Imagine if someone had done that while "Team Biden" was infesting the White House!

imgflip.com/i/ada2gz
Say their name

Of course the leftist response is, "It's not sedition when leftists do it!" As if denial or reality somehow changes reality. Upvoted.

No leftist says that

The crying demonrats could careless about our military, because they are still purging the last of the woke out of the ranks. This is all just a distraction from all the fraud waste and abuse the demons were caught at and their link to Epstein.

Whose links to Epstein?

Arizona State Senator and Retired Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Wendy Rogers

"Rogers described the move, headed in part by former CIA officer Elissa Slotkin, as a "CIA operation" and an attempt to "start a color revolution" because the Democrats can't win in court or with their relentless attempts to stonewall and stop Trump's success in the White House.

"What they're actually doing is they're injecting doubt" among service members, Rogers said, describing Slotkin's references to Nuremberg and Hollywood court-martial proceedings as a "fanciful" attempt to come off as having the military's back.

"They don't have anyone's back in the military. They're the legislature! They don't have any executive authority," she continued, further highlighting the irony from when the Democrats pushed illegal orders onto military members by forcing them to get the COVID shot or be discharged. "Now, when the shoe is on the other foot and the Democrats are at a loss— they're losing in the Supreme Court, they're losing in the future probably at the midterms because of redistricting, and moreover, because the economy is resurging and because President Trump is having all these victories every day— they just don't know what to do.""

Jan 6 was a domestic terrorist sttack

How is reminding service members of their oath to the constitution and that they are required to disobey unlawful orders sedition?

Conservatives hate that people are being told to obey the law

That’s the simpletons take. The purpose is to destabilize and promote chaos in the military.

It's the simpletons' take because they are simpletons.

Oh? How is reminding service members they are expected to follow the law "the simpleton's take"?

Explain it.

Only a simpleton believes you need to tell service members what they already know. The only reason is to infer they are being given illegal orders or will be. The ultimate goal is to sow the seeds of insurrection and a basis for refusing orders based on what you think, not the law.

IF that were true, Abu Ghraib never would have happened. You remember that, right? Where Americans tortured people? Where they took selfies laughing next to them?

You know, the stuff that bad guys do?

One has nothing to do with the other. You have no idea if anyone objected or their motivation for following an illegal order. Maybe they felt the need to fight terrorism by the democrat motto of, “by any means necessary.”

The fact that excesses have been committed by the military throughout history isn’t proof they were unaware of their ability to refuse an order.

oh, yeah, I'm sure just because something happened regularly in the past means it won't happen ever again.

But I get it, you're an authoritarian and for you disobeying any order given by Dear Leader is the real crime, even if he orders you to commit a crime.

You get nothing as usual. Apparently you were unaware that you could refuse illegal orders when you served, if you served. You must have been pulling sick call at the zoomie rec center when they were discussing that.

You claiming illegality doesn’t make it so. As long as the boat floats the objects of the attack are still present and possibly salvageable.

Telling people they should refuse to obey unlawful orders will destabilize the military? Walk me thru that logic

What’s the point of telling them something they already know?