'The Radical Agenda' is Not Supported By Most Americans

It most certainly an iconic American Brand regardless of who bought it and currently owns it.

Nice try, but no.

You didn't remember it being sold?

Yes it’s been owned by InBev for sometime. Budweiser is still an iconic American brand, granted it’s owned by a foreign corporation now.

Sad that you can’t accept that an iconic American brand can be owned by a foreign corp.

I don't think he is getting at that. It was an iconic American brand, but now it's owned by a foreign nation, with different ideals than America

Yes, It’s a foreign company, but the brand is still an iconic American brand. InBev is an international corporation so agreed it’s more about ESG and DEI conformity for their scores.

I’ve never seen a dog breeder say “former European bloodlines” just because the dog was born in America doesn’t mean it’s genetics weren’t carefully chosen in Europe. That’s dogs born in America and it’s still typically accepted that they’re European. Now imagine you actually purchase a let’s say KNPV-Ph1 Dutch Shepherd directly from Holland. You’re arguing that simply by swapping owners that dog that was born Dutch is now American. I can see arguing the dog is both American and Dutch, but you believe it loses all credibility to be considered Dutch simply because of a transaction even though it was conceived, born, and trained in Holland.

No, I'm not arguing that at all. I'm not even talking about dogs.

It’s all the same. Your argument is place of ownership determines nationality and that ethnic background holds no standing. It follows that if it works that way for one entity it should work that way for others as well.

I don't have an agument. I post facts. Budweiser is still not an American brand still.

But if you want, you may present your argument to those who railed against Obama for rescuing Chrysler only for it to be bought by Fiat.

Still won't change the facts though.