That's because they're not truly refugees, only using that as a cover to be granted asylum in host countries.
They're seeking better living, not because they're poor, but because they already have the thousands of dollars it takes to go where they're going.
Once it sets in that things aren't as cushy as they hoped in an alien land where they are lonely and burdened by the thought that their family is in danger back home, they are more prone to radicalism to compensate.
Also, notice how the terrorists are single? Or if married, the wife isn't with them? Sexual frustration is a real driver,,,
Love the the stuff you put out Mooseman and I'm all for the travel suspension, but this is the kind of oversimplification of a complex problem put into a meme that the leftists like to use to vomit all over facebook, except coming from the right. Maybe I'm just being oversensitive, or maybe it's just our time to strike back.
We should arm them with captured weapons and send them to fight for their own country and learn what Freedom is really all about !
I'm over 60 , but if The USA was invaded I will be fighting alongside every other patriot and Soldier to Keep My homeland Free. If I don't get my morning coffee the enemy will be in deeep doo doo !
Lol That's how I.S. got their weapons. THAT hasn't worked out so well.;) We should arm them? Them being??? > We've armed all sorts of AQ offshoots, & inadvertently, & (in some cases deliberately) Islamic State. By arming the people you're talking about, you'd be arming those that our allies are attacking.I.e. the allies of Syria,Russia, & Iran. I agree, whose side we SHOULD be on,if any, but we're not. Our allies are the ones imposing (their version) of Sharia, & terrorizing the populace. Totally F'd up mess , no wonder so confusing.;)