Imgflip Logo Icon

Connect the Dots....It's WAY TOO EASY!

Connect the Dots....It's WAY TOO EASY! | Democrats do everything possible 
TO PROTECT FRAUD. 
ONLY SORRY When CAUGHT! SAVE America Act requires documented 
citizenship proof to prevent election fraud. Guess Who Opposes It?

Yep, The Fraudsters! | image tagged in democrats,fraud,voter fraud,election fraud,cheating,stealing | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
476 views 25 upvotes Made by vBackman 1 month ago in politics
46 Comments
11 ups, 1mo
We really don't need the Save Act | Just go to the polling places right after your unlimited pasta meal
 While you still have your ID out | image tagged in olive garden id meme | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Modern problem
Modern solution
6 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
Democrats think requiring voter ID is too extreme; But remember when they demanded everyone get vaccine cards just to eat at a restaurant?
4 ups, 1mo
Yup... they did
1 up, 1mo
They never did that
8 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
They're only sorry they got caught.
8 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
I don't even think that they are sorry when or that they got caught. I think they just don't care any more. They are so right out in the open with their protection of fraud. Newsom even signed a bill that would make it illegal to report fraud.

They are just going to break whatever law they need to because they have thoroughly brainwashed their voters. All they have to do is dangle a picture of Trump in front of them and they will even vote directly for fraud because they think it is anti-Trump.

I fear for our country that people can be so manipulated that way. But it is like they say, when you believe in nothing then you can believe anything.
4 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Czechy you do not have a leg to stand on.

Your party makes all sorts of excuses and denials for the fraud they commit. And those are actual documented cases of fraud, some of which are going to trial. Then you make up stuff about Trump's fraud. And you still can't let go that Trump was charged with a fabricated felony charge that was quicky overturned on appeals. Trump was a felon for like 10 minutes but he's not any more because he never should have been charged with any thing in the first place. The misdemeanor case had long passed the statute of limitations.

It just got to be so hard to be a Democrat and try to have any integrity. All of the ones with integrity have either left the party (John Fetterman) or just complain all of the time (Bill Maher).

You're busy trying to deflect every chance you get rather than just face the facts that your precious Democrat party is a criminal organization.

Did your hear what Tim Walz's excuse for pardoning an illegal alien charged with multiple child rapes was? I'm paraphrasing but he said something like, we can't hold him responsible for having a bad day. A BAD DAY???????

This is the man you voted for to be Vice President and he thinks child rapists are just having a bad day.

Wake up dude. You need to take a serious look at your own party before you even dare to criticize Trump ever again. Even if Trump was everything the left says he is, he would be a saint compared to ANYONE in the Democrat party.

Remember, I am not a Republican for the reason that far too many Republicans for which I have no respect. I think the Republicans are a little better now than when I left the party but only a little bit. If I can see the corruption in the party I was a member of most of my life then perhaps there is a chance for you to look at yours. I am not saying you have to join the Republican or even the Constitution party (of which I am a member of). I am not even saying that you should leave the Democrat party. What I am saying is stop deflecting and pay attention to your party. In my opinion NONE OF THEM are worth ever having political office in the first place and most of them should be tried for treason.
4 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
There were probably about 34 felony trials but they were ALL dismissed due to lack of evidence. The only exception was the sexual harassment charge that was falsely pushed to a felony for reasons that the judge never told us. That was overturned on appeals.

Charges does not mean conviction. What happened was Democrat lawfare because of the extreme hatred of Trump you guys have.

Are you guys pissed at him for leaving the Democrat party? Are you pissed at him because he opposes socialism? Are you pissed at him because he loves this country and you guys hate it?
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
No, they were not dismissed. Nor have they been overturned on appeal.

What's your point in making things up?
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
You are dismissed.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Hey, whatever your religion really is, have you ever heard of the Ten Commandments?
1 up, 1mo
I used to remember those but leftists tore down any reference to the Ten Commandments over a bogus interpretation of a letter that Thomas Jefferson wrote to a Baptist church in Danbury, Connecticut.

Here is a little history just because I like history. You won't read it because you never read this far. Plus you think every word I type is a lie so even if you read it you won't believe it.

Twice, that I know of, an excerpt of that letter was used in a Supreme Court ruling.

The first one was Reynolds v. United States in 1878 against members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints who were practicing polygamy. They quoted an excerpt of Jefferson's letter where they said that building "a wall of separation between church and State" does not apply because of several lame excuses for violating the 1st Amendment. BTW I am not supporting polygamy. I am however, supporting the 1st amendment and essentially they had no right to legislate against polygamy and only go after members of the LDS Church while ignoring it when it occurred in other places. Plus the LDS Church was all by themselves in Utah with nothing around them. When they got there the land was owned by Mexico and Mexico didn't care because no one wanted Utah.

The second time it was used was in 1947 in Iverson v Board of Education. Justice Hugo Black wrote that the phrase "there must be a wall of separation of church and state" meant to keep the government out of the church and not the other way around. Justice Black said that wall must be kept very high.

The very next day the media reported the exact opposite of what Justice Black had said. And ever since then "separation of church and state" meant to exclude the church from everything. Even subsequent court cases acted on the idea that what Jefferson mean was a separation of church from every facet of society.

So I would know what it said in the Ten Commandments but you guys lied to remove all monuments to it.

Well there's also Exodus 20:1-17, Deuteronomy 5:6-21 and Book of Mormon — Mosiah 13:11-24.

I am not bearing false witness against my neighbor.

Book of Mormon — 2 Nephi 9:34, "Wo unto the liar, for he shall be thrust down to hell." And THAT is why being a leftists is so very hard to do because it is founded on lies and every argument off of that corrupt foundation is also a lie.
6 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
The only reason demonrats get mad when fraud is discovered is because they lose money and have to set up yet another illegal funding stream. Tossing BS apple vs orange distractions doesn't fool anyone. The demonrat party is led by international criminals, who control their base using a verity of psychological tricks, fortunately for them, their base is easily manipulated.
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
4 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
A large segment of the Republican party opposes the SAVE America Act. Even with Trump's threats and tantrums (like refusing to sign the bipartisan 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act), he can't get it passed.
7 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
Yeah a whopping 15% lol. Another Hot Drop from the king of fake news. So much for no Kings.
5 ups, 1mo
Is she a king or queen? Well, either way, she's the largest producer of it
2 ups, 1mo
"I called someone a king so that means you support kings because I said so"

Love that maga "logic"
4 ups, 1mo,
3 replies
Do you have a birth certificate with your married name on it? Oh, you dont? Sorry no vote!!!
7 ups, 1mo
Do you have a marriage certificate as well to prove that you are the same person on this birth certificate? Oh great. Thank you.
7 ups, 1mo
You do know that's another "hot drop" from Madcow right? 100% Truth Free. A dog turd not a fact.
8 ups, 1mo,
4 replies
I wasn't born married. It was never an issue for decades to vote with my married name. EVER!

Most people understand it (outside of liberals who want & need to cheat to win). Democrats should be ashamed...but you have no shame.
7 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
The only reason Blue states refuse to share voter rolls is that it will expose illegals, other-non-citizens, dead people, underage, moved out of state, and convicted felons. All ineligible to vote. I read an article on another site that disclosed that Tom Fitton's Judicial Watch organization lawsuits, filed as far back as two years ago, have resulted in over six million ineligible persons removed from multiple state voter rolls.
4 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Yes, you do that every time you comment... LOL
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
where's that totally real study you mentioned that said over 70% of post-vaccine deaths were caused by the Covid vaccine?
4 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Yup... another one... thanks for proving my point.
4 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Read that again... slowly... LOL
2 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
It's plain English. I know Russian is your first language, but nothing I said was unclear.
4 ups, 1mo
Yeah... and there's the insult... figures... You couldn't even quote me correctly... LMAO
1 up, 1mo
2 ups, 1mo
How could it ever possibly have been an issue for decades if it wasn't an issue till just a few weeks ago?
2 ups, 1mo
It's hilarious that you don't understand that the reason you were able to do that without problems is because you didn't have to jump through a bunch of extra hoops they are trying to now put in place to make it harder for women to vote

Why would you support a movement that's full of people who don't think you should be allowed to vote because you are a woman?
6 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3g2olA8GPo
3 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
?
6 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Proof of Democrat fraud exposed
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
No, that's a YouTube link.

Pretty sure if there was any such proof Trump would have said it in his grand adress the other day.
5 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
Did you not watch the video?
0 ups, 1mo
LOL...
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 9
  • image.png
  • image.png
  • image.png
  • WHAT HOW
  • image.png
  • image.png
  • image.png
  • paste:image.png
  • image.png
  • image.png
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    Democrats do everything possible TO PROTECT FRAUD. ONLY SORRY When CAUGHT! SAVE America Act requires documented citizenship proof to prevent election fraud. Guess Who Opposes It? Yep, The Fraudsters!