Imgflip Logo Icon

Mother Africa

Mother Africa | SLAVERY DID NOT EXIST IN EUROPE 
AFRICANS TAUGHT SLAVERY TO EUROPEANS; SLAVERY ABOLISHED IN THE WEST,
IS STILL PRACTICED IN AFRICA | image tagged in slavery | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,747 views 38 upvotes Made by CraigThompson 9 months ago in politics
60 Comments
6 ups, 9mo,
2 replies
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
4 ups, 9mo
Indegenous Americans also owned black slaves for the longest... I am just glad that media has not been able to control Irish and Chinese "laborers" who replaced the black slaves. Only the blacks fallen for victimhood media lies and still being manipulated.
2 ups, 9mo,
3 replies
Only tribes living on the Northwest coast practiced a version of slavery native to North America. The early colonists had no contact with these people. Many tribes held captives, but they were usually young men and women and were often adopted into the tribe. It would be a stretch to call that slavery.
4 ups, 9mo,
2 replies
joe biden - Geezer, Goon, Groper | google and the Smithsonian BOTH say you're full of SHIT, Jack. | image tagged in joe biden - geezer goon groper | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
3 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
3 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Everyone knows that some Native Americans own black slaves. Freed blacks owned slaves also. Most wealthy folks owned a slave or two. Slavery was not native to Eastern US. Africans taught slavery to Europeans and Europeans taught slavery to the Indians. The point is slave culture came from Africa and was exported to the Americas.
3 ups, 9mo,
3 replies
Absolute bullshit. The Americas had slavery well before Europeans arrived. The Aztec practices of slavery were widespread and the North American tribes spent their time raiding and counter raiding each other for horses and slaves.
3 ups, 9mo,
2 replies
Perhaps the point that the OP is trying to make is that "whitey" didn't invent slavery and weren't the only participants seems to be the only race to be blamed.

African slave holders - not white.
Cherokee slave holders - not white.
Aztec slave holders - not white.

Haven't heard any reparations demands directed towards those ethnic groups.
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
I absolutely agree with that but I reject that the Indians learned it from Europeans. They were enslaving each other long before we arrived.
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
They were.

I think people of all cultures all over the world have enslaved and been enslaved at some point in their history.

Now we are enslaved by our governments and powerful cartels.
1 up, 9mo
Right!
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
The OP points out that the slave culture that originated in Africa was adopted by Europeans. The OP doesn't cover slavery among Native Americans. Not sure why you injected all of that.
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
You did, you said Europeans taught it to Indians. No they didn’t. Native Americans were already doing it to each other and had been for centuries before European contact.
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Slavery was not practiced by Native Americans living in what is now the eastern US before it was introduced by English settlers, and their slaves were all black.
0 ups, 9mo
Wrong. It wasn’t practiced by your narrow definition but raiding neighboring villages and taking people against their will and controlling their activity or gifting them to other people in the tribe is generally defined as slavery.
2 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Really? They were taken against their will forced to work and not allowed to leave. Doesn’t that define slavery. The reason they were young men and women was because when the Indians raided they killed the babies by bashing their skulls in and murdered everyone else except young boys and women. They didn’t want anyone who might fight back and the old people who would be a burden.
0 ups, 9mo
All of this is true, but the practice was not adopted by European settlers while African slavery was adopted; therefore, calling an Indian captive a slave or not is a moot point.
3 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
2 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Can you define the era of "the middle ages"? Like what years are you talking about?
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
The Middle Ages was between the fall of the Roman Empire and the Renaissance. Muslims owned slaves in Spain and maybe a few kings trading with the Muslims may have had a slave or two, but these would only be exceptions to the rule. In general European, Christian kings of the Middle Ages did not buy and sell slaves. All of this was well before the Atlantic slave trade.
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
Okay, a 1000 years spanning 450 AD up to 1450.

it's interesting that you exclude the Iberian peninsula. They're Europeans. You also add in the Muslim faith. They're also Europeans. And that you parse out that "a few rare exceptions" of Christians owning slaves. So, what you mean Northern Europeans from the French/Germanic area that also includes the British islands.

But bad news. They had slavery too.

Okay. The Visigoths were a germanic people. One of the Gothic tribes that migrated/settled in from the Balkans to the German/Franco/Iberian area by the 300s. That's when their conversion to Christianity began. They sacked Rome in 410. They were a powerful force in the region until the 900s.

They were European. Christian. And they had slaves. Until the 900s. They even wrote it down in their laws. See the Visigoth Code.

But that's just 1 group, right? No. There are others.

The Welsh also had slavery. The Cyfraith Hywel (medieval Welsh laws) only applied to Free Welsh Men, and specifically did not apply to slaves. You don't invent an entire code of laws, write them down, and specifically say "these don't apply to slaves" if you don't have slaves.

The Kingdoms of Moldavia and Wallachia had slavery until the 1400s. (That's modern day Romania region).

But we're not done.

Those White Christian Northern Europeans decided they needed to "free" Jerusalem from the people who lived there. Upon taking over, they inherited the local slaves. Along with the city of Acre. It was the largest city in the region. And it had an slave market that made tons and tons of money. They didn't shut it down. They kept it going. For centuries. It's from this era that the idea of "Christians can't own Christian slaves" comes into existence. It was fine to own non-Christians. But not Christians.

It was in the 1200s when Pope Gregory said, "hey, all these Muslims & Jews are converting to Christianity to get out of being slaves. You don't have to free them if you don't think it's sincere."

And if you're thinking "oh, but that happened in a different part of the world, NOT IN THE PHYSICAL AREA OF EUROPE!!!" That's a ridiculous level of parsing. Christian Kings and the Church fully endorsed and profited from slavery. Their proxies in the crusader kingdom owned and operated slave markets.

If you own slaves in Acre but live in Paris, you're still a slave owner.
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Did I not say there were exceptions? Let me reword it. As a rule Christian, Middle Age Europe did not buy and sell slaves. By the time of the slave trade with Africa, slavery did not exist in Western Europe. Slave culture in the New World came from Africa where slave culture has existed continuously. The fact that most of the slaves were African proves this point. I am aware that some Native Americans in Latin America were held as slaves but this was the exception and has little to do with lands that would later become the USA. Is that clear enough? Shurley you understand that point I'm trying to make so please quit the shithouse lawyer routine.
2 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Am I going to stop it?

No.

Because you're engaging in a fantasy that somehow White Christians were innocent of the idea, concept, and practice of slavery. That only contact with the evil Africans did they fall from grace and start the Atlantic slave trade.

Which, is frankly, laughable. You're trying to victim blame Black Americans for what happened to them.

Slavery in the Americas began in 1508 with the establishment of Puerto Rico. Ponce De Leon enslaved locals to build the port city. When they started dying off, Africans were brought in from Europe.

Columbus, you remember him, right? He was selling native Americans in Seville as slaves in the 1490s.

England, merry old England, didn't abolish snatching English chilidren off the street and forcing them to sing in choirs (as slaves) until 1602. You can read about the court case that ended the practice here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clifton_Star_Chamber_Case

You need to discard this fantasy that White Europeans didn't know anything about Slavery until they came in contact with Africans. Slavery was brought with the Europeans. It was part and parcel of their arrival.
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
How many white slaves or Indian slaves were there in Virginia, New York, South Carolina, Georgia, Delaware, Maryland, and the other 13 colonies? Where did "all" the slave in the original 13 colonies come from? The slave culture in the original 13 colonies came from Africa. Slavery has been practiced in many different forms all over the world since civilization began, but the slave culture that spread in the US was of African origin. African slave culture was continuous from Africa to the Americas. No other form of slavery became part of US culture.
0 ups, 9mo
It seems like you're referring to chattel slavery- where you can buy or sell another person, their children, and have total dominion over them up to and including killing them like you would a cow.

That's called chattel slavery.

The Romans and Greeks had it: https://oxfordre.com/classics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-7311;jsessionid=967DB12DCE0962E314A220622B4D562B

Let's take another route: show me the historical evidence that chattel slavery was 1) unique to sub-Sahara Africa and 2) wasn't practiced by Europeans until the colonies were established in the Americas.
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply


This OP is hilariously racist. "taught to europeans".

That's rich.

I guess the Vikings traveled to Africa, learned it, and then brought it back?

Of course, there's all the slavery in the Bible. It's a lot.

And the Greeks and Romans had slavery.
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
So Vikings brought slavery to the English colonies in America, and Romans were part of the Atlantic Slave Trade. Good to know.
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
You're the one who said slavery didn't exist in Europe.

Don't get mad at me that you're wrong.
0 ups, 9mo
The inferred meaning was clear. Your response proved that. Stop trying to be a jailhouse lawyer.
1 up, 9mo
Slavery has been here since the second tribe of people broke off from the first tribe.
[deleted]
0 ups, 9mo
Also, North Korea also has it too RN
0 ups, 7mo
More lies, yet again. Rome had slavery, and so did Ancient Greece. and those were also Ancient times.
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
Don't forget the Romans. And the Greeks. Ancient China had slavery.
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
Slavery is as old as civilization. It was practiced by many different cultures in many different forms. A meme can't cover all of that.
0 ups, 9mo
0 ups, 9mo,
2 replies
+ ever heard about the Irish and White slavery? It's a massive part of history that's never taught. Black trade almost wasn't even that big.
2 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Yes, many Irish were taken against their will and sold as indentured servants. You might argue that it came from a different culture. The English also sent "criminals" to Australia where they worked for the colonists which was similar. It wasn't African-style slavery, but maybe it was close. No one officially owned anyone.
1 up, 9mo
What happened to the Irish was either hair splitting at its finest or legalism at its worst. Chinese also went through it to.
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
Ah, no, because there was no such thing as Irish slavery.

Were their Irish who were indentured servants? Yes.

Did they have a contract that ended? Yes.

Were they slaves? No.
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
smh smh smh
go back to the books
2 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Show it to me.

Show me the documented history.

If it's so easy and obvious, show it to me.
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
There's loads of videos on YT. Look up prompts like "white slave trade, white arab slave trade, Irish white slave trade, the part of slave history forgotten, the part of slave history that school didn't teach you, etc." There might be some videos taken down, because YT is racist against this type of history, so maybe look up some articles as well.
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
Oh, no. Any idiot can make a YT video. And they can mock up some pictures put some serious sounding music behind them. That means jack and shit.

Show me real documented history.

Show me primary sources with bills of sale. Captains log books documenting their travels, cargo, and how much they sold them for and where they sold them.

You know, all the stuff we have from the African slave trade.

Actual. Real. Evidence.

If it happened then it should be easy.

Show it to me.
1 up, 9mo,
1 reply
What accounts for "real?" History is erased all the time by official sources.

"Show me primary sources with bills of sale. Captains log books documenting their travels, cargo, and how much they sold them for and where they sold them."

- snikies bro most of the black trade wouldn't exist LMAO
0 ups, 9mo,
1 reply
So... you want me to believe that Irish people were taken as slaves here in the US.

Despite a total lack of evidence it ever happened.

That seems reasonable to you?

When you say it out loud, that seems like a thing you should do? Believe something as factual despite there being no evidence it ever happened?

Because there's a lot of evidence of the enslavement of Africans here in the US. Like a lot. There's even a fully documented war that was fought over it.

And who are "they"? The people who have aggressively deleted Irish slavery from the world. Who? And what's the benefit? You'd think that the Irish would have lots of documents and artifacts proving their enslavement. But...nothing.

The Irish were never used as slave labor here in the "new world." Indentured servants? Yes. Was their service miserable and many died? Yes.

But it came to an end. It had a finite time span.

The lives of the Africans who were brought as slaves to the US were an unending horror show. A horror that was passed on to their children and succeeding generations.

This myth of Irish slavery is nothing more than white supremacists nonsense in an attempt to diminish the suffering of Black Americans. It's sad "we're the real victims here" BS.
1 up, 9mo
I didn't say they were taken as slaves in the US.

You just haven't looked it up before, that's why this is so astounding to you. You're obviously programmed.

yeah, but there wasn't a record of every sale ever, which is what you asked for. See how your standards don't always work out?

Slavery that doesn't match with the agenda conveniently disappears all the time. Ther very fact that you haven't heard of any kind of slavery other than the black trade proves that the public school you went to did its job.

Just like black slave trade, it came to an end.

Nope, not unending. No, it's not been passed on, it's been forcibly revived for convenient purposes.

"This myth of Irish slavery is nothing more than white supremacists nonsense in an attempt to diminish the suffering of Black Americans. It's sad "we're the real victims here" BS."

Youre so damn programmed, I thought I was talking to ChatGPT.
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • boy.jpg
  • Libya.jpg
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    SLAVERY DID NOT EXIST IN EUROPE AFRICANS TAUGHT SLAVERY TO EUROPEANS; SLAVERY ABOLISHED IN THE WEST, IS STILL PRACTICED IN AFRICA