Imgflip Logo Icon

Which side are you on?

1,663 views 51 upvotes Made by thenukeman123 2 days ago in politics
Make your own GIF
74 Comments
14 ups, 2d,
1 reply
The side that doesn't burn entire cities down for a drug addict who OD'd.
11 ups, 1d,
4 replies
No, Floyd died from OD-ing. The cop who arrested him (and was burnt at the stake due to mob mentality, not justice) used a regular method of subduing suspects, and the addict already started saying he couldn't breathe BEFORE the arrest. Hell, one of the autopsies (specifically the one that WASN'T paid for by Floyd's family) clearly showed he OD'd. The fact that the left tries turning criminals like him, Luigi, and Killmar into martyrs is hilarious, albeit in a disturbing manner.
8 ups, 1d,
1 reply
Correct... the original coroner's report said that.... They had to change it to rile up their cult.
5 ups, 19h,
2 replies
I have a question. Do you support rigged trials and suppressed evidence?
[deleted]
0 ups, 13h,
1 reply
1 up, 13h,
1 reply
Yes. The election was rigged and evidence erased.
1 up, 10h
0 ups, 5h
No, he did not.
4 ups, 1d,
1 reply
So if somebody says they can't breathe you think it's a good idea to keep your knee on their neck even after paramedics tell you to stop?
5 ups, 17h
You think it's a good idea to burn cities down for six months straight for a criminal?
4 ups, 1d,
1 reply
Oh you are one of those....ok....
7 ups, 1d
What, someone who doesn't want to turn criminals and murderers into martyrs?
10 ups, 2d,
1 reply
I am the Lord your God, you shall have no other gods before me.
You shall not make for yourself any graven image.
Thou shall not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain. Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.
Honor thy father and they mother.
Thou shall not commit murder.
Thou shalt not steal.
Thou shalt not commit adultery.
Do not lie.
Do not covet.

Only one "man" in history was ever able to perfectly follow these mandates.
Jesus the Christ. The Son of God that shed His perfect blood and gave up His life to at the debt we all owe for our sins. Those that follow Him, "Christians', put our trust in Him and the work He did on that cross.
The first picture shows the Christian mentality, even by some that may not be Christian.
The second?
Stealing is fine if you are upset?
Wanting to steal what someone else has is fine so long as fairness or equity is at stake?
Killing is celebrated when feelings are involved.
Destroying things that don't belong to you is justifiable for any reason.
8 ups, 1d,
1 reply
Many "liberals" hate it when people use their freedoms in ways they don't like and are driven by hate and violence while saying they're the party of compassion. Case in point, all the leftards cheering for Kirk's death.
3 ups, 17h
Many LIBERALS hate it when people use their freedoms in ways they don't like and are driven by hate and violence while saying they're the party of compassion. Case in point, the many many MANY times they scream the word Nazi when people even slightly disagree with them, including people in the media. Or the various times they see someone's right for free speech as "hate speech", which they use to justify to themselves to try and hurt "those bigots".

I've always said it's a matter of when some crazy lunatic took your side's hate filled words to heart and did something like the Kirk Killer. Not if, WHEN.
1 up, 1d
Right.
5 ups, 12h,
1 reply
Laughable!! Libs come here to complain and don't even allow truth in their stream. A lib with a trans boyfriend shoots Charlie Kirk and some laughingly come here to defend him, instead of condemning him for killing a person exercising his 1st amendment rights!
5 ups, 15h,
1 reply
I mean I don’t know anything about George Floyd but burning city’s down it not justifying enough, especially if it’s your own city
0 ups, 10h
George Floyd was an addict who got killed (while unarmed) by a police officer who knelt on his neck for something like 9 minutes? I forget. The cop was found guilty in a court of law.

The OP and many right wingers here would probably tell you he died because he was on drugs but the autopsy report said different. And it sure seems like quite a f*cking coincidence that someone who had already been an addict for years (if not decades) would just so happen to "overdose" with a cop's knee on his neck. I wouldn't say he was a hero, but similar to Kirk, he should not have been killed like that.

I would also point out that there is a difference between yet another unarmed black man being essentially killed by the government... and yet another man being killed by some random nut with a gun.

That being said there were many, many peaceful protests and peaceful candlelight vigils following Floyd's death.... but the explicit goal of the OP meme here is to divide us. So they obviously don't want to bring up any peaceful responses to Floyd's death. They just want to point at the riots because virtually nobody is in favor of riots.

The OP is also failing to point out that tons of people are now openly calling for a civil war in response to Kirk's death. And the president himself ranting about the radical left in the wake of this isn't helping anything either. So it doesn't seem super crazy to think someone else might end up getting attacked or killed in response to Kirk.... Hopefully not but let's just say I'm not optimistic.
7 ups, 2d
Get comparison
4 ups, 1d,
1 reply
Well Charlie Kirk was white, so that is a reason
2 ups, 10h
Source LOL Charlie Kirk suspect Tyler Robinson not cooperating with cops, Utah gov says — as he confirms alleged shooter’s relationship with trans roommate. https://www.msn.com/en-us/crime/general/charlie-kirk-suspect-tyler-robinson-not-cooperating-with-cops-utah-gov-says-as-he-confirms-alleged-shooter-s-relationship-with-trans-roommate/ar-AA1MwjGG?ocid=BingNewsSerp
0 ups, 3h
okay but like. seriously. who was this guy??? like literally theonly charlies ive heard of are charlie brown and the guy from smiling friends.
like, im sorry he died, he didnt deserve that. but who was he???
1 up, 10h,
1 reply
1 up, 8h
0 ups, 8h
https://beachgrit.com/2025/09/white-men-fight-back-protests-erupt-in-huntington-beach-in-wake-of-charlie-kirk-murder/

Response to Charlie Kirk:
4 ups, 1d,
3 replies
Aw, look at you, all noble and sad.

How many memes did you make about Nancy Pelosi's husband being attacked? How many did you upvote?

Where was this when the MN Speaker of the House was murdered in her sleep?

How about during any of the school shootings? Any of the mass shootings?

You don't give a damn about Charlie. His death is only useful to you because you can further your hateful bullshit.

The shooter was from a MAGA family. He shot Charlie because he thought Charlie wasn't conservative enough.

When are y'all gonna take responsibility for who you are? You are violent and you push violent divisive rhetoric.
7 ups, 1d,
3 replies
"The shooter was from a MAGA family. He shot Charlie because he thought Charlie wasn't conservative enough."

You are wrong.
6 ups, 1d
Willfully wrong, geez! Talk about false narratives.
3 ups, 15h
I mean don’t the Bible say God created man and women. It did not say he created the other stuff
6 ups, 1d
You need that to be true so bad, don’t you.
4 ups, 1d
Yes.. all of the conservative Republicans who are living with their transsexual partners... It's almost a cliche. 🙄😒 Keep repeating your lies and maybe some ignoramus will believe you.

Also, families aren't of a hive mind.

Oh, and the dreaded white male. Because there aren't any white males on the left, correct?

Alright, go ahead. Keep spinning your bs.
7 ups, 1d,
3 replies
😂 he was living with his transgender girl/boyfriend and put antifa slogans on his bullets, but according to you he was a conservative who thought Charlie wasn’t conservative enough? Are you?… Nevermind, yes you are.
7 ups, 1d,
1 reply
7 ups, 1d,
1 reply
The left very publicly declared they could no longer “agree to disagree” and “by any means necessary”. I believe what they say. They don’t look for debate as exemplified by killing somone whose whole purpose was debate. It’s not about left leaning it’s about America hating and racism promoted by the left. The Democratic Party is dead in all but name.
5 ups, 1d,
1 reply
There is a difference. We are no longer a United people with differing views. We haven’t been for several years now. This isn’t a civil dispute among fellow countrymen anymore. We are a divided people who are ideologically incompatible. We cannot exist together, one side must win and one must lose.

If you hate America and want to destroy it, you are my enemy. I hope to defeat you and will not surrender. I will no longer accept your slights and insults against my country or race. I will speak against you in every forum possible. I won’t use the lefts mandated words or think how they tell me.

That said I believe you have a right to your beliefs and even to try to argue your point. As Charlie Kirk practiced. The first amendment is first for a reason. I believe in the Voltairian definition of free speech. “I despise what you have to say, but will defend to the death your right to say it”.

There is little hope that we will be put back together as mutually respecting opposite parties. Those who are afraid of civil debate and shedding light on ideas resort to murder and violence. Every time I feel weak or tired I will watch Charlie Kirk being assassinated in all its brutality to remind me what the other side desires for those who simply disagree. Then I will go on and continue battling to defeat the godless ideology of crime and murder celebrators.
0 ups, 15h,
1 reply
That's where you're wrong, we've been existing for more than 200 years and wiping a side on how people think is no better than a totalitarian state seizing power through force---that goes for both sides. You're proving the cycle of hatred. Why would I hate this country? I'm a patriot and I'm aware when it is dealing with hardship and want a good outcome. You may differ with what I say about myself but I'm the only one who truly knows me, not you nor your beliefs.

If we wanted to come together and find common ground, resentment towards one another must die, not each other (I do deeply appreciate you believe in Voltaire's definition of free speech, that's a really good quality of being American, props to you).

We went to war with each other because states threatened to secede from the US so they could continue practicing slavery. You're basically saying you wish to cleanse an entire political ideology people have because it doesn't align with yours and we can't do anything civil about it. What is violence going to do that can restore a country that ran on a two party system? We can't come together because we are afraid, and the two halves of the country have polarized themselves because we are so entrenched in animosity that will never get anything done or prevent another tragedy from happening

It is true, however, that we are losing every inch of hope due to the animosity we inflict upon ourselves. You want to continue battling to defeat a godless ideology of crime and murder celebrators, yet when have I said that Kirk's death was justified? When have I praised his murder? When have I wished that the shooter had targeted the people in the crowd? I never did because I see the tragedy as it should be seen. Those who have said that are the ones affected by what he said the most, yet many who lean left condemn this tragedy and what people say as much I do.

I don't hate the people in your party, but people driven by hatred despise me because of what some others did in my party. I don't call your party violent despite the few people who are neo-Nazis/white supremacists. I don't see you nor the majority of as that, I see you all as Americans concerned for where the country is headed, but here we are disagreeing whether we should get our points across through more violence or a movement that aims to stop the hate-mongering.
1 up, 10h
First let me clarify I was using “you” as a generalized term in my post not directly to yourself.

In order to find common ground we have to have some shared values and definitions. You can’t have common ground with someone who disputes every point and basic definitions. We can’t even agree on what a woman is.

As I said the left has said we can no longer “agree to disagree” what’s left then? Where do we go from there? I am not calling for generalized violence and hope it can be avoided, but I am accepting that it may not be avoidable. People who believe in god are taught to love and pray for their enemies. They are not required to stand by and allow barbarity and savagery around them. They are called to oppose it.

You are not responsible for what others of your party or affiliation has done, but you are also not the most prominent voice of that party. Ultimately only the trigger puller and any who conspired with him is responsible. You can’t call people names and vilify them to the point that they are assassinated and then say, oh gee that’s too bad. You helped kill him you put the gun in the assassins hand as sure as if you handed it to him. If we all kept that in mind we would be better off. Calling people Nazi and Hitler and Fascist is a tactic of the left. Are they hoping a nut job takes action to end the ultimate evil?

Where is the outrage and call to unite rather than divide? You say it, but instead we see justification for Charlie’s murder from the most vocal members of the left.

I appreciate your attempt at a civil conversation without the usual insults and name calling and I have many shared values with classic American liberals. My family were Democrat union members who love America and were and are vehement supporters of free speech. They are no longer Democrats because the party doesn’t share those values anymore as they have repeatedly proven. We will never unite without shared values and we will never get to those shared values if we can’t discuss them without murdering someone for winning open debate. If your ideas can’t suffer the light then they deserve to be relegated to the round file of history.
3 ups, 15h,
1 reply
Did he say he was maga?
1 up, 10h
No, he’s not. He professed hatred of Trump and Charlie Kirk according to his trans boyfriend and others who spoke to the FBI.
7 ups, 1d,
1 reply
It’s being reported as his relationship partner so ya. Keep grasping for your narrative despite all evidence to the contrary.
6 ups, 1d,
1 reply
Your sources won’t report the truth till later. Avoiding it now aren’t they.
3 ups, 15h,
1 reply
Homosexuality is against most conservative traditions and beliefs. Actions speak louder than words.
2 ups, 11h
Ya, but the shooter wasn’t.
2 ups, 11h,
1 reply
He could be but the facts say he’s not a Trump Supporter. You have already been proven wrong once again.
0 ups, 11h,
1 reply
Are you calling his dear grandmother a liar? Because she says the whole family is MAGA, and, in fact, she doesn't know anyone in her family that's a liberal.

Utah is a Red State. With a overwhelming red house & senate. A red governor. Red federal senators & representatives. I haven't gone looking for the city where he grew up, but I bet it's red.

So, in a state with overwhelming Republican support, what are the odds that he's some sweaty liberal radical? Pretty low.

Especially with all those photos of him with guns his mom tried to delete from Facebook.

And I know that you're going to cling to anything thing, regardless of it being real or not, that will let you deny that Tyler is a product of conservative ideology.

Y'all are always calling for civil war, declaring democrats evil and being demonic, and he finally decided to do the thing y'all are always talking about.

Just like the guy in Pennsylvania who tried to kill the governor by burning the house down. And the guys who were going to kidnap the Michigan governor. And the guy who shot near Trump. And the guy hiding on the golf course.

And the borderline people? The slightly crazy ones? They're starting to act on all that violent rhetoric y'all keep spewing.
1 up, 10h
He is in a relationship with a transgender shim, and hates Trump. The hallmarks of a conservative right? That’s just a bad assumption even for someone bad at assumptions it’s another level of wrong.

The left and their global communist supporters are the ones seeking to divide with hate rhetoric. Communists always try to seize power throughout history with civil war.

The guy in Pennsylvania was a leftist who hated Jews. Geez do some research before you parrot your talking points. Too many inaccuracies to even address in that paragraph.

Borderline crazy violent rhetoric has already killed Christian school children and Charlie Kirk so it’s rich that you are complaining about it now. Actions have reactions. Police your own house before casting stones.
1 up, 10h
Keep sniffing
Show More Comments
Make your own GIF
Created from video with the Imgflip Animated GIF Maker