Imgflip Logo Icon

Oops, We Did It Again. Let's See Consequences This Time.

Oops, We Did It Again. Let's See Consequences This Time. | Massive Election Fraud; Two Words: | image tagged in politics,democrats,political humor,joe biden,voter fraud,elections | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,583 views 77 upvotes Made by vBackman 2 years ago in politics
150 Comments
9 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Chuck Norris Approves Meme | I AGREE. DEMOCRATS ARE FAR TOO POWER HUNGRY TO LET A LITTLE THING LIKE DEMOCRACY GET IN THEIR WAY.  THEY'RE FIGHTING FOR THE GREAT RESET. | image tagged in memes,chuck norris approves,chuck norris | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Head in sand | DEMOCRATS WE DON'T SEE ANY GREAT RESET HERE. | image tagged in head in sand | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
OOoOOoOOoh "The Great Reset".. would it make you feel better if the label was "Making America Great Again" ?
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Clearly any sane person would want to Make America a Great place to live Again. Only a moron would want to tear the Constitution and our freedom all down so you can "Build Back" into what only a fascist would called "Better".

The Democrat motto should be:
Vote Democrat: because America needs more crime and less freedom.
0 ups, 2y
Clearly any sane person should know Biden signed the Infrastructure Bill into law, rebuilding America... literally making America great again. Ports, bridges, roads, and everything else.
8 ups, 2y,
1 reply
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Projection
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Why would I be triggered? All of this is rather hilarious.
4 ups, 2y
Gee, IDK...
7 ups, 2y
NICE :0)
[deleted]
8 ups, 2y,
1 reply
he is one of the dumbest people to ever serve as potus.
6 ups, 2y
He probably would win first place, #1...
6 ups, 2y
What democrats voted for?

"In New York, Michigan, Illinois, and Pennsylvania they voted to release violent criminals without bail, to allow them to continue to commit violent crimes against innocent people, to shoplift with impunity, and to use drugs on city streets with their mayors’ and governors’ blessings. These career criminals will continue to harass and kill citizens brave enough to ride the subway in New York or even to stand on the platforms."
3 ups, 2y
5 ups, 2y,
1 reply
7 ups, 2y,
7 replies
We've talking about it for decades. You think 2020 was the first time we've ever said anything? Democrats are above the law. They have no morals, ethics, honesty and integrity. They are to lowest forms of human life because they will do whatever it takes to get and maintain power.

And now they are under the marching orders of the World Economic Forum. You're all a bunch of sell outs.

The WEF is in control of our elections. That's exactly how a unpopular senile nitwit could beat Bernie Sanders in the primaries and a wildly popular president in the general election. Then immediately fall to the most unpopular president ever status.

You Democrats have given us massive inflation and you seriously think people are in favor of that??? If they are then this most recent generation of voters are so stupid they have trouble figuring out how the get out of bed.

How many more mindless puppets does the World Economic Forum need to take control of our government.
7 ups, 2y,
4 replies
Well said, JoeHasGottaGo! It has come down to the thinkers vs the sheep. So glad you are a thinker. :)
5 ups, 2y
Thanks.
1 up, 2y
Is there evidence of election fraud, if so please. Do in lighten me, i'll be waiting for it arrive, I prefer .gov websites or cited sources. But i'll still wait for its arrival, I waited 2 years and have been studying the news, every one knows that election fraud is fake, even some republicans say it's getting crazy that people still think that 2020 was a election fraud, so please stop being "thinker" if that's what you call yourself, and be honest with youself.
1 up, 2y
It's not really being much of a thinker if he just focuses on one group of people he doesn't like and blames literally all of our problems on them. That's what Hitler did
5 ups, 2y,
1 reply
You're just a bit too much on the cantankerous side, aren't you.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
You would be too if you thought election fraud claims can actually negatively impact Republican voter turn out.

Or that any Republican, besides Trump, had a good chance of winning over the Democrats pick for President in 2024.

But your party only had eyes for Trump - and therefor a much higher statistical likelihood of losing.
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
So you think I am a Trump worshiper, do you? Nah. He's a gazillion times better than Biden but in the over all picture, Trump is just average. He did some good and some bad.
1 up, 2y
a gazillion, a man who is a racist, rich supporter, putin supporter, is better then a man who is sending troops to ukrain, is taxing the rich, and is trying to end racism (ok that part is kinda not true, he is only really putting that one aside) but still Trump was a racist, rich boy in power, biden is a stammering slightly brain dead president, they both suck, and you and I know it.
2 ups, 2y,
2 replies
The majority of Americans seem to disagree. And I wouldn’t risk four more years on Biden on it. DeSantis or literally anyone but Trump could win in 2024.
2 ups, 2y
I know. I am in the minority. Most Republican voters put him above Reagan. Reagan was the best in my lifetime.
0 ups, 2y
I agree, thank you.
5 ups, 2y
5 ups, 2y,
1 reply
My guy, what election fraud, there was no election fraud, biden won in 2020, your too busy bitching that you lost, period.
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
wow, your looking for something to mock at me about, pretty damn sad.
1 up, 2y
It's kind of an unspoken rule around here...
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Sounds like you believe democrats are almost subhumans.
Like how slavers thought natives and blacks were. Maybe thats what you think ?
You need psych help before you go postal and end up serving a 3x life sentence. Where 3x would be the 'action' you'd be getting.
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Or more accurately how all Marxist regimes think of the peons who work as slaves to the oligarchs.

No, not all Democrats. Most of the time I am pointing my finger directly at the subhumans you and voter fraud put in office.

If we (conservatives, Constitutionalists and Libertarians) seem a little bit pissed off with Democrats it's only because you guys have nearly destroyed what was once the freest nation to have ever existed. And you're not done. You've just about made the dollar worthless. You've forced far too many laws on us. And then you have the nerve to call us racists and fascists.

There has never been a political party more racist and fascist than the Democrat party.

You accuse us of destroying democracy when you guys won't even let our votes count for anything.

We've been so completely marginalized by the media, big tech and the government. You have your woke goons "cancelling" conservative free speech everywhere, even on ImgFlip. Then your pundits make comments about free speech is only for the left. You label everything we say as hate speech. Back when Chris Matthews had a show on MSNBC or CNN (I can't remember which fake news channel he was on) his goal in life was to look for hidden meanings in words that conservatives used. Some such words like "Chicago" and "the" he proclaimed as buzz words for racism. Like for whatever reason every time we heard buzz words we were supposed to do what?

And now you are crying in a corner saying I called you "subhuman" and I look at you like a slave owner looked at a slave. No, I look at you like a man who sees a burglar in house who has ransacked the house looking for more stuff to steal.

I am not even close to going postal. That's you guys. But I will defend my life and my freedom, by whatever means I feel necessary, from anyone who tries to take it, including the government. I said defend, as in the violence will come from you guys first before I ever do anything.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
"you guys have nearly destroyed what was once the freest nation to have ever existed"

No we haven't

"There has never been a political party more racist and fascist than the Democrat party"

So you've never studied world history. Got it. Because there was literally a party in Italy called the National Fascist Party.

"You accuse us of destroying democracy when you guys won't even let our votes count for anything"

Your votes count. You just lost.

"You have your woke goons "cancelling" conservative free speech everywhere, even on ImgFlip"

Only the government is prohibited from restricting free speech. Didn't you know that?

"I am not even close to going postal"

Let us know before you do

"the violence will come from you guys first before I ever do anything"

That's the excuse you will use after killing someone, at least
3 ups, 2y
I don't feel like playing ping pong with you today.
2 ups, 2y
Wow nice selfie bro
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
"(Democrats) have no morals, ethics, honesty and integrity"

Then how come so many Democrats have those things?

"They are to lowest forms of human life"

So you view Democrats like Hitler viewed Jewish people

"The WEF is in control of our elections"

Is the WEF in the room with you now?
3 ups, 2y,
4 replies
"Then how come so many Democrats have those things?"

There's probably about 3 Democrats who have those things. The rest realized who you guys are and left the party.

"So you view Democrats like Hitler viewed Jewish people"

What kind of a monster would murder a baby just because the baby was inconvenient? If you can be that evil then you can be capable of anything. Just like your buddy, Adolf Hitler.

"Is the WEF in the room with you now?"

Not yet. They've got ESG scores implemented in most of the large corporations. They are working on a personal ESG device that people can wear that constantly monitors their activity to send back their score to the WEF.

ESG is you social credit rating. If it is low then you are a nothing in society. Yup. It's coming soon. And I want the absolute lowest score possible.

Go look it up. It's all on their website.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
P.O.V: this is your social credits, damn bro you must suck that bad.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
That is the goal. I want to be the worst person in the world in the eyes of the New World Order.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
damn, that's kinda a interesting goal
1 up, 2y,
3 replies
I am pro-freedom, pro-life and pro-pursuit of happiness. The more freedom the happier our lives will be. Those who are trying to give us a social credit score are opposed to freedom, life and the pursuit of happiness. They want power and control.

We are not even close to the free country that our founding fathers gave us and that includes the fact that slavery was allowed. The difference is that lack of freedom that slaves had has been spread out over all of us by the government. We are slaves to the government. We work most of the year just to give that money to the government. If we fail to pay or property taxes the state governments kicks us off our land regardless if we have paid off our mortgage or not. The money we earn is taxed. Our employers pays a tax on the money they pay us. Then when we use the money we earned we pay sales tax. If it is a cell phone bill there is an additional tax added to our bill. If we put money into a retirement fund we don't pay taxes on that money when it is put it but when we need it most (i.e. retirement) the government taxes it. If we don't have a retirement fund and are just going to try to make it on social security, we are taxed on our social security income.

And it is not just taxes that limits our freedom. It is the gazillion laws that are on the books. Several years ago I heard about a book a guy had written about our excessive IRS laws, not including all other laws. He said that every taxpayer, regardless of how honest and diligent they were in making sure that they were compliant with tax law, can be found guilty of at least 3 felonies. That's just the IRS. I am sure that we could be found guilty of many more felonies than that if the government decided to persecute someone.

That is not good. The founder fathers said that when the government fears the people there is freedom and when the people fear the government there is tyranny. We have tyranny.
0 ups, 2y,
2 replies
I encourage you to read the 14th Amendment. Not a single man woman or child is free since the passing of the 14th. It bassically said , ALL ARE ENSLAVED.

Sleep on that.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Ok. I just read the 14th amendment. I have run into people before that have an issue with the word "citizen". I never really paid much attention to them but I got the impression that they thought that "citizen" meant servant to the government. Is that what you are saying?

I don't look at "citizen" in any other way than protected by the guarantees of the Constitution. Protected from the government.

But if you want to talk about slavery, it has nothing to do with the 14th amendment. It all began with a narcissistic Progressive control freak named Woodrow Wilson. He was the beginning of the end of our freedom. He forced the IRS on us so that we now work for the government and not ourselves.
1 up, 2y
Its not citizens i have issues with...it is SUBJECT TO that have a problem with.
0 ups, 2y
"Its not citizens i have issues with...it is SUBJECT TO that have a problem with."

I get that but I think that has to do with the law. We are subject to the jurisdiction which is the law. But I agree with you. The wording does sound very authoritarian. Taken with the rest of the amendment, especially when the reiterated the language in the Declaration of Independence, somewhat tones that language down. We are still guaranteed a right to live and liberty and instead of pursuit of happiness they replaced it with property.. Which is what Jefferson originally put in the Declaration but took it out because he though that slave owners would use that to justify owning slaves.

The right to own property is the most fundamental right. It is the right which life and liberty depend on. So that is a good thing. If we are not allowed to own property then someone else will take ownership and we will be subject to them.

But there is something else that is disconcerting about the 14th. It punished states who fought against the Union in the Civil War. If anyone in those states fought for the Confederacy they could not hold public office. So that eliminated the rights of those states to send representatives to Congress that represented the people of those states for at least a generation. This gave rise to "scalawags" and "carpetbaggers" who came down from the northern states and ran for "representatives" of the Southern states. These people were representing themselves, much like how Congress only represents themselves today. Pretty much everyone in Congress now is the modern day equivalent of the "scalawags" and "carpetbaggers" of about 160 years ago.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
damn, Imma follow you.
1 up, 2y
Thanks.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
that's damn true, one good thing however, is the rich are being taxed, but we are being taxed? how the hell do does the government expect us to survive, while the rich can do tax evasions and shit, it bull, they want us do pay up all day everyday for what? Not much.

Most of the U.S presidents are dumbasses, Biden, Trump Obama, Bushes, most of our presidents were doing little to no work. We could be having green energy, better economy, if we would all work together and f**k social credits, we would be happier, so f**k stupid social credits, lets treat everyone decently and become better.
1 up, 2y
"one good thing however, is the rich are being taxed"

Not true. The idea of bringing down the rich is not an American idea. It came from Marxism. So much of Marx's stupidity has permeated our culture these days. It plays off of people's envy and it paints every rich person with the same coat of paint.

I am not rich but rich people did not get rich by stealing from the poor, nor did they get rich because they are corrupt. There are corrupt rich people but not all of them. But there are corrupt poor people as well.

Wealth is not finite. It is not limited to a set amount. The rich are not hoarding all the wealth. Wealth is created whenever you buy or sell something.

I agree about the presidents. But ever since Obama the Democrats have been on a destroy America course. Nothing that Obama and especially Biden has done has benefited anyone in America. Trump saw a huge bump in the economy but it wasn't because of his policies. It was the business world breathing a huge sigh of relief that Hillary didn't win and Obama was gone. They re-invested in their businesses and began hiring more people.

Then COVID came along and decimated our economy because the control freak Democrats locked down nearly every business. Lots of businesses completely shut down and laid off all of their employees. My opinion is COVID was planned. It is part of the reduce the population of the world campaign of the left. I read a few weeks ago that Boston University has created a variant of COVID that kills 80% of the lab rats they infected. Why on earth would they spend time trying to make COVID worse than it already is? That is insane.
0 ups, 2y,
2 replies
No, it's because those women never wanted babies, they were rapped, or some women are straight dumb, and have unprotected sex, leading to them having abortion (lets be honest, for women who abort babies cause they had unprotected sex, thats pretty damn sad.) other then that, its not killing a baby if you were forced to have one.
1 up, 2y
That was quick. One comment and the "reply" hyperlink disappears. It is almost like you were a moderator who could control that and you don't want anyone talking back to your absurdity.

"there are almost 8 biliion human beings on earth, this planet can not sustain us all"

This is such complete stupidity. Marxists, eugenicists and toxic narcissists have wanting to kill off massive amounts of people under this bogus notion that the planet is overpopulated. Marx wanted to eliminate the population by 80% in his time, fortunately he had no power. But his followers, Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Mao and Pol Pot killed over 100 million people. But that wasn't good enough for you. In the 60's the eugenicists reared their ugly heads again and said we would not be able to feed ourselves by 1980 if we didn't slow down reproduction.

John Holdren, Obama's Science Czar, wrote a book in the 70's called the Complete Lives System which placed a value on human life at certain ages. From from 15 to 50 live has value. Outside of that human life had no value and was expendable.

Now we have ESG scores for businesses but the WEF is planning on scoring the individual.

Welcome to dystopia.

Here is what I say to everyone who wants to reduce the population of the earth, start with yourself and leave the rest of us alone. The more people the more brains. The more brains the more solutions to problems. We have already over come every single problem the 60's population control nitwits raised as problems.

I have faith in mankind and I believe that we have the brains and ingenuity to solve problems.

However, the much, much, much bigger issue is human are not overpopulating the planet. It is just not happening. You could fit everyone on the planet in the boundaries of the United States and give them all an acre of land.

Gee if we could just increase the level of CO2 in our atmosphere then plants would grow faster and produce more. Gee if the global temperature went up we would have longer growing seasons. We could very easily feed everyone.

And if we could just eliminate all socialist, fascist, communist and any other tyrannical governments then everyone would be free to take care of themselves. That would eliminate hunger and starvation.
1 up, 2y,
2 replies
Rape, incest and health of the mother are not the reason why women get abortions. Yes, it happens but when you look at the reason why women get abortions that percentage is negligible. The overwhelming majority is convenience.

Some states are making exceptions for the minority cases. That decision on how to deal with the minority of cases is up to the states and the people of the state.

Killing a baby just because it is going to be an inconvenience is the worst thing a human being can do. I would call it barbaric except that would be an insult to barbarians.

The baby is NOT a part of the mother's body. If women were fighting for the right to have their spleen removed then a lot of people would think they are stupid but no one would pass a law against it. Angelina Jolie, in fear of getting breast cancer, had a mastectomy as a preventative measure, because she watched the horror that breast cancer caused her mother. No one tried to stop her. No one tried to pass a law against her having an elective mastectomy. Because it is her body and her choice. But a baby is a completely separate life and it is human life.

Killing a baby inside the womb is no different than killing outside of the womb. He or she has a right to life just like you do.

Does anyone ever consider if the baby wants to be murdered? Do the pro-abortion even understand that the baby actually feels his or her body being ripped to pieces. Is it because you can't hear him or her scream on horror that makes it okay with you?
3 ups, 2y
ok, no you have a understandable point there, states who allow abortion for minority cases is a good thing. You have inlightened me, I respect that thank you.
2 ups, 2y
That is true, I never really thought about it that way.
0 ups, 2y
"Sanger would be ecstatic by how the Democrats have conditioned blacks to abort close to half of all pregnancies"

Black people are "conditioned" to have abortions? That sounds pretty ignorant.

"I think you're mostly right. Probably because unborn babies were protected by the Constitution back then"

Where does the Constitution mention unborn babies?

"She did support the idea of euthanizing the old, sick, mentally ill and mentally retarded"

I haven't heard that, but even if it's true, all it proves is that she supported some bad ideas. She also supported good ideas like access to birth control.

"She is the one who started these ideas of making certain lives irrelevant"

Right, because before Margaret Sanger came along, there was nothing but peace and harmony and respect for human life. People viewing other people as irrelevant and disposable goes back to the earliest days of humankind.

"So they got their activist justices to carefully added words to 2 prior Supreme Court rulings to build up to using those words to justify infanticide in Roe v Wade"

Roe v Wade didn't justify infanticide. That's not what abortion is, unless you think a fertilized egg is a fully-formed infant.

"The Constitution does not matter to Democrats"

I'm a Democrat and it matters to me

"What the Democrat politicians want is ultimate power over the people"

And I could say the same thing about the Republicans
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
“In animal industry, the poor stock is not allowed to breed. In gardens, the weeds are kept down.” America must learn from the Nazis and carry out nature’s own mandate of getting rid of 'human weeds.'” - Margaret Sanger, “Human Conservation and Birth Control,” March 3, 1938 speech, Margaret Sanger Papers, http://nyu.edu/projects/sanger.

Hitler and Sanger never met or corresponded, as far as I know, but Hitler took inspiration from Sanger. Hitler adopted Sanger's euthanasia ideas for the sick, the aged, and the physically and mentally disabled.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
NO. I am saying that the hero of the Democrats (and Hillary Clinton's favorite woman) was a Nazi supporter.

This kind of ideology can still be found in the Democrat party. Abortion is the ideology that is most popular of Sangers ideas, especially as it applies to blacks. Liberal blacks have the highest percentage of abortions, which would make Sanger ecstatic.
0 ups, 2y,
2 replies
She certainly wasn't a perfect person. IF she supported the Nazis, then she was wrong for doing so.

"Abortion is the ideology that is most popular of Sangers ideas"

Margaret Sanger didn't support abortion for the most part

"Liberal blacks have the highest percentage of abortions, which would make Sanger ecstatic"

Abortion is voluntary, so regardless of which group has the most abortions, that's their choice.
1 up, 2y
Sanger would be ecstatic by how the Democrats have conditioned blacks to abort close to half of all pregnancies.

"Margaret Sanger didn't support abortion for the most part"

I think you're mostly right. Probably because unborn babies were protected by the Constitution back then. I am not a Sanger expert so I don't know how she thought. I know a few things. She did support the idea of euthanizing the old, sick, mentally ill and mentally retarded. So it's not a stretch to think she would support murdering the unborn as well. She may have even said so but I don't spend my time reading everything Sanger said, so I don't know.

Regardless, the woman was a monster. She is the one who started these ideas of making certain lives irrelevant. The Democrats ran with those ideas. They knew that they could never get Congress to pass a law legalizing abortion. Mostly because it would be a states rights issue. So they got their activist justices to carefully added words to 2 prior Supreme Court rulings to build up to using those words to justify infanticide in Roe v Wade.

The Constitution does not matter to Democrats. They have found every means possible to get around the Constitution, unless the can use it to get what they want.

What the Democrat politicians want is ultimate power over the people.
1 up, 2y,
2 replies
I'm going to end my conversation here because I find it very unproductive to go back and forth with you. You're stuck in your mindset and you don't seem to be able to understand that you're arguing for the wrong side. The side that devalues the individual and devalues life.
0 ups, 2y
there are almost 8 biliion human beings on earth, this planet can not sustain us all, which means abortion allows us to slow that pace of human growth down, 8 billion people, truly think about that number, if you were a planet, could you sustain that many people, could you REALLY truly do it. No, you can't there are to many mouths to feed, people to give resources to, and life to sustain, plus there are other species. Abortion is not a right, it will be NEEDED for the Earth's survival, so until we reach a type 1 civilization and move to mars, abortion is pretty use full.
0 ups, 2y
"You're stuck in your mindset and you don't seem to be able to understand that you're arguing for the wrong side"

You think I'm arguing for the wrong side. I don't agree. So obviously I'm not going to think that I'm arguing for the wrong side.

"The side that devalues the individual and devalues life"

You're free to think whatever you want. But I value individual liberty and the right for people to have control over their own body, something your side doesn't seem to be very fond of.
1 up, 2y
I couldn't find it there either. I think it was there but has been deleted. I searched for that title on the internet and it only came back with 2 references and only one had text but it is not the complete text. You can find the phrase "In animal industry, the poor stock is not allowed to breed. In gardens, the weeds are kept down." at the bottom of page 13 but I could not find the other part anywhere. And it does not seem like it is the entire speech. It seems like it was cut off before the end.

I think there is a concerted effort to strike any positive reference by anyone in the early Progressive movement to the Nazis. That's a shame. History must not be filtered or altered or else we will not learn from it.

https://theodorerooseveltcenter.org/Research/Digital-Library/Record?libID=o291927#
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
democrats are so powerful they gave the entire world inflation AND high gas prices.

LOL
6 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Where did you get that idea? No, Democrats did cause global inflation, the World Economic Forum did.

This IS The Great Reset. The nations who are in league with the WEF are following their orders. Those nations have all began printing currency at an accelerated rate.

Quantitative easing (printing more money than the value it represents) causes the value of each new and existing dollar to drop. The more that is print the lower the value. Goods and services are not valued based on the currency but rather on what the currency represents. The dollar used to be based on gold, now it is partially based on oil. The rest is based on the promise of our political leaders, which is worthless.

Because goods and services are based on the value of the raw materials used and the labor costs it now takes more dollars to equal that value.

This is happening worldwide (or specifically in the nations being controlled by the WEF) because they are all trying to collapse the world's economy.

The goal of the WEF is not to destroy national boundaries, just take control of the supporting nations. For us it means throwing the Constitution out the door and forfeiting all our rights, freedom, property and lives to the WEF.

Go to the WEF's website and look it up. They are creating a newer 21st century global fascist regime. They aren't calling it fascism, they aren't calling it anything at all. But when you look into the nation that Mussolini built, it very much resembles fascism.

High gas prices are affected by inflation AND the fact that YOUR loser president put under the control of OPEC again. OPEC simply cut production to cause the price of crude oil to skyrocket. They have a long history of causing exorbitant price increases by doing that... on purpose.
5 ups, 2y
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
OK but we did all (monetary) this under trump too. so where were you then?

As far as oil: our domestic oil companies cut production as well. I guess they are sinister too.
5 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Where was I when Trump spent money like Obama and Obama was the worst before Biden was installed as president? Where was I when Trump kept talking about tariffs like they were a good thing? Where was I when Trump ignored the massive amounts of money that the Feds were printing because of Obama's stupidity? Where was I when the debt to GDP that Obama pushed over 100% never once went below that for Trump's entire presidency?

And you thought I was Mr MAGA didn't you. But still, even though Trump wasn't the greatest president we've ever had, he was vastly better than both Obama and Biden. He was better than Bill Clinton. In some respects he was better than both Bush's. However, he sucked compared to Reagan.

Yes, I know that our oil companies cut oil production. Most businesses have to make cuts from time to time. It is not always about jacking the prices up. Sometimes a business can't get the raw materials they need on time. Sometimes a business's revenues drop and they can't afford to produce as much. It is no surprise.

I will tell you this, for Trump's 4 years in office all we saw was gas prices drop from Obama's highs and they never went up until Biden got in office and got us addicted to OPEC again for absolutely no reason on earth that I can see. Biden has done nothing but one major disaster after another. And when he got us out of Afghanistan that was the atrocity. I know the left keeps trying to blame Trump for what Biden did but that is just absurd. Biden screwed over about 35,000 American citizens and gave $80 Billion dollars worth of military hardware to the Taliban.

Biden hasn't quite reached the level of the worst president ever. FDR hold that title for doing everything in his power to prolong the great depression and locking up thousands of innocent American citizens just because their ancestry was Japanese, German and Italian. After FDR there is Woodrow Wilson who forced the IRS and the Federal Reserve on this nation. After him was Obama who tried as hard as he could in his 1st term to turn us into a communist nation. The moron was raised on a steady diet of communism, from his mother, grandmother, mentor and college professors. Then it is a toss up between Carter, LBJ and Bill Clinton. Biden is worse those those three and proving to be much more destructive to this nation than even Obama.
0 ups, 2y
Trump sucked big time in my view, maybe he had good intentions from the beginning, but they feel like they faded away faster then an avalanche. Biden is trying, and thats good, Obama kinda slipped up a lot. Don't know much about reagan, so i'll shut up there because i wont speak if I dont know something.
3 ups, 2y,
2 replies
3 ups, 2y
I guess then I am not a Trump supporter even though I voted for him.
0 ups, 2y
and thats a fact right their
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
So much nonsense, where do I start?

Well, let’s begin with the obvious. I’m not a Democrat. Your assumption that I am, again, is a startling symptom of your obvious political extreme programming that anyone not with you is against you.

Second, never said you’ve only been talking about it since 2020.

It’s boring to me because there has never been considerable proof of conspiratorial levels of voting fraud; rather than the usual clerical errors and anomalies.

Thirdly, your antagonistic reaction to the Democrats and the WEF is about as nonsensical as someone raging about the WHO, UN, G7, CDC, FBI, NSA, etc. I at least agree that there is real concern for all these apparently “evil” initial organizations. There is always going to be in anything that contains a single human being corruption. The phrase, “we’re all sinners”, comes to mind. But your directionless generalization of your personal hatred toward these groups, with zero motivation or even a modicum of informative nuance, makes you look like a raving lunatic.

Finally, you are so disgruntled by a lackluster win… A Lack Luster Win. A Win… that you’re at least considering it wasn’t fraud. Even if it is a flippant consideration. And you again generalize it to be because people are stupid.

People are way more nuanced than that. Not everyone votes all Republican or all Democrat. Not even a majority do so. And there are always reasons besides the candidate, the issues, or even who is President. And if you continue to fail to consider these things, and instead blame it on “stupid” voters, the “the evil boogeyman initial organizations”, or voter fraud when things don’t ever come up all Republican, and only Republican, then you’re always going to be frustrated with the election results.

Grow up.
6 ups, 2y,
1 reply
If you don't want to be taken for a Democrat, don't speak Democrat.
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
They speak the same language.
5 ups, 2y,
2 replies
No way do Democrats/Republicans speak the same language, Gumshoe. Hank gave you sound advice as you speak and think DEMOCRAT.

The Truth Shall Set You Free
imgflip.com/i/6zz5u2
2 ups, 2y,
2 replies
That looks like fun. Let me try

Handy guide to Republican speak

Protecting the unborn = treating women like property

Pro-2nd Amendment = doing nothing when kids get shot in the face in their schools

Protecting religious freedom = making LGBTQ people sit in the back of the bus

Marxism = literally anything we don't like

George Soros = Jewish bogeyman

Healthcare = defending healthcare

Election fraud = whenever we don't win

Constitution = something Jesus gave white people
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
"Protecting the unborn = treating women like property"
So wrong...so many ways. If we don't protect the most innocent among us, what does that say about "us"?

"Protecting religious freedom = making LGBTQ people sit in the back of the bus"
What does LGBTQ have to do w/ religion? Where do they sit in the back of the bus? They are up front and personal in young children's faces...men dressed as women...parades...no reasonable parent would want to explain that to innocent little minds much less make them a part of it.

"Constitution = something Jesus gave white people"
Leftists hate the Constitution & Conservatives love it as it applies to all citizens equally and it is racist to say otherwise.

I just picked my top three as I don't have time to delve into the others. Let's put it this way...we bonded on love for animals but that is all we seem to have in common.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Thanks for this hand book, it will help me a little, however the part were it says treat women like property, even I think republicans would not do that
0 ups, 2y
Yes there is some exaggeration, but telling a grown woman that you should get to make decisions about her body is essentially treating her like you have ownership over her
4 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Ah, so Democrats lie and I’m accused of lying or perpetrating a lie.

Please, by all means, objectively identify the lie, and quote a factual source that disproves it.
5 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Well, you just keep mouthing Democrat policies. When it talks like a Democrat, walks like a Democrat, and acts like a Democrat, it's not a Republican.

When you claim to not be a Democrat, you are lying. To yourself.
5 ups, 2y
Hank, you covered that extremely well...clear, concise and TRUE!
2 ups, 2y,
5 replies
Sounds too generalized of an accusation for anyone to take seriously. Cite examples or admit you’re just upset that I’m being critical of Republican policies or citing inconvenient facts.
4 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Gumshoe, I don't recall you acting like anything BUT a Democrat. Ever. Hank nailed it and you need to look in the mirror. Case closed...
2 ups, 2y
Grow up, vBackman.

To me, you sound like any old whiny liberal.
0 ups, 2y
The fact that gumshoe says he is republican, but walks, talks, and thinks like a democrat, but denies it is sad, im a democrat and I am willing to say "democrats f**ked up here", but gumshoe is another level of wtf
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
No, I am not planning to cite anything else just to be told that "That isn't good enough either because <reasons>".

If you don't like being called a Democrat, don't be one.
2 ups, 2y
I accept your admission that you're just upset that I'm being critical of Republican policies or citing inconvenient facts.
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
I admit nothing to you, just like you admit nothing to you.
0 ups, 2y
You admit that you have nothing but conjecture. And a profound need to have the last word.

I can at least give you a chance a that last one, if not evidence that I am a Democrat.
1 up, 2y
At the risk of repeating myself: I admit nothing to you, just like you admit nothing to you.

Rehash of "So you admit..." in 5...4...3...
0 ups, 2y
or you know your wrong and hank is right, and you just want "sources and facts" because your mad.
0 ups, 2y
damn, you seem desperate, because you know he is right
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • paste:image.png
  • image.png
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    Massive Election Fraud; Two Words: