huell money

debunked

It's funny that you think something isn't true just because you call it debunked

History says that A: Abe Lincoln was a Republican, B: The southerners back then were against abolishing slavery, and C: Those same southerners mainly identified as Democrats.

You didn't say anything about Republicans or Democrats, you said "leftists"

Leftists are Democrats.

Northerners also mainly identifid as Democrats. It was the major party in the United States of America, not the South. Further, there were no Democrats in the Confederacy.

Further, Lincoln was quite the racist himself. Then again, like you said, Lincoln was a Republican.

If he was racist, why did he abolish slavery? Also, it was a southerner who killed Abe.

Border States - Google

Exemptions to the Emancipation Proclamation - Google

Deporting former slaves from the USA - Google

Slavery was abolished by Congress after the war to cripple the South economically to further hinder it from being able to try to separate again.

We did the same thing to Puerto Rico after taking over 1898, that is, dismantle the sugar cane industry, its chief economic driver, so that Puerto Rico, like the South, would remained economically dependent on the United States.

That's not racist, he was trying to avoid controversy.

I can see you did not do your homework. And I posted it very simply to facilitate looking up.

I literally had a unit on him in history class last year.

Yes, a Southerner killed Lincoln. Southerners did a lot of bad things. It's almost like there's a pattern.

I'm not a southerner if that's what you're implying.

And? You're the one that brought him up. Are you trying to imply that you're him?

I'm not implying shit.

Wrong. Liberals today make arguments for keeping illegals around. Exploitable cheap labor we just can't live without. And let's not forget the extra votes slaves got them. Just like illegals are stuffing the ballots today. These are the same arguments that were used to keep the institution of slavery.

Republicans were the party of standards and decency. They saw the slaves as human beings. We still see illegals as human beings. But they are breaking our laws, and are not diminished as perpetual victims.

So in your mind, you think that if somebody doesn't want illegal immigrants deported (if they're not committing any violent crimes), that means they support slavery? Walk me through that logic.

Illegal immigrants can't legally vote and cases of them voting are extremely rare. There's not a single election in recent history (or probably ever) that was decided by illegal immigrants 😂😂

I do agree with one thing you said, Republicans used to be the party of standards and decency. But not anymore and not for a very long time.

Here's some Republican standards and decency, literally going back to day one of the party.

No, Republicans did not see slaves as human beings. They opposed the institution of slavery, or at least opposed the spread of it. Some saw it as morally abhorrent, others saw slaves as unfair competition for poor white laborers. They were against the spreading of slavery into the Western Territories because they wanted to make the Western Territories a Whites-only zone. No slaves, no free Africans, just Anglos.

The same type of people who had used slaves for farm labor now use illegals. They had to beg Trump to make an exemption in the deportation of the illegals they utilize because the 'family' farm is completely dependent on them, actual family farming being something of a distant past. And by paying them less than minimum wage while forcing them to buy goods only for them while charging them rent to live in trailers on the farm, making them not only dependent but putting them in debt to Mr Farmer for years, it's basically modern slavery, but with a little bit of pocket change to make it legal.

While it is legal to pay illegals substandard wages, those working stores, factories, construction... are not exempted from having to get paid a minimum wage and above.

Illegals are not stuffing the ballot box because that is... wait for it... Illegal.

Makes absolutely no sense. Did not see the slaves as human beings? How did they arrive at the conclusion that it was morally abhorrent?

Make it a "white-only zone"? Are you f**king serious? Biggest crock of shit and history rewriting I have ever heard.

You know how these animal rights people want domesticated animals to be freed? That doesn't mean that they want a herd of Guernseys on their front lawn eating their prized azaleas while farmed mink eat their kitty cat.

Next in your homework assignment, look up:

Free-Soil Party

Ima get you one for Christmas

Go for it!