Why do streaming movies suck? Why does Rings of Power seem more interested in diversity than story? Hmmm....

"According to Haldane's rule the first generations hybrids will have sterile males but fertile females, fertile males appear after generations of backcrossing"

I'm not familiar with that, so I'd have to read up on it

"They where similar in being humanoid but furthermore there are several differences"

I agree that there were differences. But they were much closer to modern humans than our other ancestors.

"They where also different in behaviour. Unlike other anthropoid species, who chase their prey for miles to later deliver the killing blow, Neanderthals engaged in physical combat with their prey. They where also found to be extremely aggresive, making them possibly the most aggresive species of the Homo genus."

If that's true, then that's interesting. Like I said, I'll have to do more research.

"I agree that there were differences. But they were much closer to modern humans than our other ancestors."

Not exaclty.Neanderthals are closer to Denisovans than to Humans. Neanderthals are not an ancestor but a cousin lineage.

Not all species in Homo are ancestors. Many are split offs in fact. Also bring closely related does not change the fact that they where extrenely different.

Liberals thrive on the race card. They couldn’t exist without it.

Indeed. They are so obsessed with "race" that many of them think that "race" and "species" are the same thing.

So name one liberal who said that

Done

"many of them think that "race" and "species" are the same thing"

Name one liberal who said that

Several sci fi left wing fans claim that several fictional alien species are "races" despite the fact that they are different SPECIES.

And Ive seen that there several paleonthropology fanatic liberals who believe that Neanderthals and other species of the Homo genus are like "races" despite the fact that they are different SPECIES. Going as far as claiming that Neanderthals where "like us" despite the fact that, being different species, where quite different from humans in behaviour and anatomy.

"Several sci fi left wing fans claim that several fictional alien species are "races" despite the fact that they are different SPECIES."

That's sci-fi. I'm talking about real life

"And Ive seen that there several paleonthropology fanatic liberals who believe that Neanderthals and other species of the Homo genus are like "races" despite the fact that they are different SPECIES"

Homo Neanderthalensis was capable of interbreeding with Homo Sapiens. If they produced fertile offspring, that means they weren't a completely different species.

"Going as far as claiming that Neanderthals where "like us" despite the fact that, being different species, where quite different from humans in behaviour and anatomy"

Neanderthals were pretty similar to humans

Bruh Nea derthals where very different. Its true they where similar but being different species meant they where very different.

And for the record evidence found Neanderthals where anti social and more aggresive than Humans, further showing they are different.

You leftists are ruining Paleontology by turning everyone into pacifists and comparing race to species.

"That's sci-fi. I'm talking about real life"

-Am talking about toxic fandoms, which exist in real life.

"Homo Neanderthalensis was capable of interbreeding with Homo Sapiens. If they produced fertile offspring, that means they weren't a completely different species."

-Lions are able to intebreed with tigers, leopards and jaguars and are still different species. And that is not how hybridization works. According to Haldane's rule the first generations hybrids will have sterile males but fertile females, fertile males appear after generations of backcrossing.

"Neanderthals were pretty similar to humans"

-Not exactly. They where similar in being humanoid but furthermore there are several differences:
1.Unlike humans, Neanderthals where not neotenus, which is why they can grow a great ape bone eyebrow. Humans are the only neotenic great apes.
2.They have a robust, barrel shaped and chubby body.
3.They have large round noses.
4.They had short limb proportions.
5.They where very masculine, to the point females got masculated.

They where also different in behaviour. Unlike other anthropoid species, who chase their prey for miles to later deliver the killing blow, Neanderthals engaged in physical combat with their prey. They where also found to be extremely aggresive, making them possibly the most aggresive species of the Homo genus.

Several anthropoid species also exibited unique behaviours:
-Homo naledi where arboreal and loved trees.
-Homo anteccesor where cannibals.
-Homo floresiensis where small weaklings who got eaten by komodo dragons.
-Homo erectus where agile hunters, similar to the Yautja.

"And for the record evidence found Neanderthals where anti social and more aggresive than Humans, further showing they are different."

Yeah, that's why those the few that weren't massacred got raped to extinction by modern humans *rolls eyes*

Bruh Neanderthals where extremely aggresive, violent, anti social, territorial, xenophobic, neophobic, dogmatic. This factors mean they excelled at war and did not get raped. And no, humans never massacred or raped Neanderthals.

Neanderthals went extinct by climate change, diseases and incest. Learn to not take your opinions as facts.

My god first you worship them as gods and now you underestimate them.

Neanderthals where not massacred or raped by Humans. They persisted for a long time after Humans arrived at Europe. And they where excellent at war and combat due to their muscle mass and high aggresion. And actually they became extinct due to Climate Change and diseases.

And dont say "modern Humans", say HUMANS. Human is the name of OUR species.

Exactly