Serious Question . . .

I'd say Vince Foster(unless I didn't see his name on the dress) but many people thought that all Bill. Why? Cause it was alright for Bill to screw around but not Hillary.

It is hard to see, Graeystone, but it is there. Vince Foster was a huge issue that was pretty much ignored as Hillary is like teflon. As far as Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky....cheating is not good in a marriage but when it occurs in THE WHITE HOUSE w/ a grown man who should know better and a young woman, that is unacceptable on all levels and is worthy of impeachment, IMO. The liberal double standards were in full effect at the time and even though Bill Clinton lied, "What difference does it make?" Disgusting Democrats....

Bill Clinton lied under oath trying to save his ass in the Paula Jones lawsuit. That is what the impeachment was about - perjury. But the Democratic spin machine made it all about his sex life.

The Arkansas State Bar Association waited until after he left the White House to revoke his law license.

You were correct in citing the reason for Bill Clinton's impeachment, however, I merely stated that his behavior in the W.H. was 'worthy of impeachment, IMO, Runaway.

I agree with Bill’s behavior with a subordinate in the workplace (lasting several months no less) is entirely unacceptable. In a more recent era the outcome most likely would be very different.

Now if he had just banged the front desk clerk at a hotel,,…

"In a more recent era the outcome most likely would be very different"

Bill Cliton was given a pass for that sex scandal (and others) by Feminists, pretty much stopping at least till fairly recently:
1. The Feminist Movement
2. The Sexual Harassment Accusation craze.

Much like his pal Trump today with his base, in a more recent era the outcome most likely would be very much the same for Bill, providing he was still young, natch.

It was ignored because you didn't have any go***mned evidence that it was a murder.

I was referring to the fact that there was PLENTY of evidence of Hillary going in right after Vince Foster's death and removing files and boxes of paperwork, anti. An average American doing something like that would have been tampering with evidence and charged. I did not mention 'murder', you did.

Ah. So the irrefutable evidence was where we can't see it or verify that it ever existed. Because Hillary's the fastest gun in the West, that's why I didn't see anything.

Well, that's a bit of an issue, isn't it? Because in American jurisprudence, judges tend to treat that with a sort of "well, case dismissed then" kind of mentality.

She obstructed an FBI investigation by removing documents from Vince Foster's office after his body was discovered at Ft. Marcy Park. His office became a crime scene upon his death. Kinda reminds me of her bathroom server....🤔. Obstructing justice usually means that you have something to hide.

You still have to prove that she did that.

As for his death, the following info supports the type of person Hillary is....ruthless, uncaring and dictatorial.

In interviewing Clinton White House aides and Foster's friends and family, the FBI found that a week before Foster's death, Hillary held a meeting at the White House with Foster and other top aides to discuss her proposed health care legislation.

Hillary angrily disagreed with a legal objection Foster raised at the meeting and ridiculed him in front of his peers, former FBI agent Coy Copeland and former FBI supervisory agent Jim Clemente told me. Copeland was Starr's senior investigator and read the reports of other agents working for Starr.

During the White House meeting, Hillary continued to humiliate Foster mercilessly, according to both former FBI agents, who spoke about the investigation for the first time.

'Hillary put him down really, really bad in a pretty good-size meeting,' Copeland says. 'She told him he didn't get the picture, and he would always be a little hick town lawyer who was obviously not ready for the big time.'

Indeed, Hillary went so far as to blame Foster for all the Clintons' problems and to accuse him of failing them, according to Clemente, who was also assigned by the FBI to the Starr investigation and who probed the circumstances surrounding Foster's suicide.

'Foster was profoundly depressed, but Hillary lambasting him was the final straw because she publicly embarrassed him in front of others,' says Clemente.

'Hillary blamed him for failed nominations, claimed he had not vetted them properly, and said in front of his White House colleagues, 'You're not protecting us' and 'You have failed us,' Clemente says. 'That was the final blow.'

After the White House meeting, Foster's behavior changed dramatically, the FBI agents found. Those who knew him said his voice sounded strained, he became withdrawn and preoccupied, and his sense of humor vanished. At times, Foster teared up. He talked of feeling trapped.

On Tuesday, July 13, 1993, while having dinner with his wife Lisa, Foster broke down and began to cry. He said he was considering resigning.

Based on what 'dozens' of others who had contact with Foster after that meeting told the agents, while Foster was already depressed, 'The put-down that she gave him in that big meeting just pushed him over the edge,' Copeland says. 'It was the final straw that broke the camel's back.

It was well known at the time that she did that and the information is out there.

THE MYSTERY IN FOSTER'S OFFICE - Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/...
Dec 20, 1995 · After that search, Williams had an aide move a box of files from Foster's office into the White House residential quarters, to a third-floor closet. Those files would be part of …
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1995/12/20/the-mystery-in-fosters-office/7d2abb40-35c6-439e-a943-4ba6d001af7d/

EXCLUSIVE: Missing: FBI files linking Hillary Clinton to the 'suicide' of White House counsel Vince Foster have vanished from the National Archives

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3753013/Missing-FBI-files-linking-Hillary-Clinton-suicide-White-House-counsel-Vince-Foster-vanished-National-Archives.html

Oh, you misunderstand me. I know that your cooky conspiracy theory is well-known. I'm well aware of that. I've been hearing about it for thirty years. My point was that the reason it's never resulted in any charges against her is because you don't have a shred of legally admissible proof for any of this hot garbage.

Here is a NY Times article. You can find other stuff on your own...I am busy and seeing how I really DON'T "have to prove that she did that", I will bid you adieu and do what I need to get done. It is interesting and does remind me again how the media are complicit in not reporting all the facts (kinda like Biden and his conflicts of interest/corruption, lies, his son's laptops, his failures since he was installed as POTUS, etc). Disgusting.

A Secret Service officer today flatly contradicted the White House account of the night of Vincent W. Foster Jr.'s death, telling the Senate Whitewater panel that he had seen Hillary Rodham Clinton's top aide remove files from Mr. Foster's office. The aide vehemently denied doing it.

Testifying under oath before the special Senate committee investigating Whitewater, the officer, Henry P. O'Neill, said that on July 20, 1993, several hours after Mr. Foster's body was found in a Virginia park, he saw Mrs. Clinton's chief of staff, Margaret A. Williams, carrying two handfuls of folders from Mr. Foster's office.

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/07/27/us/2-conflicting-accounts-on-files-from-white-house-aide-s-office.html

Interesting question.

Be a conservative

Good answer, Stavka. And the bad behavior most often will be condemned by other conservatives (rather than being ignored or altered as the media & Democrats do as in Hillary's/Biden's cases.

Stealing from one of my favorite movies of all time, Drop Dead Fred.

Be poor.

Something you can prove, for a start.

Well, looks like we're steps ahead of you!

....OK. So, is one of those steps ahead of me to get your evidence to a courtroom? Because you haven't done that yet.

Well, guess what? I am not in charge of that, or able to influence that in most ways, however, we can draw lines and connections with information, which we have done.

we and I

So it's not good enough to convince a courtroom but it's good enough to convince you?

You're not the least bit worried about what that means about you?

Not what I said, obviously. I am not able have that presented in front of a courtroom, but what I am able to do is to draw connections with the information I have. Which is 99% of what everyone does, because 1% of stuff is done in court.

But the information you have is bad. It was rejected from every law suit, every congressional hearing... Even the Republicans who were bringing the evidence on your behalf admitted on the record that none of it was substantial. It wasn't good enough for a courtroom and yet here you are drawing connections from it.

Or because the people that rejected it simply had an agenda.

What repubs?

Unlikely. Seeing as how EVERYONE who makes a decision that contradicts you has an agenda. It's your favourite excuse - but it is just an excuse.

It wasn't the agenda. It wasn't bias. It wasn't the media. It was your information. The case against her was bad. THAT'S why it failed.

Why was it bad? Any proof?

oh my God - YOU'RE THE ACCUSER! It's on YOU to prove that the evidence is good, not on me to prove that it's bad.

And you do it in court. Hillary has defended herself in court so many times over and over and over. Not one of your things has ever gained any legal traction. And it's because the case against her has never been good!

"oh my God - YOU'RE THE ACCUSER! It's on YOU to prove that the evidence is good, not on me to prove that it's bad.

And you do it in court. Hillary has defended herself in court so many times over and over and over. Not one of your things has ever gained any legal traction. And it's because the case against her has never been good!"

Well, no. Its on me to prove it is good, and since you keep making claims that it is bad, to prove it is bad.

I did nothing in court. Stop with the party politics.

Yup. You did nothing in court. EVERYONE did nothing in court. It was a massive waste of everyone's time because NOBODY HAS A REAL CASE AGAINST HER. And that's pretty much the entire point right there.