There are plenty of arguments as to why illegal migration is wrong. I don't agree with many of them, but if you can categorically prove to me that it's wrong every single time, I'll believe you. What even is your point? Every comment it seems to change. I don't morally believe you should be deported if you enter illegally, but legally, you should (at least in the US). There is a difference between what's illegal and what's immoral (note Apartheid South Africa).
My point is that there is no evidence to suggest Harris allowed any sort of criminal invasion through the southern border.
Thank God Almighty I haven't. I'm not a child anymore, so he probably wouldn't try to rape me, but he probably hates the fact that I not only have a moral compass, but also a belief in human rights. Meanwhile all he has is a love of Putin's and Bill Clinton's D*cks
It is actually the public's job and place to police the police. Who else do you think does it? What do you think "Protect and Serve" means? Even better though, ICE have nowhere near the accountability the police has. If hundreds of police detainees just disappeared one day, people would raise eyebrows, there'd probably be a national inquiry or something. Exactly that happened with Alligator Alcatraz, and ICE has faced no consequences.
Now I really love the comparison you've made between ICE and SWAT raids, because SWAT raids take place on criminals believed to be armed and dangerous. The two women were not armed. In fact, there is no reason for ICE to be any more heavily armed than a police officer on patrol, since illegal entry into the country is a nonviolent, civil offence. If you really think the women drove because an ageny was in front of the car, you're sorely mistaken. At the same time, another agent was attempting to open the car door. If you'll look at the video, the woman turns the steering wheel all the way to her right before accelerating, even though the agent was directly in front/to her left. And last I checked, obstructing a federal agent is not a crime for which the death penalty applies. It was not self defence, since by the time shots were fired, the car was already past the agent with no other agents in the way.
Let me be clear: the two drove to escape, and even turned the wheel away from the agent. Shots were fired after any danger to the agent had passed. There was no reason to shoot to kill, they were not armed and ICE is not SWAT. The two are seperate for a reason.
You've moved the goalposts. You said there was an invasion of criminals, now you've just gone to giving a lukewarm take on migration. Either defend your point or admit you're wrong
The US hasn't had open borders for decades. Most migrants are not only harmless, but in fact provide great benefit by working, just as most police officers provide great benefit by preventing crime. Some migrants commit crimes, or don't contribute, or whatever, so we have border controls to ensure as few of these migrants as possible enter the country. You may say it needs to be stricter, but that is not the point here. The controls and accountability systems that prevent ICE from abusing their power have been clearly shown not to work (if they even exist, which I don't know), so institutional reform of ICE is necessary, in the exact same way that if migrants killed people, I would expect better border control to prevent such a thing happening again.
