Coincidence? I Think Not...

That example is a very good exhibit of it.

The fact that conservatives can‘t understand why people get more left leaning when they get more educated will allways make me laugh.

The fact that leftists can't understand why they can't get a job their made up college degree is supposed to get them will always make me laugh.

In theory they 'learn' real American history but then their leftist teachers 'interpret' that history to make anti-American WOKEism -- including Marxism -- seem both logical and emotionally appealing.

Nor is this done randomly or by accident. It is planned and coordinated by their union leadership and also by the very nature of what these teachers themselves 'learn' while undergoing their 'educational' studies in leftist controlled colleges.

But personal politics have no place in schools.
The children are there to develop their reading, math, spelling, and other educational skills. And if the teachers are taking time for lessons on being woke and gender studies, that's just taking time away from real subjects that will help the children in life.

Yes but to the Left, ideological indoctrination IS real education. This is consistent with their known and documented histories.

But couldn't putting children at a disadvantage in that way be seen as a form of child abuse? That they're being paid for. Just thinking about that sounds like cruel and unusual punishment.

Yes it does; but ideologically speaking these people are the equivalent of the worst type of hard core religious fanatic; and so they don't see it that way.

That's scary...that's what they think is the best teachers for the children. It's like they're being indoctrinated into a cult. Often against what the parents want.

This is why homeschooling is growing at a fast pace.

I would believe that.

When they renamed the class from History to Social studies was a big clue which way the indoctrination system was headed.

That's probably very true.

Racially biased history is slanted to not provide the full picture on purpose, and
as a result purposefully creates animosity towards one neighbors or ones parents, or grandparents/ancestors, when an entire generation is taught a view that
in adulthood, will create cognitive dissonance, en masse.

The divide and conquer strategy.

The length of history anyone needs to know is short and it mostly shows the conservative-liberal divide.

*most conservatives born here *
before: Service was ok with reasonable costs
Soon after: Government got involved
Soon after that: Things got worse and more expensive
Immediately after: Government got more involved
Then: Services trashed, costs spiralling
*most liberals born here *
Now: Government points out issues, claims government can fix it
Later: Liberal voting for socialism

Again my position is, Democrats don't want to represent you, they want to rule you.

Who thinks young people who have not been taught civics, are voting?
https://youtu.be/MIwv_I6THTA?si=Nnpvy582_uLnkfJk

I hope you like it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgEli5zAi0U

That's a good comparison.

didnt mean it in either direction, everybody forgets about socialist west berlin for some reason...

One reaps what one will SEW

Sozialistische Einheitspartei Westberlins

Gerhard Danelius
Erich Honecker

Marxists gotta Marx. Bernie gotta Bernie. Chomsky gotta Chomsky. Marcuse gotta Jacuzzi w/BLM

i have no idea why extreme conservatives are so pissed about communism, which i mind you, Communist Party USA was illegalized.
and same goes for far leftists talking about fascism. like bitch I'm pretty sure even the worst presidents we've had know their limits

"illegalized" ?
Helluvan essay Jack

One does not have to be an "extreme" conservative calling "communism"
nor a "far leftist" name calling "fascism"
...to learn that the 3 ladies that ran the BLM movement during and after the George Floyd Social Justice Warrior follies self-identified as "TRAINED MARXISTS" or

...to learn that Angela Davis ran for Vice President in 1980 & 1988 for the Communist Party USA and then they did so poorly, and the USSR and CUBA was so unpopular that the Party she was so high up in, just decided to CHANGE IT's NAME.
If it were as you say, "illegalized", then Professor Davis might have had to give back her
LENIN MEDAL she earned for being such a strong supporter of The Cause.

-Davis was the protege' of Herbert Marcuse of The Frankfort School in the 1960's on the WRONG side of the Berlin Wall that came down in 1989.
-You know, the side of the Wall that JFK heroically was dropping food into Berlin.
-You know, the side of Moscow, that Bernie Sanders got married in, when NO americans ever came back from, but people like him to spread the news of USSR, Venezuelan, and Cuban idealistic superiority ?

the Communist Control Act of 1954 restricted CPUSA members from certain powerful positions in the US.

*Ah, the 2nd Red Scare of J. Edgar Hoover & Joe McCarthy was over by 1980, No?

and they received below 0.02% of the votes.

& what's that have to do with the restrictions claimed in 1954 ?

so they're not getting any elections their way any time soon.

What ?
Was it overlooked that The Communist Cause recently won 3 elections:
2008, 2012, & 2020

soon means in the future, dingbat

...so according to your words, the far left commie/Marxists hidden by the fold,
under and into the label of Libweirdo Democrats will not be
"getting any elections their way any time soon."

Brilliant !
I'll make note of your words.

BTW, why did the Communist Control Act of 1954 that you mention not keep Obama nor Biden from being restricted for "certain powerful positions in the USA"

Semantics ?

because they weren't CPUSA members.

https://youtu.be/TisotBmWaps?si=8yKOE-yq4QHVsXxL

You might want to check on that. You know how the Democrats like to change terms.

imgflip.com/i/a1wkv5

i said communism.
not socialism.

What's the difference, they both want to control you and your money?

The difference is that in one the government controls the means if production in the name of the masses, and in the other the government controls the means of production in the name of the masses.

Thank you. That's a good explanation of the differences.

SOCIALISM:
Implemented partly in countries such as the kingdoms of Norway and Sweden and the Republic of Finland, aims to retain some private property rights, and attempts to close the gap between social classes, while keeping the practice of money and wages, acting as the transition phase between full capitalism and marxism-leninism
COMMUNISM:
Implemented in the People's Republic of China, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Cuba, and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, completely stateless, classless, and moneyless. Although communist states like Cuba and China still use money, pure communism, according to later Marxist theory.

Continuing on, socialism only controls the means of production and distribution in major plants like factories and utilities, and gives wages based on their contribution, meaning work is actually needed to keep the workers from bankruptcy, mostly preventing economic collapse, while communism controls all means of production, distribution, and exchange and gives rations based solely on need, which in practice, can cause full economic collapse if the workers stop doing their work

aww did bitchboy have nothing to respond with??

It appears you already did respond to yourself.

it's been a week
you could've at least tried to refute me