Imgflip Logo Icon

Joe Biden knows Jack-shit about stopping crime. If you think grabbing guns is the answer, you're a dumbass.

Joe Biden knows Jack-shit about stopping crime. If you think grabbing guns is the answer, you're a dumbass. | YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY CRIME AROUND THE COUNTRY IS SPIKING DRAMATICALLY? YOU THINK IT'S LACK OF GUN CONTROL? TELL ME AGAIN HOW LESS POLICE PRESENCE AND NOT CHARGING VIOLENT CRIMINALS IN YOUR SHIT-HOLE CITY IS WORKING OUT | image tagged in memes,creepy condescending wonka | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,883 views 87 upvotes Made by anonymous 3 years ago in politics
Creepy Condescending Wonka memeCaption this Meme
124 Comments
15 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Pepe despair | image tagged in pepe despair | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
People know the dems are soft on crime. 2020 proved it. They think criminals are the victims.
[deleted]
11 ups, 3y
Indeed. Citizens watched organized and fully funded ANTIFA and BLM violently riot, loot, burn and etcetera for a year with ZERO meaningful consequences from Dem Party politicans whom stood down police departments and forbade Republicans from doing anything to put a halt to the collective leftist generated insanity. So many citizens now BELIEVE that it is their RIGHT to become . . . thugs.
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Capitol "Protestors" | CRIME | image tagged in capitol protestors | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
You are absolutely right. Democrats are soft on crime and 2020 proved it.
0 ups, 3y
They’re wrong too.
10 ups, 3y,
3 replies
Less police and less legal gun owners are two negatives. . .and last time I checked two negatives never make a positive!
[deleted]
5 ups, 3y,
4 replies
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
I agree. I just wished Americans weren't thrown the book, by leftist-DAs, when we do depopulate the criminals.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
3 replies
I wonder how long it will take for these terrorist comments to be erased.
5 ups, 3y,
3 replies
When Americans defend their homes/lives, you think they're "terrorists" ?
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
3 replies
When Americans talk about killing other Americans they don't agree with, they are terrorists. What about you? Is there anything good about you when you aren't talking shit on-line?
4 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Law-abiding citizens don't agree with criminals. How is this concept beyond your understanding?
2 ups, 3y
You have to love their projections. Polar opposite of reality.
3 ups, 3y
And you're comfortable saying that makes them terrorists?
2 ups, 3y
You said; "When Americans talk about killing other Americans they don't agree with, they are terrorists."

So you're inferring that Americans that defend themselves from criminals(that are trying to murder/harm the American), are "terrorists" that are just attacking people they disagree with, when they're a criminal attacking the American.

That's what you're saying with your comment replying to mine.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Who said anything about Americans killing other Americans they don't agree with?
That's Antifa/BLM/Democrats.
But what brought that up?

What about me? You bring your strawman here, then you claim that I'm talking "shit" ?
That's a joke.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
I don't assume. I know when a criminal is a democrat/racist/marxist/antifa/blm, they tell us or show us that they are.

Awe, sorry that you don't like when I call out criminals for their political beliefs. I have no problem with people believing things. It's when they criminally act out those political beliefs to attack asian people, white people, and conservatives, for simply being asian, white, or conservative, is when I care. They're terrorists, so therefore we have every right to remove them from this nation, send them to China's prisons.

So if you could go ahead and stop them from politically attacking asians, whites, conservatives, that would be a red flag if you don't.
0 ups, 3y,
5 replies
No, you don't know. You assume. You are clearly and blatantly assuming based on a political bias. Otherwise, you're prejudiced. There is nothing inherently wrong with that. Children and I suppose immature people can sometimes make the same kind of premature judgments based on the limited information they have.

I'm sorry you don't like being responded to when you say something highly suspect. Would you like to clarify your statements? Or you can double down and continue to make people assume you're pretty much advocating killing people based solely on their political beliefs rather than their criminal actions. When you say depopulate, and you mean actively going out to kill democrat/racist/marxist/antifa/blm, rather than simply defending yourself, then there is no difference between you and that person who you presume is openly attacking people based on their skin, or culture, or politics. You're just more of a same with a different flag or skin tone and you've become the very terrorist you seek to destroy.

Let me be clear, there is nothing wrong with arguing or debating with people to fight for your beliefs. There is nothing wrong with stopping someone who is a direct threat to you or someone else. Them existing is not enough. And when you pursue them, you lose all justification for your actions. If you really want to kill people, might I suggest joining the military or the police? In some cases, mostly the former, you're given all the justification you need to do exactly that.

I don't have to do anything you say, just as you don't have to do anything I say. The difference is, I'm not asking for much while you're clearly not a great recruiter for whatever cause or agenda you're advocating for. Most people don't like terrorists, thieves, rapists, or criminals, true. But if you seriously think every criminal act is politically motivated or that only democrats or people with different political beliefs commit these actions, you're very sorely mistaken.
1 up, 3y
"You are clearly and blatantly assuming based on a political bias. Otherwise, you're prejudiced. "

Aren't you assuming that I think of or judge criminals of different political backgrounds? Clearly you are assuming it, because you've commented twice in support of your assumption about me.
1 up, 3y
"There is nothing inherently wrong with that. Children and I suppose immature people can sometimes make the same kind of premature judgments based on the limited information they have."

I'm not the type to make any judgement based on limited information. But I like that you're wanting to hold people to account, I'm just not one.
1 up, 3y
"I'm sorry you don't like being responded to when you say something highly suspect."

Don't know about that. I think it's highly suspect if Americans can't defend their lives/homes from criminals (regardless of their politics), sometimes getting charged with crimes for defending their lives/homes. I find that makes it harder to think of a court system, law being unequally applied.

People would have to be actively killing me for an unjust reason for me to get angry enough to defend my life, so don't worry. I know when 6 on 1(me) is maybe a fight or flight decision to make.
1 up, 3y
"But if you seriously think every criminal act is politically motivated or that only democrats or people with different political beliefs commit these actions, you're very sorely mistaken."

Not sure why you'd assume that.
1 up, 3y
"No, you don't know. You assume."

I don't assume. I know when a criminal is a democrat/racist/marxist/antifa/blm, they tell us or show us that they are, either electronically or spoken.
0 ups, 3y
I disagree with murderers, rapists, and thieves. But they’re just Americans I don’t agree with. See your line of reasoning?
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
By 'defend', do you mean attack people?
2 ups, 3y
But of course, for you "defending life" means to go out and attack people. THAT's how brainwashed you are.
1 up, 3y
So you're so far gone, over to authoritarianism, that you don't understand word meanings, because you twist other words, so you think that when other people use words, you ASSUME that they've twisted the definition of the word, just like you?

When I say DEFEND, I say DEFEND, to mean DEFEND.

I'm not an authoritarian like you that changes words to fit narratives.
2 ups, 3y
Did you fail to understand the context of the conversation? I'm the one that was talking about it, why do you automatically assume that I meant "Americans whom we disagree with" ? When I used the word criminal, you thought of you or something?
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Agreed... violence is not an optimal solution to our situation as things currently stand.
3 ups, 3y,
3 replies
Not sure you understand what I said. Do you side with criminals getting away with murdering Americans? Or do you wish to maybe NOT violate American's rights to defend themselves from criminals trying to murder Americans?
4 ups, 3y,
2 replies
If someone is being attacked, I think someone has a right and an obligation to defend themselves to the extent that they neutralize the situation... which could include killing the assailant if it comes to that. Furthermore, someone has a right to protect others from battery, their family, and their property from destruction, as well.

Some caveats: Bad words, differing opinions and protests (the actual peaceful kind, not burning and looting) don't qualify; Inciting violence, premeditated murder, murder-after-the-fact and conspiracy to commit murder-after-the-fact similarly do not qualify... and shouldn't be endorsed... on either side of the political spectrum.

Another civil war, which will inevitably involve violence, may be in our future... but it is within everyone's best interest to avoid it, if possible. In fact, it's my opinion that we are already currently engaged in civil war in America... but it's not too late to pull out of the nose dive. Not yet at least.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
3 replies
I can't find anything in this statement I disagree with.
3 ups, 3y,
2 replies
But just because facts are fact, I upvoted your comment, even though I know you wouldn't for me, haha
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
That's not true, I gave you an upvote just now. See I'm no hater. I'm just a sicko trying to win the culture war with memes.
1 up, 3y
What culture war? You want us to give up our firearms? No chance!

What outcome do you want? Any of those outcomes violate our rights?
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
I don't want you to give up your firearms. And I'm not giving up mine.You are barking up the wrong tree.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Hilarious, considering I think the same way, but if you seen a comment with me typing the same thing as SoulRiven, you'd flip out and label me "terrorist" because you've been MSM-brainwashed. Sorry. :)
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
Look at that. Strip away the crap politics and we have things in common.I bet we could get along. You seem like you take this pretty serious though.
1 up, 3y
It’s what we need. People these days don’t wanna talk with the other side, which has caused all of this division. Both sides need to wanna talk though, if we wanna end division. But, the truth is it’ll never end. We can eliminate it to some degree, but it’ll never go away.
1 up, 3y
I take the dissemination of information seriously when my nations' people are at risk of global marxism with a depopulation agenda.
1 up, 3y
Okay, we differ on political views but I agree with you also.
1 up, 3y
Yes!
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
If police are available nearby, they should handle the situation. I’m not saying self-defense is bad, but only use it when it comes to that point.
3 ups, 3y,
2 replies
You're not going to be able to determine what should be waited for, police, and when you should act on your own behalf, by a comment.

When it happens in real-life, you'll know you can't trust waiting for police.
1 up, 3y,
3 replies
Touché.
1 up, 3y
One of the best sites online, is this junk :)
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
I imagine there will be some chaos, but not as bad as people claim, of the people dying-off from the vaccines, but will be called "unrelated deaths", so crime will get higher and maybe Sheriffs will have to deputize the non-vaccinated.
0 ups, 3y
Oh.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Even if I disagree with people online, on here, I still want us all to help hold the law, cause politicians and law enforcement, don't REALLY have our backs, the way that I have your back. Especially when police are being prosecuted for f**king up on their job, so it'll be up to classical liberals, libertarians, conservatives, to stand for equal justice with law. As in, you and I are able to put politics aside, to judge someone on what they've actually done, not what they "wrong-think" on either side, I'm on everyone's side here.
1 up, 3y
Cool.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y
Agreed.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Who is trying to murder you? The way you talk it seems like you think there are 15 people trying to kill you right now. With the right combination of fear and desperation you can get people to do and believe anything. Paranoia strikes deep, are you sure you aren't being manipulated? Maybe you are the manipulator, I don't know. Anyone who leans to far to the left or the right doesn't understand how this country works. Rioters are not protesters, they are anarchists and they come from the left and the right. These are complex issues. I don't expect you to understand. I've got my house and my guns and nobody is taking them from me no matter what side you are on!
2 ups, 3y
"The way you talk it seems like you think there are 15 people trying to kill you right now."

I'm talking about Americans defending themselves from criminals and that I believe they shouldn't be charged with crimes for defending themselves from criminals.

Is that alarming to you? Why do you think me talking about real issues, is some kind of alarming thing for you?
2 ups, 3y
So you couldn't understand that I live in a city where there are 5-10 shootings daily and I live in a bad side of town? So I care about the issue of Americans defending themselves from criminals, because that does happen here.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
3 replies
There are no easy solutions, but if we are talking about executing people with different political views, We might as well hang it up now. Western Hemisphere experiment failure.
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
That was what the American Civil War was fought over... a difference of political and economic views. So, if another occurs, I wouldn't necessarily say Western Civilization is a failure.

I also don't agree that there are no easy solutions... violence is quite easy and comes to humans very naturally... as history clearly indicates. But the hard solutions - those that are achieved without violence - are often the most rewarding and should be what we're striving for now.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
Well, you are entitled to your opinions. Violence does seem to come naturally to us unfortunately. Do we really have to have to have a civil war every couple hundred years to label western civilization a success? It seems like we are headed for it right now, and from where I'm standing, who knows who would win.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
The West isn’t a failure, look, because of the west you and I are able to express our views!
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
That is the beauty of America. We can disagree and it's okay. For now anyway.
1 up, 3y
Yes. For now...
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Unrelated question, but, do you support the death penalty?
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Does my fake computer personality support the death penalty? Mmmm. No.
0 ups, 3y,
3 replies
Why?
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
you are out of replies. If you want to continue this banter I will start a new thread
0 ups, 3y
Ok.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
How does killing them make what they did better?
0 ups, 3y
They don’t deserve life. Ted Bundy, all the sex killings he did. Imagine what he did that we still don’t know about. BTK? Bind, Torture, Kill. The name says it all. I’m saying the death penalty should only be used on the worst of the worst.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
My fake computer personality thinks all life is precious.
0 ups, 3y
Ted Bundy too? Richard Ramirez? Son(s) of Sam? Jack The Ripper?
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
It's the politics stream. They won't be. But mention a specific condiment invented in France, and oh, shit, you're banned.
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
BOO HOO! Now we don't care about dogwhistles all of a suddenreeeeeeeeeee
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
4 replies
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
I'm upvoting all of your stuff.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
2 ups, 3y
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Favor returned. ;)
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
People will hate you for that
2 ups, 3y
Could give a f**k. At least you have a sense of humor. TDS notwithstanding. At least you are honest about it. It's why i'll joke with you and not take it serious.
1 up, 3y
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
It's nice to see you can admit that the okay hand sign has been co-opted by white supremacists. It's great to see you making progress, Sydney.
1 up, 3y
Yes, look at all those poc racists. Aren't you clever ;)
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Well in France they put mayo on French fries, so they should be banned!
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
It wouldn't surprise me to see the mods in this stream do that.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
Now that I think about it, maybe they should be censored. Why spread around and normalize terrorist comments?
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
I don't mean censor them, I was assuming they would be deleted by the authors when they realized how bad they sound talking about depopulation that way. But you are probably right.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
You are a terroritst. Official.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
Good one.
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
You're okay with right-wing thugs though?
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Do you understand the point of defunding the police?
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y
What I think it means? It's not a matter of personal opinion but of objective fact; what defunding the police means in practice is the diversion of funds from a police force that don't specialize in the skills required and directed to groups that do.

Do you agree that there are organizations better suited to deal with individuals having a mental health crisis, experiencing a drug overdose or who've been raped?

There are countless instances of police needlessly shooting people in these situations that likely could've been avoided if the appropriate organizations had been involved.
The organizations that provide support to people struggling with drug addiction, alcohol addiction, sexual and domestic abuse and mental issues are all underfunded.

Sending police to deal with vulnerable people when the outcome is so often the death of the vulnerable people needs to end.

This is the problem, nobody is arguing for chaos in the streets, they are arguing for protection of the vulnerable.

What are you arguing for?
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
No.
2 ups, 3y
I mean... mathematically, this isn't necessarily correct... but I understand your point. On that we agree.
1 up, 3y
Multiplication of Negative Integers does. Do you think that is why Democrats and criminals have so much in common? They think both negatives multiply to make positives.
Show More Comments
Creepy Condescending Wonka memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY CRIME AROUND THE COUNTRY IS SPIKING DRAMATICALLY? YOU THINK IT'S LACK OF GUN CONTROL? TELL ME AGAIN HOW LESS POLICE PRESENCE AND NOT CHARGING VIOLENT CRIMINALS IN YOUR SHIT-HOLE CITY IS WORKING OUT