Dr. Brytney Cobia - Liar, liar, scrubs on fire

You didn't bother to check that the month is July in the thing

Go back to Politics TOO

The font is clearly different and added in by some else. And where is that table of data? Where's the link to verify the information?

Because the actual nchs site it links to Alabama. Where did this come from?

Yes, very good! It was added to show the exact week that the data set represents since table only shows July 2021. It was done to avoid unnecessary conversations with the knit-picking crowd that 'we're in mid-July and table shows July therefore incomeplete', or some shit like that. Somehow you can't avoid this BS with libtards.

Circles were added too! Did you miss those?? Are you OK with the circles? You sure??

And where is that table of data? Where's the link to verify the information?

I would rather liberals, especially ones providing information and sources, and trying to contribute to the conversation rather than mock actually join the table than leave. But okay.

Buh buh buh they had serious cases. If they had the vaxx the cases would be less severe.*

*Vaxx makers only claim the vaxx will prevent minor symptoms.

You are grossly uninformed.

Tipping point being reached:

“Even with nearly 21 million residents now fully vaccinated, California is recording its highest positivity rate since mid-February, when only about 2 million were vaccinated.”

Israel now says the Pfizer vaccine is down to only 40% protection against #Covid infection in the last month.
That’s the good news. The bad news: the real number is probably below 30% at this point since the 40% number includes two weeks when effectiveness was notably higher.

In Cape Cod, a geographic cape extending into the Atlantic Ocean in Massachusetts, the vaccinated are falling ill with Covid-19. The American town with one of the highest vaccination rates in the state, now has the highest rate of new cases. An official told ABC News on Monday that the “vast majority” of the 132 Covid-19 cases were among vaccinated individuals.

According to data from the UK, you are more likely to get “Covid” if you are vaccinated.

You are more likely to die from the vaccine than by drowning statistically now.

World – Historical Death Rate Data.
2021 7.645
2020 7.612
2019 7.579
2018 7.546
2017 7.570
2016 7.594
2015 7.619
2014 7.643
2013 7.667
2012 7.743
2011 7.818
2010 7.894

3 studies out this month already showed that people already have their previous antibodies from encounters with coronaviruses from even years ago. Natural immunity already higher and better than vaxxes with less than 1% absolutely efficacy and tens of thousands dead in US, UK, EU from the shots.

“Even with nearly 21 million residents now fully vaccinated, California is recording its highest positivity rate since mid-February, when only about 2 million were vaccinated.”

How many are in the ICU, tho?

"Israel now says the Pfizer vaccine is down to only 40% protection against #Covid infection in the last month."

While cases are indeed rising significantly in Israel because of the more vaccine-resistant delta variant, that’s from a very low baseline. The country remains at a fraction of its former case numbers. The seven-day average is at about 800 new daily cases, or less than one-tenth of Israel's January peak.

Israel is averaging about 120 weekly hospital admissions, which is down from a peak of nearly 2,000 in January. So while cases are less than one-tenth of what they were then, hospitalizations are about one-sixteenth.

"The bad news: the real number is probably below 30% at this point since the 40% number includes two weeks when effectiveness was notably higher."

This is just your personal speculation and not based on any fact at all.

"In Cape Cod, a geographic cape extending into the Atlantic Ocean in Massachusetts, the vaccinated are falling ill with Covid-19. The American town with one of the highest vaccination rates in the state, now has the highest rate of new cases. An official told ABC News on Monday that the “vast majority” of the 132 Covid-19 cases were among vaccinated individuals.

According to data from the UK, you are more likely to get “Covid” if you are vaccinated."

Yes, the more people who are vaccinated, the more the infection rate will be among the vaccinated population. My point was more toward those who were having a critical reaction to covid who were vaccinated versus the unvaccinated. You've completely failed to address this at all.

"You are more likely to die from the vaccine than by drowning statistically now."

I can quote you some statistics that prove you wrong.

https://covid-101.org/science/how-many-people-have-died-from-the-vaccine-in-the-u-s/

Only 3 people in the US have died from the Vaccines due to blood clots... while only 3,500-4000 a year people in the US die from drowning. But, I get it. You think the 6,207 who've died, which would be 100% of any vaccinated person who has died in the US, all died from the vaccine. Well, over 350,000 people died from Covid in one year. So, based on your erroneous logical framework, Covid is still more deadly than the vaccine.

"Only 3 people in the US have died from the Vaccines due to blood clots."

Public Health Scotland:
+5,200 dead within 28 days of covid vaxx

EudraVigilance (EU)
19,000 dead from covid vaxx
1.8 million injured (half seriously)

CDC
11,000 dead from Vaxx
-500,000 injured

GOV.UK
+1,400 dead from vaxx
+1,000,000 injured

"Public Health Scotland:
+5,200 dead within 28 days of covid vaxx"

According to both your anti-vaxx source and Public Health of Scotland, you're wrong. For different reasons of course.

"However, using the data on the number of deaths due to the Covid-19 vaccines in Scotland we can estimate what the likely number of deaths are due to the jabs in England. Adjusting to the size of the population we estimate the actual number of deaths due to the jabs in England in the past 6 months could be as high as 57,470."

https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/18/5522-people-have-died-within-28-days-of-having-a-covid-19-vaccine-in-scotland-according-to-public-health-scotland/

Unfortunately, DailyExpose doesn't explain how they came up with 57,470 from 5,522 (the actual recorded number of deaths in that time period.) So, it's unsubstantiated speculation rather than actual fact.

What is a fact, is that between December 8 and June 11, 5,522 people who were vaccinated have died. However, the report notes two very important things.

"The analysis includes all recorded deaths due to any cause and does not refer to deaths caused by the vaccine itself."

and

"As the vaccination programme is being rolled out... many people will experience an illness or death in the days following their vaccination by coincidence. This is particularly the case for those vaccinated early in the programme, when the programme prioritised the VERY ELDERLY population and those with PRE-EXISTING UNDERLYING health conditions."

In other words, 5,522 people did not die FROM THE VACCINE. In fact, if you would go to page 27 of the actual report, from which your antivaxx source draws it's erroneous conclusion, they have a chart of expected deaths to deaths of those who've recieved the vaccine. The expected average deaths are higher, leading them, and any reasonable person, to conclude that the vaccine is EXTREMELY UNLIKELY to be the cause of those who have died.

https://beta.publichealthscotland.scot/media/8183/21-06-23-covid19-publication_report.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3XGr5Ws_SzOE5UDoCJ9RC2wfRDplDDVPwL2PeTfGD-SKLfv8mqbsJCJ7g

I'm happy to continue to disprove the other countries.

Just for fun:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/47-studies-confirm-inefectiveness-of-masks-for-covid-and-32-more-confirm-their-negative-health-effects

So, there are some nice facts in the report completely overlooked by LifeSiteNews.

First, the CDC study only confirms that those who wear masks to do public events, like eating or drinking (which requires masks to be taken off) made up for a large percentage of the so-called "always" wore a mask crowd who still got Covid. In other words, it wasn't lack of mask use so much as going to a public place where mask use was unavoidable.

The actual study concludes that: Eating and drinking on-site at locations that offer such options might be important risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Efforts to reduce possible exposures where mask use and social distancing are difficult to maintain, such as when eating and drinking, should be considered to protect customers, employees, and communities.

Second, the WebMD article concludes that alternative forms of facial protection offer inferior protection. Not that masks are overall ineffective.

Third, the evidence summarised in this review does not include results from studies from the current COVID-19 pandemic and given how small influenza played a part during the additional preventative guidelines during Covid, many studies have concluded that influenza can be reduced significantly through a combination of social distancing, basic hygiene maintenance, and mask wearing.

Fourth, the WebMD article is actually concluding whether or not personnel are using protective gear correctly. They aren't. Yikes!

Fifth, Neither trial accounted for cluster randomisation in the analysis. So, from the limited results it is unclear whether wearing surgical face masks results in any harm or benefit to the patient undergoing clean surgery.

In short, while these are certainly interesting studies and articles about efficacy, none recommend not wearing a mask at all but rather that mask use alone is not an efficient standard based on when it is worn, where it is worn, how it is worn, and what is worn. That doesn't mean all masks are useless.

Britain’s Chief Scientific Adviser Patrick Vallance said on Monday that 60 percent of people being admitted to hospital with COVID-19 have had two doses of vaccine.

Irrelevant who is in any ICU. Vaxx makers never claimed their useless product would ever do anything more than prevent minor symptoms.

Also, no one is dying from any coronaviruses. Never have, never will. CDC admitted less than 6% of so-called covid deaths were attributed to covid. So we know it's much lower.

There is no sars-cov-2, there is no delta, there is no such thing as a covid test.

At last, something that may potentially dispute my claim.

Wah wah, it was a misprint by Patrick Vallance, who has since corrected his claim.

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/60-people-being-admitted-uk-hospitals-had-two-covid-jabs-adviser-2021-07-19/

It appears to 60% of the people being admitted into hospitals for Covid are unvaccinated.

So, lets see if there is a 39% vaccinated number....

And nothing. Nothing that disputes that 39% may be partially or fully vaccinated so, nice try!

Man, the media really ran with that story for a few days and failed to correct it. Sorry you got some bad fake news there, bub.

JeffreyRyan, I have already posted this to you, but in the interest of science, I'll post it again.

2010, total deaths 2,468,435
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_04.pdf

2011, total deaths 2,515,458 (1.9% increase from last year)
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr63/nvsr63_03.pdf

2012, total deaths 2,543,279 (1.1% increase from last year)
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr63/nvsr63_09.pdf

2013, total deaths 2,596,993 (2.1% increase from last year)
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr64/nvsr64_02.pdf

2014, totals deaths 2,626,418 (1.1% increase from last year)
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr65/nvsr65_04.pdf

2015, total deaths 2,712,630 (3.3% increase from last year)
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr66/nvsr66_06.pdf

2016, total deaths 2,744,248 (1.2% increase from last year)
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr67/nvsr67_05.pdf

2017, total deaths 2,813,503 (2.5% increase from last year)
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_09-508.pdf

2018, total deaths 2,839,205 (0.9% increase from last year)
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr69/nvsr69-13-508.pdf

2019, total deaths 2,854,838 (0.6% increase from last year)
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db395-H.pdf

2020, total deaths 3,358,814 (17.7% increase from last year)
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7014e1.htm

2020 saw the highest death rate increase in ten years by 17.7% The highest percentage before that was 3.3%... if we were to take the previous years total deaths (2,854,838) and subtract that by the second highest average increase of 3.3% (94,210), that means we're left with a significant increase in deaths by 409,766 deaths!

According to the CDC, we had about 375,000 attributed to Covid.

If Covid is a myth, as you so claim, how do you account for the tremendous increase?

https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/07/25/cdc-revokes-emergency-use-authorisation-to-rt-pcr-for-covid-19-testing

CDC Revokes Emergency Use Authorisation To RT-PCR For COVID-19 Testing

Tens of thousands of flu cases just disappeared around the world. The pandemic that never was.

Flu cases did not disappear. They've been difficult to access amidst a global pandemic as there are many overlaps to influenza and covid.

For those having trouble following, assuming you, JeffreyRyan, understand what you even posted, it essentially means that laboratories must select and validate a new (FDA approved) laboratory method for detecting and quantifying the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The CDC assay was the first to be approved for use back in Feb 2020 so many laboratories will probably still be using this as their sole method of detecting and quantifying the virus.

The CDC assay approval will be revoked after 31 Dec 21, so any laboratory using this method can't report any patient results after this date, which might reduce the overall testing capacity. It can take a fair amount of time to select and validate a new assay, so laboratories needed a heads up.

There are several reasons for this change. The original assay is a singleplex assay, meaning for each patient three (originally four) wells on a 96 well PCR plate had to be used to test for SARS-CoV-2 and human DNA.

CDC created a second generation assay that tests for Influenza A, B, SARS-CoV-2, and human DNA in multiplex format, meaning each patient only requires one well on the same plate. This is obviously more efficient because it allows you to not only test patients for Influenza and COVID, but it also enables you to test significantly more patients on a single RT-PCR run than you could before.

"World – Historical Death Rate Data.
2021 7.645
2020 7.612
2019 7.579
2018 7.546
2017 7.570
2016 7.594
2015 7.619
2014 7.643
2013 7.667
2012 7.743
2011 7.818
2010 7.894"

I have no idea what this is.

Death Rate of what? Just Population to Death? I looked it up and came across this, disproving whatever point you're trying to make here.

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-death-rates/fact-check-annual-deaths-data-does-not-show-2020-as-having-one-of-the-lowest-rates-in-recent-years-idUSKCN26D0YP

The page on Macrotrends, itself, features a disclaimer at the top noting that 2020 data does not account for Covid-19 deaths. So these statistics you're quoting are not based on actual numbers but are estimates. Hence why 2021, a year that has not even concluded, is included.

If the Covid-19 deaths are not included, then your death rates are invalid.

"3 studies out this month already showed that people already have their previous antibodies from encounters with coronaviruses from even years ago."

Then how does account for the 350,000 deaths in the US in 2020, which was higher than average, than about that same exact number?

"Natural immunity already higher and better than vaxxes with less than 1% absolutely efficacy and tens of thousands dead in US, UK, EU from the shots."

Yet 98% of the people who are in the ICU for Covid are unvaccinated.

Death rate you moron. Death rate.

Temper temper. Yes, the world population Death Rate. I asked and answered my own question. If you would like me to be less confused by your innane ramblings, then perhaps you should make a point instead of spouting off ridiculously random numbers to try to pass them off as statistics.

Again, because I suspect you did not read, the source of those numbers is irrelevant, as they are merely estimates from Macrotrends, which features a disclaimer at the top noting that 2020 data does not account for Covid-19 deaths.

"Yet 98% of the people who are in the ICU for Covid are unvaccinated."

Nope. Not even close.

Just because you say so, doesn't disprove the fact that preliminary reports according to the CDC lead that to be true.

https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-health-941fcf43d9731c76c16e7354f5d5e187

https://www.cnet.com/health/99-of-covid-deaths-are-now-of-unvaccinated-people-experts-say/

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/fully-vaccinated-people.html

Please note, dismissing my sources only makes you look foolish.

I have not dismissed any of your sources, but rather pointed out when they have not backed up unsubstantiated conclusions or expanded on what they omitted or misunderstood from THEIR OWN SOURCES.

Which would lead any reasonable person to conclude that my claim stands.

Bring yourself up to speed on how CDC stopped/limited tracking data for vaccinated in the US. They're desperate to make it a 'pandemic of the unvaccinated' - that has been their key message and narrative for the last week and a half.

Unfortunately, Singapore, Israel (most vaccinated pop), and three most vaccinated countries in Europe (UK, Netherlands, and Malta) are showing quite the opposite.

Reposting since it got downvoted and hidden.
Maybe don’t do that with people who are willing to intellectually engage you.

Oh, but if you actually read the article you find such lovely gems of facts that kind of don't prove me wrong.

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/vaccinated-people-in-singapore-make-up-three-quarters-of-recent-covid-cases-2493025

First, lets tackle that 3/4s bit of Covid cases being among vaccinated.

They go into more explicit numbers that 25% are unvaccinated, sure, but that only 40% are fully vaccinated (2 shots). And that it's probably the 35% of the partially vaccinated showing signs of Covid infections. Nice try at manipulating the numbers there. I would hardly call 40% a HIGHly vaccinated country, but okay.

Not to mention that six of the seven people admitted for critical condition were unvaccinated. The one that was vaccinated? Only had the one shot. So they have a 0% of fully vaccinated people in the ICU. Which doesn't dispute my claim at all that 98% of those in critical condition are unvaccinated.

How much you wanna bet that Israel and the UK are showing similar signs?

Hilarious how propaganda bots sound allot like you.

Indeed. Anecdotal evidence of course.

Mine is preliminary findings based on fact.

I'm not sure why propaganda bots are programmed to turn information that is factual into anecdotal. Perhaps to discredit it?

Just because you bought into propaganda, doesn't make it a fact.

I don't get my facts from Twitter.

https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2021-06-25/99-of-new-us-covid-hospitalizations-deaths-occurring-among-the-unvaccinated

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/nearly-all-covid-deaths-in-us-are-now-among-unvaccinated

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2021/06/24/99-of-people-killed-by-covid-last-month-were-unvaccinated-analysis-finds/?sh=9631b57f049a

https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-health-941fcf43d9731c76c16e7354f5d5e187

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/statistics-show-risks-vaccinated-covid-19/story?id=78845627

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/fully-vaccinated-people.html

I also don't dismiss sources that don't adhere to my confirmation bias.

If you have additional or better information, then please, provide them.

Otherwise, you're just subjectively antagonizing rather than productively contributing this conversation.

Sure, why don't you repost the same exact thing someone decided to down vote once already. There's a good strategy.

I don't want to bet you anything, and I did not down vote your comment.

Running out of replies is a good time to stop.

Indeed.

Here's the data from Israel.

And the number of critical cases and hospitalizations?

Cases, is all they reported. No further break down.

So you can’t disprove my claim.

Manipulating the numbers, is how we got here in the first place, AND THAT'S ALL ON YOU.

Isn't this the guy who is selling masks, lockdowns, and vaccines?
"(Vaccines) the best investment I ever made" - BG

So, your argument that you manipulated the numbers because someone else did? And that's my fault?

Pshhh... argue better. You tried, and failed, to call out my facts with bullshit. And I respectively called you out on your bullshit.

Come at me with facts rather than try to throw anecdotes at me.

Right, because all the manipulation of the fact that 3/4 of vaccinated are testing positive for covid, is me. LOL

Let me remind you, YOUR use of "probably" in YOUR argument. Meaning, you're pulling this out of your ass. AND I'm the one manipulating here? Do me a favor...

My argument, that manipulation comes from the globalists who are not only pushing this scamdemic, but profiting from it. All of which you echo. These are the facts.

I'm sure hard for you to see as you're too invested in it yourself.

"It's allot easier to fool people, than to convince them they were fooled". (that's what I mean by you being too invested in it - in case you're wondering)

They are, I’m not disputing that. Vaccines aren’t 100% preventative. They’re meant to deter serious cases until the virus is virtually non-threatening and, in time, isolate and prevent the virus from infecting everyone ever again. Expecting the virus to go away before a significant portion of the population has been inoculated is unreasonable.

In regards to the seven in Singapore, the fact that NONE who have been completely inoculated are in critical condition is significant and, again, supports my claim.

You’ve utterly failed to introduce anything but speciation, paranoid tripe, and insignificant facts.

People who get the vaccine are infected. Great! And? What is your point? That the vaccine isn’t working?

Then why are 98% of the people in critical condition unvaccinated? You can’t answer THAT question without questioning or dismissing the source.

Re. Singapore, your claim does not change the fact vaccinate people make up 75% of covid cases.

tHe vAcCiNe iS WoRkInG So f**KiNg wElL, fAuCi iS NoW TeLlInG VaCcInAtEd pEoPlE To gO BaCk tO WeArInG MaSkS.

Your claim is irrelevant.

My claim that 98% of the unvaccinated are in critical condition is not in dispute that any percentage of the vaccinated are capable of infection.

The vaccinated are not being hospitalized and will recover.

The unvaccinated have a much higher chance of not recovering.

Either get vaccinated and continue wearing masks until enough of the population in your area is vaccinated and the infection isolated.

Or don’t. And don’t bitch when you or your unvaccinated loved ones die.

Good thing I'm not claiming anything then,.. just stating facts.

What is it about this virus that has made you all so stupid and incapable of critical thinking? I need to wear a mask for your mask to work.
I need to get vaccinated for your vaccine to work.

Do you require everyone to get polio vaccine for yours to work?
Do you require everyone to get smallpox vaccine for yours to work?
Do you require everyone to get hepatitis vaccine for yours to work?
Do you require everyone to get measles vaccine for yours to work?
Do you require everyone to get malaria vaccine for yours to work?
Do you require everyone to get influenza vaccine for yours to work?

No, I will not be bitching, or beg a bitch for one and hear her say it's too late. My godfather died due to blood-clot caused by the vaccine. I did not bitch about that either. Everyone makes their own decisions and we all need to accept that.

You have stated some facts, but they don't lead to the conclusions you're inferring nor dispute my claims. As a critical thinker, you wouldn't be very upset about the fact that 98% of those in critical condition are unvaccinated. Yet, you're the one claiming I'm stupid and incapable of critical thinking for stating a fact.

Anyone who told you that ONLY wearing a mask protects ONLY you, was wrong.

It has been said, many times, that masks do not protect YOU but rather, they prevent YOU from potentially spreading with our very minute symptoms.

The difference between polio and smallpox is that a great deal of the population took them ! Only a very small percentage back then participated in vaccine hesitancy and hysteria that vaccines were dangerous. Those numbers have grown in recent years, essentially preventing us from being able to successfully eradicate hepatitis, measles, malaria, and influenza. Influenza being a slightly different beast of a virus as it tends to mutate seasonally. Making it very difficult to isolate and eradicate unlike the others listed. We actually came close to eradicating measles a year or two ago but then Covid hit. Maybe next decade.

You godfather was one of three, then. If that's true, then I'm sorry for your loss.

Choice, as you will find as you grow up, is often limited by both personal and external forces. True, at this time, you do have a choice to not take the vaccine but it's not done so for any noble endeavor or based on actual facts. No one is going to celebrate your bravery. They'll just shake their heads and move on with their lives. Which is my choice to do with you.

These sort of stories that are coming out more and more (suppressed on national level) aren't helping your case one bit.

https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/more-than-5100-breakthrough-covid-cases-reported-in-mass-at-least-80-have-died/2435719/

Data can evolve. At the time yours was mere speculation. So, lets take a look at this article to see if it disputes my claim that overall 98% of unvaccinated are hospitalized.

Oh, and by the way, yes, so far that number has lowered. To 97%.

You’re just getting mad at facts, my dude.

From the article:

“Health officials insist vaccine confidence should not be shaken, and say these numbers should be put into perspective. The overwhelming majority of the reported breakthrough cases -- more than 93% -- did not result in either hospitalization or death.”

Not sure if they mean 93% of the overall cases in Boston or the entire nation. But they say more than 93% so the data complied and it may lower! But at this time 93-97% of covid hospitalizations and deaths are from the unvaccinated.