I'm not gonna lie, they had is in the first half

Give the anti-vaxxer the vaccine.

Give the woman an abortion.

Give you the sandal

Mom throws la chancla

https://youtu.be/wiQynC05REQ

That's how ya do it!

Bill Belichek wants to sign her!

lol tho

When life give you sandal .. u smell like defeat.
:[

Good point. They make me vomit.

You should try marshmallow vodka.

huhg... huhgg
🤢🤮

Be responsible and protect yourself with the vaccine so you don’t end up on a ventilator.
Be responsible and use a condom, birth control or abstinence so you don’t get pregnant.

Personal responsibility.
It is that simple.

Yes, yolo. A condom, abstain if you can't be responsible using a condom or if the woman doesn't have birth control.

We can't pretend people aren't capable or don't have a responsibility to take measures if they don't want a baby. It would start to be a different story if society did not make make-believe that the fetus inside of you means nothing until it's almost fully matured. If they saw that the baby was a creation and was a life or saw it as it really is, a growing human life then people would maybe treat the possibility of pregnancy as something to be responsible for and not just "well if I get pregnant then I'll just abort it".

No but I'll just say you seem a bit more ..... optimistic.... about the human race than I am. Maybe I've met too many legit crackheads, maybe I've seen Trainspotting too many times, idk... In any case, basically I think if you're against abortion, don't have one.

You can't base the world off people you meet on this site 😐

Why not? I met one of my alts once... total d*ck.

:L

But...but...then what do the fragile right-wing get to feel in control of?

How would they cope?

Well... They can still bask in their victory of outlawing gay marriage.

oh wait........
;P

Who pushes for that?

Idk if anyone still does... But many used to. Pretty sure Jeff Sessions for one. Evangelicals. Even some dems.

NPR/Gallup poll from June 2021 says for the first time ever 55% of Repubs approve of gay marriage ....vs 83% Dems

I don't care but it should be a union rather than a marriage, as the definition of that is between a man and a woman, but no huge deal.

I would argue that marriage by definition is g...

☑️Cancelled
;P

Unless you're a pregnant woman, apparently.

But that's the thing- there's a double standard...

Problem is, they don’t care in the slightest about logical consistency.

Personal choices used to have consequences.

Blame-shifting is now commonplace.

It’s always some else’s fault or responsibility.

🤭Great Meme

Well, if a girl gets raped she can’t control that. They have the right for an abortion

We all realize the case of rape doesn't fit in this example. It is a small percentage compared to the majority of reasons.

The REPORTED cases are a small percentage.

Agreed. Many people are afraid to report it out of fear

Okay, dobby. And all of those are a small percentage compared to the others

Oh, it's you PigBoy...or is it I'mALumberjackAndI'mOkay? Not that there's really a difference, you're both boring, Boomer bigots.

I've only been Jawilli. Not a boomer. And I couldn't tell u how some people create multiple accounts. Im no imgflip pro.. Not sure how I'm viewed as a bigot. Nothing in my life would show that.

You're fooling nobody.

Which part? Multiple accounts or bigot?
Neither is true. Honestly.

You are taking this shill seriously? He's just pathetically shitposting.

I know it just bothers me. Some people will just argue. Show them a black square and they will say "no it's a white square in the dark"

He does it because he knows you're right...

He wants to bother you. Some here will be reasonable. This is just a soulless atheistic drone. Pushing to kill the most innocent. Because they are 'lesser' and can't defend themselves. The type that would agree with Hitler about 'useless eaters'.

You lost the ability to call someone else a bigot, Dobbsy.

Do I need to post it yet again?

Women impregnated by rape can't get an abortion after six weeks in Texas.

Gee, maybe don't wait six weeks to abort it. DUH!

Most women don't learn they are pregnant until 4-7 weeks. And you would have to wait for an appointment.

So some woman gets raped and doesn't realize she could be pregnant for more than six weeks? Give me a break. LMFAO

Glad you find it so funny. Rape is a traumatic experience and the first thing many will do is reject it, block it out of memory and deny that it happened. It's the same reason they delay police involvement.

Sucks to be so pathetically weak, I suppose. Guess they'll have to try a little harder now or be stuck with a little bundle of joy.

https://thercc.org/get-support/after-an-assault/feelings-stages-following-sexual-assault/

Two wrongs don’t make a right.

Abortion is murder. You are still killing an innocent life that was not responsible for the situation.

Abortion is a right. If a girl/woman doesn’t want the child then she has the right to not keep it. It doesn’t matter if it wasn’t the baby’s fault. It might not even have been the girl/woman’s fault either. She might not be able to take care of the baby financially either. Don’t go around with your pro life b.s.

"Abortion is a right. If a girl/woman doesn’t want the child then she has the right to not keep it"

Yeah not keep it as in...give up for adoption. Not end it's life.

Have you ever given birth? Pretty sure you haven’t. It’s a lot of pain and can sometimes result in death. Yeah they can give it up for adoption but it’s a lot easier to just get an abortion then go through the process of birth

No I haven't given birth but was right next to my wife when she gave birth to my son without an epidural. She nearly broke my fingers.

The problem is you and others don't see any value to the life until it is out of the womb

You’re getting my point.

Yes. The sad twisted things people cheer for. Including yourself

Genuinely sorry. I forgot the “not”. Sorry for the confusion

It's not about not seeing any value to the life before it is out of the womb, it is about seeing the value of the life of the person whose womb it is in.

Would you have wanted your wife to continue with a pregnancy that her immune system was rejecting and attacking?

What about one that was causing Hyperemisus gravidarim?
You'd happily watch her get thin and pale? Hold her hair back every day for months as she wretched and vomited, burning her esophagus?

Do you think women that don't have access to contraception should have to give birth every 9 months for decades or live a life of celibacy?

You are making rare situations as the justification for all abortion.

And that last question/situation you posed is ridiculous. My wife couldn't be on birth control but yet we were responsible and took measures to not get pregnant and we didn't need access to Healthcare. We can't pretend people aren't capable or don't have a responsibility to take measures if they don't want a baby. It would start to be a different story if society did not make make-believe that the fetus inside of you means nothing until it's almost fully matured. If they saw that the baby was a creation and was a life or saw it as it really is, a growing human life then people would maybe treat the possibility of pregnancy as something to be responsible for and not just "well if I get pregnant then I'll just abort it"

Anyways, I'm sure I can't change your mind or heart on the matter or I'm sure you wouldn't concede anything based on pride or loyalty to your current stance. So...catch you on another meme.

"well if I get pregnant then I'll just abort it"

I don't think people do have that attitude.
People that have abortions were usually trying to avoid getting pregnant, nobody WANTS to have to deal with an abortion; It's a difficult decision that still has a lot of stigma attached to it.

Lots of people get pregnant because contraception doesn't always work.

Accessing an abortion involves navigating a lot of obstacles: financial, geographical, emotional, literal...

Women that can actually manage to get to a clinic (do you know how many have been closed?) often have to walk through a mob of people screaming abuse in their faces and judging them.

"well if I get pregnant then I'll just abort it"

“I don't think people do have that attitude.”

You must not be very smart then.

The biggest problem is people cheer for the right to abort for any reason. Goes back to not seeing any value of the life growing inside.

I think you are misinterpreting it, people are cheering for human rights, for women's rights, for bodily autonomy.

Before you "what about the rights of the fetus?.."

While it is literally inside the body of another, that person's rights take precedence.

You cannot be 'for' the fetus without being 'against' the woman.

She does have the right to not keep it. That is what adoption is for. She does not have the right to murder it.

What other forms of murder are acceptable to you?

She has the right not to be forced to endure pregnancy, childbirth and all the health consequences and risks they entail; This isn't Gilead.

The unborn child has a right to...y'know...live. And not be forced to endure dismemberment, massive saline injections, or the health consequences that entails.

This isn't The Sims.

A fetus is harboring inside a woman's body and for much of its stay, depends on the mother for survival. The woman is producing a child and it is only between her and her doctor if she chooses to abort the fetus. Not the religious right. It's her autonomy.

All cultures throughout creation have acknowledged the humanity of the unborn. Even atheist cultures.

Only recently has that humanity become a hindrance to the convenience abortion as a form of birth control. Hence the need to remove it - to make an unborn a "less than human" in order to make their murder more palatable.

Ask me about all the other times in human history that a "less-than-human" status has been used to rationalize acceptance of mass murder.

I'm guessing you don't want free birth control, condoms and so forth.

Or a strong, unionized working class so that women earn enough to support a family, and earn the same a man does for the same work.

Or guaranteed paid maternity leave.

Or guaranteed housing to support such a family.

Or guaranteed healthcare, including mental health services.

These are all things that would reduce the amount of abortions.

Women are not Nazis for getting abortions, nor does it make them monstrous or inhuman. On the contrary, it is the Nazis and fascists who wish to control women's bodies. Women are simply asserting their rightful authority over their own bodies and productivity, and if you do not like their choice, that's too bad. It isn't your decision and it isn't your place to regulate.

Nazis would be a-ok with all y'all getting abortions. They would see you as a self-pruning plant.

Abstinence education and a strong foundation of morals and self-worth are remarkable deterrents for pre-marital pregnancy. I notice those are lacking from your list.

I'm sure you're very familiar with what other fascists who believed they had the right to control what people did with their bodies thought.

The baby is it’s own unique person, unlike any other. It should have the right to live, same as any other human.

The only people responsible for raising that child are the parents. Not my job to pay for anybody else’s healthcare, life choices, lifestyle, or birth control.

PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY.

If you are unsure of the definition, look it up.

If it is its "own unique person", it shouldn't need to be literally attached to and dependant on another unique person to survive.

It’s not IF it’s it’s “own unique person”… It is.

Fingerprints and DNA are unique.

We use both of those things to identify individuals. You know… science.

I didn't question it being unique, I questioned it being it's own person.

Does a patient stop being their "own unique person" when put on life support in a hospital?

Is the life support a person?
Is the patient you are referring to in utero?

Just because they are no longer physically attached, a baby is still completely dependent upon another person to survive. Is a newborn their own unique person yet?

"Just because they are no longer physically attached, a baby is still completely dependent upon another person to survive. Is a newborn their own unique person yet?"

A fetus that is attached to someone via an umbilical cord and is leeching nutrients from their body, putting pressure on their internal organs and affecting their hormones and blood pressure is not the same as a baby that can be fed by anyone.

Get out of here with the fake feminist outrage.

Admit that the difference in uniqueness of an individual isn't the person but in an arbitrary category of the system keeping that person alive. One definition makes them less than human.

Pathetic.

Are you gonna admit that at the end of the day, you just want to control what women do with their bodies?

For the 8,000th time - the unborn child is not the woman's body.

For the 8,000th time, I didn't say it was.

Why don’t you just admit they are their “own unique person” (because of unique DNA and fingerprints), but that you just don’t give a f**k about them?

At least you’d be acknowledging the science that way.

I already said I don't disagree that they are unique, if they are their own person, they wouldn't need to be attached to someone else to continue developing.

It’s not IF it’s it’s “own unique person”… It is.

Fingerprints and DNA are both scientifically accepted methods of identifying individuals.

The child has its own DNA and fingerprints, it’s IS “own unique person”.

You mean the way various European countries are attached to and depend on leaching off the EU - 'scuse - the USA to exist? And that's not even bringing up the citizenry which is constantly looking for new ways to fluff their pillows with goverment subsidies to support their bloated entitled excuse for a life?

Womp womp.

I donate double reds every 16wks. Now answer the question.

Well done you.

The question? You want me to answer what's the difference between using a machine for life support and a woman? Seriously?

You think women are no different to machines? You are continuing to make it clear that this is not about how much you value the fetus, it's about how little you value women.

“Are you gonna admit that at the end of the day, you just want to control what women do with their bodies?”

No, I am not going to admit that… because that is not accurate.

I “just want” women to stop killing babies like they are disposable trash.

It’s not IF it’s it’s “own person”… It is.

Fingerprints and DNA are both scientifically accepted methods of identifying individuals.

Since the child has its own DNA and fingerprints, it’s IS “own person”.

I noticed you ignored this part, so I’ll repeat it.

PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY.

If you are unsure of the definition, look it up.

What difference does it make of the life support system is a person or equipment?

If an unborn baby isovrd from the uterus to aechanical life support system do they then become a unique person?

"What difference does it make of the life support system is a person or equipment?"

Wow.

Would you be happy to be used as life support for a stranger?
I bet you don't even donate blood.