Impeach Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler for Abuse of Power!

[image deleted]

So your assertion is that you cannot abuse power by working within the "confines of the constitution"?

Ahhh, okay, in that case, let me see if I have this figured out:

Drawing up articles of impeachment *after* a sham witch hunt / kangaroo court process in which no actual offense, impeachable or otherwise, was identified by the various "witnesses" who didn't actually witness anything, AND the vote followed party lines, even though Pelosi had promised bi-partisan support for any impeachment effort... which means the only reason the impeachment moved forward in the House is because of a severe case of 'TDS-fueled orange-man-bad'... is NOT abuse of power.

But to ask the leader of a foreign country with which we have a senate ratified treaty to mutually assist each other in rooting out corruption, to investigate a US vice president who has admitted to extorting the previous leader of said country by threatening to withhold $1 billion in aid if they didn't fire a prosecutor looking into an energy company which had placed his son on its board in spite of the fact that the son has no qualifications to be on the board other than his last name... is somehow NOT abuse of power?

Okay, I think I have it straight now. Thanks.

Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters, ratified by the U.S. Senate on Oct. 18, 2000.
https://www.congress.gov/treaty-document/106th-congress/16/document-text?overview=closed
https://www.congress.gov/106/cdoc/tdoc16/CDOC-106tdoc16.pdf

Mutual Legal Assistance. Laughable.

Explain to me- in detail- exactly what crimes any of the Biden's have been accused of?

Before you go "oh, um, how about Burisma?!" Go check your time line. Was Hunter involved with the company when the alleged crimes were committed?

Also. While you're explaining things in detail I need to know exactly why Rudy was heading up the "investgation" in the Ukraine and not trained FBI agents?

Also. Why is the personal lawyer of Donald Trump involved in the issue? Remember, Trump told the Ukrainian president to call Rudy.

Obama, Biden, Hillary and Nuland didn't interfere in Ukraine's election, they overthrew its democratically elected President and its entire go***mn government in a bloody coup with the aid of neo-Nazis and installed their own puppet regime. Two months later Hunter was getting payoffs from Burisma.

Aww how cute, imply emotionality to avoid dealing with the facts. You can't see the weighty matters that sink to the bottom of the sea and are not easily accessible, but only rave about the little turds that float to the surface. Last month you were screaming "transcript!" this month it is "timeline!". Sad.

So, fun story, Biden's account doesn't line up with reality.

You should go research the time line of events and who else called for a corrupt prosecutor to be removed from office.

Because when a bunch of nations call on another country to remove someone from office, it's not extortion.

As I recall, that was your defense of Trump's 10 counts of obstruction of justice. Since there wasn't a crime it's okay that he interfered with the investigation.

Yes, interfering with an investigation is itself a crime. That's why we have the phrase "the cover up is worse than the crime." It is literally referring to the punishment for obstruction of an investigation is harsher than what they would have faced for the crime.

That you have made it to adulthood and can't understand that is shocking.

And Biden didn't intefer with shit. His son wasn't employed by Burisma when their alleged crime was committed. His son wasn't under investigation at any time.

Once again we see your willful ignorance on full display.

The prosecutor was fired for not pursuing corrupt politicians in his country and there were many other countries that wanted him out as well. It had nothing to do with Burisma, as that investigation already stalled at the time.

Trump's aides have been dodging subpoenas (which is itself another abuse of power), and Pelosi didn't promise bipartisan support, but stated that bipartisan support was necessary for an impeachment effort. Also, the whole thing about Biden withholding aid from Ukraine being connected at all to his son was never proven. https://www.factcheck.org/2019/09/trump-twists-facts-on-biden-and-ukraine/

There's no understanding that which is not.

If it fails in the Senate, it'll be because the Republicans are the ones being purely political.

HAHAHAHAAAAAHHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!

Like the Democrats in the House purely political.

Yes because there hasn't been a single democrat that's stood out from the party line put down by Pelosi. Your statement is beyond laughable.

But, the Senate is not using any political power to overthrow a sitting President! They are using their power to stop Treason!

Yes!
Treason
the crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.

Pelosi and the rest of the democrats are trying to overthrow a duly elected president, and have been since he was elected. It’s sickening.

They would, if they vote to convict.

not everyday when IMGflip is yelling "IMPEACH" "IMPEACH" "IMPEACH"