Imgflip Logo Icon

100% 100% 100%

100% 100% 100% | If Democrats in Congress care about affordability, then why did every single one of them vote against eliminating taxes on tips, overtime, and Social Security? Instead, Democrats tried to massively hike taxes on working families
They are affordability frauds. | image tagged in jim halpert pointing to whiteboard,memes,funny,democrats,politics,political meme | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
541 views 31 upvotes Made by Jwolf4218 4 weeks ago in politics
48 Comments
8 ups, 4w
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
6 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Members of Congress won a battle to increase their pay. The war will go on. Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) could be entitled to a $420,000 payout  | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
WDYM ???
Affordability seems pretty important to them
5 ups, 4w,
4 replies
For a party that wants things to be affordable. They're not doing a great job.
6 ups, 4w
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
5 ups, 4w,
1 reply
They look pretty concerned about their affordability to me
5 ups, 4w
Exactly.
5 ups, 4w,
1 reply
As usual you are just making stuff up. But even IF it was just a tax cut for the rich then good. They deserve it after all the crap they get from Democrats.
2 ups, 4w,
2 replies
One Big Beautiful Bill. I guess they didn't cover it for you guys over there on the news. Look it up anyways.

But the rich are Democrats, remember?

Keep your bogus lines straight, it makes for maximizing potential proficiency with propaganda.
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
No Democrats are rich fraudsters not legit rich people who operated companies and corporations.
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
What does that even mean?
You've got a thing for these sound bites of yours,,,
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
For the simple minded: People who run corporations get their money from their investment in the operating of these companies. They get wealth by creating companies that employ people and have them and the company pay into the income tax and Social Security programs.
Democrat politicians on the other hand get a great salary which is taxed but they also skim the tax dollars through fraud via things such as NGOs and USAID as we have seen. No politician should be earning 10-100 times what their salary is. It's impossible to have that kind of growth as most big investors can tell you. I hope this clears this up for you and if not maybe try clearing your head with whatever your daily dose is then trying a reread.
1 up, 4w
Something something corporations are honest earners but Democrats skim on their taxes something something because word-of-the-week buzzwords from the Elon fanfic.

Ironic, as basically everyone I've ever known who was a registered Republican did so solely for the purpose of paying lower taxes.

Goodness, the sparkly neon cartoonish view the overseas LARPer set have of the goings on here in America. All in defense of the biggest tax cheat and grifter to have ever wandered into DC ever, no less.
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
That reply was just not silly enough. You're going to have to work on it to make it sillier.
2 ups, 4w,
2 replies
So they did cover it where you live?
So how come you're so unaware of it?

Is that guy your alt or are you just working in tandem?
3 ups, 4w,
1 reply
What you see is what you get. I only have one account on ImgFlip. I don't work with anyone. Well... I do work with you to try to keep you from going off the deep end with your nonstop barrage of propaganda. And I am failing miserably.

The mainstream media is the same here as it is where you live. It is all controlled by nutjob leftists who refuse to ever let the truth get out. That is why you think you know what is in the Big Beautiful Bill. You only know what they told you to believe.

As for my opinion, the Big Beautiful Bill was neither "big" or "beautiful". It was a huge disappointment. If barely scratched the surface of what I would have hoped the bill was supposed to do.

But when you have complete and absolute mindless obstructionism coming out of the Democrat party and wimpy afraid-of-their-own-shadow Republicans, then this is probably the best Trump could get through congress.

That bill did not even come close to going as far as it needed to. It needed a much, much, much bigger tax cut. It needed to eliminate all taxation for social security recipients.

Because when taxes are cut by the percentage rather than a fixed amount, then the higher percentage the larger the amount of a tax break it is to the rich. That is just how percentages work out. That is the missing part of the story the Democrats never talk about. They never tell you that most of the revenue that the IRS takes in comes from the rich, so they should get the bigger tax cut.

Also why does the left hate the rich so much and at the same time why are there so many rich leftists?
2 ups, 4w
I gave him the breakdown below starting "The burden of federal individual income tax ...". He's too obstinate to read it.
2 ups, 4w
In reality most rich people avoid paying taxes anyway. So the point has no meaning.
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
How was it a tax cut for the rich? I keep hearing that sound bite from leftists but never any details of what that actually looks like. Do you have anything to prove that sound bite is true or is it just empty rhetoric as usual for short time Demotard gains?
2 ups, 4w,
2 replies
No, I don't have anything to prove your sound bites.

If you're up to it, you can look up the One Big Beautiful Bill which like the 2017 tax cut, benefits the the rich but with a temporary one for the lesser thans.
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
The burden of federal individual income tax is highly progressive and concentrated among high earners:
The top 1% of earners pay approximately 38–46% of all federal income taxes, depending on the year and data source (e.g., 38.4% in 2023, 40.4% in 2022).
The top 10% of earners are responsible for roughly 70–76% of total federal income tax revenue.
The bottom 50% of earners contribute a minimal share, typically between 2–5% of federal income taxes.
For households below the top 10% income bracket, payroll taxes often represent a heavier day-to-day federal tax burden than income taxes. While individual income taxes provide relief to lower-income groups through credits and deductions, payroll taxes are generally regressive, affecting middle- and lower-income workers more significantly relative to their total income
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
Look up One Big Beautiful Bill and learn to deal.
1 up, 4w
I did. It's in the link I provided you that you wouldn't go to. You are in denial.
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2025/06/myth-vs-fact-the-one-big-beautiful-bill/ some reading for you. Instead of sound bites from Madow or The View.
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
no links
1 up, 4w
Then google it. look at the url. incompetence is no excuse.
5 ups, 4w,
1 reply
Yeah. We all know where every Lefty on this platform gets his (mis)information. The source who never had a story that wasn't Debunked. Lol.
1 up, 4w
Stay on topic. Lol.
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
lol 😂 you hating whitey makes you racist. Do you love your country? That would make you a nationalist by University speak.
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
Sorry, your head is too far up your ass for me to hear you.
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
😂 That’s funny! Actually the reason you can’t hear me is because I typed my comment. I wasn’t speaking. Thanks for the laugh. Stay ignorant young Paduwan.
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
Lol, it's spelled Padawan, not Paduwan. If you can't even get that right, I'm certain the other news you're spouting must be fake.
1 up, 4w
Your mastery of the Star Wars nomenclature is so telling of who you are! 😆 go find a girl to kiss baby D.
5 ups, 4w
IOW, they are liars. Outright LIARS.
0 ups, 3w
Where did you get this from? Even if it is correct, at least most democrats aren’t corrupt or as corrupt as trump is!
3 ups, 4w,
1 reply
did they?

Show me the bill they voted down.

You know, with their minority in the House.

Show me.
4 ups, 4w,
2 replies
"against" not voted down. They are the minority and hopefully will be a bigger minority come November. They still did not support affordability and that's what "against" means. Glad I could be of service and thank you for your attention to this matter.
5 ups, 4w
And when it comes to healthcare why is it always the Universal Healthcare Plan the dems/leftist legislators push and never the Cadillac Healthcare Plan they get.
2 ups, 4w,
2 replies
Show me the bill.

Should be easy enough, right?

Because altering the tax code to eliminate overtime, tips, and "social security" would require a bill.

Show me the bill.
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
I'd love to show you one but it has to go through it's process. I must also go through Senate.
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
It has already been passed. It was the "one big beautiful bill".

Remember that one?

the one that cut taxes on the rich. And raised taxes on the middle class. And cut subsidies to Medicaid & Medicare, which resulted in your healthcare costs going up.

And rural hospitals closing.

Do you see why they voted against it now?
2 ups, 4w,
1 reply
1. How did it "raise taxes on the middle class"?
2. How did it "cut taxes on the rich"?
3. How did it cut subsidies to Medicade and Medicare?
4. What examples are there of healthcare costs go up?
5. What rural hospital closed and why was that?
No. I don't see why they voted against it but you'd better let me know the details of your claims or once again, nothing but demotarded nothing burger lies.
1 up, 4w
1) it eliminated personal exemptions for taxes. The standard deduction often doesn't cover the tax burden for the middle of the middle class. the loss of clean energy and EV credits. it will cost more to upgrade or repair green energy improvements to their houses. It also eliminated the ACA credits, so now their personal costs for health insurance have gone up.

2) It dropped the permanent tax rate on the top income rates from 39% to 37%. The pass-through business deduction was made permanent. Wealthy business owners whose income comes from their business, not a salary, but the profit. they get taxes less on the profits being passed through the busines to them. this is in addition to the 2% drop.

3) It cut them through the work requirements- in order to receive non-disabled adults must work 80 hours a month to receive medicade or medicare. They have to re-check every 6 months, which if they make a mistake in the paperwork or they are lost in the cycle, they're dropped. And because the deficit has been increased without a subsiquent tax increase, due to the PayGo Act of 2010, there will be other cuts to the programs.

4) with the lost of teh ACA credits, the health insurance premiums immediately jumped up. Additionally, they have gone up since that cut increasing to by 58%. Deductibles have risen from an average of $2900 to $3500. Enrollment fell by 5%, about 1.2 million people. so if they do get sick or hurt, it will be without insurance.

5) you can check to see which hospitals are closing in your state due to the cuts here: https://www.businessinsider.com/map-rural-hospital-closures-by-state-2026-1?op=1
Because fewer people have insurance, dispoportionaly in the rural areas, and they have more expensive plans they seek healthcare less often. Which means less revenue for the hospitals.

That's why they voted against it. The bill does nothing. The 'no tax' on overtime or tips isn't immediate. The taxes are still taken out, but they get to claim them at the end of the year. So they won't see any benifit until the following years tax return.
2 ups, 4w
I'd love to see them show us proof. I have yet to see a republican actually present proof.
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
Guess someone forgot the republicans cut welfare and then placed the tax burden on the poor so the rich could get richer!
1 up, 4w,
1 reply
You guys have the same old sound bites that are meaningless.
0 ups, 4w
You guys always downplay the facts.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
If Democrats in Congress care about affordability, then why did every single one of them vote against eliminating taxes on tips, overtime, and Social Security? Instead, Democrats tried to massively hike taxes on working families They are affordability frauds.