They want crackheads to be forced by the government to have babies

Incorrect. No one wants to force anyone to reproduce. The so-called "crackhead" already made that decision when they got pregnant... Civilized society just wants to prevent them from murdering their baby.

Common sense.

Probably they do not. But still they (except rape victims) made the choice to engage in activity that would possibly lead to pregnancy, so it still on them 100%. It's never the baby's fault and they should not be murdered. But no one FORCED them to get pregnant.

As for rape, that RARELY results in pregnancy. But it does possibly and is a sad situation. But why double the victims? Why kill a baby?

I assume then, you're fine with outlawing the 97% of convenience abortions and only permitting the very rare cases of rape, incest and physical life of the mother?

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/abortion/in-clinic-abortion-procedures

Won't give such an evil site a clickthrough. Yes, "convenience" is the appropriate word. Killing a baby because doing the right thing and giving birth would be "inconvenient".

But stick to the point. You agree that those 97% of abortions should be outlawed, correct?

You need to go back to science class if you think an acorn is a tree

You can't tell the difference between an embryo and a baby?

Embryo is a stage of a baby. Apparently you cannot.

An embryo is not a baby

False. Embryos are babies in an early stage. Case closed.

So you think an acorn is an oak tree?

Yep. In an early stage. Science!

You forgot the obvious caption. You also forgot to answer the question put to you (first). Since you want to use the rare cases as reasons for abortion, you do agree that the other 97% of convenience abortions should be outlawed. Simple yes/no.

The conveniences are obvious and do not need to be enumerated. Woman gets pregnant. Decides the child is inconvenient (for whatever reason). Murders child TO MAKE HER LIFE MORE COVENIENT.

Don't bandy about with silly word games. I know that's all you have since you have no logical arguments.

Do you support outlawing convenience abortions? It's been clearly defined and is unarguable. So answer the question or go away.

again.... list the "conveniences"....its a pretty simple question

When you kill your unborn child because it's inconvenient for you to have it, that means that the reason for the abortion is convenience. It's pretty self explanatory.

Big government good...... force you to have baby.... next... big government good.,.. take away your guns. I will vote for that.

And big government also forced abortions.

No one has advocated for forcing anyone to have a baby (which they do at the point of conception). Likewise we are advocating for equal rights and not allowing someone to murder another carte blanche.

"Being disallowed from murdering her baby"

This tells me you are incapable of having an honest conversation

"resulting in staying pregnant is not forcing anything anymore than preventing someone from robbing a bank prevents them from gaining the cash"

So you think a pregnant woman should be forced to stay pregnant.

"Clearly abortion, aka baby murder should not be an allowed option."

Abortion isn't baby murder

"No one has advocated for forcing anyone to have a baby"

Yes you have

Ah Octavia. Still lying it seems.

If you're telling a pregnant woman she should not be allowed to have abortion as an option then you are saying she should be forced to have a baby

False. She already HAS a baby. Case closed.

You aren't understanding my point. I'll try again

Do you think abortion should be an option for a pregnant woman?

If not, you're saying she should be forced to remain pregnant. Why?

Being disallowed from murdering her baby, resulting in staying pregnant is not forcing anything anymore than preventing someone from robbing a bank prevents them from gaining the cash. Your argument makes no sense.

Clearly abortion, aka baby murder should not be an allowed option.

However correcting the 1973 Supreme Court error won’t make abortion illegal.

If only libs could read and understand directions on birth control packages... And recognize it's the legislation that makes the laws...

Then maybe they would stop whining about a leaked proposed reversal of a judiciary decision...

Well. . .I can help teach them one of those things-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgVKvqTItto

Yes... I did say: "If only libs could read and understand directions on birth control packages..."

LOL

Yea ok. I will help you with your demographics...

Oh Pleazzzzzzzzzz....Everyone knows libs are whiners... LOL

thats funny... the only stream that has banned me was the right wing facist politics section..... you call trump bad name, you get banned wha wha wha

Pregnant crackheads? This is a typical liberal strawman logical fallacy argument.

Maybe if you would just take a chill pill and worry about yourself the world would be a better place.

the fact that you would compare anything with a deadly assault on America Herself is SAD....

Deadly assault? Lmfao. More people died while you all were out rioting, looting, burning down buildings and destroying generations worth of businesses. More people will die today in Chicago than during your imaginary insurrection.

Deadly. shame it was just one insurrectionist traitor that got shot.

I feel the same way every time a person resisting arrest gets shot and killed; why can’t the police just wipe out entire ghettos of thugs and make our lives a ton more safe?

I feel the same way when Cops fail to kill thugs, and only paralyze them.