Imgflip Logo Icon

WEF torment

WEF torment | WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM | image tagged in black box | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
718 views 41 upvotes Made by Hardraker 1 year ago in politics
60 Comments
5 ups, 1y,
1 reply
100% accurate
3 ups, 1y
Not even remotely accurate
2 ups, 1y
WEF to actualize BOOMERS project PUFF:

Progressives
Utopian
Fantasies
Fulfilled
1 up, 1y
WOULD HUMAN CLONING & ARTIFICIAL WOMBS REALLY BETHAT MUCH OF A DETRIMENT TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? | image tagged in memes,futurama fry | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 1y
MARXISTS = Prickly Thorns

The metaphor is not a time in place, nor a place in time,

Therefore the "when" is a constant

The World Economic Forum is allegedly a Modern Marxist construct,
like The New Left was for Marcuse.
3 ups, 1y,
1 reply
“End privately owned property”

Lmao as if the bourgeoisie would ever want that in the World Economic Forum, which is funded by them, mind you. Bro watched one “[blank] in 2050” video with wojaks in it and just accepted it as a prophecy
2 ups, 1y,
2 replies
Ironic in the comment is the mention of the 'bourgeoisie' ; a construct of MARX and Engels.
Also ironic is that there is at least one member of the WEF Board of Trustees that is a graduate of the
"Karl Marx Higher Institute of Economics" located in Sofia Bulgaria.

Now known as the "University of National and WORLD Economy"

So, the "Karl Marx Higher Institute is now post Covid-19 named the University of the World Economy by design and approval of the World Economic Forum.
Ideology Actualized.
Ironic and Coincidental...Who knew?
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
That’s not the argument you think it is, It’s basically just a university renaming itself to not be associated with Marxist ideology, like with Stalingrad and Leningrad. This is the same saying Germany is fascist because it used to be named the German Reich. Plus there are a lot of people on the WEF Board of Trustees, what’s one guy gonna do?

I beg of you, define what you think Marxism is in your own words.
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
Thanks for gracing us here with your presence,
let alone your feeble explanation attempt of misinformation and disinformation.

One guy? Some within the WEF, see the WEF's 4th Industrial Revolution as the 4th German Reich.
A New Globalist Socialist "Democracy" in the style of East Germany democracy. The DDR or Deutsche Democratic Republic that went down in 1991 dissolution... only to rise like the Phoenix from those 1991 ashes on March 23, 2020 as the WEF Marxist "World Democracy"

It's either the harmless argument you think it is, or is EXACTLY as stated..

No need for you to beg, yet no reason to get off ones knees either;

A rose flower, by any other name, smells as sweet.
A rose thorn, by any other name, is as prickly.
Marxism is a rose thorn

If dead and dried up on the stalk, a rose thorn is still prickly
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
Put some new paint on Marx with Marcuse, Bloch, The New Left Movement or whatever....
it has always failed, and will fail this time too, and as always at great human cost.

By your logic, the name change was "...just a university renaming itself to NOT be associated with Marxist ideology."

What do you have for an article to cite, demonstrating this reason of yours offered for the name change?

Saying that the "Karl Marx Higher Institute of Economics" changed it's name to NOT be associated with Marxist ideology, is akin to saying that Angela Davis changed the name of the "Communist Party of the USA, to The Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism" so as not to be associated with Marxist ideology.

Turns out, they appear to change the name not to disassociate, yet to go undetected

...as MARXISM becomes distasteful enough to spit out when the people discover it is an ideology more about the perpetuation of Chaos and Struggles, than it is a solution to problems humans face.
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
I don’t see you define what you think Marxism is like I asked you to. At all. Hmm, I wonder why.

You also don’t provide a source saying that the Karl Marx Higher Institute of Economics was renamed because Marxism has been normalized, so unless you want to fall upon the double-edged blade, don’t be asking for a source.

Also the Communist Party of the USA didn’t rename itself, The Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism is just a more moderate grouping within it. It’s funny how you mention the Communist Party of the USA as an example of Marxist world domination as if it wasn’t vehemently opposed by U.S. lawmakers, shown best in examples such as the Truman Doctrine and the Communist Control Act of 1954.
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
When one is blind, it keeps one from seeing at all. That is a mystery to wonder.
One must open their minds and hearts prior to their eyes.
All that is expressed in response by you appears prickly.
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
*Maybe try to click on "Show Full Comment" and one might find the definition one is seeking.
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
I already clicked Show Full Comment and you just said Marxism is when rose thorn. Right…
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
It's A Miracle! PTL! He can see! HE CAN SEE!
1 up, 1y
Idk about you but for me, saying “Marxism is when rose thorn” isn’t exactly too… specific about what you mean. Who knows, maybe I’m just illiterate
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
"Bourgeoisie" is an early 1700s French word with roots going back to Latin and Greek.
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
Ooooh, a linguistics aficianado.
How 'bout "Proletariat" ?
1 up, 1y
Great HC band from Boston!
1 up, 1y
The Great Reset

Resetting DDR, (Deutsche Democratic Republic) the defeated East Germany back in the game,
to overcome Gorbachev listening to U.S. President Ronald Reagan on June 12, 1987 at The Wall in Berlin. By 1989, Bush Senior got to share the credit with Gorbachev, as if it were their great idea, when it was physically breached. By 1991 the dissolution was ushered in with the campaign of Billy from Hope, AR sparking the hope that one day a Great Reset could get their Global agenda back on track
[deleted]
4 ups, 1y,
3 replies
Would ending fossil fuels really be so bad?
5 ups, 1y,
2 replies
Since the alternatives like solar and wind tend to suck. . .yes.
[deleted]
4 ups, 1y,
1 reply
So let's develop them to be less sucky.
5 ups, 1y,
2 replies
I worked for a wind turbine company back in the mid-1990's. It didn't go anywhere and went bankrupt. So yes, still waiting and still sucky.
1 up, 1y
Whose fault is that?
[deleted]
3 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Oh, so all the hundreds of wind turbine companies that are still profitable should be told they don't exist because that one competitor from thirty years ago didn't make it.
3 ups, 1y,
5 replies
Who ever said wind is profitable or even environmental? They're heavily subsidized by the government. Without those taxpayer dollars they would collapse.

There is no way that wind and solar can even come close to coal, hydroelectric and nuclear. Not even close. And when we're forced into buying electric cars that demand is going to skyrocket.

The Biden administration and the WEF are going to force wind and solar on us. No one will be able to afford electricity when that happens. Those electric cars aren't going to us any good and neither are wind and solar. We're going back to the horse and buggy overnight, when all of that happens.
3 ups, 1y,
3 replies
I live in very rural surroundings n there's been over 20k acres of PRIME corn n bean land (most of which, around here, is used in ethanol production) lost to solar n wind projects nearby. Like the solar farm that got destroyed by 70+ mph winds and the 24+ turbine wind farm that was built 2 yrs ago n not ONE turbine has spun ONCE. Not to mention, the 100s of turbines in just my County that hafta shut down when the wind exceeds 35 mph, so the blades don't bend and break or slice into the support shafts. 🙄 Gooooo, Green!!! 🤣
3 ups, 1y,
2 replies
The 1st wind turbines I ever saw was in Southern California on the 10 Freeway east of San Bernardino. They were built in the 90's. Most of the time when I drove passed them they never moved. They fell into disrepair and were about to be abandoned until more recently when all of this wind electricity nonsense started going around.

I wonder if the wind energy people realize that the lubricants to allow those eye sores to turn is made from petroleum.

And I do mean eye sores. They're everywhere. When the cities end the wind mills show up. They are destroying the beauty of the countryside.

I look at them as monuments to mankind's stupidity and gullibility.
1 up, 1y
So true... windmills are not environmentally friendly... they can't even be recycled...
2 ups, 1y,
2 replies
If they are the ones I've seen, they are turning frequently
1 up, 1y
I live in the west. I've driven passed wind farms in Wyoming, Idaho, Utah and California. I've probably seen them in Arizona and New Mexico but I don't remember. I haven't seen any in Nevada, that I remember, but most of the time I'm in Nevada is on interstate 15. Hoover Dam generates all of the electricity for Las Vegas. It's been too long since I've driven the 80 through Nevada to remember if they had wind mills there.
1 up, 1y
But there's no wind in SoCal,,,
1 up, 1y
Really? In PRIME agricultural acreage?
2 ups, 1y
I'm sure all of that actually happened
2 ups, 1y
FUN FACT:
Harari has lectured about the future of work at WEF, and a panel was held that had somebody named Ivanka TRUMP as an 'expert' on that panel discussing retraining workers, ALSO at WEF

One imagines whether one votes for BOOMERS like
Biden or Trump,

Global WEF progress is an unstoppable Freight Train of Marxism
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Oil and gas and coal are all heavily subsidized by the government.
2 ups, 1y,
2 replies
Yes and that needs to end. It was started because politicians didn't want to take the blame for rising prices, so they threw taxpayer dollars at it in a stupid attempt to keep prices down.

The same is true of nuclear.
0 ups, 1y
Well....let's end them now and even out the score for a while with solar, wind etc.
1 up, 1y,
3 replies
No.
It started at the beginning of the oil industry, with lack of infrastructure being the reason.
Well, infrastructure has been built, but doubling prices overnight won't exactly please consumers.
2 ups, 1y
Infrastructure, infrastructure, infrastructure, infrastructure, infrastructure, infrastructure, infrastructure, infrastructure, infrastructure, infrastructure...

That's got to be the Democrat party's favorite word. Every Democrat politician has been using that word ad nauseam to justify more and more nonsensical spending.

I guess it is ONLY the "greed" of the oil industry that causes price fluctuations. Nothing else. OPEC, cutting production, has nothing to do with it. Biden's devaluing our dollar has nothing to do with it. It is just the big fat cats in the oil industry who throughout everything have kept their profit margins exactly the same as they have always been.

Maybe, just maybe, if the 2020 election was truly fair and there was no fraud, then we would still be oil independent. We wouldn't have turned the printing presses up to 11 and the price at the pump would be, roughly, the same as it was when Trump was president.

What's keeping gasoline prices slightly down right now is your idiot president has tapped into the strategic oil reserves and has been selling it domestically and to foreign countries.

Dang it. I typed too much. You'll never read anything after the 1st paragraph.
1 up, 1y
Trump is a fake conservative. He was a Democrat the majority of his life. He said a lot of things that scared me because it came right out of the Democrat play book.

In fact most Republicans call themselves conservative only because they are 2 steps to the right of the Democrats and they are following the Democrat on their march to fascism. Many of those Republicans are the no different that the Democrats of 10 years ago.

I haven't moved left with any of them. I'm staying right here where the founding fathers were.
0 ups, 1y,
1 reply
MODDA below a few comments with the reply option missing:

"Biden did NOT devalue the dollar. He strengthened it."

Well, by that logic, Bidenflation solved the Economy.
0 ups, 1y
MODDA: Compliments are in order for your Picture Book, Storytelling Skills

One imagines your delivery going something like this:

"... and then children,
because of Biden strengthening the value of the US Dollar,
we all lived Happily Ever After."
-The End

Applause
[deleted]
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Even in low winds, a typical wind turbine hits carbon neutrality within seven months, so it is not at all clear what you mean by not being close. That's not just close, that's past the goalpost!
3 ups, 1y,
2 replies
Wind turbines ONLY produce electricity when there is enough wind to turn the turbines. Wind is completely reliant on the weather.

That is about as clear as possible. Wind power cannot generate enough electricity as nuclear, coal or hydroelectric. And nuclear and hydroelectric are also carbon neutral, they are also sustainable. And they produce electricity 24/7. There actually are clean coal plants, despite all of the nay saying from the left. It may not be completely carbon neutral but it is far better than traditional coal.

But the biggest issue is carbon dioxide. CO2 is essential to life. If we have lesser amounts of CO2 life gets very hard. Plants cannot thrive in a CO2 depleted atmosphere. Our atmosphere is 80% nitrogen, 18% oxygen and 2% all other gases. 2% of that 2% is CO2. This is way down from the earlier years of this planet.

The higher the CO2 levels the stronger, healthier and more productive plant life becomes. The more plants, the more mammals there are on earth because there is more food. CO2, despite what all of the UN and government paid scientists say, is not connected with temperature. There are times in the ice core samples where CO2 increase preceded, other times followed temperature increases. There are times when CO2 levels seem to have no effect whatsoever on the temperatures. The reason for this is because, by far, the biggest influence on global temperature was, is and always will be the sun.

"Global warming" was changed to "climate change" when it became obvious that the earth's global temperatures were just not cooperating with the UN and government paid scientist's conclusions. But that is the problem when you approach science with a predetermined conclusion and have to fabricate data to make it look like science backs your conclusion.

"Climate change" is the excuse that politicians and global elitists are using for global fascism. This is why every single solution that comes out of political organization (and not from science) is all about power and control over the lives of everyone.

On top of all of that, China, the worlds biggest polluter, hasn't done anything to change their habits, nor will that. If climate change is real then nothing we do matters as long as China keeps up with their destructive ways. 2nd to China is Africa and they are showing no signs of changing their lifestyles.
4 ups, 1y,
1 reply
"Wind turbines ONLY produce electricity when there is enough wind to turn the turbines"

That's why you put them in areas that get a lot of wind. It's that simple.

"CO2, despite what all of the UN and government paid scientists say, is not connected with temperature"

Yes it is. We've known that for a long time.

"The reason for this is because, by far, the biggest influence on global temperature was, is and always will be the sun."

It's probably the atmosphere more than the sun
3 ups, 1y
"That's why you put them in areas that get a lot of wind. It's that simple"

And yet I've seen entire wind farms where the turbines weren't moving. In the majority of times I've driven passed them either none were moving or only 1 or 2 were moving.

In case you are wondering they don't produce electricity unless they are turning. And we're supposed to say that this is just as or more efficient than hydroelectric, nuclear and coal??

Not to mention they can't just produce 110 volts, depending on how far away from the consumers, they have to produce much more because the longer the distance the greater decay of power. This is true of all electrical generation plants. But with coal, hydroelectric and nuclear they can control the amounts of electricity needed.

Wind mills can be turning but not fast enough to produce enough electricity to make it to the consumers.
[deleted]
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
And when wind stops being a regular feature of our weather, let me know so I can send you your "you actually made a point" certificate.
3 ups, 1y,
2 replies
I said, "Wind turbines ONLY produce electricity when there is enough wind to turn the turbines."

Apparently you don't spend any time outdoors. There are many, many, many, many times when there is no wind. Or as I said, there wasn't "ENOUGH WIND TO TURN THE TURBINES".

I've driven passed wind turbines all over the country and many times their blades weren't even budging, not even in the slightest.
3 ups, 1y
Problem with having the (llmao) Last Laugh My Ass Off is Klaus Schwab actually stating the quote "You will Own Nothing And Be Happy", then goes onto describe some plan for renting or borrowing from the Collective Commune of Society for Equitable treatment for everyone with your digital global social credit score of society Global currency.
ANIMAL FARM
All Animals are equal, some are more equal than others, the notion of "Equity" in a nutshell. Thanks, Erik Blair
[deleted]
2 ups, 1y
Oh. So the problem here is that you don't know what a battery is?
0 ups, 1y,
1 reply
So is oil, to the tune of people paying HALF at the gas pump than they should.
1 up, 1y
2 ups, 1y,
1 reply
Let's divert peoples attention on these comments to Fossil Fuels, to distract them from commenting upon other valid concerns represented by the meme... distract it from the uncomfortable...

Such as Yuval Noah Harari and any search of what he has said at DAVOS as goals for WEF:
Let alone what he says to Carnegie group or just on his own website.... Like his comments on the Pandemic, since WEF founder Klaus wrote the book on COVID-19, the great resest, to build back better....

Harari, for one example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RS8TxC3mJzk

Fossil Fuels will be the least of Human worries, as they willingly give up their USA Liberty for Centralized Globalist control advocated by the members of the WEF.

FUN FACT:
Harari has lectured about the future of work at WEF, and a panel was held that had
Ivanka TRUMP on that panel discussing retraining workers, ALSO at WEF

Looks like whether one votes for BOOMERS like
Biden or Trump, Global WEF progress is an unstoppable Freight Train of Marxism
[deleted]
1 up, 1y,
1 reply
Actually, I don't WANT to divert attention away from the tactics used here: to mix the innocuous and reasonable talking points with the extreme ones, as if wanting to move away from fossil fuels means I must also be supporting ritual baby eating.

It is transparent. It is cheap. And I would like to draw as MUCH attention to it as possible!
2 ups, 1y
Then, a person can conceive, that really does seem like one might achieve fulfillment.
Good for you.
1 up, 1y
Great idea. Let's revive the Wool Industry
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • Black Box
  • img (15).png
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM