The list goes on and on.. The diversions are many..

and they eat babies kidnapped by Mickey Mouse

Most likely.

With pineapple. On pizza. Because they're weird like that.

Wow. This is just a fruit salad of conservative paranoid conspiracy theories, huh?

So. Let's start with ...ELECTION FRAUD!

There was none. It's been 2 years. There's no "kraken of evidence." Even Trump says he lost.

2000 mules. OMG. This is so cute. Dinesh for the "documentary" to soak a few more dollars outta conservative pockets! The same "documentary" that has an unidentified "witness" that claims people were getting paid for ballot harvesting. Her "evidence"? She saw people being paid.

Not doing anything. Just getting paid.

And "location data" from cell phone records? Look. I know the movies tell you it's like GPRS. And Dinesh here wants you to believe that. But it's not true. I used to work in the telecom industry. Cell phone towers have a range of about 3 miles. So, when you get "located" it's based on which tower your phone has connected to. You can be ANYWHERE in that 3 mile radius.

That's a lot of ground.

A lot of ground that's no where near a ballot box.

And the "footage" of people dropping off multiple ballots? How do yu know those are the same people being tracked?

You literally don't.

So, stop with the lies and the nonsense.

He lost.

GET. OVER. IT.

You seem very angry. I've read that some liberals express themselves by screeching "Reeeeeeee!" when they realize they are wrong, have been all wrong, and are ashamed of having been all wrong. Have you tried it? Have you screeched a loud lung busting "reeeeeeee!!"?? If not, please seek professional help to assist you with your TDS. :)

5kckwq.jpg (click to show)

you need to cut back on the Cult 45, bruh. It's not good for you. Maybe you should stop so that way you can rejoin reality.

Instead of this crazy up is down alternate universe you live in.

https://news.yahoo.com/2000-mules-lie-cuing-apologies-195711886.html

I’m glad the pedo clients of Epstein are finally being exposed on the politics stream — thank you for bringing attention to this issue 🙏

#SaveTheChildren

Trotting out that useless rag again, hey KF?

If there was anything to it, don't you think our ever vigilante and 100% trustworthy lamestream media would have been all over it? It's not like they don't want to make up dirt on Trump anyway, right?

So what's holding them back?

What’s holding them back? I dunno — what held them back from bringing Epstein to justice for decades? They finally got him, but how many dozens or hundreds of girls had to pay first?

Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying Trump is an Epstein-level offender. I’m just saying he partied around with Epstein and raped young girls once or twice, then decided it wasn’t for him.

Yet for some reason, your (less than) objective view of this type of evil doesn't seem to extend to another frequent Epstein guest, Bill Clinton.

That's the problem in a nutshell with posts like yours. Just my $0.02 worth.

Bro Clinton can eat a fat dick, if he’s implicated in any Epstein stuff then throw the book at him. I don’t bring him up not because I’m some pro-Clinton hack but simply because he’s irrelevant to modern politics. The Democratic Party has been showing him the door since way back in ‘08. The idea of Bill Clinton back in the White House was the strongest argument against Hillary Clinton’s candidacy in ‘16. No doubt a major reason Trump won. Not to mention rage over NAFTA and the deindustrialization of the American heartland, a Clintonist policy now universally recognized (by everyone who doesn’t sit on a corporate board) as a disaster. Etc etc.

"I don’t bring him up not because I’m some pro-Clinton hack"

I think you may have that backwards. It's likely you don't bring him up because you are a pro-Clinton hack.

I really shouldn't have replied to your post. I was mostly being critical of KF. If you want to pretend that a statute of limitations on perversion applies to Bill Clinton, that's up to you.

Clinton being another Epstein friend/client gives Trump a pass, or is this where you cite yet another sick vile molester of girls to make that bucket of rape spit go down easier for the Anti-Mickey Mouse Klub?

Something about flocks of Trumpites believing it was credible enough to threaten her life if she testified?

Typical modda. Making unfounded claims. I'm more than willing to believe some of the crazy crap you post, but you've got to realize that credibility is a factor. When a post is made without any proof, without any substantiation, people tend to just ignore what it's saying.

In other words, you must realize modda, that anyone can produce a document like the one you posted, right? And they can have it say anything they want... you do know that, right?

blah blah blah...
Those aren't claims, fella, those are criminal convictions.

You wanna larp as an American, m8? A Repulsivcan American?
I'm cool with that.
Butcha gotta take the icky undies that comes with that wardrobe, mkay?
That's how it works.

Welcome to Muh'Merica,,,

"Those aren't claims, fella, those are criminal convictions."

Negative. That looks like something a middle schooler could produce using a PC and a printer. Or maybe that was you?

Ohhhh, right, that was you who thinks I'm not American. (I tend to forget the really ignorant and asinine stuff people post, and thankfully the people who post them)

Was that your alt that claimed the other week I typed that all up from scratch?
That is awesome.

Oh, wait, a PRINTER, no less! Don't forget me framing the original!

Hold up while I hand this reply to a messenger service to transport it to the site so they can post it for you to read!

2020 Election "Fraud"? Trump just said that he had in fact lost the election, and thus that it was a lie.
Pedo clients? Like, for example, Donald Trump?

What nonsense are you talking?
He lost the election because the electors voted against him. There was massive fraud involved in getting those electors to vote.

You keep saying that. And you never have anything to support it.

YOu need to stop saying it.

Because you're not just wrong. You're super wrong. Which is like normal wrong but you're also wearing a cape.

2000 mules. Mountains of evidence.

2000 mules = 0 evidence.

One claim about using cell records to show people at the polls is laughable. I worked in network support for a telecom. The range of a tower is 3 miles. So you can be ANYWHERE in that 3 mile range. It's not GPRS.

Of course, the other claim about being paid for ballot harvesting...based entirely on one person claiming she saw people being paid. Not being paid for specific things. Not any invoice/paystubs. Just what she thinks happened.

LAUGHABLE.

2000 mules is video of people illegally dropping off ballots at drop boxes. One of the videos shows the person stopping to sign all the ballots. You really need to pay attention.

True the Vote, the organization that collected the video and cell data, has testified that the ballot collection and dropoff footage shows no illegal acts. And they have never alleged that illegal acts were performed.

Yet a convicted felon D'Souza wants you to think it is.

Who are you going to believe? The people who gathered the footage or a known criminal?

Source of that claim?

Which claim?

That D'Souza is a known criminal? Or that True the Vote has said that they do not think their footage shows illegal acts?

All of it.

Forgot to include the video of their testimony. All 2 hours of it: https://www.truethevote.org/election-integrity-testimony-in-wisconsin-on-thursday-march-24-2022/

D'Souza's conviction: https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/newyork/news/press-releases/dinesh-dsouza-sentenced-in-manhattan-federal-court-to-five-years-of-probation-for-campaign-finance-fraud

His pardon: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/statement-press-secretary-regarding-pardon-dinesh-dsouza/

A pardon REQUIRES you to admit guilt in order to accept it. Thus you cannot claim the 5th Amendment when called to testify about your crimes. You admitted guilt.

So, the source of the claim that D'Souza is a criminal is 1) his conviction and 2) that he accepted the pardon.

True the Vote:

https://madison.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/conservative-group-claims-ballot-trafficking-in-2020-wisconsin-election-but-wont-share-evidence/article_4bef68b4-4b7f-5095-9647-10bec896bfb9.html

That's the local news paper covering it.

The exact quote: “I want to make very clear that we’re not suggesting that the ballots that were cast were illegal ballots,” True the Vote founder Catherine Engelbrecht said.

Thanks that clears things up, but past criminal activity of an ambiguous nature (literally everyone is guilty of campaign finance violations due to how the law is written) doesn't have any impact on his claims of election fraud. Nonsequiter.

They didn't say it wasn't criminal acts. They said they aren't saying the ballots are illegal. There's a difference.

Actually Giuliani's fake Elector ballots weren't used, so, no.

Ok, the narrative has now changed on how the cheating was done. Great.

Nope. That's the same story as it's always been, you just didn't understand it.

First, it was voter fraud, now, it's fake information to get people to vote Biden. Doesn't sound the same to me.

Nope. You still don't have it.

The Electors that voted against him did so in accordance to law, despite Giuliani coming up with a bunch of phony ones for submission from at least 8 swing states as part of Traitor Trump's failed coup attempt.

Actually dueling electors is a democrat thing, and completely legal.