They don't even try to hide it

And were all gonna move to Georgia so we can vote and then move out.

LOL

Yup, nothing to see here. Not like the proof you guys showed about Trump/Putin collusion you whined about for 4 years, even after Mueller came up with zilch.

You haven't proved squat. Just because majority white bellwether counties that flipped to Trump due to increased polarization, doesn't mean that voter fraud occurred. You haven't even come close to reaching the burden of proof necessary to convince a court. I mean, why would democrats purposefully lose counties that they were probabilistically destined to win?

https://apnews.com/article/election-bellwethers-crumbled-trump-2020-d3c59a486452502048ebd5ffb4693ba7

Point out where I said that was proof. I'll wait.

But if you think in 4 years it goes from 100% to 6% without something fishy going on, well, what can I say for you?

A good two year investigation might suffice, since that's better proof of election interference than a fake salacious foreign dossier.

Take it to the courts. And watch as Biden’s victory is affirmed for like the 40th time.

Yeah, can't wait until it's taken to the supreme court. You know, where you scum painted Kavanaugh as a rapist, ACB as a religious zealot and Thomas a rapist who Biden railed against.

Oh, you never pointed out where I said that was proof. Still waiting.

I mean, you sarcastically said: "Yup, nothing to see here. Not like the proof..." Call me crazy, but I think that is you implicitly suggesting that bellwether counties were proof of voter fraud.

You lack the ability to consider evidence of extreme anomalies on this vote. It’s always about race for you guys. White people voted wrong! The fact remains a statistical anomaly occurred among many others. Smells fishy to everyone but those committed to “by any means necessary” to get their way.

Statistical anomalies in the most polarized, highest turnout, highest stakes election in recent history does not prove voter fraud. You have to try harder than that.

Huh...some state like Oregon have been using mail in ballots as a primary method of voting since like forever. The military used them since the Civil War. This idea that mail in ballots are a magnet for fraud is ahistorical, meritless BS.

No one said it proves it, but it points to it. It may not be proven that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen on a broad scale. Mail in ballots are suspect that’s why we didn’t use them before this election and the primary source of potential fraud this election.

What I'm suggesting is that such a drastic difference after just 4 years implies that voter fraud may have occurred, not that it was proof that would stand up in court. That's more to go on than a fraudulent dossier so you should have no problem investigating, right? Or does it only go one way?

Zilch or nah

Lol whose I phone is that? Yours? Not enough to bring charges for was it?

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/breakdown-indictments-cases-muellers-probe/story?id=61219489

37 indictments, 7 guilty pleas, 5 prison sentences

For those keeping score, that’s 37 indictments, 7 guilty pleas, and 5 prison sentences more than Benghazigate, Emailgate, Obamagate, Hunter Biden’s Laptopgate, and Voter Fraudgate combined

So by all means let’s talk charges

Yes let’s talk charges and what were the collusion charges? Which one of those charges were for Russian Collusion? How many of those charges were for the primary target of the two year investigation?

Compromise: DC becomes a district in Maryland

Typical Republican meme, the thinking is that letting American citizens vote is cheating, and of course those people will vote for Democrats.

Literally the only reason why you oppose DC and Puerto Rico is because Republicans would lose power in the senate. You don't give a flying f**k about democracy. If it hinders Republican power, then democracy could mean less to the,.

Wrong about that, wrong about me. Puerto Rico has been voting since the 1970's whether to become a state, become an independent country or stay a territory. The voting has basically been a three way split for decades with no one idea gaining any traction. I am all for the people of Puerto Rico being self determining. When they vote for statehood, they'll get statehood. I am certainly not in favor of the Democrats in Washington decreeing statehood for them (which is by itself undemocratic) and I am NOT in favor of the quid pro quo that would follow. The Democratic gambit for statehood for DC and Puerto Rico is NOT about democracy, and you know it. The Democrats are currently trying to circumvent the constitution, exploit any errors they might find. They want to get rid of the electoral college (because they know the popular vote favors them) They want to appoint extra activist liberal judges on the supreme court to actually subvert democracy and politicize the one branch of government that is supposed to be non-political, and they want to grant statehood to two places that would swing congress. The Republicans are currently trying to preserve the constitution. The American people aren't stupid. They know what is what. I don't think you are stupid. You know all of this. I am not a Republican, by the way, I have plenty of beefs with them as well.

Puerto Rico HAS voted for statehood!

"When they vote for statehood, they'll get statehood."

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/524590-puerto-rico-votes-in-favor-of-us-statehood

Non binding plebiscite with a 50% voter turnout hardly amounts to a mandate.

First you're "I'm all for Puerto Rican self-determination!", then you're "Their vote doesn't count!"

I don’t think I commented on self determination scroll up and re read

Sorry, mistook you for someone else!

Ok thanks

It's still a majority.

Need a higher voter turnout and an official vote but territories voting isn’t what decides it.

PR is a US Commonwealth, not territory.

It's strategic location assures the USA will not let it go.

The preference for Statehood has been gaining some traction in recent years.

PR has different political parties.

Whether or not they gain Statehood status should have nothing to do with how any political party here views them as pawns.
If any in particular view themselves as unsuitable in the eyes of Puerto Ricans, that's on them, not on the citizens - US citizens - of Puerto Rico, and might be taken a cue for some introspection AKA, exclusionist policies actually WORK because math,,,

Well said

Why did we wait this long to do it. Must be a reason? Maybe because they don't meet the qualifications such as having a republican form of government...