He is not the one trying to change the way we vote.

voting by mail has been a thing since the 1800s.

Absentee isn't the same as what's being called for Lying Lefty

well it would be using the same system in the same order for similar reasons. so yes. it is.

Absentee voting is mail in voting

exactly what im saying!

Only my the Democrats want to fundamentally change votin for this election because they are afraid they will lose and need a way to contest the elections. Know this, the country will not peacefully accept Nancy Pelosi as president

No she isn’t but by contesting the election as speaker of the house she will assume the role if the election remains in dispute. Which is the whole plan now.

You assume there is a general understanding of our government here. It's actually sad to see some of the comments. An ignorant base is easier to control.

wait, is that actually true?

Yup, if the election is contested and no clear winner declared by Inauguration Day the speaker of the house becomes president.

dang...

IT'S TRUE :0)

Democratic advice: vote early, vote often.

Dems in 2016: We cannot let Russia alter our elections!
China: *sneezes*
Dems in 2020: We absolutely must let China alter our elections!

IKR?

voting by mail has been a thing since the 1800s.

Who is that guy anyway?

the man who exposed watergate.

oh. btw i went & looked at all of that info from many sources, & something seems very off. i looked at a CNN report on it, but it was just ridiculous & was filled w/ fallacies. i often forget how bad CNN is & then look something up on it & remember... lol

please tell me exactly what "fallacies" you noticed if you dont mind.

they kept speaking for ppl & giving them political motives 4 saying things, & also they're quick 2 assume everything trump says is a lie while only having a portion of the story. so they lived in straw mans & jumped 2 conclusions w/o enough information.

I asked to be specific. as in specific instances and sources.

i can't find what i found last night, so i'll use what i saw today.

well, in one recent article, they said that trump knew the virus was deadly b4 it grew here. but all they have of what he said is "i like playing down the virus. i don't want to create a panic." they have no quotes that say he actually knew it would be deadly. Especially considering the death rate of covid is not as bad as they have implied. they also claimed that kayliegh mceanny was just speaking what trump told her to, but nvr gave any reason why they thought that or any evidence about it.

Plus, if u've heard, trump was nominated 4 the nobel prize 4 brokering a peace deal between Israel & UAE, & was nominated again 2day 4 a serbia-kosovo deal. CNN has failed 2 even MENTION either. at least some liberal medias like the Atlantic explain why they think it's bunk (& their articles are replete w/ fallacies too, but not like CNN). But CNN didn't even mention them.

Plus, if u ever listen or read their stuff, pay attention 2 how they word things in articles, or speak in reports. They're masters at assigning motives w/ their word usage & the voices they use to portray ppl. i study writing a lot, so this kind of stuff sticks out 2 me.

hmmm alright. ill look into it. thanks for telling me tho. i like to have unbiased sources if possible.

well, nah b/c they can't know some of the stuff they say. they accuse w/o much proof. if it were true, they would b happening upon it by extrapolating upon lil info. peace.

actually, it's very hard 2 do these days. even Fox News, which has been biased towards the right, is getting infiltrated by liberals & leftists now. Newsy claims 2 be neutral, but it sometimes does the same as CNN.

well maybe if its being "infiltrated" you should be wonder why these beliefs are spreading... perhaps they are true? idk man im not gonna dog on you for what u think but ya

yw tho!