Imgflip Logo Icon

Another inconvenient truth rooted in fact!

Another inconvenient truth rooted in fact! | image tagged in democrats,african americans,civil war,republicans,politics,political | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
439 views 31 upvotes Made by ChadAllen64 2 days ago in politics
66 Comments
5 ups, 1d,
2 replies
Funny how libs like to relabel everything that triggers them... except the name of their party, which is synonymous with slavery...
2 ups, 21h,
1 reply
The very name 'democrat' is an insult to the Founders because they straight up 100% rejected and sent straight into the black hole of politics the very idea of democracy.
0 ups, 19h
Yeah, George Washington specifically in his farewell address, the others would shift into Federalist or Democratic-Republican (though others would also oppose the idea of factions). I think political parties are bad too, but James Madison said that they are unavoidable in a free society which makes sense considering that a lot of ideas are expressed/represented as large entities, but it also disrupts national unity.
2 ups, 1d,
4 replies
Parties flip in the 60's after Civil Rights Act.

I don't feel the need to further explain because no matter what, you're incapable of seeing the other side and would rather stroke your ego and cling to your party/ideals bot.
3 ups, 1d
LMAO...
3 ups, 1d,
2 replies
That's a myth. One Democrat joined the GOP, while the KKK Grand Recruiter stayed in the Democratic party. How many times did Democrat President LBJ drop the N bomb? A LOT that's how many and he even did it on recording.
0 ups, 19h,
2 replies
Lincoln racist | There was never a switch,
the Republican Party was always racist In the 20th Century, the Democratic Party
simply decided to  join up with t | image tagged in lincoln racist | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 16h
From defending slavery as a “state right” in the 1800s to opposing school choice in 2025, Democrats have consistently leaned toward centralized power.

Examples include:

Great Society welfare rules that destabilized Black families by penalizing marriage.

Educational policy that blocked alternatives to failing schools while rewarding unions regardless of outcomes.
0 ups, 18h,
1 reply
Thaddeus Stevens wasn't racist
0 ups, 15h,
1 reply
But Lincoln was, as well as most of the rest of the party, as was the norm back then.
1 up, 15h
That's a huge lie... Thanks
0 ups, 19h,
1 reply
LBJ's said a lot of slurs, not a perfect guy at all, but it shouldn't absolve his impact/contribution to the passing of the Civil Rights Act in the '60s which lifted segregation laws/black codes.
0 ups, 12h,
1 reply
He only did that I get their votes. He didn’t actually care.
0 ups, 9h
Regardless it still went into effect
0 ups, 19h,
2 replies
There was never a switch.

The only change that occurred was that in the 20th Century, the Democratic Party decided to evolve, whereas the Republicans opted to remain the same, hence the movement and term, "Conservative'
1 up, 19h,
2 replies
You mean the Republican Party stuck with the official duty of the presidency instead of “evolve” into social issues?

You left out Lincoln’s personal view at the end of the letter.
“I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty, and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men, everywhere, could be free.”
3 ups, 15h
Lincoln ended his letter by appealing to anti-slavery supporters and hinted that action may be forthcoming if necessary, writing that he shall do more or less if he believes it will help save the Union. Finally, he made a distinction between his view of “official duty” as president and his “oft-expressed personal wish that all men everywhere could be free,” reminding the public that he had consistently advocated for the ultimate extinction of slavery.

Even though Greeley, anti-slavery Republicans, and abolitionists might not be completely satisfied by Lincoln’s letter, he knew their attitudes would change once he announced the proclamation, because it would be far more sweeping than the Second Confiscation Act could ever have been. Lincoln believed that only the president as the commander-in-chief could exercise war powers to free slaves in states in rebellion. At the same time, the president needed to frame his policy as being dedicated to preserving the Union above all, in a way that would be acceptable to the border states and his fragile Union coalition, in order to avoid negatively impacting vulnerable Republicans ahead of the upcoming midterm elections in the fall.

Of course, they want everyone to ignore All The Facts.
3 ups, 16h
The Myth of Democrats as “The Working Class Party”

It’s trendy to imagine Democrats as champions of the little guy. Yet historically, the party has had deep ties to the powerful:

The “Solid South” leaned on railroad magnates and cotton kings.
Tammany Hall ran on patronage and big corporate donations.
In recent years, Big Tech, Wall Street, and Big Pharma have overwhelmingly favored Democrats in political contributions.

FDR’s New Deal didn’t dismantle monopolies; it often protected them, erecting regulatory walls that smaller businesses couldn’t scale. Influence was — and still is — often redistributed upward. The only thing Democrats have ever consistently redistributed is influence — from voters to big donors.
0 ups, 19h
I know that statement was basic and I'm also aware of Abraham Lincoln's approach towards slavery/colonialism, it just gains attention and people rage about it lol
2 ups, 24h,
2 replies
Pffft, no they didn’t. What a dumb statement. All the people that made up a party just decided to swap their values and keep the name?
3 ups, 21h,
1 reply
Liberal logic... they got it from the MSM... LOL
2 ups, 17h,
2 replies
It’s astonishing the level of incognitive babel.
2 ups, 15h
They love to promote their Lincoln lies with their omissions.
0 ups, 15h,
1 reply
"babel" indeed.

Oh, the irony,,,

You should really stay away from the big words also, particularly the ones that hardly anyone has used in a century.
1 up, 13h,
1 reply
The word babble comes from the Tower of Babel. Interesting story you should put down the communist manifesto and read it.
0 ups, 13h,
1 reply
Incognitive Tower of Babel?

Ah, now it totally makes sense.
English as a second language is difficult for the foreign contingent here.
1 up, 13h,
1 reply
You got nothing. Lies and weak attempts at ridicule by confusing yourself. 😂
0 ups, 13h
As confused as you are with the language, 80% of the time it's actually not too difficult to understand you. You write in pretty basic sentences so it's pretty easy to simply separate the noun and the verb and jettison the wannabe pretentious fluff,,,
2 ups, 14h,
1 reply
It’s called transwitching very popular in the 60’s.
2 ups, 13h
lol apparently democrats can identify as Republicans without actually being one or believing in any of the platforms.
2 ups, 18h
The truth hurts
3 ups, 1d,
1 reply
4 ups, 24h,
1 reply
Southern democrats fought against the North. Democrats are still democrats.
2 ups, 23h,
1 reply
Hold on a second, are you actually saying that during the Civil War, the Southern States that fought against the North actually were Southern, as their status as Southern States would indicate?
,
As you can see on the map, in the Election of 1860, Northern Democrats cleaved from their Southern counterparts and fielded their own candidate. Do I really have to repost for the same map again for you to see?
4 ups, 23h,
2 replies
Democrats fought against the abolition of slavery. They are the same democrats who need to import slaves now over our border.
4 ups, 20h
Republicans have generally advanced civil rights, limited government, and individual liberty.
Democrats, even when their language evolved, often defended systems of control — whether those systems were slavery, segregation, or bureaucratic dependence.

The switched crap.. is just that... crap
2 ups, 23h,
2 replies
No, they did not, and you know it.

It amazes how even with a simple diagram - a color coded one, no less - the comprehension of this manages to be compromised.

Perhaps the clutter I added was too much, so I'll post it again sans clutter for the benefit of the reading audience.

Hope this clarifies things.
4 ups, 21h,
2 replies
As you can somehow not see on the map you post the north was Republican and the south was democrat.
4 ups, 20h
The Democratic Party’s evolution from slave codes to bureaucratic codes is not a story of moral repentance, but of adaptation. The control systems changed, but the instinct to control grew evermore clever. It never morally improved. Never once.
3 ups, 18h,
3 replies
Maybe you’re colorblind and possibly got your orientation of north and south mixed up. But, according to this map, northern states voted for the Republican candidate and southern states voted for the Democratic candidate.
4 ups, 16h
Democrats Still Oppose True Equal Opportunity

They’ve consistently blocked policies that would break dependence on the state:

-School choice: Blocked at every turn.

-Faith-based initiatives: It’s always fought as soon as it challenges secular orthodoxy. Democrats wanted to replace God with the all-controlling government of their dreams. With Democrats manning the guns pointed at their former slaves.

-Pro-growth tax reform: Opposed even when it helps working families.

When Democrats say ‘equal opportunity,’ they mean equal opportunity to stay under their

thumb.
3 ups, 17h,
1 reply
😂
2 ups, 13h
Race-Based Taxes Are the Future of the Democrat Party
3 ups, 14h,
1 reply
Your map shows the south was democrat and the north was republican - contrary to your other comment.
3 ups, 17h,
2 replies
Note your own map. 😂 take a look at what the southern states are classified as. I think it says southern democrats.
3 ups, 14h
Modda can’t read his own map.
3 ups, 13h,
1 reply
So you are saying the southern democrats won in the south but all the voters were racist republicans? Beahahahaha! 😂 thanks for the laugh!
2 ups, 13h,
1 reply
The evidence is there for all to see Southern democrats joined the confederacy and voted against Lincoln. You would have to be paid shill to try to spin that to “it wuz the Republicans!”
0 ups, 13h
What on Earth are you going on about?

Your efforts to try to mangle everything in order to retrofit it into your bogus narrative and misdirect basic logic only manages to confuse yourself. At least shoot for some consistency with what your point is. Or rather, was.
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator