Imgflip Logo Icon

Ever notice how brave the Left is?

Ever notice how brave the Left is? | LIBERAL POSTERS HERE IN 
POLITICS SINCE THE ELECTION; COMMENTS | image tagged in democrats,liberals,woke,leftists,kamala harris,pussies | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
580 views 39 upvotes Made by flare4roach 1 month ago in politics
Boy and Girl scared of Bunny memeCaption this Meme
88 Comments
8 ups, 1mo
Leonardo Dicaprio Wolf Of Wall Street Meme | DO I SEE THE BRAVERY OF LIBERAL POSTERS ? NO ! | image tagged in memes,leonardo dicaprio wolf of wall street | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
comments disabled

😄👍🇺🇸
7 ups, 1mo
Simpsons Seizure | *TRUMP WINS* DEMS | image tagged in simpsons seizure | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
4 ups, 1mo
Laughing Leo Meme | LMAO! | image tagged in memes,laughing leo | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
4 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
However, they no longer have the popular vote and Electoral College pegs to hang their hats on.
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Why would anyone do that? We don’t want densely populated areas deciding who will be president for the whole country.
0 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
News flash: Land doesn’t vote. People do.
Why should someone’s vote be essentially worth more because of where they live?
2 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
News flash: nobody believes land votes. But the minority vote of less populated places also needs to be given consideration — something that does not happen if the larger cities get to override everything.
0 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
Cities don’t vote either. It’s not like every person in NYC votes exactly the same
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
People in NYC vote for candidates who cater to their needs, such as mass transit, office jobs, tourism, etc. People in rural communities vote for candidates who cater to needs such as agriculture, mining, industry, etc.
Do you think Harris would give a rat’s tail about fracking if we used the popular vote?
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Harris doesn’t give a rat’s tail anyway. She only acted like that to get Pennsylvania votes.
Without the electoral college, candidates can be more truthful on where they stand instead of having to lie to different state populations to get their electoral votes
0 ups, 1mo
In other words, ignore different states because they only care about cities with the highest populations.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Psst. Sometimes the word “cities” refers to their populations. That’s the way English works.
0 ups, 1mo
And like I said, a single population doesn’t vote all the same.
0 ups, 1mo
Extra consideration. Wyoming's votes are in effect worth four times that of the State of California. California. The entire state.
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
That’s a news flash for you?
I see you agree with the electoral college from your 2nd sentence.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
No, the opposite. If someone votes in Wyoming, then that is essentially worth more than a vote in NYC because since there’s less people there, it means they have more say in where their electoral college votes go to.

And to counter the argument of different states being worth more, Wyoming has such a small population that they have the minimum amount of electoral votes (being 3). So if you do the math on the population, it essentially means an individual vote in Wyoming is worth more than an individual vote in NYC.

I say phooey to that! Let the people directly elect the president instead of the old, archaic system.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
So, you must also believe that Washington DC, Delaware and Vermont also have more say because they have the minimum votes too.

The minimum votes ensure that smaller states get a minimum amount of representation. NYC’s population makes a vote in a small town in upstate NY worth more than a vote in Phoenix, AZ, by your logic.

The “archaic” system makes sure that smaller states have at least some say in who gets elected.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
I do believe that, yes. It doesn’t matter if a star is blue or red, its size should not mean a citizen’s individual vote has any different weight.

So what if most of the population lives in a few big cities? After all, then wouldn’t the policy made from those elections benefit the most people?
0 ups, 1mo,
3 replies
Yeah, they would benefit large densely populated areas - thus giving those people the most say. Or, as you put it, making their vote higher weighted than rural communities.

Our founding fathers knew that was a bad idea so they came up with the representative system we have now. More populated states still have a larger representation. But at least smaller states get some representation.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Where are you getting the idea that one person having one vote has unbalanced weight without the electoral college? One’s political alignment isn’t automatically decided by their location. A person who votes for the losing party in a big city loses an election just as much as one in a rural community. There is no higher weight. One person, one vote.
0 ups, 1mo
You’re missing the point. To win the popular vote, the most efficient use of time and money is to focus on large cities where they can swoon the most people at a time. This was more so before we had modern communication systems.
So, the rural communities get ignored because it takes more time and money to meet with the same number of people because they are spread so far apart.
Since people in large cities would have the ears of the candidates they have a greater influence (weight) than people in rural communities.
0 ups, 1mo
It is, but it’s not the end all be all. Heck, we saw it in this election cycle. Trump’s rally sizes were dwindling, yet he finally won the popular vote.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Good point, but you’re forgetting that with that increased technology means increased communications. While in person communication is by all means important, many voters will just go off what they’ve seen on television or social media about a candidate and never even think about seeing them in person. So a candidate’s message can reach further than the cities in which they campaign
0 ups, 1mo
But you see they still do in person rallies, so in person is important.
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
dems are shocked after every election they don't win that it's the electoral college that decides who gets elected... Unbelievable that they are surprised every time... lol
0 ups, 1mo
I wasn’t surprised, just disappointed
4 ups, 1mo
4 ups, 1mo
😂 it’s been refreshing not to have the hate mongers and race baiters around for a while.
1 up, 1mo
:0)
1 up, 1mo
0 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
What's to say? He won.

I hope you get everything you voted for.

Everything.
3 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Secure borders, Deported illegal alien criminals en masse, The end of DEI Hiring practice, the end of TransGender Cultism, ..yea I hope we get everything too.
0 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
Gotta take the lumps with the good. Remember that no matter how cheap gas prices get, they have the added cost of Ukrainian blood, as well as any other nation Putin wants to invade since he knows Trump won’t stop him
2 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Well the Ukrainians blood was spilling gallons upon gallons with the democratic leadershipin place wasn't it? How long would you spill thier blood fighting an endless war? So cheap gas and Peace with no blood split is a good thing wouldn't you say? Also I hope you can be woman enough to admit you are wrong when none of these end of the world prediction come to pass... Don't be like Gumshoe and end your account because he was wrong on everything he predicted about Trump.
0 ups, 1mo,
3 replies
If the borders of Ukraine are the same in four years as they are now, gloat all you want.

Heck, I know I was wrong about the election results. I know I underestimated just how much America abhors the thought of a woman president. But now when Project 2025 (or Agenda 47, whatever euphemism they’re using for it these days) is implemented, and prices soar due to tariffs, you’ll have no one to blame but yourselves.

And again, if nothing like that happens in four years, feel free to gloat
1 up, 1mo,
2 replies
That’s the problem with Democrats. You need to elect someone based on more than their gender and skin color.
0 ups, 1mo,
3 replies
Have you not seen the front pages or any memes on this site? That's how she was typified by Republicans, derogatively, no less.
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
72 million people chose Trump because of derogative memes about Harris on Imgflip? lmfao
0 ups, 1mo
Uh huh, 'Muhmerica was swayed by memes on an obscure site that has lost over a million Roblox juggling members in one single year!
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
“Mocked is hired? You hired her?”
What are you talking about?
Biden hired her mainly because of her race and gender - textbook DEI hire.
She is mocked in memes because of that, among other things.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
I was talking about you saying you hired her
0 ups, 1mo
Which I didn’t say.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Yes, I’ve seen memes mocking the left for voting based on gender and/or skin color. I’ve made a few myself.
What’s your point?
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
You really just noticed that you and the rest made memes mocking Kamala as a DEI hire, to put it euphemistically?
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
Exactly - hired because of her gender and race. That’s what DEI is about.
0 ups, 1mo
Mocked is hired? You hired her? Interesting.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Harris ran on neither of those things. You all just assumed she did because of her gender and skin color.

Find me clips of Harris campaigning on either of those things unprompted and unprovoked. I’ll wait.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
I didn’t say she ran on that. I’m saying the left votes based on that.

Biden chose Harris to be his VP because she’s a female minority. He also made gender and race the primary qualifications for his SCOTUS nominee.
0 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
I disagree with that. I voted for Harris because I didn’t like Trump’s tariff plan or Project 2025/Agenda 47.

And yes, of course Biden chose Harris for those reasons, as well as her being Someone young to contrast his age. The whole VP position has been used to round out a ticket. Wanna know why Pence was selected in 2016? Because he was a hardcore conservative that contrasted with Trump’s liberal leaning past. And Vance was selected also due to his youth, and being able to articulate Trump’s ideas more cleanly.

As for the SCOTUS Nominee, I doubt that’s truly the case. But given I don’t know much about that, I’ll hear your evidence for that
0 ups, 1mo
Hillary got 65,844,954 votes, 48.2% of thee vote, and nearly 3 million more than Trump,

Kamala got 72,855,297 votes, also 48.2%.

And yes, it's true people didn't like Hillary, a lot of people don't like Hillary. But they don't like Hillary because Hillary is Hillary, not because Hillary is a woman. Kamala didn't get 7 million more votes than Hillary did because people hated her because she was a woman or her skin tone being closer to that of Obama.

Kamala was first and foremost a candidate. Now if you want a wedge her into some sort of niche, well that's on you. But she was a presidential candidate, not a woman of color whatever in a box out there somewhere.
She lost to Trump because of inflation. And because of immigration. That's with the majority. Add to that the circus sideshow that was Biden's cabinet and everything else Biden did to rub his nuts in the face of Trump's base to remind them for 4 years why they voted for Trump in the first place. Yeah, that sure dissuaded them the second time around,,,
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Saying “America abhors the thought of a woman president” indicates that’s the main reason you voted for her. Because it certainly isn’t the reason people voted against her.

Yes, Biden said he would nominate a black woman to the Supreme Court - saying “It’s long overdue.” So, race and gender were the two main qualifications. That’s got to be embarrassing for her, knowing she wasn’t picked for judicial qualifications.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/26/politics/shortlist-breyer-replacement-supreme-court/index.html
0 ups, 1mo
I was indicating that was the main reason people didn’t vote for Harris. Or Hilary for that matter (but Clinton also has some shady Epstein stuff about her, but that only officially came out after she lost).

That being said, I see your point on the SCOTUS thing. But to keep it in perspective, he did nominate a qualified person for the job, one who I’m sure was just as qualified as other candidates
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
How about instead of moving goal posts about Ukraines borders, how about if there is peace. Isn't peace the end result ? How about I get to gloat if there aren't 2 major wars happening at the same time in 2 years, there is not an invasion on our southern border and Illegal gang bangers taking over apartments on American soil. wouldn't those things be something you are happy about as well? We can both gloat about American success, that is all anyone Who voted for Trump wants.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Peace means nothing unless the terms are fair.

Let’s say you built a shed in your backyard, and your neighbor decided they wanted it, so they squat in it. You argue with the neighbor, but they refuse to move, and say they also want your house. So You call the police on them, and the police say you have to give up your shed and then your neighbor won’t take your house. In the end, peace is technically established, but is that fair to you at all?

Going back to Ukraine, that’s pretty much Trump’s plan for “peace”: enabling a murderous bully. So you can’t say I was wrong about my predictions until Trump exits office without this happening.

If Trump does bring peace to these wars in a fair manner, he brings down prices directly through his policies, and he secures the border, then yeah I’ll admit I’m wrong as each thing happens.

Here’s to hoping it does. And as long as we’re hoping on things nigh impossible to happen, here’s to hoping I win the lottery.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Peace means nothing unless the terms are fair? I am sorry but Life is not fair - not dying is better than things not being perfectly fair. Countries come and go and change, their leaders change, and political party come and go.. nothing ever seems fair to everyone. But when your people are not dying , starving , being denied water.. things aint really so bad. btw I would have responded days ago, but the mods felt cute and staggered my timeouts.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
“I’m sorry but Life isn’t fair.”
Well it might be if folks like you would let it be
0 ups, 1mo
noone makes life fair or not.. life is not fair that is reality, no one can chagnge reality. We have plenty of war hawks on our side too, it is beyond ingorant to think we do not. Even Ted Cruz is a war Hawk , we have peopel that want to sacrifice people nonstop, That is where Trump is head and shoulders above them, he wants peace, people not dying is better than a deal not being 100% fair.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
I may very well be the only one on this site who correctly predicted Trump would win in 2016. Even his supporters didn't believe he'd win. What I said to the naysayers starting in 2015 was, "I got one word for you: George W Bush"

I'm one of only three individuals I've heard of on the entire planet that predicted Trump would win. I'm sure there's a couple more, but that's all I know of for now.

I also said that the only reason why he'd lose in 2020 was because of Covid.
1 up, 1mo
Good for you
1 up, 1mo,
1 reply
That blood is on dems... Of course, you would leave that out... SMH
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
How. They’ve done everything in their power to prevent Ukraine from falling under the rule if Russian dictatorship.

That’s like saying someone trying to intervene in a man assaulting a woman is responsible for whatever injuries the woman suffers from the assailant.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
All dems did was get 10s of thousands of people slaughtered on both sides. The industrial war machine eats men, and it can only exist as long as war hawks keep it fed.
0 ups, 1mo,
2 replies
That War Hawk is Putin. He attacked and is still attacking. Ukraine has a right to defend itself from the invasion.

Would you let Hamas run rampant in Israel, potentially overthrowing the entire government and eradicating the state as a whole in the name of “peace”?
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
If Israel gets detroyed , so what? Why does that have to draw America into some endless war - do you know if Ukraine,or Israel disappeared over night , you or anyone else inAmerica would not even know it until the tv told you about it. Its time to worry about America for ONCE.
0 ups, 1mo,
10 replies
I AM worried about America! Do you think Putin’s going to stop at Ukraine? No, especially if we just give him parts of a sovereign nation!

I may not agree with everything Ukraine does, nor is it some holy bastion of Democracy, but leaving it to die only risks greater war. And we will pay in American Blood.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Your looking into a crystal ball you don't have, Russia takes a few miles of Ukraine and then agrees to peace with Ukraine, that is a good day. No more killing , no more soldiers being sacrified to the IWM, and people living their lives again. We would do the exact saem thing if Calfornia tried to secede. We would slughter them all day all until they rejoined. Thinking we wouldn't is ajoke.
0 ups, 1mo
Why are you treating Ukraine like it just seceded from Russia and Russia is justified in its invasion? It’s its own sovereign nation!
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Time is going to fly by, I hope I can remember this conversation in 2 years cause I would really like to come back to it. I want to hear that you are doing great and life is good for you, in two years if you can tell me that , I'll be very happy.
1 up, 1mo
So will I! Even if I’d have to swallow my pride to say it
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
That makes no sense what so ever eiter.. look you believe in endless war, I do not. You think the world has to be perfectly fair and if it isnt dying is better. I do not. That is the crux of this debate. You are never going to convince me that endless war is better than peace. So we might as well simply move on with our lives.
0 ups, 1mo
I don’t believe in endless war. Don’t put words into my mouth.

I believe that it’s better to fund a country defending itself when not doing so could lead to a greater war with our troops on the line.

How can I make you understand that not funding this war will not lead to the peace you expect?
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
because I don't believe the hype the left wingers created over Russia. For some reason The left turned Russia into a boogey man ever since Trump took th election in 2016. Meanwhile china has been taking lands all over the world, victimizing minorites , they are the leader in human rights violations, they released a biological agent on the world and yet for some brain washed reason Russia is still the big bad wolf you are terrifed of and want to sacrifce men to fight . That is why I don't get you. You Ignore China and rage against Russia because left wing media told you to.
0 ups, 1mo
And what side do you think China is on when it comes to the conflict?
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
How? How is what is going on in Ukraine ever going to affect anything you or I do? It isn't, Like I said , if either one of those nations disappeared overnight, you or I would not even know.
0 ups, 1mo
It’s not that it’s disappearing into thin air, it’s that it’s being slaughtered. And it’s never just one country.

After Ukraine, Putin will continue on his warpath, and what if his target is a NATO country? Then boom, we are obligated to go into war, and now our children are dying in that war.

No thank you.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
You talk about history but you completely ignore the fact that weak leaders cause nations to fall, I stand confidently in my choice over camela.
0 ups, 1mo
Nations fail for more reasons than weak leaders. And Dear Old Trump is going to show us exactly how.

I do hope time proves me wrong though.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
Germany conquered poland in 6 weeks and had no intention of stopping, this small confict between brother nations is nothing like WW2. there is no comparison what so ever.
0 ups, 1mo
If this were back during the time of the Poland Invasion, you’d be saying the exact same thing.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
"And what side do you think China is on when it comes to the conflict?"

China is not part of this conflict because they are busy taking over the world while America and Russia bark at each other. At the time same liberals and the media cover China as they do horrific acts on the world.

When you start to open your eyes and break the media brainwashing - you can see who the real threats are. Here is a secret , its not Russia.
0 ups, 1mo
You don’t even realize it, do you?

They’re on the side of Russia. If they take Ukraine, then they go after a NATO state, then we go to war, and our army is weakened as a result no matter the outcome of the war, then they can sweep in as the leading world power.

Now tell me, who would you rather have as the world policeman: The US, or China?
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
I am treating this entire situation witha grain of salt because it has nothing to do with you , me or America. It never did, the lying politicans tried to make you think it does so we continue to fund never ending war. Its like you would sacrifice the entire population of Ukraine to spite Russia, We send arms and money to Ukraine , more and more of their men die fighting an endless war. Either Nuke Russia or let them take the Ukraine back - either way, get it over with instead of bleeding Americans dry. 35 tril in debt we can nto afford to fund foreign wars including Israels.
0 ups, 1mo
I’m still trying to figure out the mental gymnastics to where standing up and fighting is the option that “sacrifices Ukraine” instead of literally letting Putin run rampant.

Remember when Poland was invaded by Germany and Britain tried to just give it to Hitler? What did that do? Guess what, Hitler didn’t stop there! And then guess what, World War II!

History rhymes with itself all the time. That’s how I know abandoning Ukraine is a stupid idea.
0 ups, 1mo,
1 reply
china is already beating us , that is what I been trying to tell you, while leftists are busy saber rattling at Russia, China is buying and take over land all over the world, expanding their power. They are beating us without ever picking up a rifle. Thank God.. Thank God Trump won, cause They would not have hid it with Camela, they would have simply shown their hand because she was so weak. america would have crumble with a weak leader like her in power. Stop missing the forest becuase of all the trees, Russia and Ukriane are a distraction, china is taking power all over the world.. We can change the direction of all this with a strong leader and Trump fits the bill.
0 ups, 1mo
I do hope you’re right about Trump. I seriously do. I do not think you are, but I hope you are.

And if you are not, remember that this is what you voted for. And probably will vote for again since you hate learning from history.
0 ups, 1mo
Why should America get involved with Russian civil wars? You know Ukraine was part of Russia until 84ish, they are not part of Nato, why do Americans get to flip the bill every time some one gets into scuff with their neighbor? This is why the left lost, No more funding foriegn wars. Period. We are no longer going to be the world police, its time for everyone to grow up.
1 up, 1mo
I hope you are right... because Trump wants to fix everything the dems did to end America's sovereignty...
Boy and Girl scared of Bunny memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
LIBERAL POSTERS HERE IN POLITICS SINCE THE ELECTION; COMMENTS