Imgflip Logo Icon

So when does it stop being a private company who can do what they want, to becoming a company that can be forced to comply?

So when does it stop being a private company who can do what they want, to becoming a company that can be forced to comply? | THE LEFT SAYS IT'S OKAY FOR A "PRIVATE" WEBSITE TO DELETE ANYTHING THEY WANT; BUT THEY BETTER NOT REFUSE TO BAKE A GAY WEDDING CAKE BASED ON THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, OR THEY'LL SUE YOUR BIGOTED ASS | image tagged in memes,hide the pain harold | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,832 views 93 upvotes Made by anonymous 3 years ago in politics
Hide the Pain Harold memeCaption this Meme
182 Comments
11 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Cool Joe Biden | Easy.  When it my liberal policy you must comply If it’s anyone else’s opinion, it’s a treasonous hate attitude that must be squelched. | image tagged in cool joe biden | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
3 replies
But That's None Of My Business Meme | SUPREME COURT RULED THAT THE BAKER COULD DO IT. BUT YOU PROBABLY MISSED THAT PART. | image tagged in memes,but that's none of my business,kermit the frog | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
3 ups, 3y
Waiting Skeleton Meme | WAITING FOR TWITTER TO BE SUED FOR REFUSING SERVICE TO SOMEONE BECAUSE OF HIS BELIEFS | image tagged in memes,waiting skeleton | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
They ruled he could refuse because Colorado failed to take his personal Religious beliefs into account.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y
And He moved states and is happy so the moral of the story is.....segregate based on our beliefs now I suppose.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
The point is that one of those parties had to get to the Supreme Court to exercise that right.

That's not really equitable.
[deleted]
6 ups, 3y,
1 reply
5 ups, 3y
Pretty sure though, they weren't asking for a cake topper of two barbies getting it on or anything.
3 ups, 3y
Upvoted!
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Dude when you got on the website you had to sign a legally binding document to follow their rules without those rules every website have tons of bad stuff like child porn.
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
3 replies
Did you read ALL of it?
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
When they start banning you on a grand scale, don't complain about it then.

Everyone has no problem with it and thinks it's funny when it happens to others and doesn't affect them. Just wait.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
2 replies
When these sites began, they adhered to their terms. They changed the terms since then. I joined Facebook in '07, YouTube in '07 and it was different.

And if they're going to delete one user's content, they need to delete everyone else's with the same content. But they aren't doing that. They ban one user and leave the other user up. They're hypocrites.

They're censoring us and people like you who aren't being affected by it don't care because it hasn't happened to them... YET. Just wait.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Start your own platforms. Parler, GAB etc are waiting for you. Go there.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
We DID start our own and you leftist pricks took one down and are coming after the others. How dense can someone be? We started our own and got taken down!
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
TRY HARDER YA LAZY CUCKS!
3 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Please shut the f**k up and you can go f**k yourself in every direction(Horizontally,Vertically,Diagonally). We tried harder than you can get you lazy f**ker.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Lol
0 ups, 3y
lol what trash
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Not hard enough apparently.

LOSERS!
0 ups, 3y
ur still talking fat ass bitch
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Quit supporting anti constitution agendas, dumbass.
0 ups, 3y
Start reading the constitution COMMIE!
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
But you just answered your own raging anger. They updated their terms. Just for this reason. You don't get it. You are playing with tiddly winks and they have checkmated your King.
0 ups, 3y
After reading this comment i can see exactly what you are talking about thx.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Yes I in fact did read all of it nonsense about gay wedding cakes and suing.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Oh you were reading the CAKE site agreement. Now read 230 and see what you see.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
That was what it said in the meme.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
When the cake boss gets a 230 enacted by REPUBLICANS (It was passed under BUSH Presidency) and propped up by special interests they too can have a special standing. If 230 is ever repealed social media will die because they will have to screen every post they would be responsible for anything posted. Including meme sites. Poof. Gone. forever. Maybe that is good. maybe not. Who knows but It will probably never be repealed.
1 up, 3y
That is a dumb law but websites need a TOS and the reason reactionaries keep getting banned is because they can't not do a brake TOS
0 ups, 3y
Twitters already doing that
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
And that's good so you don't go around posting calls for violence and child porn.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Then what is the point if your not complaining about the existence of TOS.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
TOS apply to online services. The bakery is a brick and mortar business. So, it’s like you having to agree to the TOS of every brick and mortar store you shop at.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Most shops have some kind of what can perceived as TOS like they won't serve if you aren't wearing a shirt or something like that.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Exactly. What ever happened to the notion of “We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone”?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Are you agreeing with me?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Sort of, but the difference is, you usually aren’t required to agree to any TOS when you use services of a brick and mortar business.
0 ups, 3y
Except you are they can decide to just not serve you they usually don't because they want money but if anyone that owns a business wants to not serve you for whatever reason they legally can and I personally think that's good.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
That’s how anti-discrimination laws work.
[deleted]
4 ups, 3y,
1 reply
And yet they discriminate against Christians. 🤔
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
If taking away your right to discriminate is an infringement on your religious liberties, then f**k your religious liberties.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
Who's discriminating?
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Tell me, if the situation was reversed and Biden was the one suspended, would you still be bitching about it?
[deleted]
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
I never "bitch" about someone being silenced. I hate racists, but according to the constitution and the first amendment, they have every right to spew their hate. As long as it doesn't physically harm them or threaten them.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
You just posted a bitch about bitching about being a bitch. Cmon man.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Sure, I'm bitching about losing my freedoms. That's something worth bitching about.
[deleted]
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Then you go on forums and bitch about people who bitch. Stop being a bitch. Do something with your life. Go outside. Whiney ass bitches are useless.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
You have no idea what I do outside of this website.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
you shit in a toilet
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
I mean you have to have em at some point.
[deleted]
0 ups, 3y
Show More Comments
Hide the Pain Harold memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
THE LEFT SAYS IT'S OKAY FOR A "PRIVATE" WEBSITE TO DELETE ANYTHING THEY WANT; BUT THEY BETTER NOT REFUSE TO BAKE A GAY WEDDING CAKE BASED ON THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, OR THEY'LL SUE YOUR BIGOTED ASS