No. The purpose of a vaccine is not and never was to prevent a disease entirely. It's to fight the disease when you get it.
Take a look at this photo. It's a very famous photo that supports what is widely considered a classic vaccine success story.
Both these children got smallpox on the same day. BOTH THESE CHILDREN ARE SICK. They both caught smallpox. The one on the right was vaccinated against smallpox at birth, the one on the left is not. And, as you can see, the one on the right has almost recovered already. The one on the left is a much more serious case.
A vaccine gives you antibodies to fight against an infection, but the active immune response doesn't even activate until after dead cells starts turning up in your lymphatic system (this is what your tonsils and your spleen are involved in). A virus is too small to create some kind of magic barrier to stop from getting into the body in the first place, but if your body is prepared, you can shorten the window of the infection from two weeks to just a couple of hours, which means that it spreads to other people less, and makes the virus more survivable when you get it.
Lower public infection and higher survival rates? Yes, please. We'll have some of that. That's what we want. We'd like some of that, please.
THAT'S what a vaccine should do. Preventing disease entirely is impossible and not the objective: fighting the disease and lowering its prevalence is.