Most Trump supporters don’t run around in public wearing MAGA hats, but they will enthusiastically vote for him in 2020

still a lot

You wish.

I suppose you have some kind of evid nice that most election cheating is done by republicans and their followers?

Yes, the facts. Every time you hear about someone voting twice, they're GOP. And voter suppression, keeping qualified voters away from the polls, is official Republican policy.

I’ve never heard of GOP voters voting twice, but I’ve heard of plenty of Dem voter fraud.
I’ll say it again, if GOP voters really are voting twice, why are Dems so against voter ID?
If voter ID requirements are suppression, how did those people register to vote in the first place?
None of your arguments make any sense.

Oh honey... Please show us all the evidence of "Dem voter fraud", lets have a look sir.... You ask for us to provide evidence, but can't back up your own statements, great way to lose an argument ;)

Funny how you ask for evidence without providing any to support your own claims. Typical Democrat, just expecting people to kindly believe their rants while demanding proof to support any counter points.

As for proof of election cheating by Democrats, did you forget about the whole rigged DNC primaries already?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-chair-goes-at-the-clintons-alleging-hillarys-campaign-hijacked-dnc-during-primary-with-bernie-sanders/

So FreeTheTankMeemes is another one of your alt accounts, I see.

Your continued deflection is duly noted.

Keep up the good work, your continued stupidity is splendid.

Aww cute xD you think I`m fake, great way to lose your argument ;)

My claim is based on the number of voter fraud incidents found in the 2018 elections. The sheer number of votes from one example in NC skews the statistics so far seeing as voter fraud has generally been nonexistent and the number of fraudulent votes per vote is below 0.0025. Due to this large amount of fraudulent votes that happened in NC, I would argue that it is totally rational to say most fraudulent votes in the 2018 elections were done by republicans, thus most election cheating was done by reoublicans ;)

Furthermore the number from this sad example skews the statistics even when counting elections back for a long time. Thus one could argue most election cheating in the last decades has been done by Republicans.

Here is the one hilariously sad example,
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2018/12/05/we-finally-found-voter-fraud/?utm_term=.c79e6dd8e9c8

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/12/republicans-finally-have-a-voter-fraud-scandal-and-none-of-them-want-to-talk-about-it/

We're not against taking measures to prevent it, we are against using measures that deliberately make it harder for certain groups to vote. Making the measures more like voter supression, which has been talked about by several republicans.

https://www.thenation.com/article/republicans-boast-about-voter-suppression-tampa-ground-shifting/

http://time.com/5455179/georgia-brian-kemp-voter-suppression-recount-republicans-trump/

https://www.thedailybeast.com/north-carolina-gop-brags-racist-voter-suppression-is-workingand-theyre-right

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/17/us/some-republicans-acknowledge-leveraging-voter-id-laws-for-political-gain.html

So you deduce that most voter fraud is done by Republicans because fraudulent votes were found in NC? OK then, I guess that means Democrats have the most votes by dead people since so many mail-in ballots were sent out to dead people in CA.

Like I said, how is requiring Photo IDs at polling places voter suppression? They claim it’s hard for poor people to get IDs but they fail to explain how these same people managed to get an ID in order to register to vote in the first place. The whole voter suppression argument is nonsense.

I`d love to see your evidence ;) but you still wont provide any xD Live on little troll, live on =)

I would go so far as to claim that most voter fraud in the last few decades, in term of total amount of fraudulent votes or votes interfered with is Republican, based on the fact that the total number of votes changed in just one single NC example breaks most statistics, due to sheer number of cases there. Please attempt bring forth any evidence to the contrary =) I doub`t you can ;)

Voter suppression is being boasted about by certain Republican politicians so yes. When you make getting voter Id`s hard etc, but since you can`t be bothered to reserarch this yourself and I don`t have time to explain it now, I bid you good day!

Well done, my good sir.

<<<<<< Stealth Maga >>>>>>>>

I'd like to point out that the name of this account is God_Emperor_Trump. Implying that this person believes that Trump is God, and an emperor. Hmm.

Thats why I always Heil Trump in his memes

It's a Dune reference.

It implies a lot more than that.

It means he thinks the majority is full of faithless idiots who can only be jealous of the power that Trump holds. That Trump does all these weird and evil things for the greater good and that, in the end, he'll be right.

Which is, of course, all bullshit.

Check out the OP's profile, doubtful Dune means anything more than a pesky mound of sand on the beach to walk around.

SukaMadik was the first to use it, at least on imgflip, some months before the OP signed up, under that name, anyway.

Alright. Muchos.

haha, alright.

Trump 2020 is a done dealio. I feel bad for the those who will be once again Crushed. I Plan to see loads of SJW memes after.

The only reason he didn't win the popular vote is because he knew it means nothing so he strategically campaigned to win the electoral college. It doesn't matter how many pieces you take in chess if you don't take the king.

By all accounts - including his ill prepared and reluctant to relocate wife - Trump never expected, intended, nor hoped to win.

I've heard that too, and I totally believe that Melania didn't want this, even without knowing how much vitriol she and Trump would receive. Do you think it was mostly an attempt to strengthen his brand? I always thought when Seth Meyers made that crack at the White House correspondents dinner was the moment he got 100% commited to it. Partly just to rub his face in it.

They've said that with all his runs, that it was to spark interest in his show, but that always seemed a tad flimsy to me, all that traveling and yammering, just for a TV show? Plus isn't the Presidency a far bigger show, so why not opt for that if possible?

Although they say he enjoys campaining, as he has been doing since early 2017, so who knows.

Oh, I owe you a reply about Moslems and the slave trade last week, have to find the comment. Turns out I was wrong since they used them round their part of the world, not in it to sell them off here.

Wish we were able to sort through notifications to find unanswered ones easier.
I'm bad enough as is, but distracted by even more since last month, and a lot are getting buried.

Then why would he have had to collude with Russia to win... If he never intended to win?

"VagabondSouffle 2 ups, 2d, 2 replies

By all accounts - including his ill prepared and reluctant to relocate wife - Trump never expected, intended, nor hoped to win."

Is this my comment you're replying to? Or did I miss something which I never said anyways?

How did you relate out of that, this:

"Tijuana_Slim0 ups, <1h

Then why would he have had to collude with Russia to win... If he never intended to win?"

At least you didn't pull a Hitler rabbit out of that hat and accuse me of saying that.

The General Media Narrative for two years now is that Trump used Russia to cheat to win... You're Saying He "never Expected, Intended nor Hoped to win"

If he "never Expected, Intended, nor Hoped to win"... why would he cheat to do so...

so by saying this, You are either
A. admitting the Media is full of shit and Mueller investigation was a waste of Time..
B. being contrarian and stirring the shit for sake of stirring the shit (ie a Troll)

AKA: I know what I said, and so do you.

I even c/p'd it in case there is something truly genuinely undeniably beyond mentally incapacitated with the cretinous glob of spit that has wended its way into where your brain should have been.

I understand you got rubles to earn, Vlady, but next time try not to be so overtly totally moronic. Stupidity isn't cute.

Idiot.

For real, where the heck and how did you come up with something so f**king stupid?

I'm sure they do but Clinton neglected, if I remember correct, Wisconsin, and a few others and focused more on 'the popular vote' which put her at a disadvantage. If the electoral college was abolished, politicians would focus heavily on NY, CA and a few others and ignore most of the states.

I think sometimes people forget it's the 'united' states. One can argue how many electoral votes each state can have but everyone should have some voice, imo.

Why would he do that? Winning the electoral college votes is how you become president.

But it still doesn’t get you elected.
And those who think changing to a popular vote system would mean more Democrat presidents, are sorely mistaken. Republicans would change their campaign tactics to go for the popular vote and win just as many elections.

It’s a moot point anyway since changing the system would require amending the constitution. That will never happen since the less-populated states will never vote in favor of it.

I don’t support it because it would mean the densely populated cities would end up choosing he president leaving the less populated areas with little or no say.

I'd rather densely populated cities choose our President than empty wide landscapes.

let's see if the democrats ignore the electoral college again this time

Those 3M extra votes were in California. Do you want that shithole to determine how the rest of the country is run? Why do you think the founding fathers set up elections this way? To level the playing field. I thought Democrats would be all about that. Guess not.