a brief summery sometimes, it actually explains the reasoning behind it.

Such as:

THE CEO of PFIZER WON'T TAKE HIS OWN VACCINE!!!!!

...is the headline... but the article says:

HE WILL actually be taking the vaccine when it's his turn.

This is just one example, of course. Still fascinating reads.

Know your enemy.
1 up, 4y
At least some of it has been debunked.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Lol “crowdsourcing” from one crowd isn’t very unbiased. This is akin to the election polls in 2016. Ask enough old people with land lines a question you start to see trends.

I looked around and saw nothing that amounts to evidence. One Twitter post had a screenshot of addresses purported to be postal addresses “disguised” as apartments etc. many people use post boxes as their addresses for deliveries etc.

Pretending something is proof, swearing it is proof, signing an affidavit that says you saw it and it’s absolutely proof....doesn’t make it proof.

You can believe what you saw was Bigfoot. Or an alien abduction. Or a ghost. Or the Loch Ness monster....and you can swear by your story, and sign an affidavit telling your sworn truth proof as evidence.

Doesn’t make it true.

Sorry. Really I swear I am sorry for you.

(See? I can TYPE OUT “sorry” but it doesn’t mean it’s true.)
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
Wait, are you saying there's no "proof" or no "evidence"? Because all I've heard from jackwagons like you for months now is there's no evidence. But now you're saying no "proof". The two terms are not identical. Because all of that is evidence, even if it's not ironclad proof.
3 ups, 4y
That IS YOUR “EVIDENCE” MORON.

Your “evidence” is people swearing something is true (aka proof.)

For f u c k sake you people are f ucking reeeeetarded.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
There is evidence and credible evidence. In court, the latter is simply called evidence. It's like illegal votes and legal votes. Only the latter are counted and specified simply as votes. It's the former that requires the clarification.
1 up, 4y,
3 replies
And yet, in a court of law, a sworn affidavit is a form of evidence. It may not be *sufficient* evidence for this claim or that, but it is *evidence*. So saying there is zero evidence, as NPCs like you have been programmed to repeat, is simply false.

And you can look on CNN or MSNBC or at all the NPCs here on imgflip, and you will see over and over and over again them saying "no evidence, no evidence."

You're all morons.
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
A crayon drawing of a ufo is evidence too then. Doesn’t mean the FBI will investigate because you show them the drawing and a sworn affidavit saying you saw ufos.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
0 ups, 4y
Well done!
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Whether or not they've sworn to it is irrelevant to it's sufficiency.

For example, a person claiming to see a someone taking money out of a bank isn't evidence of a bank robbery. The person may even be telling the truth to what they saw but rather they lack the understanding of what they saw. Such as the someone in question being a bank teller. Now, can a bank teller rob a bank? Absolutely. Is someone witnessing said teller withdrawing evidence of that? No.

I would keep the name-calling to a minimum if your intention is to sway more people to your side. People rarely agree with someone if they have a nasty habit of calling you a moron or a non-person.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Are you a complete imbecile? Apparently so. I didn't say one word as to it's SUFFICIENCY. In fact, I specifically said, "It may not be *sufficient* evidence." My point was that it is, in fact, evidence, which vile lying filth like you keep saying there is none of. Now maybe it's not enough, but it absolutely exists. There IS evidence. And your complete failure to grasp this very simple point confirms my assessment of your (un)intelligence.
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
Do you think your insults improve your argument?

I believe my point has been made and until you have something more meaningful to contribute, I’d say our conversation is at an end.

Biden will be President.

Please, find a more constructive way to get over it.
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
No, but they amuse me. And they help express my complete and utter contempt for scum who are intent on destroying me and everything I love while wrenching their shoulders out of their sockets to pat themselves on the back.

And if your point is that you are far too stupid to understand what I've been saying, yes, you've made that point. I agree.
1 up, 4y
I assure you, your insults do more disservice to yourself. They reveal you’re far too emotional to make an objective observation or relay an informed opinion.

I doubt anyone is trying to destroying you but I think you’re being very self-destructive. Once you’ve relinquished this grim fantasy, perhaps your life may show some improvement.

I sincerely hope it does. It has been a pleasure chatting with you despite your less than optimistic attitude.
1 up, 4y
0 ups, 4y
Trumpers are seriously losing their sh*t. XD
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y
Oh, thanks for putting up what 51 judges already threw out. Now I can categorically laugh at all of it. And you.
Show More Comments
Tumblr Angel memeCaption this Meme
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • Chelsea Cat logo
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    WHY WON'T PEOPLE ACCEPT THAT BIDEN WON? BECAUSE HE CHEATED