You have a right to be stupid. Except when it effects my right to exist.

A swing. And a miss.

Better luck next time.

It already has transitioned, it used to be known as global warming.

If you like vanilla sex, that's perfectly okay. I personally like to have my hair pulled a little. That doesn't make it a SA.

You keep using the word "insurrection" like you know its definition.

Clearly you don't. Historically speaking, a real insurrection comes with many weapons and many people dead. Seems like someone dropped the ball on Jan 6.

Lemme ask you an honest question: Do you believe that a corrupt government that's been in place for decades could ever manufacture an event as a way to cover-up for another event which was also manufactured?

While some insurrections involved weapons and death, not all insurrections involve weapons and death.

Just like how all chocolate chip cookies are cookies, not all cookies have chocolate chips.

Claiming that an insurrection must have weapons and death is a BS talking point you got from Fox. It's nonsense. You can have a violent insurrection without guns. Or swords.

And your vague conspiracy theory is vague.

Who's been arrested, tried, and sent to prison for Jan 6th?

Trump supporters.

All of them. Not one 'antifa soiboi' or a 'BLM activist'. Not one.

There's no evidence at all that somehow Nancy Pelosi or "the democrats" or George Soros was involved. None. At all.

But there's a ton of evidence that Trump and his cronies planned it out. Because they wrote it all down. They emailed & texted each other about it. They had meetings where they took notes. We even know the exact day Trump decided on this plan. BECAUSE HE TWEETED ABOUT IT.

At exactly 1:42 a.m. on Dec. 19, 2020 after a 6 hour meeting.

"Big protest in D.C. on January 6th" he tweeted. "Be there, will be wild!"

Court documents from the more than 800 criminal cases stemming from the Capitol riot tell a similar story. In several cases, records from the criminal proceedings have referenced how Trump's tweet motivated rioters to make plans to come to Washington, D.C., and, in some cases, to gather weapons and body armor ahead of the trip.

You don't need to gin up a vague shadow conspiracy. There's one right there. They wrote it all down. Multiple Republicans have testified under oath that it happened.

Sorry pal. I don't watch Faux News.

There's ZERO evidence Trump instigated a faux insurrection. He tweeted to keep it peaceful, but Twitter deleted that tweet. Trump also posted a video to keep it peaceful. He even said at the rally that day to keep it peaceful. But, you go on with your bad self regurgitating Mainstream Mockingbird Legacy media talking points.

The problem with folks such as yourself is the evidence could be tangible in your hands and you will still dismiss it because your confirmation bias is so strong, it won't let you take a step back and look at the big picture.

I challenge you to literally eat crow a year from now when the truth about Jan 6 is made aware. Nancy Pelosi and her gang, both Republicans and Democrats in cahoots, staged Jan 6 to cover up for the stolen election.

You know not of what you think you know and speak of. Do you still believe Sept 11th 2001 happened without US intelligence knowing about it? Do you dismiss all the evidence that points towards an inside job? If you believe the corrupt actors can pull off 911, is it not also possible they pulled off a rinky dink ruckus on Jan 6 trying to make it look like something it wasn't?

Here's the indictment for Trump's Jan 6th efforts: https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

You can read some of the evidence Jack Smith will be using against Trump.

So...your claim of ZERO EVIDENCE is factually wrong.

So, whatchyer saying is you believe the government is honest and absent any corruption whatsoever and just because an indictment says there's "evidence" it must be true? Perhaps you've jumped the gun. And indictment isn't a conviction. Furthermore, a defendant has a Constitutional right to present his defense utilizing exculpatory evidence provided by the prosecutors, conduct their own discovery, call their own witnesses, and so own.

I will return here when Trump is vindicated to see how you're doing. I'm gonna guess you will be in complete denial.

Oh, right. They would NEVER manufacture evidence to manipulate an outcome. Oh, wait. They did IN A F**KING FISA COURT. If they can fool a FISA judge, they can certainly fool a grand jury pool, just as they have fooled you.

Get over yourself.

I am reasonably confident that you don't understand how the indictment process works.

Because the prosecutor has to show evidence to the grand jury in order to get the approval to issue that indictment.

So...

Yeah. That indictment does have evidence.

Whether or not he is convicted based on that evidence remains to be seen.

But the evidence has already been entered. His lawyers are going through it now as part of their discovery.

So, again, your claim there is no evidence is factually wrong.

Well said, Viking Buddy!

Do you know democrat DAs let murderers get plea deals for less than what their sentences were for?

My point... is the ridiculous sentences handed down by the Biden DOJ for misdemeanors...

Nope... you just want to ignore the Biden kangaroo court system... and their trampling to the US Constitution...

Moppin' Up, with the Viking!

The level of irony in this statement is truly astounding that you white knight for the constitution, but turn a blind eye to people destroying the US capitol....

But that's classic Right Wing Mindlessness for you...

OOOOOOOOOOOPPPPPSSSSSS!!!!

So. Whatchyer saying is the Mainstream Legacy Media IS filled with facts based solely in reality that appeals to common sense?

I bet you still believe that 9-11 was carried out by Bin Laden, completely bypassing all our intel outlets. Good ole Georgy Bush and his crew were duped and three buildings fell killing thousands of Americans and a portion of the Pentagon was destroyed by "terrorists" that held accounting records. How convenient. But I suppose you know better than the rest of us.

Nope, no one questions its authenticity. The issue is that they claim it was stolen and are trying to throw the book at project veritas for releasing it. Nice spin though

How are people being arrested for stealing the diary.... if its fake?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nb_D9d6xQOI&pp=ygUPUHJvamVjdCB2ZXJpdGFz

Skip to 1:08

Ok so are you saying it is stolen now or fake? because or sounds like they stole all those things and her diary too. Just listen to the call yourself

Just because her fake diary is in the box of stuff that is also hers doesn't make it her diary.

lol... nope... The FBI verified it was hers...

The same morons that believed there was a tape of hookers pissing on Trump now believe there's absolutely no way this diary could be Ashley's. NPC syndrome. Many such cases.

Yup... you missed the part where Ashley confirmed it was hers... OOPS

https://twitter.com/i/status/1686059290530922506

Ouch

“I’m Ashley Biden. It is my stuff”

Haha, you can lead a dem to truth but you cant make them think

Sure... that's why the couple that found it were charged for selling it... OOPS

How does the Fed pay you? Paypal? Cashapp? Venmo? Cookies?

They're really not getting their moneys worth with you.

So. They send you cookies, then.

Savage. Well played.