The first attempted coup d'etat in the history of the United States

Thought the first coup attempt was that sore loser of a democrat by the name of Jefferson Davis.

I understand your point.
But I believe he was instead trying to create a separate Democrat utopia of slavery and extreme racism, all without (necessarily) overthrowing the Republican president.
Cheers!

What separate Democrat utopia of slavery and extreme racism?

Confederate Southern Conservatives WASP*

Southern*

That would be the same Jefferson Davis so many conservatives are defending these days

Who is defending him?

The people who don't want Confederate statues taken down

...because they didn't actually take over anything in January 2017?

That isn't the allegation, Zippy...
The allegation is that that they COLLUDED with RUSSIA to INTERFERE in OUR ELECTION PROCESS.

You remember...

The
Very
Thing
That
YOU
and
These
CRIMINALS
Accused
Trump
of
Doing.

LOL... even when their lies have been exposed they deny the truth...

This must be true, Viking Friend!

The phrase coup d'etat very clearly denotes a complete takeover of the state entirely.

Now, admittedly, six years is a long time to stretch back your memory, but there's quite a bit of written documentation available and your grandkids might help you out if you get stuck: can you remember who was quite publicly in charge by the end of January 2017?

Trump was president but the entire rest of the government was against him.

Someone hasn't looked at a dictionary in a while.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/coup%20d'%C3%A9tat

Even your own definition requires the exercise of violence which is noticeably absent even in your own version of events.

You conveniently (intentionally) skipped past the word "or" (making violence optional), which surprises me not one tiny bit.

No. It's violent, can be an overthrow or an alteration.

Why would it be either a violent overthrow or a calm peaceful alteration? That would make every cabinet reshuffle a coup d'etat if so much as the transport secretary were changed. That's obviously nonsense.

I'm reading the definition, you're making shit up. That "or" exists in that position for a reason.

Yeah. It's violent, and either an overthrow or an alteration.

Replacing the Transport Secretary when he retires is NOT a coup d'etat. Not in ANYONE'S definition.

Do you ever get tired if making a fool of yourself?

Ever heard the term "bloodless coup"? Yeah, they don't have to be violent.

I never said that it was. Using the media to suppress damaging information to one candidate while promoting false information about another, however, falls under the category of alteration. If everyone had known about the contents of Hunter's laptop, there would have been no doubt that he and his family were compromised by both the Russians and the Chinese. Trump would have trounced him and remained in the presidency, but the result of media manipulation and outright lies pushed by Democrats effectively altered the landscape of government - causing a very widespread alteration.

NYT, WaPo have both confirmed the Hunter laptop emails are authentic while a grand jury examines the evidence found within. All that remains to be seen is if Hunter is willing to go to prison for his father, and if his father is willing to throw him under the bus. If there's a pardon for Hunter - it's as good as an admission of guilt. Joe is done, and nobody likes Kamala. It's going to be 1942 all over again come November.

You did! You said it could be just a minor alteration to the government! That was your attempt at getting around the grammar of the definition you copy and pasted, remember?

Trump lost, even with his 3rd rate coup attempt.
Get over it.

Here you go - peaceful coup

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolent_revolution

As usual, you're perfectly wrong.

The attempted coup d'etat was initiated on January 5, 2017. Obama (who was still president at that time), Biden, James Comey (who remained FBI Director after Trump's inauguration), and others present in the Oval Office decided to use Hillary's Russia collusion hoax to take down Trump in the coming months/years. Of course, the FBI came to take a leading role in the plot.

Thankfully, the democrats involved were just as clueless and ineffective as they always are. So the attempted coup d'etat failed, and the details are spilling out on an almost daily basis.

And, as always, the little libs can't really understand.

There was no coup d'état in January 2017. A coup d'état is a sudden taking over of the entire government with the assistance of the military. That did not happen.

"Thankfully, the democrats involved were just as clueless and ineffective as they always are"

And yet people like you accuse Democrats of orchestrating a nationwide theft of a presidential election on such a massive scale that it conveniently left no evidence behind

Ahhhh. So you're talking about the plan to hold the president accountable for his ethical conduct and impeach him if he commits high crimes or misdemeanours as per the Constitution.

Yeah, that's not a coup d'etat and in fact that's what they're supposed to do.

Which crimes would those be? The ones the media are now saying were fake?

They didn't subvert an election by suppressing one body of evidence (Hunter's laptop) and promoting another (the Russian collusion hoax)? Hmmm.....Funny, that seems to be exactly what the media is currently reporting that they did - that the Hunter laptop story they said was false is actually true, and that the Russian collusion narrative they pushed turned out to be false.

What is the definition of coup d'etat again?

: a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics
especially : the violent overthrow or alteration of an existing government by a small group

Trump was the existing president, and media/democrats pushing false narratives while suppressing truth was used to subvert his re-election efforts. That seems to fit the definition of "alteration of an existing government".

There was an election, Biden - Joe Biden, not this Hunter Laptop whomever - won, Loser Trump lost the vote. Again. Deal with it.

So you're pro media now?

I'm anti-censorship and anti-hypocrisy

... You really don't remember those four years? Somebody else entirely was the president?

I knew Leo G. Carroll was over a barrel
When Tarantula took to the hills
And I really got hot when I saw Jeanette Scott
Fight a Triffid that spits poison and kills

Dana Andrews said prunes give him the runes
And passing them used lots of skills
And when worlds collide, said George Pal to his bride
I'm gonna give you some terrible thrills, like a

^ That's been my basic response to alternate universe scenario proponents.

btw, I still you a reply for the Klaatu thing the other day,,, I was headed to bed when I saw it and....

iT wAs A cOuP dE TaT!!!

Death by Suicide... or is it just murder?

Political theater
Guy's probably alive somewhere
Too many lies in the media to believe anything they say

If they pulled that off it would be pretty amazing!

Most of what we're told comes from highly filtered and controlled sources. I've caught them out far too many times. Why no mugshots for either of them? Simple, people will believe the narrative even when it doesn't agree with the picture.

PS. Good One... Upvote! Sorry all the Men* attacked you for the obvious!
(*where Men means Sheep)

They have leftist privilege. They can murder, rape children, steal elections and commit treason with impunity because they know nothing will ever happen to them.

"They can murder, rape children, steal elections and commit treason"

Sounds like a lot of conservatives

A 1,000 page document had actually confirmed it. More people would've known about that though if the protests hadn't started up at the time so no one was talking about the 1,000 page document because everyone was more focused on that