Problem: There is nothing to improve. Fantasy creatures do not need "joints" on their wings because they are fantasy creatures. And medieval and classical depictions of dragons where not always depicted with jointed wings. My drawing is based on classical depictions (aka the original and historical dragons).

There is a difference between criticism and lying and telling people what to draw. Your description of a "dragon" is not only very limited to your own limited ideas but goes against classical ideas about dragons.

Deleted them due to grammar errors. Anyway this is my response to your arguments that where filled with misinformation and lack of context. Now I want to see your response.

1) Dragons could be depicted with any kind of ears. But where commonly depicted with mammalian ears in medieval art. 2) Dragons in medieval and renaissance art where depicted with different kinds of wings. 3) Dragons are snakes, as such they where described as having long and muscular serpent-tails they used to coil and strangle other animals in medieval bestiaries.

How is the dragon iffy? (If you are wondering behind the artsyle differences in the characters, I made the drawing represent the struggle between a more simple drawing and a more complex drawing.)