Gee, I wonder why they don't do those things

Or just not disable comments in their political memes

It's actually fun to challenge liberals on their views. Because they don't really have any foundation to them. Well, they do, but their foundation is just spending... throwing money at a problem. But, as we've discovered with DOGE, usually they're just lining their own pockets, grifting for their fellow grifters, paying kickbacks, etc.

The next time anyone has to discuss an issue with a liberal, let them have their say. They'll just say some made up bullshit anyway. Then ask them a pointed question about what they just said.

Watch them bail out.

Of course, the libs here on the mighty imgflip aren't like that. They still can't explain in detail why their ideas are good, but they can explain why MAGA's are bad. It usually starts and ends with the color orange.

The fact that Leftists often get very frustrated when trying to explain their position under the slightest scrutiny, should be the time when they clue in that they're wrong. For anything, if your position doesn't hold up to scrutiny, then you should learn from the situation and update your position.

We try to hold formal debates, we really do. You guys just dismiss our opinions the moment we mention that we’re democratic.

Formal debates are where one can speak their opinions uninterrupted. Yet the Left has held so few as compared to the right.

Except that the Democrat National Committee 2024, left out the voting and participation part of
democratic and their own Party was good with that. Great Idea! Brilliant!
The opposition won't notice.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/democratic-process

The Left also don't hold Primary Elections for their Presidential Candidate.
They hold Selections as part of their marxist-version of the Democratic Process

Valid point. Upvote.

Let's GO TACO

As a leftist (in many ways), I'm happy to have a Q&A with you right now if you like

You mean ivermectin?

Yeah, it's a key ingredient in horse dewormer.

I know. Ivermectin is an ingredient in a lot of things because it's an anti-parasite.

It's great that you understand that horse dewormer is an anti-parasitic and not a vaccine.

Of course, because nobody claimed horse dewormer is a vaccine. The only claims are that one of its ingredients, ivermectin, can be used to treat symptoms of covid-19. Which is true.

yeah, you can. But it's like using cheese whiz as a sun block. You can do it. It won't do anything. But you can do it.

Well I don't think the success it showed in treating Covid was just an accident, but I won't claim to be some kind of expert on it. Kind of like how Fauci claimed the vaccine was effective at stopping Covid.

Sez the person of 'bot' that scoffs at Ivermectin as a medicine used safely by humans to treat and prevent a variety of maladies, from headlice to scabies, even a varitey of parasites.

Yes, it does work as a Horse dewormer and from what one can read on the NIH website in an article from 2010, that in many more cases, a HUMAN DeWormer too. & may work in other cases too.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please cite a Peer Reviewed Medical Study that supports your claim
"that it (ivermectin) won't do anything." Just provide the link, and I'll acknowledge here that you are correct. & just please don't tell us you google searched it so can assure everyone that you saw a headline for Nature Magazine backing your claims up.

So, no one is disputing that the horse dewormer doesn't work as a dewormer. It's great at that.

But it doesn't work for covid. Because covid isn't a parasite, it's a virus.

And you asked for a randomized peer reviewed study showing that horse dewormer doesn't work for covid: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35353979/

That's publicly available paper, but it was originally published in the New England Journal of Medicine. It wasn't a meta-study, but had over 3000 patients.

Horse dewormer doesn't do shit for covid. It never did. And the only people who told you it did were the ones willing to sell it to you.

It's great that you think that mRna Booster Jab Juice is a 'Vaccine' that stops transmission

Can you name one vaccine in the whole ass history of vaccines that has stopped transmission if you get infected after receiving the vaccine?

Just one.

Odd premise.
If one were to get infected after receiving an actual vaccine, it seems then that vaccine did not work to develop antibodies against said contagion, and as such, that individual attempt at vaccination was ineffective.

Is that not rudimentary human immunology, for why vaccines work when they do, which one might add is statistically most ALL of the time?

*Mind you, as a disclaimer, I'm just well read & I'm not a Physician, so these are great questions to ask your doctor, the next time you see her.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BTW, Those studies you said you saw from Yale, Oxford, Nature, Lancet etc... are not Peer Reviewed Randomized Studies. The Oxford one I suspect is the Review of data, Says that right in the description, and not a
Peer Reviewed Randomized medical study. Yet, of course you knew that already.

There's a ridiculous amount of misinformation out there. Dig a little deeper. As you say, and I quote, "Maybe you should take the time to verify something like that in the future."

Do you have anything further to add ?

This may come as a shock, but no vaccine in history has offered 100% protection from infection. Not even the small pox vaccine. The one we used to inoculate the world and eradicate the disease? Its effectiveness rate is 95%. Meaning, if you vaccinated 100 people with it and then exposed them to smallpox, 5 would still be infected. Those 5 could still transmit the disease.

And you're thinking, "well, that's okay because it's a life time of 95% protection!" Bad news. It only lasts for 5 to 7 years. 10 at the most. After that... it's as if you've never been vaccinated.

No vaccine has ever stopped transmission. No vaccine has offered 100% protection. Ever.

So, when someone says to you that the mRNA vaccines don't work because they don't stop transmission, you know they don't know what they're talking about OR they're deliberately lying to you.

Surprise! It's not a vaccine, yet as Elon said "Synthetic mRna is a Revolutionary Medicine" & that Peter Thiel says "We ought to hold a Tickertape Parade for the inventors" of the mRna based Covid-19 'Vaccine'

The current NIH Director states that even when he got the shot, 4 months later he was Diagnosed with Covid-19; and has said although it is highly effective medicine to reduce the severity of symptoms when contracting a SARS/Coronavirus ie; cold/flu virus, this effect of the mRna booster jabs ONLY LASTS for TWO MONTHS, then quickly wears off.

The Covid-Jabs "Immune System Wonder Booster Juice"
work well as a short term preventative treatment for severe symptoms, yet they are not a vaccine, even if you call it one.

Ask your physician to cite a Randomized Study or two.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3043740

Tis but one effective use that you cite.
Why is it you omit the use for Humans?
One Sure looks BRILLIANT acknowledging ONLY one of the medicines uses as horse/
equine dewormer

-"Currently, some 80–90 million people are taking the drug annually through MDA in Africa, Latin America and Yemen. A further 300 million total treatments have been approved..."

-"It is also known that the prevalence of head lice is markedly reduced in children taking ivermectin tablets and that scabies is markedly reduced in populations taking the drug regularly"

-"In 2010, Ecuador became the second country in the Americas to halt River Blindness transmission. It is hoped that transmission of the disease in the Western hemisphere will be stopped by 2012—a goal that will have been achieved thanks to twice-yearly MDA with ivermectin."

Now, you may be correct or incorrect with it's effectiveness vs. Covid-19;
as JUST LIKE
mRna Booster Juice Jabs; there exist ZERO/NO/NADA randomized Studies published in any major Medical Journal proving or disproving effectiveness or the stopping of transmission.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3043740

That's a bold claim about boosters and not being published in any major medical journal. Just...did you take a moment to search some terms like "mRna Booster effectiveness covid" or "covid booster shot effective" at all?

Or did someone tell you that, and you accepted it because you wanted it to be true?

I'm willing to bet it was the 2nd one because I just did a search for mRna Booster effectiveness covid and I found results from Yale, Oxford, NIH, Nature, Lancet and others.

Maybe you should take the time to verify something like that in the future?

I did not state the claims you make have not been published in any major medical journal.
I did ask you or anyone else to cite a Randomized Study that proves such claims. Just one.
Still waiting for that link.

For you, out of kindness, I'd suggest fast-forwarding through most of this link to watch the roughly
2 minutes from 43:19 to 45:20

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2e3QAYrzR0&t=2010s
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's an interview from 2 years ago of our current NIH Director and yes, credentials matter.

...it's not my "bold claim" it's his. He has published over 130 peer reviewed randomized studies.

(and I'd like to think that even someone with your particular individual set of bias,
might learn from watching the entire interview, which is a nearly one hour long program.)

You did search for mRna Booster effectiveness and found results, none of which demonstrate that it is a Vaccine, nor that it actually works even remotely like a vaccine. Is there anything out there in the past two years that shows these work longer than two months ?

They work, they just don't work for very long in duration, and the frequency of this need to take the experimental prevention juice may prove to be problematic as an effective medicine in the long term strategy of overall Public Health.

"Today, ivermectin is being increasingly used worldwide to combat other diseases in humans, such as Strongyloidiasis (which infects some 35 million each year), scabies (which causes 300 million cases annually), Pediculosis, Gnathostomiasis and Myiasis—and new and promising properties and uses for ivermectin and other avermectin derivatives are continuing to be found."

Source: FEBRUARY 10, 2011 article "Ivermectin, 'Wonder Drug' from Japan: the human use perspective by Andy Crump and Satoshi Omura...

...published on NIH website for the USA National Library of Medicine / National Center for Biotechnology Information

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3043740/

And in all of that medical science, were those parasitic or viral?