Imgflip Logo Icon

Kirk went up against some very smart liberals but when your foundation is all lies, you cannot debate the truth

Kirk went up against some very smart liberals but when your foundation is all lies, you cannot debate the truth | Have you ever wondered why there has never been a leftist version of Charlie Kirk? If anyone even dared attempt it, they would be so utterly destroyed by facts. There just isn't anyone on the left intelligent enough to effectively debate any conservative. | image tagged in debates,no leftist version of charlie kirk | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
648 views 36 upvotes Made by AdamSmithsInvisibleHand 12 months ago in politics
picard thinking memeCaption this Meme
209 Comments
10 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
8 ups, 12mo,
2 replies
And that is just 2 out of a whole lot more of those "geniuses". The left is full of these people who cannot stand reality.
7 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
Yeah... and not one of them would ever dare to debate Kirk...
4 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
They don't debate anyone. When's the last time you saw AOC or Crockett or Omar debate someone? They never debate - they just spew out whatever talking points are put on their paper in front of them.
1 up, 12mo,
3 replies
Their politicians. Politicians don't debate anyway
3 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
That's what I just said lol. We have found a common ground Czech Cheese. We both understand that politicians don't do a lot of debating.

You're one step closer to leaving behind Democrat/Socialist/Marxist ideals
1 up, 12mo,
1 reply
I'm not a Marxist anyway
3 ups, 12mo
Good Marxists aren't cool.
2 ups, 12mo,
2 replies
Which is a sad truth. We used to ensure every level of public official would hold debates - such that voters could make informed decisions about how they will exercise their right to vote.

Now a days we don't do that quite as much - instead of a debate, we put politician up in front of a group of like minded individuals who ask questions & the like minded individual asking the question just gets their belief reaffirmed. They don't get the chance to hear views and opinions from the other side of the aisle.

So both R and D voters end up going to the ballot box believing they are absolutely correct in their thinking - never having experienced what someone from the opposite party thinks of a topic.

The end result is polarized individuals who end up seeing opposing views as the enemy, when the reality is that what they want and the other side wants often align in Desired Outcome - but have vastly different mechanisms to get to that Desired Outcome.
3 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
And any 'legit' debates end up being three ring circuses and/or one giant pissing match between major candidates.
2 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
Yep! Except when Trump is in a Primary Debate. He just mops the floor with the candidates.
[deleted]
0 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
"They're eating the dogs!" and "You're being very rude!" are a couple of my favorites. He don't need to go full on to expose his opponent's flaws either.
0 ups, 12mo
Usually they do that on their own & then act like nobody noticed. Trump noticed lmao
1 up, 12mo,
1 reply
I'm not saying politicians cannot debate. I'm just saying that's not their main job.
1 up, 12mo,
1 reply
Definitely not their main job - but it should be part of the hiring practices. Politicians don't get up and debate the issues the people bring up anymore prior to elections, except for Presidential & Vice Presidential candidates.
2 ups, 12mo
They don’t do that because the left cannot agree to disagree and the Rinos didnt want to get dirty.
2 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
I leftists politicians don’t debate. Their policies don’t work and increase suffering and they can’t even defend them in open debate.
0 ups, 2d,
1 reply
Leftist politicians are virtually non-existent.
0 ups, 2d,
1 reply
😂 the entire Democrat party are leftists. Their political class are most certainly leftists aas exemplified by embracing Commie ideals.
0 ups, 1d
That's like saying the entire Republican party is Mitt Romney.
2 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
The real reason there isn't a Democrat version of Charlie Kirk (besides that one dude Dean) is that Democrats get dunked on by folks like me. I'm nowhere on Kirk's level, but totally Dunk in political debate on this site. All the fun politics posters do on the regular and we are just normal every day people.

If we can have a Dunk session on the regular - Democrats don't have a chance. So nobody will ever try to be Democrat Kirk.
2 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
You're absolutely right. Not only that it is very very very hard to argue when the foundation for all of your claims are based on some fantasy world. You just can't argue from a false premise.
1 up, 12mo,
1 reply
Except for that one dude Dean. He's very Shapiro in fast talk & fact based like Kirk
1 up, 12mo,
1 reply
I'm not familiar with him. Is Dean his first or last name? I'll look him up. I would actually like to see a leftie who can actually present their ideas as well as Shapiro.

Bill Maher used to be the Democrats hero but then the Democrats moved to far to the left for him and he never moved. Now Dems don't like as much. But Maher still suffers from trying to make an argument from a week position. That is why so much of what he says is just insult. That's the Saul Alinsky way.

I wonder if Maher will actually have to finally throw out the leftist crap when he realizes it is not viable. Joe Rogan seemed to have.
2 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
I've only seen him a few times but every time he's like some little genius goblin wizard
0 ups, 2d,
1 reply
There are a whole bunch of liberals, leftists, Democrats, and other lefties (besides just Dean) who have been absolutely destroying on YouTube and TikTok debates... Destiny, Sam Seder, Parker, Jimmy Snow, RTP Talks, TomFooleryShow, Isaiah, and even Picklesggs have been going in on MAGA dummies all year. That has basically replaced my imgflip time. I mean memes are cool or whatever but eh..

Also as far as CK the vast majority of people Kirk ever "dunked on" were random college freshmen... so I hate to break it to you but idk how much interest there is in anyone on the left trying to be "a Democrat version of Charlie Kirk".... Unless you still consider yourself a Democrat. Maybe just you. Lol
0 ups, 17h,
1 reply
Kirk's whole thing was reaching youth, so that makes sense. The folks coming to him are coming with what they've learned in mostly public schooling & university -- so dunking on a lot of folks with similar opinions that are a product of their educational systems is pretty impressive, because he was breaking the mold of mindless socialist ideal driven drones.
0 ups, 9h
Not saying it doesn't make sense for him politically to try and convert the youth.

I'm saying dunking on random students walking around about culture war issues (which idk if schools actually teach about?) when they probably have little to no debate experience just doesn't seem that impressive to me.

Also I tend to assume the pool of his dunk clips is most likely biased in his favor. Because if any of those college kids did dunk on him, it would not make sense for him to post the clip. Maybe he posted long form videos of the entire events though.. not sure.
7 ups, 12mo,
3 replies
They'd be destroyed by their own side for daring to go against the narrative.
4 ups, 12mo
You nailed that one. Absolutely truth.
2 ups, 12mo
You beat me to it. Completely true.
0 ups, 2d
Sooo ironic that anyone on the right would dare say that considering life long Republicans are cast aside for not being lockstep with trump. 😂
6 ups, 12mo,
2 replies
0 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
but that's why i like ya tone, you a good egg.
[deleted]
0 ups, 12mo
1 up, 12mo,
1 reply
Two things conservatives hate
4 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
Lmao nope. Reasoning & objective facts belong to the Conservatives these days.

Example: XX XY chromosomes. Conservatives will tell you factually these mean Male and Female. Democrats will argue that gender is a state of mind.

1,000 years from now - when archaeologists are digging up civilization from 2025 & they find Transgender Skeletons, the DNA analysis will prove that the Transgender Individuals are either XX or XY. Male or Female. Not the genders the Transgender individuals expressed for themselves.

That's called an objective fact. Something Democrats have a hard time accepting.
3 ups, 12mo
Yes they are. Chromosomes absolutely determine the physical sex of an individual. Full Stop, the science has already been settled. There's even scientific acknowledgement of the very occasional XXY where someone was born with attributes of both sexes. Those people are genetic anomalies.

Conservatives don't actually ignore what's in the brain - they acknowledge that there's something off in the brain of a biological boy that thinks they are actually a girl or Vice Versa.

Gender follows the biological sex of the individual. You might be a woman, who thinks they are and identifies as a Man. That's fine - that's not objective facts though, those are subjective feelings. But 1,000 years from now - the skeleton will be that of a woman - they pull DNA and the DNA will spell it out. That's how objective facts work.
3 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
Emotions and Thoughts - are subjective personal accounts. They are not Objective Facts. Objective Facts are observable from external sources. Emotions and Thoughts are internal sources. Those are personal to the individual.

Which is fine - if someone wants to identify as the opposite sex, I have no quarrel with being nice to them and using their preferred pronouns. What I do have a problem is accepting it as scientific fact that they are the opposite sex - because under a high enough powered microscope, every single cell in their body will be coded with the sex that was determined at birth.
0 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
"What I do have a problem is accepting it as scientific fact that they are the opposite sex"

Did Czechy ask you to accept it as a "scientific fact" that transgender women = biological women? 🤔 Who ever asked you that?
2 ups, 12mo,
2 replies
Well when I stated that Democrats would argue gender is a state of mind, then CzechyCheese proceeded to argue how it's a state of mind - I provided a retort to their response. You know... how the way civil discourse/debate works.
[deleted]
2 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
I prefer "Chucky cheese"
0 ups, 12mo
Wtf is chucky cheese ?
0 ups, 12mo,
1 reply
Actually they said it's a "societal thing". And it's more or less true. Different societies would probably have different ideas about what it means to be different genders.. but maybe less so about different sexes.

But again who is asking you to accept as a scientific fact that someone is the opposite sex? Or is this an imaginary problem that you made up?
1 up, 12mo,
1 reply
When I said folks on conservative side would say that they would factually point to facts & liberals would make it about feelings & then Mr Cheese made a point talking about how it's head stuff and not facts.

Let me point out that gender being something other than fact - is definitely less right than it is more right.

Imaginary concepts don't make facts - science does. XX XY & the incredibly ultra rare XXY. Male Female & the incredibly ultra rare genetic anomaly.

Any XX or XY that thinks they are the other gender is fine by me. They can think that all they want and I'll be polite & call them by their preferred stance. Doesn't change the fact that they are just pretending to be the opposite sex.
0 ups, 2d,
1 reply
Guys I won the debate because look .... a picture of Michael Jordan!! 🫪 Lol

Folks on the conservative side "factually point to facts" ?? Lol wut ? They don't even know what the facts are.. and idk if they could give less of a sh*t.

Wanna know how seriously conservatives take the facts around this topic? Ask em what they think about gender studies and wait for the laugh.

You pointing out that "gender is something other than fact" sure sounds like a concession to me... 🤷‍♂️"Less right" or "more right" sounds like feelings.

And I guess I'll ask you one more time since you dodged it several times....

Who asked you to accept it as a "scientific fact" that transgender women = biological women? Was it feelings or did you hear a story somewhere? Show me on this doll where they hurt you bro.😂
0 ups, 17h
Every person that is trans & insists (under the threat of whatever form of temper tantrum awaits) to be addressed by their preferred pronouns. "IT'S MA'AM" person, person who threatened Ben Shapiro on a talk program, Athletes that wish to participate in Sports of their preferred gender & not biological gender, person who wish to use changing rooms and restrooms of their preferred gender and not biological gender, persons who insist there are more than 3 genders (male/female/ultra rare both).

All of those people are wanting everyone else to accept that they are indeed the gender of choosing (not fact based XX/XY/ultra rare XXY) & they want to society to conform to that ideology.
3 ups, 12mo
[deleted]
2 ups, 12mo
https://i.imgflip.com/a73eda.gif
Show More Comments
picard thinking memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
Have you ever wondered why there has never been a leftist version of Charlie Kirk? If anyone even dared attempt it, they would be so utterly destroyed by facts. There just isn't anyone on the left intelligent enough to effectively debate any conservative.