"Everybody was Kung Fu fighting"

Yeah, nothing says out of shape like geriatric, eh?

Theoretical people they make up in their heads to justify why 'we need to do more' no matter how much is done

Most of them are promising to fix things that they screwed up in the first place

Good question.
But the better question is: who are really working for?
upvote.

Just the same TDS

They're only fight for the queer and the darker skinned people. They lie a lot.

Democrats, and other assorted leftists, are fighting FOR tyranny and most don't even know it. And you can't tell them otherwise.

Someone told them that it's the government's responsibility to take care of everyone. But it's just understandable to them that governments, all governments, corrupt and when they do then comes the genocides, terror, enslavement and misery.

An Army of Bulletproof Monks dressed like Santa, beards and all.

Oh, and this guy ab4s6y.jpg (click to show)

They fight against American citizens, police officers, basic human rights, religion, it is a long list. To keep this short, if something is good in this world the democrats will fight against it.

They fight against white supremacy. So you think white supremacy is good? Bad take my dude

If leftists can't accurately describe a man, then how do they know what kings are?

This was posted a week ago. Don't you remember?

I don't care what that says, it is scientifically wrong.

Prove it, using actual science

A p**is is the male sex organ, therefore if you are born with a p**is, you are a man, I don't need science, I can make you look like an idiot using common sense.

You say it's scientifically wrong and then you say you don't need science. So which is it?

How come no medical or scientific organization agrees with your definition that a man is just someone born with a p**is?

Democratic corruption.

Gender regards sociology and psychology. Sex regards biology. Learn your science.

Gender terms = man, woman, non-binary, etc.

Sex terms = male, female, intersex, etc.

Using them interchangeably is only evidence that you yourself don't understand the science. Sex is broken into three distinct groups: Male, female, and intersex (intersex being the group for anyone who does not align with the chromosomal or physical traits we typically assign to one of the other groups).

The male group isn't "static" either - it's a spectrum. For instance, not all males have the same physiology. Some have bigger and smaller genital areas. Some have more or less hair. Some have more or less testosterone, etc. The same is true for the female group and the intersex group.

In sociology and psychology, the terms man, woman, nonbinary, fluid, etc - they all regard identity of self and how that identity relates to roles within one's personal life and that of society.

These ideas are correlated but they are NOT interchangeable.

The problem you're having is that your common sense is fueled by ignorance.

Tell me exactly when they changed the definition of gender to be their feelings.

Also, intersex is not a gender, it is a mutation.

You can say you're a basketball all you want, the thing is, thinking that way is a PROVEN mental disorder. It is called Gender Dysphoria, when you don't feel right in you BIOLOGICAL gender group (and yes, there are only 2 genders, male and female).

Well here's the problem with your thought. The "dysphoria" is the opposite of "euphoria" - rather than a feeling of "rightness" or "correctness." That dysphoria is brought on by the disagreement from other influences with what the individual identifies as the role in society that best suits them.

You're thinking about this incorrectly by assigning inanimate objects. Think about it more like this: If I want to be a person who swings a hammer and I'm REALLY good with the hammer and feel comfortable with the hammer but then everyone around me tells me that I'm not allowed to swing a hammer and instead I have to bake pies while I don't know how to bake pies very well and they don't come out very nice - eventually I'm going to get a bit "dysphoric" about that. I feel a bit stuck in that role and I wish to break free.

So - replace the "role" of being a hammer swinger with the "role" of doing actions and taking the place of a man. I am a man myself. Luckily, this role fits for me. So if someone told me I had to take on stereotypically woman roles and actions and forced me into that position, I'd probably be a bit dysphoric in the same way the hammer man making pies would be.

As you can see with this analogy, the problem isn't the hammer swinger at all. The problem is that people are forcing a guy who is good at swinging hammers to be stuck in a bakery simply because they think he looks more like a baker. Well, he's not a baker. He's a hammer swinger. Same same.

The fix for this dysphoria is training people to advocate for the roles they want for themselves - and that's what psychologists focus on. The individual finding ways to not feel the dysphoria about what society is doing to them. Now, this isn't exclusive to transgendered people. We do gender affirming care for all types of sociological genders. Men get testosterone sometimes for low T. Women get estrogen, cosmetic surgery, etc. Men get genital enhancements and hair restoration services to help them feel like they better align with their role as well. This isn't exclusive to them.

So the disorder does exist, but it's not specifically caused by the individual. It's caused by people like you - forcing people into one role or another without their consent. In fact, the whole reason there are other genders in between is for the same reason - some don't like EITHER of the two archetypal genders. Some don't want ANY such label - those people call themselves "nonbinary"

So you're wrong.

Exactly when? 1955 when John Money introduced the term gender role to the sociological and psychological communities. This was eventually adopted in the 70's and 80's as the standard among those communities. Thanks for asking. I'm glad you want to learn instead of continuing in your ignorance.

Now, intersex is not a gender - you are correct. Intersex is a group within the biological sexual bi-modal spectrum that aligns closest to the range within the middle, though there is an isolated group in the middle that have no distinct sex one way or the other as well. So you are right. You're learning. Intersex is NOT a gender. It's a grouping of sexualities along the bi-modal spectrum of sexual biology. Good job! You're also correct that mutation can be one of the causes for someone to fall into this intersex group. It isn't the only one though. Prenatal hormone imbalance in the mother, endocrine disrupting chemicals, hormone regulation or gonad dysfunction, or even placental and maternal-fetal interactions can all also account for people falling into this group. The trouble is that mutations account for only about 30% of intersex cases on the whole. 70% of intersex biology cases have no identified genetic cause.

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/new-research-provides-clues-to-why-people-are-born-intersex/u3y5fwa43

It's wonderful that you want to learn and you're even doing a good job of learning a bit here. You've actively demonstrated that you understand that sex and gender are different. *claps* bravo. Maybe a little more reading will help you along the way to not being ignorant about it.

I do not care about feelings. Gender and sex are states of physical being and therefore are synonyms, of course, you would know that if you went to a basic biology and anatomy class and learned the differences in skeletal structure between males and females. If you wanna say you identify as a smurf or a pencil or a f*g alien, be my guest, it doesn't change what you are, no matter how much you may wish it does.

Well, again, biology, sociology, and psychology are not all the same domain of science. You seem to be fundamentally lacking this understanding. Maybe instead of me going to a basic biology or anatomy class for the umpteenth time you could try taking ANY sociology or psychology class that incorporates gender into the curriculum. Then you wouldn't be so drastically behind on this conversation.

Nobody is contending that claiming to be a woman makes them inherently female. That would obviously be absurd. Trans women are women but they are not confused thinking they have women biology inside of them, for instance. That would obviously be wildly incorrect.