America Finding Its Greatness Again

I don't think you understand we stopped one out of a hundred ways they cheated. There won't be an honest election again until after the Civil War.

wow, such bull. believing trump stupid excuse *dies of cringe*

What a crock of bullshit.

Hi fellow imgflipper-offerer. How's your day going?

Yes, you are.

What a load of Biden's Bidenshit.

You need more fiber

You need an identity

Why?

MuH FaScIsM 'n' ExtreEEEEEEEEEmisM!!!!1!!1

You're right, fascism was used incorrectly.

I meant terrorism - the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

I'll wait for you to deflect to the Police Brutality Riots of '20 and try to call it the same thing. (I'd be surprised if you didn't.)

Violence and intimidation... you mean violence and intimidation like raiding someones house? Or maybe placing them in leg irons at an airport? Or threatening them for simply reposting your content? Or maybe firebombing CPCs? Perhaps showing up outside a SCOTUS justice's house with a pistol, a knife, zip ties, duct tape, etc.? I could go on, but I think you get the picture.

And yes. I AM going to bring up the Race Riots of 2020- the ones that caused over $2 Billion in damage and cost over 25 lives. For those of you who aren't the best with numbers, the January 6 protest cost less than 0.075% of what damages the 2020 Riots caused.

And in the spirit of discrediting our opponents' arguments... "I'll wait for you to deflect to the January 6 protest of '21 and try to call it the same thing. (I'd be surprised if you didn't.)"

And on the topic of fascism- Yeah, us "ultra-MAGAs" like to stand in front of a cultural icon lit up in blood red, with the military standing at attention behind us, while disparaging our opponents as "enemies of the country" and "a threat to democracy." Yeah... we LOOOOOVE to do that.

And yes. I AM going to bring up the Race Riots of 2020- the ones that caused over $2 Billion in damage and cost over 25 lives. For those of you who aren't the best with numbers, the January 6 protest cost less than 0.075% of what damages the 2020 Riots caused.
> So, not only are you justifying the capital riot because you were losing political power but what matters is so long as you do less damage than the "other guys" you are justified? Wow dude, hypocrisy thy name is US_Terrorist76.

But yeah, I mean in a sick and twisted world, I could see how that makes sense and the numerous lives that have been lost to what has been proven to be corrupted police and excessive use of police force is not important to you. I could see how you'd call them race riots since members of the black community suffer these atrocities at a disproportionate rate compared to whites. I could see why you'd want to deflect and ignore that in spite of people calling for reform for *years* nothing had been done and you have the audacity to act surprised. I mean, it's not like there have been numerous vigils over the years, numerous peaceful protests just for nothing to happen.

I mean, let's also forget the number of indictments of police officers and white supremacists who were arrested for also playing parts in escalating the riots. But you wouldn't care about that because it doesn't fit your narrative.

Excellent deflection. I condemn the violence in whole part by both sides. I applaud those who got permits and had shown the world that when MAGA came up to bat for their first time for a protest, MAGA went straight to a riot within the first six months of claims of election fraud. They didn't wait for the system to work. No, instead they attacked the seat of our government. Members of the black community and those that support them are far more patient than those MAGA zealots.

I'm not justifying or unjustifying January 6. I'm saying that you have a glaring double standard. You justify and downplay $2 Billion of damage and 25 lives, yet yell about, and blow out of proportion, a 4 hour political protest costing less than 0.075% of your preferred protest.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCiTxia1Gzo

" the numerous lives that have been lost to what has been proven to be corrupted police and excessive use of police force is not important to you."

Actually, it is. It is often used politically (cough Michael Byrd cough). But that doesn't mean you get to destroy things, including, but not limited to: black owned businesses, hispanic owned businesses, asian owned businesses, statues, historic churches, ect.

"Excellent deflection."

Wow, so presumptuous and full of oneself.

" I condemn the violence in whole part by both sides. "

Right after justifying and excusing it. Yeah, that's not gonna work, buddy.

"MAGA went straight to a riot within the first six months of claims of election fraud. They didn't wait for the system to work. "

My brother in Christ, there are only 3 months between a presidential election (fair or not) and an inauguration. I don't know what system you are referring to, but we did give it a chance. It too was corrupted.

"Members of the black community and those that support them are far more patient than those MAGA zealots."

Yeah, it was "those MAGA zealots" that called "no justice, no peace" and "kill all cops" and "reparations now"... the epitome of patience.

"yet yell about, and blow out of proportion, a 4 hour political protest costing less than 0.075% of your preferred protest."
(Now who's doing the downplaying double standard? Marvelous.)

https://apnews.com/article/virus-outbreak-race-and-ethnicity-suburbs-health-racial-injustice-7edf9027af1878283f3818d96c54f748
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qp2b9Qo88UI

" the numerous lives that have been lost to what has been proven to be corrupted police and excessive use of police force is not important to you."

"Actually, it is. It is often used politically (cough Michael Byrd cough). But that doesn't mean you get to destroy things, including, but not limited to: black owned businesses, hispanic owned businesses, asian owned businesses, statues, historic churches, etc."
> Lol, Michael Byrd, the guy who was inside the House of Representatives on the other side of a Barracade who gave a woman 9 seconds to stop climbing over the barricade, coupled with multiple warnings and she didn't listen. F**k around and find out, she did. So much for backing the blue eh? THough, I guess that's the theme for the attack on our country. "Patriot."

Right after justifying and excusing it. Yeah, that's not gonna work, buddy.
> Saying you understand, is not the same thing as justifying it. What option did they have after years upon years of protest with no action?

My brother in Christ, there are only 3 months between a presidential election (fair or not) and an inauguration. I don't know what system you are referring to, but we did give it a chance. It too was corrupted.
>> Wow, proof that brainwashing works. You're not even aware of it. You didn't even check the claim, you just kneejerk react. I guess you missed one of Trump's Great Speeches. Like the one he held on August 20 in Scranton, PA. I thought the Right Wing prided themselves on being informed?

Yeah, it was "those MAGA zealots" that called "no justice, no peace" and "kill all cops" and "reparations now"... the epitome of patience.
> After years upon years of inaction by those they elected to represent them. Yeah. Whereas MAGA believed a false dilemma played by Trump, ate it up and in only six months attacked the heart of our country. Good job. You get a participation award for being good at riots I guess?

"Now who's doing the downplaying double standard? "

You.

"Saying you understand, is not the same thing as justifying it. What option did they have after years upon years of protest with no action?"

In some situations, it *kinda* is. But regardless, if you actually believe this, perhaps go read the 13th, 14th, 15th, 19th, and 26th Amendments, as well as the Civil Rights acts on 1957, 1960, and 1964. All of which were passed predominantly by Republicans, by the way.

" Lol, Michael Byrd, the guy who was inside the House of Representatives on the other side of a Barracade who gave a woman 9 seconds to stop climbing over the barricade, coupled with multiple warnings and she didn't listen"

Wow, nine whole seconds?

Also, if this was reversed and it was a cop who shot a Democrat woman, you'd be outraged.

"F**k around and find out"

So did George Floyd :)

(and I already know what you're going to say. And to that I would say, I thought you were worried about the excessive use of force and police brutality? ;D)

"And on the topic of fascism- Yeah, us "ultra-MAGAs" like to stand in front of a cultural icon lit up in blood red, with the military standing at attention behind us, while disparaging our opponents as "enemies of the country" and "a threat to democracy." Yeah... we LOOOOOVE to do that."

Oh, yeah you do. I can't tell you how many times Trump has called Democrats in whole part "radical." Called the entirety of those who adopt anti-fascist mindsets "terrorists."

As for Biden's speech? I think I'd rather let you just sit in ignorance as it's obvious you only watched little soundbytes as you're missing a lot of context of what he said. Pretty sure I can also find times where Trump used the military when it wasn't proper etiquette.

Now that I think about it, I find it hilariously ironic that the anti-PC culture is worried about Biden being politically correct.

You can't have your cake and eat it too. If you want a president who's PC, act like it. If you don't want to be PC, then shut up; you're just playing the victim card when you're surprised that not being PC didn't work for you.

Oh, no. You posted a mic drop meme. That means you must be correct!

"Oh, yeah you do. I can't tell you how many times Trump has called Democrats in whole part "radical." Called the entirety of those who adopt anti-fascist mindsets 'terrorists.' "

"in whole part"? What?

No, he called those who burned and rioted and looted in the name of "anti-fascism" terrorists. Nice try, though.

"As for Biden's speech? I think I'd rather let you just sit in ignorance as it's obvious you only watched little soundbytes as you're missing a lot of context of what he said."

You don't realize the supreme irony of this, do you? :)

No, I watched quite a bit of it.

"Now that I think about it, I find it hilariously ironic that the anti-PC culture is worried about Biden being politically correct."

We're not. We're holding him (and the PC community) to the same standards that they berate us with.

"Those who adopt anti-fascist mindset terrorists." LMAO say you support fascism without saying it. Also, check this - this had NOTHING to do with antifa, and was stated in 2019: "The radical far left continues to push a socialist takeover of our healthcare system and lie to the American people about the devastating impact it would have." That is a condemnation of the entire political party. Yeah, I'm right.

"He called those who burned and rioted and looted in the name of antifacism terroists."
"https://fox28media.com/trump-claims-major-consideration-given-to-declaring-antifa-a-terrorist-organization"
Nice try, though. This is dated 2019, and this was merely a civil disturbance. Your partisanship is showing. I'm right.

"I watched quite a bit of it."
So can you show me on the doll, where the mean colors and the "mean speech" hurt you? It's almost like Biden has more balls than Trump to actually say what he says in front of a camera, than just spend his entire time tweeting about it.

"We're holding them to standards."
You have to have standards first. Case in point "F**k your feelings 2016." "Radical left... Protesters are terrorists. -2019" Mind you in the altercation between ANTIFA and Proud Boys in 2019, both sides got into a civil disturbance and he only chastised one. Things that make you go "HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM."

Tell me if you can spot the difference:
" Asked by reporter Barbara Barr, “Do you condemn Antifa?” Biden responded, “Yes I do—violence no matter who it is.”" (dated 10/16/20)

As for your boy Trump? You know, the guy who is about to get legally f**ked (and deservedly so) "Proud Boys, stand back and stand by. But I'll tell you what: Somebody's got to do something about antifa and the left. Because this is not a right-wing problem — this is a left-wing problem."

He didn't condemn them. He told them to stand by. And boy, they sure did. They tried (and failed, lol) to overthrow the 2020 election through force.

I'm right. Mic Drop stands. The evidence speaks for itself.

I don't support Fascism/National Socialism.

I think you know that.

"Your partisanship is showing. I'm right."

LOL, as if you weren't even more partisan.

I'm not saying Biden didn't condemn violence. What I'm saying has nothing to do with that.

Let's examine that. Was it the Proud Boys who burned down black owned businesses? Who burned historic churches? Who looted flat screen TVs in the name of "social justice"? Who set up an "autonomous zone" in the center of a major city and instituted a "white tax"? Who beat up old women and threw paint in the faces of older men?

No.

It was all ANTIFA. The Proud Boys go against them.

Anyway, this is quickly turning into an "I-make argument-you-scream-TRUMP-IS-A-NAZI" exchange. When you're ready to civilly discuss things, by all means comment, but if you're going to be calling literally half the country "terrorists" simply because they don't agree with you, well, you can go argue with yourself.

I don't support Fascism/National Socialism.
>> These are not the same and cannot be used interchangeably.

I think you know that.
>> I'm sure you're against *real* national socialism. Though actual nazis? I reserve judgement.

LOL, as if you weren't even more partisan.
>> I'm partisan for acknowledging flaws of my party, and pointing out the flaws of yours? The only one who hasn't acknowledged the flaws of their party is you. I'll wait for you to rush and virtue signal that you'll now acknowledge the flaws.

I'm not saying Biden didn't condemn violence. What I'm saying has nothing to do with that.
>> So make your point more cohesive.

Let's examine that. Was it the Proud Boys who burned down black owned businesses?
>> Probably... https://www.justsecurity.org/70497/far-right-infiltrators-and-agitators-in-george-floyd-protests-indicators-of-white-supremacists/

Who burned historic churches? Who looted flat screen TVs in the name of "social justice"?
>> People not in representation of the BLM cause, that's for sure.

Who set up an "autonomous zone" in the center of a major city and instituted a "white tax"?
This man: https://nypost.com/2020/06/13/protester-in-seattles-chaz-demands-white-people-give-out-cash/ ... evidently. That's the only example I could find after 10 seconds of looking.

Who beat up old women and threw paint in the faces of older men?
>> Seem to remember police doing that.

It was all ANTIFA. The Proud Boys go against them.
>> Prove it. Do they have a membership? I saw the video. Seems like an elderly couple trying to cross the street through a demonstration confronted by three people. Wearing different colored clothes all masked during... a pandemic? Derp on the left has a hole for his mouth so that makes no sense. With their hands behind their backs, that looks like quite a beating.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mfp0HhKBtIo 0:35

Anyway, this is quickly turning into an "I-make argument-you-scream-TRUMP-IS-A-NAZI" exchange. When you're ready to civilly discuss things, by all means comment, but if you're going to be calling literally half the country "terrorists" simply because they don't agree with you, well, you can go argue with yourself.
>> Ah, I see, you're running out of deflections as I keep answer them and shutting you down. You've run out of places to hide, your hypocrisy remains and you still fail to denounce the violence by III%ers, Boogaloo Boys, Proud Boys etc. So, who endorses violence? Not me.

So, after replying to your entire post. Guess what?

I called it - nothing but deflection from the right wing.

How totally unsurprising.

*Ignores the claims, doesn't even address them* "WeLl, WhAt AbOuT tHe DeMs!?"
You stay, you bud, it's easier that way.

"So, after replying to your entire post. Guess what?

I called it - nothing but deflection from the *left* wing.

How totally unsurprising.

*Ignores the claims, doesn't even address them* "WeLl, WhAt AbOuT tHe *RePuBs*!?"
You stay, you bud, it's easier that way."

you mean violence and intimidation like raiding someones house?
> Whose house?
Or maybe placing them in leg irons at an airport?
> Who was placed in leg irons and why?
Or threatening them for simply reposting your content?
> Who was threatened for reposting content? What was the content?
Or maybe firebombing CPCs?
> Who firebombed what? If you use an abbreviation in writing, you need to establish what it is somewhere in the text as CPC could be anything.
Perhaps showing up outside a SCOTUS justice's house with a pistol, a knife, zip ties, duct tape, etc.?
> Was there intent to use them? Or were people just found there and they happened to have them on their persons? Why were they there? But, MAGA said that duct tape, zip ties knives, and guns are part of a "tourists" gear... such as with the capital amirite? ;) But no, I see what you're saying and even then I don't agree with it. However, it is their right to protest. Were they brandishing these things? I could go on to make a list of Right-wing intimidation through the years which is far greater in number, but I don't think I need to.

Donald J Trump, James O'Keefe, Scott Smith, etc.

Peter Navarro, https://video.foxnews.com/v/6307424523112#sp=show-clips

Libs of TikTok, liberal/leftist TikTok videos
https://www.foxnews.com/media/taylor-lorenz-shrugs-off-death-threats-libs-tiktok-twitter
https://nypost.com/2022/06/14/elon-musk-defends-libs-of-tiktok-over-twitter-death-threats/

CPC = Crisis Pregnancy Center. My bad. But anyway, groups like "Jane's Revenge" and "Ruth Sent Us" firebombed more than a few CPCs.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-attacks-on-crisis-pregnancy-centers-janes-revenge-abortion-roe-v-wade-violence-destroyed-11655653644

Yes.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/08/armed-man-arrested-outside-brett-kavanaughs-home-after-threatening-supreme-court-justice.html

And about that last part... all I can say is LMAO. That's one of those deflections you berate me for supposedly doing. :)

Oh yeah, and let's not forget

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/22/us/north-dakota-teenager-vehicular-homicide/index.html

Donald J Trump, James O'Keefe, Scott Smith, etc.
> So, the party of law is mad about the law doing its job? Lol, that's delicious.

I looked at Libs of Tiktok story. Seems to be just that. I'd expect as much from a tabloid. Nothing but hearsay.

CPC, seems to be an isolated incident. Did some more digging, it's happened in four states by a group that I am not a part of. I do not endorse any sort of violence, as I've said. These people are counter productive to the message that the majority of whatever you call people who are not you (libs, leftists, democrats, demons, evil people, etc.) Yeah, we're not about that. Let's Look at this another way: How many times have Nazis, III%ers, Proud Boys, all shown up at Trump rallies, events, or pushed GOP agenda on display in broad daylight, with none of that feverishly confrontational GOP who loves America, defines themselves as patriots, but tolerates nazis? How many times have they pushed them away, hm? The same people who were responsible for the death of six million Jews? Let'em speak? Nah man. You have no credibility in this arena. But, I thought I'd indulge you just the same.

"https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/08/armed-man-arrested-outside-brett-kavanaughs-home-after-threatening-supreme-court-justice.html"
Good, justice served. That nonsense gets us no where. I can understand their frustration since it seems to work so well for the MAGA party.

North Dakota Vehicular homicide...? What was the name of that lady in Charlottesville that got ran over by the right wing? Heather Heyer? Don't get me wrong, this guy should be jailed and imprisoned, make an example of him. I stand by that we are not the party of violence, unlike MAGA. Everything that Dems/libs are doing now, is symptomatic of the rampant abuse and sustained terrorism by the right wing. That doesn't make it right - let me be clear about that. Just because the right wing has been nothing but terrorists and provocateurs over the past 7 years, does not justify retaliation. In a kingdom where "Eye for an eye" is law, everyone is blind, but the one-eyed man is king.

"So, the party of law is mad about the law doing its job? Lol, that's delicious."

So the party of kindness wants to riot in the streets and raid their enemies' homes? LOL, that's delicious.

"I looked at Libs of Tiktok story. Seems to be just that. I'd expect as much from a tabloid. Nothing but hearsay."

Hearsay... accurately summarizes most of your arguments, I think...

"I do not endorse any sort of violence, as I've said."

So why are you spending your time justifying it?

Also... what are you going on about with National Socialists? Seems like a triggered rant.

The III Percenters i don't know much about. Allow me to do some digging (of my own, thanks).

The Proud Boys, however, are in no way evil or mean. Nor are they racist. In fact, their leader is a Black Cuban. They don't allow women, but they're allowed to do that (and because they don't want ANTIFA beating them up, like they do old women. What brave lefties).

Glad we can agree that that was a bad thing. Too bad some of us just want to go back to something that happened over a year and a half ago, and lasted all of four hours.

"I stand by that we are not the party of violence, unlike MAGA."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! After all this, you STILL insist that "well that wasn't us" and "but MAGA!" You really are a hoot.

"Just because the right wing has been nothing but terrorists and provocateurs over the past 7 years"

Hmmmm... this sounds familiar... almost sounds like you're avoiding the issue and spouting ad hominem to disparage your opponents.

Like Hitler.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! After all this, you STILL insist that "well that wasn't us" and "but MAGA!" You really are a hoot.
>> Yep. We've condemned violence again and again and again. Yet... The capitol rioters are being treated "so unfairly" "political prisoners." Joke's on you. Your party is literally excusing the violence at the capitol. As I've said, put everyone who commits violence in prison. Everyone. Now you guys need to stop seeking to pardon your capitol terrorists.

Hmmmm... this sounds familiar... almost sounds like you're avoiding the issue and spouting ad hominem to disparage your opponents.
>> It's not ad hominem if it's true. What issue am I avoiding? I'll address it. Which is more than you've done in this conversation. Each deflection I've answered and called to. You're running out of excuses.

Like Hitler.
>> So, I guess that makes you like Hitler then? And nearly everyone in politics stream?

"Yep. We've condemned violence again and again and again. Yet... The capitol rioters are being treated "so unfairly" "political prisoners." Joke's on you. Your party is literally excusing the violence at the capitol. As I've said, put everyone who commits violence in prison. Everyone. Now you guys need to stop seeking to pardon your capitol terrorists."

Actually, you haven't (I'm not talking about "other Democrats" or "we"... I'm talking about YOU. You've spent your time justifying it, so long as it's committed by the left.)

I am refraining from comment on the J6 protest, because of various reasons. But I'm not disparaging nor encouraging it.

"So, I guess that makes you like Hitler then? And nearly everyone in politics stream?"

I'm talking to YOU, ya dingus.

I just finished the reply where you said "Go comment with yourself." What happened? Two more lengthy replies?

I'll tell ya what: here's how this is going to go - if you don't denounce any violence in these two replies I read, we'll know what's really going on. ;)

... I read both your replies and much to much lack of surprise, you even admitted to not disparaging or encouraging it. You're pleading the fifth. As Trump said, "Only criminals plead the fifth."

I justify nothing. The very fact that you can't comprehend between justifying and seeking to understand, and how very different they are, speaks volumes for your ability (or lack thereof) to participate in this conversation effectively.

My work is done here. Thanks for trying. Perhaps next time you might have something constructive to say instead of deflecting, denying, and dodging :)

LMK when you're ready to be civil.

So the party of kindness wants to riot in the streets and raid their enemies' homes? LOL, that's delicious.
>> Oof, I must be getting to you if you're mimicking me. Yeah, you know, even "kind" people have their limits of political oppression, constant badgering and bigotry which has been started by the Right in mid 2010s.

"I looked at Libs of Tiktok story. Seems to be just that. I'd expect as much from a tabloid. Nothing but hearsay."

Hearsay... accurately summarizes most of your arguments, I think...
>> I'm surprised you can. LoTT posted some screenshots about a conversation, but redacted all the names, there is no evidence at this time to substantiate her claim. Though, I'd like to see you challenge what I've got as hearsay. I'll wait.

So why are you spending your time justifying it?
>> I don't think you know what you're talking about.

Also... what are you going on about with National Socialists? Seems like a triggered rant.
>> Nazis? I see you using "National Socialists" as some sort of red herring/genetic fallacy. You should take history. Nazis were literally "Socialist" in name only. You should try to find out what the red triangle means for Concentration camps. Then again, that'd require you to read something you don't want to read.

The III Percenters i don't know much about. Allow me to do some digging (of my own, thanks).
>> ...? Dialtone?

The Proud Boys, however, are in no way evil or mean.
>> So, because they have a black cuban leader, makes them not racist? LMAO
Tell me, can you tell me where he is now? Didn't he get arrested for something? I also seem to recall there being a rule that says to get to the final rank (or whatever) you have to punch
ANTIFA. Sounds like a cause for violence to me. Deny, deny deny.

You should'nt have taken the brown acid dude- it's a bummer please- clueless Moonbat

Either way, you're gonna have to swallow one.

*due

But your point still stands... The lefties should be here yelling soon, if they're not already.

Muh FrauDdDdD1!!!
Lol

Called it

No, no see..... I'm not yelling, I'm cheering it on. Keep going. I want your salty election tears flavoring my popcorn clear into 2024.
:3

Uh-huh...
Interesting...

oh yeah, I forgot... the customary ";)"... or :3"... or "lol"... because if you post any of those at the end of your comment, it means you've automatically won.

"...it means you've automatically won."

Ok?
Lol

You are free to think it means "I've automatically 'won' " if you want but I'm actually laughing!

This feels like deja vu, but...

Bro you forgot it again!!
L
O
L

Forgot what?

Doesn't count, it's in all caps :)

Also, why aren't you commenting on the main meme, and just mine?
It's almost like you're trolling.

Interesting.