Imgflip Logo Icon

Socialism is a form of slavery

Socialism is a form of slavery | UNDER SOCIALISM
YOUR LABOR BELONGS
 TO THE STATE; WHAT DOES THAT
REMIND YOU OF? | image tagged in socialism | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
455 views 35 upvotes Made by CraigThompson 3 weeks ago in politics
46 Comments
5 ups, 3w
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
5 ups, 3w
and that's a fact | image tagged in and that's a fact | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
3 ups, 3w
The truth is right in front of everyone, socialism fails because greedy people rise to the top. You will never see socialist leadership in anything less than a mansion, they will not drive old cars, eat from a sack lunch or ration their own power so everyone can share in their nation's wealth. The meme is true, economic slavery is still slavery
1 up, 3w
image tagged in picard oops | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 3w
1 up, 3w,
2 replies
Is there a way 20yr old people are chatting about this? Because it all feels like 40+ yr old men yapping about socialism to me.
2 ups, 3w
Yes the young are demanding it. See NY
0 ups, 3w
Your suspicions are correct. It's all a bunch of boomers responding to Russian bots that post this nonsense.
1 up, 3w
The Japanese empire, the USSR, North Korea, the Nazis, China under Mao..... just a few
2 ups, 3w,
5 replies
Let's see if this is easy enough to follow:

In capitalism, those with capital own the labor because they purchase said labor, and they do it at wholesale prices, and pretty darn low at that. They have capital. They own everything. Including the government.

Socialism is the opposite of that.
Because math.

Hope this clarifies things.
4 ups, 3w,
2 replies
A good welder or electrician can get a job anywhere. A skilled computer programmer can make crazy bank. All "labor" is not valued the same in the US because of suppy and demand, capitalism. In Cuba, a cab driver can make more money than a doctor. Your "math" does not add up. Modda, you live in a world that does not exist.
1 up, 3w
Oh, yeah, about Cuba. Their power grid is almost kaput along with their infrastructure.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
So what I said then?

A welder or electrician can be found in any Home Depot parking lot. That'll cost less than one found in the Yellow Pages.

Same with computer programmers, citizens being displaced by foreigners with H-1B visas, something Trump would like to expand.

Labor does not have intrinsic value. Its worth is determined by what those with capital wish to pay for it. Market forces can be affected by what the government facilitates.

What government can't change is the definition of socialism, no matter how many executive orders might be lobbed at it.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
I'm trying to find folks to work on my house. It is difficult to find someone who is available, competent, and honest. Not sure what you mean, "Labor does not have intrinsic value." Supply and demand determine the value. That is why women's studies majors are underemployed, and building projects are delayed because of a lack of skilled workers.
0 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Shucks, should have hired them before ICE raided the Home Depot.
Oh, wait, wrong country.

When an electrician tells his grandmother not to worry, that he'll fix the kitchen light for her, chances are that it's probably for free, and thus a tad bit less than it would be for a customer.

Labor has no intrinsic value. Because math.
1 up, 3w
In that case he has a lifelong social debt to his grandmother and is only making a tiny payment on it, in exchange for labor.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
What is anything worth? The amount someone is willing to pay for it. Does anything have an inherent intrinsic value? If I'm dying of thirst, gold is useless; water is priceless.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Good, you're catching on.

Is this going somewhere other than you basically agreeing with me over the course of various comments under the guise of doing otherwise because contrarian because partisan?
1 up, 3w
We are fighting about language? "Intrinsic value" is a nonsense word. Out of context, it means nothing. Address the original meme. In the US I own my own labor. In North Korea, Kim owns everyone's labor.
3 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Why are you promoting socialism?
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Why are you promoting socialism?
1 up, 3w
Why are you promoting socialism?
Why are you promoting socialism?
Why are you promoting socialism?
Why are you promoting socialism?
Why are you promoting socialism?
Why are you promoting socialism?

I win. I said it more times than you.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
The problem is that in that system corruption rises to the top and then they control everything in the name of the laborers. Then they rule tyrannical.
Your argument is essentially: we haven't tried true socialism.
0 ups, 3w
I don't have an argument. I did not post an argument.
Your argument is your argument, not mine.

As you can see, the MAGArtronics have come out en masse to post a St Petersburg generated argument against socialism, with all the unawareness of the irony in that that an algorithmic generated persona can muster.
1 up, 3w
Hold on, I have to go have a heart attack from laughing.
1 up, 3w,
2 replies
The state belongs to the laborers. . .kind of like how the government belongs to We The People. . .except a lot of people in government don't see it that way because they act like We The People belongs to the government. And do you think that can't happen in your brand of socialism?
. . .
. .
.
Sure in the Engel's model of socialism that is true. But the Henri de Saint Simon OG model of socialism isn't like that now is it. Ever wonder why influential people push the Engel mode instead of the Simon model which predate both Engel and Marx by about forty fifty years? Here's a hint - Simon actually cared about the worker because he saw them all as the same regardless of ditch digger or CEO and there was no frickin' class division. Simon's beef with people were with a government(or in France's case, the Crown) that did nothing but looked down on workers regardless of ditch digger or business owner and healthy people that refused to work and he straight up called those people parasites.

Heck, the Simon model can work but there's no way later versions of socialists and communists would ever permit that because what Simon called socialism is what we today call CAPITALISM! But how can that be? Here's the thing. The word capitalism did not exist until about 1872. Also the word socialism did not exist until Simon created and defined it. That original definition has NOTHING to do with what later people like Engel and Marx claimed the word meant.

If it wasn't for Simon, then later people would never know who Marx and Engels were because those two had to rip off and twist an existing economic model which just happed to be Simon socialism.
1 up, 3w
One point. The Constitution doesn't began with We The People because of ownership. It is a document from the people to the government to put limits on the government. It was an attempt to limit the power and scope of the government because all governments previously have been major burdens on the people.

Our founders did want our government to become tyrannical. This is the reason for the 2nd amendment.

We The People only own what we have purchased, either with money, barter or labor, and money is just a representation of the value of our labor.

Private property rights are paramount to liberty. Not just land but everything we've ever traded for is our property. This also includes ownership of your life.

I have not seen any other system of government that gives so much to the individual and then turns around and says those rights do not come from the government and they are inalienable, meaning no one has the authority to take those rights away.

All other governments operate as if your rights, if they give you any, come from the government. If the come from the government they can be taken away by the government. Governments will infringe our rights but that cannot take what God has given us.
0 ups, 3w
I stopped reading when you said your brand of socialism.

That's your brand socialism. You claim to live in rural Pennsylvania. Rural Pennsylvania does not exist except for so-called socialism (actually social welfare. I assure you, the rest of us who are supplementing yous have no say in the matter). Your brand of socialism.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
[image deleted] That meme reminds me of ignorance and horseshit, magamouthwash
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Ironic
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
No just very telling of the losers here
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Its just funny you call it ignorance.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Even funnier that you don't, and then you think that you are even ahead of the game? That is the funniest f**king thing there is.
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Im not ahead of anything. Youre just misinformed.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
If you say so ping pong, must be your gigo update
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
What makes you disagree with the meme?
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
It's 100 % wrong for one
2 ups, 3w,
2 replies
In what way?
2 ups, 3w
I have a couple of questions:
1. You didnt answer why you disagree with the meme.
2. Who is "you idiots"?
3.What do they get disproved of?
0 ups, 3w
Get off the hate site and get a. Education, but remember this every country proves you idiots wrong every second of every minute of every hour of the day
4 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Please explain in detail how workers don't own their own labor under capitalism. If you have marketable skills, you can work anywhere you want. The United States is experiencing a skilled labor shortage.
3 ups, 3w
While there is some truth that the Government and some corporations are not acting in the best interests of workers, how will socialsim fix this? Giving more control to the government will make it worse. When fewer people have more power, corruption is always the inevitable result. Also, central planning is proven to be inefficient. History proves that capitalism is superior to socialism in every way.
3 ups, 3w
Why does your "labor output" matter? As long as you are paid well, who cares? Why does output need to be proportional to pay? How can it even be measured?
1 up, 3w
In that theoretical situation, what is keeping that employee at that job? They are free to find work with a different employer under better terms.

If they can't, then maybe they are easily replaceable. Maybe their "skills" aren't really all that valuable, and some self improvement is needed.

Every significant promotion I've earned so far in my career was the result of improving my abilities first.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • castro.webp
  • slave-family_001.webp
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    UNDER SOCIALISM YOUR LABOR BELONGS TO THE STATE; WHAT DOES THAT REMIND YOU OF?